SOSYAL MEDYA BAĞIMLILIĞI ve YALAN SÖYLEME İLE İLİŞKİLİ PSİKOLOJİK FAKTÖRLER: LİTERATÜR TARAMASI

Yıl 2024, Cilt: 10 Sayı: 1, 288 - 313, 15.05.2024

Eda Deligöz

Öz

Yalan söyleme eylemi, bilişsel ve sosyal etmenlere bağlı gelişen, bireyi pek çok açıdan zarara uğratan çok boyutlu bir problem şeklinde ifade edilebilir. Literatürde, yalan söyleme ile sosyal medya bağımlılığının psikiyatride ve klinik psikoloji alanında diğer psikopatolojik durumlarla ilişkili olduğundan bahsedilmiştir. Sosyal medyanın kullanılması, bireylerde yalan söyleme davranışının kolay gelişmesini ve yaygın hale gelerek kişilerin ruhsal durumunu psikopatolojik boyutta etkilemesi, yalan söyleme ve sosyal medya ile ilişkisine dikkat çekmiştir. Literatürdeki Türkçe ve yabancı dillerde yer alan yazılı metinlere yer vermiş ve yalan, sosyal medya, internet bağımlılığı, sosyal medya bağımlılığı anahtar kelimeleriyle araştırma yapılmış ve psikolojiyle ilişkilendirilerek bir derleme halinde sunulmuştur. Araştırmanın yöntemi, veri tabanları aracılığıyla disiplinler arası bir yaklaşımla literatür taraması yapılmış ve psikolojik kuramsal perspektife dikkat edilmiştir. Literatür taraması için 1949- 2023 yıllarında YÖK Ulusal Tez Merkezi, Google Akademik, ProQuest, ResearchGate veri tabanlarında yer alan makale, kitap ve lisansüstü tezler arasında “sosyal medya”, “sosyal medya bağımlılığı”, “internet bağımlılığı”, “yalan”, “psikoloji” anahtar kelimeleriyle arama yapılmış ve 140 makale, kitap, yüksek lisans- doktora tezlerine ulaşılmıştır. Seçilmiş olan 128 makale, kitap, lisansüstü tez materyalleri araştırmanın örneklemi olmuştur. Çalışmanın amacı literatüre dayanarak, sosyal medya bağımlılığı ile yalan arasındaki ilişkiye değinilmiş ve sosyal medyada yalan söyleme eğiliminin artabileceği ifade edilmiştir. Sosyal medyanın aşırı şekilde kullanımı, bireyler üzerinde psikolojik olumsuz sonuçlar doğurmakta ve psikopatolojik örüntüler ile beraberlik göstermektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

sosyal medya, sosyal medya bağımlılığı, internet bağımlılığı, yalan, psikoloji

Etik Beyan

yok

Destekleyen Kurum

yok

Proje Numarası

YOK

Teşekkür

yok

Social Media Addiction and The Concept of Lying: A Literature Review

Öz

The act of lying can be considered as a multidimensional problem that generally arises due to cognitive and social factors and harms the individual in society in many ways. Studies in the literature have mentioned that lying and social media addiction are related to other psychopathological conditions in psychiatry and clinical psychology. The development of digital technologies, the widespread use of social media environments by individuals in society, the sharing of users in virtual environments in competition with each other, as a result of which lying behavior becomes easier and becomes widespread, affecting people's mental state in a psychopathological dimension. He emphasized the importance of the relationship. The concepts of social media addiction and lying are important concepts that are frequently mentioned in psychiatry and clinical psychology. In this study, articles, papers, books, etc. in the literature in Turkish and foreign languages. Written texts were included and research was conducted with the keywords of the concept of lie, social media, internet and social media addiction, digital and virtual environments, and the information obtained from these was presented in a compilation. As a result of the results of the studies included in the study, it was stated that the concepts of lying and social media addiction are important predictors of other psychopathological patterns in the fields of psychiatry and psychology.

