ARAŞTIRMA GÖREVLİLERİNİN KENDİNİ SABOTAJ EĞİLİMLERİNİN İNCELENMESİ

Yıl 2015, Cilt: 8 Sayı: 2, 0 - 0, 07.01.2016

Hilal Büyükgöze , Feyza Gün

https://doi.org/10.17218/husbed.11352

Cited By: 2

Öz

Bu çalışmanın öncelikli amacı, araştırma görevlilerinin kendini sabotaj düzeylerinin belirlenmesidir. Çalışma kapsamında, katılımcıların kendini sabotaj düzeylerinin cinsiyet, medeni durum, kıdem ve kadro durumu gibi kategorik değişkenlere göre farklılaşıp farklılaşmadığının belirlenmesi de amaçlanmıştır. Nicel araştırma yaklaşımının benimsendiği bu araştırmanın çalışma grubunu İstanbul ve Ankara’da devlet üniversitelerinde istihdam edilen araştırma görevlileri (N=408) oluşturmaktadır. Veriler, Jones ve Rhodewalt (1982) tarafından geliştirilen ve Türkçe adaptasyon çalışması Akın (2012) tarafından gerçekleştirilen 6lı Likert tipi 25 maddeden oluşan “Kendini Sabotaj Ölçeği-KSÖ” ile toplanmıştır. Veriler, 2014-2015 akademik yılının bahar döneminde online olarak toplanmıştır. Çalışma kapsamında toplanan verilerin analizinde aritmetik ortalama, standart sapma, t testi ve ANOVA’dan yararlanılmıştır. Kullanılan ölçeğin yapı geçerliği AMOS’ta yürütülen doğrulayıcı faktör analizi ile, güvenirliği ise Cronbach alfa değeri ile incelenmiştir. Araştırma sonucunda, araştırma görevlilerinin kendini sabotaj eğilimlerinin görece düşük olduğu ve çalışma kapsamında incelenen demografik değişkenlere göre ise eğilimlerinin anlamlı bir farklılık göstermediği belirlenmiştir. 

