Yükseköğretimde Öğrenci Bağlılığı: Kişisel ve Üniversite Deneyimi Farklılıkları

Yıl 2024, Cilt: 14 Sayı: 1, 24 - 38, 30.04.2024

Burcu Bilir Koca , Engin Karadağ

https://doi.org/10.5961/higheredusci.1282152

Öz

Bu araştırmanın amacı, Türk yükseköğretim sisteminde öğrenci bağlılığının ulusal düzeyde hangi seviyede gerçekleştiğini belirlemek ve
öğrencilerin kişisel ve üniversite deneyimlerine göre öğrenci bağlılığını incelemektir. Araştırmada nicel araştırma yaklaşımlarından tarama
modeli kullanılmıştır. Araştırmanın örneklemi ise, tabakalı örnekleme yöntemi kullanılarak belirlenen 11 devlet üniversitesinde öğrenim
gören 3,093 lisans öğrencisinden meydana gelmektedir. Araştırmada Yükseköğretim Öğrenci Bağlılığı Ölçeği kullanılarak elde edilen
veriler betimsel t-testi ve ANOVA ile çözümlenmiştir. Sonuçlar, üniversite öğrencilerinin yükseköğretim öğrenci bağlılığı ölçeğinden
aldıkları puanların orta düzeyde olduğu göstermiştir. Ayrıca öğrencilerin yükseköğretim öğrenci bağlılığı ölçeğinden aldıkları puanlar
kişisel ve üniversite deneyimlerine yönelik özelliklerine göre anlamlı farklılıklar göstermektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Öğrenci bağlılığı, Yükseköğretim kurumları, Üniversite öğrencisi

Student Engagement in Higher Education: Differences in Personal and University Experience

Öz

The purpose of this study is to determine the level of student engagement in higher education and to examine student engagement
according to students’ personal and university experiences. The research was structured according to the survey model from quantitative
research approaches. The sample of the study consisted of 3093 students studying in 11 state universities selected by stratified sampling
method. National Survey of Student Engagement was used as data collection tools in the study. The data obtained using the National
Survey of Student Engagement were analysed by descriptive t-test and ANOVA. It was determined that the student engagement scores of
university students are medium level. Student engagement scores of university students showed significant differences according to their
personal and university experience