Anahtar Kelimeler

social media, social media addiction, lying, psychology, internet addiction

Proje Numarası

YOK

Kaynakça

• 1. Fulk J, Steinfield CW, Schmitz J, Power JG. A social information processing model of media use in organizations. Communication Research, 1987;14 (5): 529-552.
• 2. Uluçay DM, Uzun K. WhatsApp use and interruption in the business environment. Selçuk University Faculty of Communication Academic Journal, 2017;10 (1): 216- 231.
• 3. Ellison NB, Steinfield C, Lampe C. The benefits of Facebook “friends:” Social capital and college students' use of online social network sites. Journal of computer‐mediated communication, 2007;12 (4); 1143–1168.
• 4. Bekiroğlu HA, Hülür AB. A research on university students' Facebook use and digital schizophrenia. Ordu University Social Sciences Institute Journal of Social Sciences Research, 2016; 6(14): 146-175.
• 5. Bauman Z, Lyon D. Liquid surveillance: A conversation. John Wiley & Sons, 2013.
• 6. Çelik R, Özçağlayan M. Self-expression, exposure and surveillance in social media (A qualitative study on the transformation of surveillance with digital information). Proceedings of the International Academic Conference on the Impact of Digital Communication, 2014:187- 210.
• 7. Lampe C, Ellison N, Steinfield C. A Face (book) in the crowd: Social searching vs. social browsing. In Proceedings of the 20th anniversary conference on Computer supported cooperative work, 2006:167-170.
• 8. Joinson AN. Looking at, looking up or keeping up with people?: Motives and use of Facebook. In Proceeding of the Twenty-sixth Annual SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 2008:1027–1036.
• 9. Tüfekçi Z. Can you see me now? Audince and disclosure regulation in online social network sites. Bulletin of Science Technology Society, 2008; 28 (20):20-36.
• 10. Şener G. Social networks as personalized community media: An evaluation on Facebook usage in Turkey. Bilgili, Breaking Molds, 2010; 2:249-277.
• 11. Tokunaga RS. Social networking site or social surveillance site? Understanding the use of interpersonal electronic surveillance in romantic relationships. Computers in Human Behavior, 2011; 27 (2):705-713.
• 12. Marwick AE. The public domain: Social surveillance in everyday life. Surveillance & Society, 2012; 9(4): 378-393.
• 13. Ünal- Tutgun A. Social media addiction: A research on university students. Doctoral thesis, Marmara University: Istanbul, 2015.
• 14. Çaycı BK, Ayşegül E. Ağ toplumunda sosyalleşme ve yabancılaşma. The Turkish Online Journal of Design, Art and Communication, 2014; 4(1): 1-9.
• 15. Heim J, Brandtzaeg PB, Hertzberg KB, Endestad T, Torgersen L. Children's usage of media technologies and psychosocial factors. New Media & Society, 2007; 9: 425-454.
• 16. Boz N. Digital identity and self-presentation in new communication environments, Doctoral Thesis, Marmara University Social Sciences Institute, Istanbul, 2012.
• 17. Vrij A, Edward K, Roberts KP, Bull R. Detecting deceit via analysis of verbal and nonverbal behavior. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 2000; 24 (4): 239-264.
• 18. Vrij A. Detecting lies and deceit. John Willey & Sons Ltd: England, 2008.
• 19. Zuckerman M, DePaulo BM, Rosenthal R. Verbal and nonverbal communication of deception. Advances in experimental social psychology, 1981; 14: 1-59. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60369-X
• 20. DePaulo BM, Lindsay JJ, Malone BE, Muhlenbruck L, Charlton K. Cues to deception. Psychology Bulletin, 2003; 129: 74-112.
• 21. Riggio RE, Friedman HS. Individual differences and cues to deception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1983; 45 (4): 899-915.
• 22. Riggio RE, Tucker J, Throckmorton B. Social skills and deception ability. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 1987; 13 (4): 568-577.
• 23. DeTurck MA, Miller GR. Training observers to detect deception: 'Effects of self-monitoring and rehearsal'. Human Communication Research, 1990; 16 (4): 603-620.
• 24. Zuckerman M, DeFrank RS, Hall JA, Larrance DT, Rosenthal R. Facial and vocal cues of deception and honesty. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 1979; 15: 378-396.
• 25. Uzun S. Psycho-social approach to lying attitude in adolescents (Sakarya Case). Master's thesis, Sakarya University Institute of Philosophical and Religious Sciences, Sakarya, 2011.