Kaynakça

• Akça, F. (2012). An investigation into the self-handicapping behaviors of undergraduates in terms of academic procrastination, the locus of control and academic success. Journal of Education and Learning, 1(2), 288-298. doi: 10.5539/jel.v1n2p288
• Akın, A. (2011). Academic locus of control and self-handicapping. Procedia, Social and Behavioral Sciences, 30, 812-816.
• Akın, A. (2012). Kendini sabotaj ölçeği: Geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Eğitim ve Bilim Dergisi, 37(164), 176-187.
• Alter, A. L., & Forgas, J. P. (2007). On being happy but fearing failure: The effects of mood on self-handicapping strategies. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43, 947-954. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2006.07.009
• Anlı, G. (2011). Kendini sabotaj ile psikolojik iyi olma arasındaki ilişkinin çeşitli değişkenler açısından incelenmesi (Yayınlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi). Sakarya Üniversitesi, Sakarya.
• Arbuckle, J. L. (2006). AMOS 7.0 User’s guide. Chicago: SPSS.
• Brown, C. M., & Kimble, C. E. (2009). Personal, interpersonal, and situational influences on behavioral self-handicapping. The Journal of Social Psychology, 149(6), 609-626.
• Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2011). Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi el kitabı: İstatistik, araştırma deseni, SPSS uygulamaları ve yorum (14.baskı). Ankara: Pegem Yayıncılık.
• Chorba, K., Was, C. A., & Isaacson, R. M. (2012). Individual differences in academic identity and self-handicapping in undergraduate college students. Individual Differences Research, 10(2), 60-68.
• Dietrich, D. (1995). Gender differences in self-handicapping: Regardless of academic or social competence implications. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 23(4), 403-410.
• Doebler, T. C., Schick, C., Beck, B. L., & Astor-Stetson, E. (2000). Ego protection: The effects perfectionism and gender on acquired and claimed self-handicapping and self-esteem. College Student Journal, 34(4).
• Eblin, J. J. (2009). Gender differences in claimed self-handicapping: The role of group status and effort prime (Unpublished senior honors thesis). The Ohio State University: Ohio, USA.
• Elliot, A. J., & Church, M. A. (2003). A motivational analysis of defensive pessimism and self-handicapping. Journal of Personality, 71(3), 369-396.
• Forgas, J. P. (1994). Sad and guilty? Affective influences on explanations of conflict episodes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 56–68.
• Forgas, J. P., Bower, G. H., & Moylan, S. J. (1990). Praise or blame? Mood effects on attribution for success or failure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 809–819.
• Garcia, T. (1995). The role of motivational strategies in self-regulated learning. New Directions in Teaching and Learning, 63, 29-42.
• Gündoğdu, R. (2013). Investigation of self-handicapping tendencies of teacher candidates according to demographic variables by controlling self-esteem scores. Turkish Studies: International Periodical for the Languages, Literature and History of Turkish and Turkic, 8(3), 263-277.
• Harris, R. N., & Snyder, C. R. (1986). The role of uncertain self-esteem in self-handicapping. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 451-458.
• Hirt, E. R., Deppe, R. K., & Gordon, L. J. (1991). Self-reported versus behavioral self-handicapping: Empirical evidence for a theoretical distinction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61(6), 981-991.
• Hirt, E. R., McCrea, S. M., & Boris, H. I. (2003). “I know you self-handicapped last exam”: Gender differences in reactions to self-handicapping. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(1), 177-193. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.84.1.177
• Hobden, K. L. (1997). Behavioral versus claimed self-handicapping: Underlying motivations and attributions following failure (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Toronto, Canada.
• Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1-55. doi: 10.1080/10705519909540118
• Jones, E. E., & Berglas, S. (1978). Control of attributions about the self through self-handicapping strategies: The appeal of alcohol and the role of underachievement. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 4(2), 200-206.
• Jones, E. E., & Rhodewalt, F. (1982). The-self handicapping scale. (Available from Frederick Rhodewalt, Dept. of Psychology, University of Utah, Salt Lke City, UT 84112).
• Kearns, H., Forbes, A., & Gardiner, M. (2007). A cognitive behavioral coaching intervention for the treatment of perfectionism and self-handicapping in a non-clinical population. Behavior Change, 24(3), 157-172.
• Kernis, M. H. (2005). Measuring self-esteem in context: The importance of stability of self-esteem in psychological functioning. Journal of Personality, 73, 1-37.
• Kernis, M. H., Cornell, D. P., Sun, C. R., Berry, A. J., & Harlow, T. (1993). There’s more to self-esteem than whether it is high or low: The importance of stability of self-esteem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 1190-1204.
• Kimble, C. E., Kimble, E. A., & Croy, N. A. (1998). Development of self-handicapping tendencies. The Journal of Social Psychology, 138(4), 524-534.
• Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford Press.
• Leary, M. R., & Shepperd, J. A. (1986). Behavioral self-handicaps versus self-reported self-handicaps: A conceptual note. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1265–1268.
