Children’s Auditory Performance Scale: Turkish Validity and Reliability

Yıl 2020, Cilt: 7 Sayı: 1, 32 - 40, 30.04.2020

Mine Baydan , Filiz Aslan Suna Yılmaz , Fulya Yalçınkaya

https://doi.org/10.21020/husbfd.635851

Öz

Objectives: Central auditory processing disorder (CAPD) is characterized by the difficulties in sound identification and discrimination although the hearing thresholds are in the normal limits. Children’s Auditory Performance Scale (CHAPS) is a questionnaire to use as a support in diagnosis. The aim of the present study is to examine the reliability and the validity of the Children’s Auditory Performance Scale
Materials and Methods: In total 150 children were included in the study and all children underwent hearing screening and children with normal hearing thresholds were included in the study. The children’s ages ranged from 7 to 15 years old (mean age = 102.85 ± 34.47 months). Cross-sectional survey was used in the study. Demographic information was obtained from participants and parents or teachers of the children who fulfilled the questionnaire.
Results: The internal consistency of the questionnaire was examined with Cronbach’s Alpha (α = 0.97). Factor analysis determined a six-factor structure which explained 77.75% of the variance in CHAPS scores.
Conclusion: The Turkish version of CHAPS can be considered as a reliable and valid instrument for clinical and research use.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Central auditory processing, central auditory processing disorders, reliabilty

Children’s Auditory Performance Scale: Turkish Validity and Reliability

Öz

Objectives: Central auditory processing disorder (CAPD) is characterized by the difficulties in sound identification and discrimination although the hearing thresholds are in the normal limits. Children’s Auditory Performance Scale (CHAPS) is a questionnaire to use as a support in diagnosis. The aim of the present study is to examine the reliability and the validity of the Children’s Auditory Performance Scale
Materials and Methods: In total 150 children were included in the study and all children underwent hearing screening and children with normal hearing thresholds were included in the study. The children’s ages ranged from 7 to 15 years old (mean age = 102.85 ± 34.47 months). Cross-sectional survey was used in the study. Demographic information was obtained from participants and parents or teachers of the children who fulfilled the questionnaire.
Results: The internal consistency of the questionnaire was examined with Cronbach’s Alpha (α = 0.97). Factor analysis determined a six-factor structure which explained 77.75% of the variance in CHAPS scores.
Conclusion: The Turkish version of CHAPS can be considered as a reliable and valid instrument for clinical and research use.

Anahtar Kelimeler

central auditory processing, central auditory processing disorders, reliability

Kaynakça

• 1. Development TFoCAPC. Central auditory processing: Current status of research and implications for clinical practice. American Journal of Audiology. 1996;5(2):41-52.2. Wilson WJ, Jackson A, Pender A, Rose C, Wilson J, Heine C, et al. The CHAPS, SIFTER, and TAPS–R as Predictors of (C) AP Skills and (C) APD. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research. 2011.3. Dawes P, Bishop DV, Sirimanna T, Bamiou D-E. Profile and aetiology of children diagnosed with auditory processing disorder (APD). International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology. 2008;72(4):483-9.4. Ahmmed AU, Ahmmed AA. Setting appropriate pass or fail cut-off criteria for tests to reflect real life listening difficulties in children with suspected auditory processing disorder. International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology. 2016;84:166-73.5. Smoski W, Brunt MA, Tannahill JC. Children’s auditory performance scale (CHAPS). Tampa, FL: Educational Audiology Association. 1998.6. (ASHA) AS-L-HA. Central auditory processing disorders.7. Keith RW. Development and standardization of SCAN-C test for auditory processing disorders in children. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology. 2000;11(8):438-45.8. O'Hara B. The Auditory Processing Domains Questionnaire APDQ rev. 1. For parents and teachers of students ages.7.9. Fisher L. Fisher’s auditory problems checklist. Bemidji, MN: Life Products. 1976.10. Anderson K. SIFTER: Screening instrument for targeting educational risk in children identified by hearingscreening or who have known hearing loss. . Tampa, FL: The Educational Audiology Association. 1989.11. Ahmmed AU, Ahmmed AA, Bath JR, Ferguson MA, Plack CJ, Moore DR. Assessment of children with suspected auditory processing disorder: a factor analysis study. Ear and hearing. 2014;35(3):295-305.12. Dawes P, Bishop DV. Psychometric profile of children with auditory processing disorder and children with dyslexia. Archives of disease in childhood. 2010;95(6):432-6.13. Volpatto FL, Rechia IC, Lessa AH, Soldera CLC, Ferreira MIDdC, Machado MS. Questionnaires and checklists for central auditory processing screening used in Brazil: a systematic review. Brazilian journal of otorhinolaryngology. 2019;85(1):99-110.14. Downs D, Schmidt B, Stephens TJ, editors. Auditory behaviors of children and adolescents with pervasive developmental disorders. Seminars in Hearing; 2005: Copyright© 2005 by Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc., 333 Seventh Avenue, New York.