• 26. Kam KY. A cultural model of nonverbal deceptive communication: The independent and interdependent self-construals as predictors of deceptive communication motivation and nonverbal behaviors under deception. Doctoral Thesis, The University of Arizona, 2003.
• 27. Buller DB, Burgoon JK. Interpersonal deception theory. Communication Theory, 1996; 6: 203- 242.
• 28. DePaulo BM, Kashy DA, Kerkendol SE, Wyer MM, Epstein JA. Lying in everyday life. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1996; 70 (5): 979-995. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.70.5.979
• 29. Coleman L, Kay P. “Prototype semantics: The English word lie”. Language, 1981; 57: 26-44.
• 30. Ekman P. Telling lies. W. W. Norton Company: New York, 1992.
• 31. Bilim-Technical. “Diagnosis of the Disease After 400 Years”, 2004. http://www.biltek.tubitak.gov.tr/haberler/teknoloji/S-445-15.pdf
• 32. Anderson DE, Ansfield ME, DePaulo BM. Love's best habit: Deception in the context of relationships. In P. Philippot, R. S. Feldman, & E. J. Coats (Eds.), The social context of nonverbal behavior, 1999; 372–409, Cambridge University Press.
• 33. Peterson C, Seligman MEP. Character strengths and virtues a handbook and classification. Oxford University Press: New York, 2004.
• 34. Terzi S. Events that lead to attachment injuries in romantic relationships: A qualitative study. Turkish Journal of Educational Sciences, 2014; 12 (2): 99-108.
• 35. Yörükoğlu A. Child mental health. Özgür Publications: Ankara, 2002.
• 36. Gander MJ, Gardiner HW. Child and adolescent development (Trans. A. Dönmez, N. Çelen, B. Onur). İmge Kitabevi Publications: Ankara, 2004.
• 37. Girişken N. The influence of the family on child education. Atatürk University Faculty of Agriculture Journal, 1974; 5 (2-3): 141-160.
• 38. Derman MT, Başal HA. The relationship between behavioral problems observed in preschool children and the parental attitudes of their families. Amasya University Faculty of Education Journal, 2013; 2 (1): 115-144.
• 39. Minkler LP, Miceli TJ. Lying, integrity, and cooperation. Review of Social Economy,2004;62 (1): 27-50. https://doi.org/10.1080/0034676042000183817
• 40. Benlioğlu O. Lie Radar. Mona Publications: Istanbul, 2017.
• 41. Talwar V, Lavoie J, Garibello CG, Crossman AM. Influence of social factors on the relationship between lie-telling and children's cognitive abilities. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology,2017;159:185–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2017.02.009
• 42. Cüceloğlu D. Culture of fear. Remzi Bookstore: Istanbul, 2008.
• 43. Özmen A, Huyut- Çetintulum B, Yücel N. Literature review of changes in central nervous system anatomical structures in MRI images of people with Internet gaming disorder. Mevlana Medical Sciences, 2021; 1 (1): 10.
• 44. Nazlıgül- Denizci M, Baş S, Akyüz Z, Yorulmaz O. Internet gaming disorder and treatment approaches: A systematic review. Addicta: The Turkish Journal on Addictions, 2018; 5, 13–35.
• 45. Ekti̇ri̇ci̇oğlu C, Arslantaş H, Yüksel R. The disease of the age among adolescents: Technology addiction. Journal of Archive Literature Review, 2020; 29 (1): 51-64.
• 46. Karabulut A, Gökler R. Communication with technology addicted children. YOBU Faculty of Health Sciences Journal, 2023; 4 (1): 54-61.
• 47. Charles CD, Baranoski M, Griffith E. Pathological lying revisited. The Journal of the Americans Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 2005; 33, 342- 356.
• 48. Soysaldı M. Lies and ways to protect yourself from spiritual diseases of the heart. Sufism: Journal of Scientific and Academic Research, 2005; 6 (15): 89-105.
• 49. Akçay E. Lying ability and memory: Comparison between gender. Selçuk İletişim, 2012; 7 (3): 234-243.
• 50. DePaulo BM, Kashy DA. Everyday lies in close and causal relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1998; 74 (1): 63-79. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0022-3514.74.1.63
• 51. DePaulo BM, Stone J, Lassiter D. Deceiving and detecting deceit, Editor: BR Schlenker. The Self and Social Life, 1985: 323-355.