• Leondari, A., & Gonida, E. (2007). Predicting academic self-handicapping in different age groups: The role of personal achievement goals and social goals. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 77, 595-611.
• Luginbuhl, J., & Palmer, R. (1991). Impression management aspects of self-handicapping: Positive and negative effects. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17, 655–662.
• Mamaril, N. A., Usher, E. L., & Coyle, B. A. (2013). Academic self-handicapping and self-efficacy as predictors of mathematics achievement of African American middle school students. P20 Motivation and Learning Lab, University of Kentucky, College of Education, Kentucky, USA.
• Martin, K. A., & Brawley, L. R. (2002). Self-handicapping in physical achievement settings: The contributions of self-esteem and self-efficacy. Self and Identity, 1(4), 337-351. doi: 10.1080/15298860290106814
• Martin, A. J., Marsh, H. W., Williamson, A., & Debus, R. L. (2003). Self-handicapping, defensive pessimism, and goal orientation: A qualitative study of university students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(3), 617-628.
• McCrea, S. M., & Hirt, E. R. (2008). She works hard for the money: Valuing effort underlies gender differences in behavioral self-handicapping. Journal of Experimental and Social Psychology, 44(2), 292-311. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2007.05.006
• Mello-Goldner, D., & Jackson, J. (1999). Premenstrual syndrome (PMS) as a self-handicapping strategy among college women. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 14(4), 657-669.
• Meyer, C. L. (2000). Academic procrastination and self-handicapping: Gender differences in response to non-contingent feedback. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 15(5), 87-102.
• Midgley, C., Arunkumar, R., & Urdan, T. C. (1996). “If I don’t do well tomorrow there’s a reason”: Predictors of adolescents’ use of academic self-handicapping strategies. Journal of Education Psychology, 88(3), 423-434.
• Midgley, C., & Urdan, T. (2001). Academic self-handicapping and achievement goals: a further examination. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 26, 61–75. doi:10.1006/ceps.2000.1041
• Newman, L. S., & Wadas, R. F. (1997). When stakes are higher: Self-esteem instability and self-handicapping. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 12(1), 217-232.
• Prapavessis, H., & Grove, R. (1998). Self-handicapping and self-esteem. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 10(2), 175-184. doi: 10.1080/10413209808406386
• Pulford, B. D., Johnson, A., & Awaida, M. (2005). A cross-cultural study of predictors of self-handicapping in university students. Personality and Individual Differences, 39, 727-737.
• Rhodewalt, F., & Davison, J., Jr. (1986). Self-handicapping and subsequent performance: Role of outcome valence and attributional certainty. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 7, 307-323.
• Rhodewalt, F., & Hill, K. (1995). Self-handicapping in the classroom: The effects of claimed self-handicaps on responses to academic failure. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 16(4), 397-416.
• Sahranç, Ü. (2011). An investigation of the relationships between self-handicapping and depression, anxiety, and stress. IOJES, 3(2), 526-540.
• Schwinger, M., Wirthwein, L., Lemmer, G., & Steinmayr, R. (2014). Academic self-handicapping and achievement: A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 106(3), 744-761.
• Sheppard, J. A., & Arkin, R. M. (1989a). Determinants of self-handicapping: Task importance and the effects of preexisting handicaps on self-generated handicaps. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 15, 101-112.
• Sheppard, J. A., & Arkin, R. M. (1989b). Self-handicapping: The moderating roles of public self-consciousness and task importance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 155, 252-265.
• Shields, C. D. (2007). The relationship between goal orientation, parenting style and self-handicapping in adolescents (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Alabama, Alabama, USA.
• Smederevac, S., Novovic, Z., Milin, P., Janicic, B., Pajic, D., & Biro, M. (2003). Tendency to self-handicapping in the situation of expected failure. Psihologija, 36(1-2), 39-58.
• Thomas, C. R., & Gadbois, S. A. (2007). Academic self-handicapping: The role of self-concept clarity and students’ learning strategies. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 77, 101-119.
• Tice, D. M., & Baumeister, R. F. (1990). Self-esteem, self-handicapping, and self-presentation: The strategy of inadequate practice. Journal of Personality, 58(2), 443-464. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1990.tb00237.x
• Urdan, T., & Midgley, C. (2001). Academic self-handicapping: What we know, what more there is to learn. Educational Psychology Review, 13(2), 115-138.
• Want, J., & Kleitman, S. (2006). Imposter phenomenon and self-handicapping: Links with parenting styles and self-confidence. Personality and Individual Differences, 40, 961-971.
• Yalnız, A. (2014). Algılanan anne-baba tutumları, kendini sabotaj ve öz-yeterlik arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi (Yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi). Sakarya Üniversitesi, Sakarya.
• Zuckerman, M., & Tsai, F. F. (2005). Costs of self-handicapping. Journal of Personality, 73(2), 411-442. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2005.00314.x