Anahtar Kelimeler

Student engagement, Higher education institutions, University student

Kaynakça

• Aksu, M., Çivitçi, A. ve Duy, B. (2008). Yükseköğ retim öğ rencilerinin öğ retim elemanlarının ders uygulamaları ve sınıf içi davranışlarına ilişkin görüş leri. İnönü Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 9(16), 17-42.
• Appleton, J. J., Christenson, S. L., & Furlong, M. J. (2008). Student engagement with school: Critical conceptual and methodological issues of the construct. Psychology in the Schools, 45(5), 369-386.
• Arndt, J. G. (2014). Comprehending male and female levels of engagement in subsets of the national survey of student engagement: Explicating the dynamics of gender role conflict as a medıating factor for males. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Western Michigan University, Kalamazoo, MI.
• Arslantaş, H. (2011). Öğ retim elemanlarının öğ retim stratejileriyöntem ve teknikleri, iletişim ve ölçme değerlendirme yeterliklerine yönelik öğ renci görüş leri. Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 8(15), 487-506.
• Arslantaş, H., Cı̇noğlu, M. ve Yıldız, M. (2012). Öğ retim elemanlarının sınıf içi öğ retim becerilerinin öğ renci görüş lerine göre değerlendirilmesi. İnönü Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 13(3), 67-90.
• Audas, R., & Willms, J. D. (2001). Engagement and dropping out of school: A life course perspective. Hull, Québec: Applied Research Branch Strategic Policy Human Resources Development Canada. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/ download?doi=10.1.1.466.7579&rep=rep1&type=pdf adresinden erişilmiştir.
• Axelson, R. D., & Flick, A. (2010). Defining student engagement. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 43(1), 38-43. doi: 10.1080/00091383.2011.533096.
• Başö ren, M. (2015). Lise öğ rencilerinin matematik dersine katılımının, duygu düzenleme, algılanan araçsallık, umut ve başarı değişkenleriyle olan ilişkisi. (Yayımlanmamış doktora tezi). Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi, Bolu.
• Chiu, T. K. F. (2023). Student engagement in K-12 online learning amid COVID-19: A qualitative approach from a self-determination theory perspective. Interactive Learning Environments, 31(6), 3326-3339, DOI: 10.1080/10494820.2021.1926289
• Cinches, M. F. C., Russell, R. L. V., Chavez, J. C., & Ortiz, R. O. (2017). Student engagement: Defining teacher effectiveness and teacher engagement. Journal of Institutional Research South East Asia, 15(1), 5-19.
• Coates, H. (2007). A model of online and general campus-based student engagement. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 32(2), 121-141.
• Connell, J., Spencer, M., & Aber, J. (1994). Educational risk and resilience in african-american youth: Context, self, action, and outcomes in school. Child Development, 65(2), 493-506. doi:10.2307/1131398.
• Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (4th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.
• Ergün, E. ve Kurnaz, F. B. (2017). Çevrimiçi öğ renme ortamlarında sınıf topluluğu hissi ve öğ renci bağlılığı arasındaki ilişki. Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi, 25(4), 1515- 1532.
• Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59-109.
• Frydenberg, E., Ainley, M., & Russell, V. J. (2005). Schooling issues digest: Student motivation and engagement. The Australian Government Department of Education, Science and Training (DEST). http://web.archive.org/web/20120721015202/http:// www.dest.gov.au/sectors/school_education/publications_ resources/schooling_issues_digest/schooling_issues_digest_ motivation_engagement.htm#Introduction adresinden erişilmiştir.
• Furlong, M. J., & Christenson, S. L. (2008). Engaging students at school and with learning: A relevant construct for all students. Psychology in the Schools, 45(5), 365-368. doi:10.1002/ pits.20302.
• Groccia, J. E. (2018). What is student engagement?. New Directions For Teaching and Learning, 154, 11-20. doi: 10.1002/tl.
• Günüç , S. (2013). Teknolojinin öğ renci bağlılığındaki rolü ve derste teknoloji kullanımı ile öğ renci bağlılığı arasındaki ilişkilerin incelenmesi. (Doktora tezi). Anadolu Üniversitesi, Eskişehir.
• Harper, S. R., Carini, R. M., Bridges, B. K., & Hayek, J. C. (2004). Gender differences in student engagement among African American undergraduates at historically Black colleges and universities. Journal of College Student Development, 45(3), 271-284. doi: 10.1353/csd.2004.0035.
• Hopwood, B., Dyment, J., Downing, J., Stone, C., Muir, T., Freeman, E., Milthorpe, N. (2023). Keeping the party in full swing: Findings on online student engagement with teacher education students. The Journal of Continuing Higher Education, 71(1), 40-58, DOI: 10.1080/07377363.2021.1966922
• Hu, S., & Kuh, G. D. (2002). Being (dis)engaged in educationally purposeful activities: The influences of student and institutional characteristics. Research in Higher Education, 43(5), 555-575.
• Kandiko, C. B. (2008). Student engagement in two countries: A comparative study using National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) data. Journal of Institutional Research, 14(1), 71-86.
• Karadağ, E. ve Yücel, C. (2018). Türkiye üniversite memnuniyet araştırması 2018. Eskişehir: ÜNİAR Yayınları. doi: 10.13140/ RG.2.2.13111.11683.
• Krause, K. (2005). Understanding and promoting student engagement in university learning communities. ‘Engaged, inert or otherwise occupied?. Victoria: The University of Melbourne, Centre for the Study of Higher Education. https:// www.liberty.edu/media/3425/teaching_resources/Stud_eng. pdf adresinden erişilmiştir.