• 52. McCornack SA, Parks MR. What women know that men don't: Sex differences in determining the truth behind deceptive messages. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 1990; 7(1): 107-118. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407590071006
• 53. Maier RA, Lavrakas PJ. Lying behavior and evaluation of lies. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1976; 42 (2): 575-581.
• 54. Aydın MS, Balım S. Why do we lie? An exploratory look at the lying behavior of college students and adults. Object, 2021; 9 (20): 291-304.
• 55. Popliger M, Talwar V, Crossman A. Predictors of children's prosocial lie-telling: Motivation, socialization variables, and moral understanding. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 2011; 110 (3): 373-392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2011.05.003
• 56. Ford CV. Lie! Lie!! Lie!!!. (Translated by Ş. Küçükal). HYB Publishing: Ankara, 1997.
• 57. Savi F. Examining the relationship between behavioral problems of primary school students aged 12–15 and family functions and parental personality traits. Doctoral thesis, Dokuz Eylül University, Institute of Educational Sciences, Izmir, 2008.
• 58. Jensen LA, Arnett JJ, Feldman SS, Cauffman E. The right to do wrong: Lying to parents among adolescents and emerging adults. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 2003; 33 (2): 101–112.
• 59. Talwar W, Lee K, Bala N, Lindsay L. Children's conceptual knowledge of lying and its relation to their actual behaviors. Law and Human Behavior, 2002; 26 (4): 395-415.
• 60. Yavuzer H. Children and crime. Remzi Bookstore, Istanbul, 1996.
• 61. Lee K, Ross H. The concept of lying in adolescents and young adults: Testing Sweester's folkloristic model. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 1997; 43 (2): 255- 270.
• 62. Allendy R. Problem kids. Kitas Publications, Istanbul, 1974.
• 63. Yavuzer H. Child psychology. Remzi Bookstore: Istanbul, 2000.
• 64. Özbey Ç. Problems in child development. İnkılap Kitabevi, Istanbul, 2006.
• 65. Young KS. Caught in the net: How to recognize the signs of internet addiction and a winning strategy for recovery. John Wiley & Sons: New York, 1998.
• 66. Bayrakçı M. Social learning theory and its application in education. SAU Faculty of Education Journal,2007; 14: 198-210.
• 67. Movsumlu A. Adaptation of the lie perception inventory in adolescents into Turkish. Master's thesis, Fatih University Institute of Social Sciences, Istanbul, 2015.
• 68. Saygılı S. Behavior Disorders in Children. Elit Publications: Istanbul, 2004.
• 69. Johansson A, Götestam KG. Internet addiction: characteristics of a questionnaire and prevalence in Norwegian youth (12–18 years). Scandinavian journal of psychology, 2004; 45 (3): 223-229.
• 70. Kalkan M, Kaygusuz C. Internet addiction. Anı Publishing: Ankara, 2013.
• 71. Steinberg L. Puberty. (2nd Edition, Figen Çok, Trans.). İmge Kitabevi Publications: Istanbul, 2007.
• 72. Griffiths M. Sex on the Internet: Observations and implications for Internet sex addiction. Journal of sex research, 2001; 38 (4): 333-342.
• 73. Shaw M, Black DW. Internet addiction: definition, assessment, epidemiology, and clinical management. CNS drugs, 2008; 22: 353-365.
• 74. Odacı H, Çıkrıkçı Ö. Differences in problematic internet use based on depression, anxiety and stress levels. Addicta: The Turkish Journal on Addictions, 2017; 4 (1): 41-61.
• 75. Lemmens JS, Bushman, BJ. Development and validation of game addiction scale for adolescent’s media psychology. Journal Cyberpsychology & Behavioral, 2009; 29 (8): 342-349.
• 76. Valkenburg PM, Peter, J. Online communication among adolescents: An integrated model of its attraction, opportunities, and risks. Journal of adolescent health, 2011; 48 (2): 121-127.
• 77. Kaess M, Durkee T, Brunner R, Carli V, Parzer P, Wasserman C, Wasserman D. Pathological Internet use among European adolescents: psychopathology and self-destructive behaviors. European child & adolescent psychiatry, 2014; 23: 1093-1102.
• 78. Tsitsika A, Janikian M, Schoenmakers TM, Tzavela EC, Ólafsson K, Wójcik S, Richardson C. Internet addictive behavior in adolescence: a cross-sectional study in seven European countries. Cyberpsychology, behavior, and social networking, 2014; 17 (8): 528-535.
• 79. Turkish Statistical Institute (TSI) Household information technology usage survey. http://www.tuik.gov.tr/PreHaberBultenleri.doid=21779 Access date: 18 January 2018.
