The Duality of High and Low Culture in D. H. Lawrence’s Lady Chatterley’s Lover

Yıl 2023, Cilt: 11 Sayı: 21, 87 - 105, 15.03.2023

Dilek Bulut Sarıkaya

https://doi.org/10.20304/humanitas.1203307

Öz

Lawrence, in Lady Chatterley’s Lover (1928), reflects the post-war modern British society which condemns its individuals into a psychological trauma of ongoing conflicts between different classes and cultures. Advocating the exigency of a classless society, Lawrence shatters the hegemonic ideology of the highbrow culture which disdains working class culture as vulgar, coarse and commonplace. Reacting against the cultural displacement of working classes who are considered as masses, Lawrence indulges in revealing the authenticity and earnestness of the working class culture. Lawrence’s depiction of an uncorrupt ethical standing of the working class culture is the negation of the concept of culture, associated with high class manners and ways of life. The prevailing concern of this study, therefore, will be to analyze Lawrence’s Lady Chatterley’s Lover from the perspective of cultural studies to unravel the clash of high and low cultures in relation to the hierarchical class structure of the post-war England.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Lady Chatterley's Lover, D. H. Lawrence, cultural studies, high culture, low culture

D. H. Lawrence’ın Lady Chatterley’in Sevgilisi Romanında Üst ve Alt Kültür İkilemi

Öz

Lady Chatterley’in Sevgilisi romanında D. H. Lawrence, Birinci Dünya savaşı sonrası İngiliz toplumunda bireylerin nasıl bir sınıfsal ve kültürel çatışma içinde kalarak psikolojik tramvalara itildiklerini göstermektedir. Kültürlerin üstün veya aşağı görünmediği sınıfsız bir toplum yaratma gerekliliğini savunan Lawrence, kitleler olarak görülen işçi sınıfının kültürel olarak yerinden edilmesine karşı çıkarak otantik ve samimi bir işçi sınıfı kültürü ortaya çıkarır. Lawrence’ın işçi sınıfının henüz bozulmamış etik değerlerini ortaya çıkarması kendi döneminin üst sınıf hayat tarzıyla özdeşleşen kültür kavramını silmektedir. Bu nedenle, bu çalışmanın amacı Lady Chatterley’in Sevgilisi romanını kültürel perspektiften okuyarak savaş sonrası İngiltere toplumunun hiyerarşik sınıf yapısıyla ilintili üst ve alt kültür çatışmasını ortaya çıkarmaktır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

D. H. Lawrence, Lady Chatterley’in Sevgilisi, kültür araştırmaları, üst kültür, alt kültür

Kaynakça

• Arnold, M. (2006). Culture and anarchy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Baksi, Catherine. (2019, August 1). Lady Chatterley’s legal case: How the book changed the meaning of obscene. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/law/2019/aug/01
• Barker. C. (2004). The Sage dictionary of cultural studies. London: Sage.
• Bell, M. (1992). D. H. Lawrence: Language and being. Cambridge: Cambridge UP.
• Berson, M. (1997). In Chatterley, class is the evil-not the sex. The Seattle Times. http://www.book-it.org/new/shows/chats/reviews.htm
• Buckley, W. K. (1993). Lady Chatterley’s Lover: Loss and hope. New York: Twayne.
• Delany, P. (1990). Lawrence and the decline of the industrial spirit. In M. Squires & K. Cushman (Eds.), The challenge of D. H. Lawrence (pp. 77-88). Wisconsin: The Wisconsin UP.
• During, S. (2005). Cultural studies: A critical introduction. London: Routledge.
• Edwards, P. (1999, July). Culture is ordinary: Raymond Williams and cultural materialism. http://www.users.zetnet.co.uk/amroth/scritti/williams.htm
• Eliot, T. S. (1976). Christianity and culture: The idea of a Christian society and notes towards the definition of culture. San Diego: A Harvest Book.
• Holbrook, D. (1992). Where D. H. Lawrence was wrong about women. Lewisburg: Bucknell.
• Hyde, G. M. (1990). D. H. Lawrence. London: Macmillan.
• Kiely, R. (1990). Out on strike: The language and power of the working class in Lawrence’s fiction. In M. Squires & K. Cushman. (Eds.). The challenge of D. H. Lawrence (pp. 89-102). Wisconsin: The Wisconsin UP.
• Koh, J. (2002). D. H. Lawrence’s world vision of cultural regeneration in Lady Chatterley’s Lover. The Midwest Quarterly, 43(2), 189-206.
• Lawrence, D. H. (1959). Lady Chatterley’s Lover. New York: Grove Press.
• Leavis, F. R. (1955). D. H. Lawrence. London: Penguin.
• Leavis, F. R. (1968). Mass civilization and minority culture. In For continuity (pp. 13-46). New York: Books for Libraries Press.
• Schwarzmann, G. M. (2008). Marxism and Bolshevism in D. H. Lawrence’s Lady Chatterley’s Lover. South Atlantic Review, 73(2), 81-95.
• Shiach, M. (2001). Work and selfhood in Lady Chatterley’s Lover. In A. Fernihough (Eds.) The Cambridge companion to D. H. Lawrence (pp. 87-102). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Stoll, J. E. (1971). The novels of D. H. Lawrence. Columbia: Missouri Press.
• Williams, R. (2014). Culture is ordinary. In J. McGuigan. (Eds.), Raymond Williams on culture & society: Essential writings (pp. 1-18). Los Angeles: Sage.