• Krause, K. L., & Coates, H. (2008) Students’ engagement in firstyear university. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 33(5), 493-505. doi:10.1080/02602930701698892.
• Korobova, N. (2012). A comparative study of student engagement, satisfaction, and academic success among international and American students. (Doctoral dissertation). Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa.
• Korobova, N., & Starobin, S. S. (2015). A comparative study of student engagement, satisfaction, and academic success among international and american students. Journal of International Students, 5(1), 72-85.
• Kuh, G. D. (2003). What we’re learning about student engagement from NSSE: Benchmarks for effective educational practices. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 35(2), 24-32. doi: 10.1080/00091380309604090.
• Kuh G. D. (2009a). What student affairs professionals need to know about student engagement. Journal of College Student Development, 50, 683-706.
• Kuh, G. D. (2009b). The National Survey of Student Engagement: Conceptual and empirical foundations. New Directions for Institutional Research, 141, 5-20.
• Marks, H. (2000). Student engagement in instructional activity: Patterns in the elementary, middle, and high school years. American Educational Research Journal, 37(1), 153-184.
• Newmann, F. M. (1989). Student engagement and high school reform. Educational Leadership, 46(5), 34-36. National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE). (2019h). NSSE 2019 U.S. Engagement indicator descriptive statistics by class and sex. http://nsse.indiana.edu/2019_institutional_report/ pdf/EngagementIndicators/EI% 20-%20Sex.pdf adresinden erişilmiştir.
• National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE). (2019i). NSSE 2017 & 2018 Canadian engagement indicator descriptive statistics by class and sex. http://nsse.indiana.edu/2018_institutional_ report/pdf/canada/NSSE17_18%20Canadian%20Grands%20 EI_bySex.pdf adresinden erişilmiştir.
• Osagie, S. E. (2016). Student engagement and academic success in veterans’ postsecondary education. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Temple University, Philadelphia, PA.
• Osterman, F. K. (2000). Students’ need for belonging in the school community. Review of Educational Research. 70(3), 323-367.
• Öz, Y. (2019). Yükseköğ retimde öğ renci katılımı. (Yayımlanmamış doktora tezi). Anadolu Üniversitesi, Eskişehir.
• Park, Y. S. (2005). Student engagement and classroom variables in improving mathematics achievement. Asia Pacific Education Review, 6(1), 87-97.
• Parsons, J., & Taylor, L. (2012). Student engagement: What do we know and what should we do. Edmonton, Alta: University of Alberta.
• Pascarella, E. T., & Terenzini, P. T. (1991). How college affects students. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
• Peck, L. (2017). The correlation between the National Survey of Student Engagement indicators and first year student achievement, satisfaction, and retention. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Old Domininion University, Norfolk, VA.
• Phillips, G. C. (2013). A comparative study of international student engagement and success based on race/ethnicity, gender, and institutional type. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN.
• Pike, G. R., Kuh, G. D., & Massa-McKinley, R. (2008). Firstyear students’ employment, engagement, and academic achievement: Untangling the relationship between work and grades. Naspa Journal, 45(4), 560-582. doi: 10.2202/1949- 6605.2011.
• Salas-Pilco, S. Z., Yang, Y., & Zhang, Z. (2022). Student engagement in online learning in Latin American higher education during the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review. British Journal of Educational Technology, 53, 593–619. https://doi. org/10.1111/bjet.13190
• Sarıtepeci, M. (2012). İlköğretim 7. Sınıf sosyal bilgiler dersinde harmanlanmış öğrenme ortamlarının öğrencilerin derse katılımına, akademik başarısına, derse karşı tutumuna ve motivasyonuna etkisi. (Yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi). Gazi Üniversitesi, Ankara.
• Sarwar, M., & Ashrafi, G. M. (2014). Students’ commitment, engagement and locus of control as predictor of academic achievement at higher education level. Current Issues in Education, 17(3), 1-10.
• Schlechty, P.C. (2001). Shaking up the schoolhouse: How to support and sustain educational innovation. San Francisco: Jossey- Bass.
• Schlinsog, J. A. (2010). Engagement in the first year as a predictor of academic achievement and persistence of first-year students. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Louisville, Louisville, KY.
• Shulman, L. (2005). Making differences: A table of learning. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 34(6), 36-44. doi: 10.1080/00091380209605567.
• Smith, S. A. (2019). Student engagement and retention of minority students in a faith-based institution. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Liberty University, Lynchburg, VA.
• Trowler, V. (2010). Student engagement literature review. York: The Higher Education Academy.
• Zhao, C. M., Kuh, G. D., & Carini, R. M. (2005). A comparison of international student and American student engagement in effective educational practices. The Journal of Higher Education, 76(2), 209-231.