• 80. Taylan HH, Işık M. Internet addiction among secondary and high school students in Sakarya. Turkish Studies-International Periodical for the Languages, Literature and History of Turkish or Turkic, 2015; 10 (6): 855-874.
• 81. Öner K, Arslantaş H. Internet addiction in high school students, affecting factors and relationship between internet addiction and depression risk. Journal Medical Brasovean, 2018; 1: 38-49.
• 82. Van Rooij AJ, Schoenmakers TM, Vermulst AA, Van Den Eijnden RJ, Van De Mheen D. Online video game addiction: İdentification of addicted adolescent gamers. Addiction, 2011; 106 (1): 205-212.
• 83. Poli R, Agrimi E. Internet addiction disorder: prevalence in an Italian student population. Nordic journal of psychiatry, 2012; 66 (1): 55-59.
• 84. Irmak -Yalçın A. Examination of secondary school students' digital game playing behaviors according to the health behavior interaction model. Doctoral thesis, Istanbul University Institute of Health Sciences: Istanbul, 2014.
• 85. Noyan CO, Darçin AE, Nurmedov S, Yılmaz O, Dilbaz N. Validity and reliability study of the Short Form of the Smartphone Addiction Scale in Turkish among university students. Anatolian Journal of Psychiatry, 2015; 16: 73-81.
• 86. Aktaş H, Yılmaz N. Smartphone addiction of university students in terms of loneliness and shyness factors. International Journal of Social Sciences and Educational Research, 2017; 3 (1): 85-100.
• 87. Young KS. What makes the Internet addictive: Potential explanations for pathological Internet use. 105th annual conference of the American Psychological Association, 1997; 15: 12-30.
• 88. Ceyhan AA. Predictors of adolescents' problematic internet use levels. Journal of Child and Youth Mental Health, 2011; 18 (2): 85-94.
• 89. Ceyhan E, Ceyhan AA. Developmental consequences of computer and Internet use in children and adolescents. Computer II, 2011; 165-188.
• 90. Esen BK, Gündoğdu M. The relationship between internet addiction, peer pressure and perceived social support among adolescents. The International Journal of Educational Researchers, 2010; 2 (1): 29-36.
• 91. Augner C, Hacker GW. Associations between problematic mobile phone use and psychological parameters in young adults. International journal of public health, 2012; 57: 437-441.
• 92. Cao H, Sun Y, Wan Y, Hao J, Tao F. Problematic Internet use in Chinese adolescents and its relation to psychosomatic symptoms and life satisfaction. BMC public health, 2011; 11: 1-8.
• 93. Dikeç G, Yalnız T, Bektaş B, Turhan A, Çevik S. Relationship between Smartphone addiction and loneliness among adolescents. Journal of Addiction. 2017; 18 (4): 103-111.
• 94. Ceyhan E, Ceyhan AA. An investigation of problematic Internet usage behaviors on Turkish university students. Online submission. 7th International Educational Technology Conference NorthCyprus: Near East University, 2007.
• 95. Wang L, Luo J, Gao W, Kong J. The impact of Internet use on adolescents' lifestyles: A national survey. Computers in Human Behavior, 2012; 28 (6): 2007-2013.
• 96. Thatcher A, Goolam S. Development and psychometric properties of the problematic internet use questionnaire. South African Journal of Psychology, 2005; 35 (4): 793-809.
• 97. Çevik GB, Yıldız MA. (2017). The roles of perceived social support, coping, and loneliness in predicting Internet addiction in adolescents. Journal of Education and Practice, 2017; 8 (12): 64-73.
• 98. Morahan MJ, Schumacher P. Incidence and correlates of pathological internet use among college students. Computers in Human Behavior, 2000; 16: 13-29.
• 99. Caplan SE. Problematic Internet use and psychosocial well-being: development of a theory-based cognitive–behavioral measurement instrument. Computers in human behavior, 2002; 18 (5): 553-575.
• 100. Doğan U, Tosun Nİ. The mediating effect of problematic smartphone use on social anxiety and use of social networks in high school students. Adıyaman University Social Sciences Institute Journal, 2016; (22): 99-128.
• 101. Van Deursen AJ, Bolle CL, Hegner SM, Kommers PA. Modeling habitual and addictive smartphone behavior: The role of smartphone usage types, emotional intelligence, social stress, self-regulation, age, and gender. Computers in human behavior, 2015; 45: 411-420.
• 102. Jang KS, Hwang SY, Choi JY. Internet addiction and psychiatric symptoms among Korean adolescents. Journal of School Health, 2008; 78 (3): 165-171.
• 103. Öner K, Arslantaş H. Depression. Internet addiction and loneliness relations in adolescents of high school students. Jurnal Medical Brașovean, 2016; 1: 45- 51.
• 104. Walther B, Morgenstern M, Hanewinkel R. Co-occurrence of addictive behaviors: Personality factors related to substance use, gambling and computer gaming. European addiction research, 2012; 18 (4): 167-174.
• 105. Koo C, Wati Y, Lee CC, Oh HY. Internet-addicted kids and South Korean government efforts: Boot-camp case. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 2011; 14 (6): 391-394.
• 106. Yeh YC, Ko HC, Wu JY, Cheng CP. Gender differences in relationships of actual and virtual social support to Internet addiction mediated through depressive symptoms among college students in Taiwan. Cyberpsychology & behavior, 2008; 11 (4): 485-487.
• 107. Griffiths MD, Kuss DJ, King D. Video game addiction: past, present and future. Current Psychiatry Reviews, 2012; 8 (4): 308-318.
• 108. Akın A, Usta F, Başa E, Özçelik B. Adaptation of the game addiction scale into Turkish, validity and reliability study. Turkish Journal of Social Research, 2016; 20 (1): 223-232.
• 109. Huan VS, Ang RP, Chye S. Loneliness and shyness in adolescent problematic internet users: The role of social anxiety. Child & Youth Care Forum, 2014; 43: 539- 551.
• 110. Ko CH, Yen JY, Yen CF, Chen CS, Chen CC. The association between Internet addiction and psychiatric disorder: a review of the literature. European Psychiatry, 2012; 27 (1): 1-8.
• 111. Wu X, Chen X, Han J, Meng H, Luo J, Nydegger L, Wu H. Prevalence and factors of addictive Internet use among adolescents in Wuhan, China: interactions of parental relationship with age and hyperactivity-impulsivity. PloS one, 2013; 8 (4).
• 112. Jun S, Choi E. Academic stress and Internet addiction from general strain theory framework. Computers in Human Behavior, 2015; 49: 282-287.
• 113. Yen JY, Yen CF, Chen CC, Chen SH, Ko CH. Family factors of internet addiction and substance use experience in Taiwanese adolescents. Cyberpsychology & behavior, 2007; 10 (3): 323-329.
• 114. Reed P, Vile R, Osborne LA, Romano M, Truzoli R. Problematic internet usage immune function. Plos One, 2015; 10: 1-16.
• 115. Ceyhan E. A risk factor for adolescent mental health: Internet addiction. Journal of Child and Youth Mental Health, 2008; 15 (2): 109-116.
• 116. Koca- Büyükgebiz E, Tunca MZ. A research on the effects of Internet and social media addiction on students. Alanya Academic View, 2020; 4 (1): 77-103.
• 117. Selim F. On honesty and lying: Past, present and philosophical examination. Journal of Strategic and Social Research,2022; 6 (3): 703-719.
• 118. Babacan ME. Social media usage areas and addiction relationship. Addicta: The Turkish Journal on Addictions, 2016; 3 (1): 7-28.
• 119. Hazar M. Social media addiction, a field study. Journal of Communication Theory and Research, 2011; 32: 151-175.
• 120. Yolaç E. Sapere Aude, Sola Yayınları: İstanbul, 2017.
• 121. Işık M, Kaptangil İ. Akıllı telefon bağımlılığının sosyal medya kullanımı ve beş faktör kişilik özelliği ile ilişkisi: Üniversite öğrencileri üzerinden bir araştırma. İnsan ve Toplum Bilimleri Araştırmaları Dergisi, 2018; 7 (2): 695- 717.
• 122. Batıgün- Durak A, Hasta D. İnternet bağımlılığı: Yalnızlık ve kişilerarası ilişki tarzları açısından bir değerlendirme. Anadolu Psikiyatri Dergisi, 2010; 11: 213- 219.
• 123. Ekici A. Aziz Antonius’un baştan Çıkarılması: Bir kötü alışkanlık olarak internet. Cogito, 2002; 30: 227- 235.
• 124. Arısoy Ö. İnternet bağımlılığı ve tedavisi. Psikiyatride Güncel Yaklaşımlar, 2009; 1: 55-67.
• 125. Alyanak B. İnternet bağımlılığı. Klinik Tıp Pediatri Dergisi,2016; 8 (5): 20-24.
• 126. Şenormancı Ö, Konkan R, Süngür MZ. İnternet bağımlılığı ve bilişsel davranışçı terapisi. Anadolu Psikiyatri Dergisi, 2010; 11: 261- 268 . 127. Öksüz B. Sosyal ağ sitelerinde izlenim yönetimi ve işe alım. Dijital İletişim Etkisi Uluslararası Akademik Konferansı Bildiri Kitabı, 2014; 487- 500.
• 128. Müezzin EE. İnternet bağımlılığı. Eğitim Teknolojileri Okumaları, 2016; 365- 382.