The Moderating Effect of Dynamic Capabilities and Institutional Context on Internationalization of Turkish Business Groups

Yıl 2023, Cilt: 52 Sayı: 3, 497 - 519, 30.12.2023

Tuğba Kaplan , Kader Şahin

https://doi.org/10.26650/ibr.2023.52.1069015

Öz

This study aims to investigate the outward foreign direct investment (FDI) location choices of leading Turkish business groups (TBGs) regarding internationalization motives, dynamic capabilities (DC), and institutional context. The scope of the study consists of eleven multinational TBGs with FDI exceeding 100 million USD and a two-stage mixed method was used. In the qualitative methodology, person-to-person interviews and content analysis were used for determining TBGs’ internationalization motives and DC. The quantitative methodology included an analyses that measured the effect of internationalization motives on location choice with the moderation of DC and institutional context. The qualitative stage results of the research suggested that TBGs act with market, resource, efficiency, and strategic asset-seeking motives. Formal institutions were effective in TBGs’ internationalization, and their DC consists of marketing, internationalization, and innovation capabilities. According to the quantitative stage results, institutional context moderated the effect of dynamic capabilities between internationalization motives and location choice. The importance and originality of this study were that it explored the internationalization process of business groups (BGs) and affiliates, and it investigated the effect of DC and institutional context with a combination of quantitative and qualitative approaches.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Business Groups, Dynamic Capabilities, Internationalization Motives, Emerging Country, Formal Institutions

Destekleyen Kurum

TÜBİTAK 1001 Scientific and Technological Research Projects Funding Program

Proje Numarası

215K261

Teşekkür

Authors would like to thank the Anadolu Group, Koç, Yıldız, Zorlu, TAV Airports, Borusan, Sabancı, Hayat, Alarko, Eczacıbaşı, Çelebi holdings for their contributions.

Kaynakça

• Adams, R., Bessant, J., & Phelps, R. (2006). Innovation Management Measurement: A Review. International Journal of Management Reviews, 8(1), 21-47. google scholar
• Aguilera, R. V., CrespnCladera, R., Infantes, P. M., & Pascual-Fuster, B. (2020). Business groups and inter-nationalization: effective identification and future agenda. Journal of World Business, 55(4), 1-17. google scholar
• Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. USA: Sage Publications. google scholar
• Âlvarez, I., & Marin, R. (2010). Entry modes and national systems of innovation. Journal of International Management, 16, 340-353. google scholar
• Ando, N., & Ding, D. Z. (2014). An integrative institutional approach to MNC performance in China. Asia Pacific Business Review, 20(4), 541-557. google scholar
• Arend, R. J., & Bromiley, P. (2009). Assessing the dynamic capabilities view: Spare change, everyone?. Strategic Organization, 7(1), 75-90. google scholar
• Bayraktar, Y., & Tutuncu, A. (2022). Does tax planning affect R&D expenditures? A study of Borsa Istanbul (BIST) Manufacturing Sector. Istanbul Business Research, 51(2), 563-581. google scholar
• Benito, G. R. (2015). Why and how motives (still) matter, The Multinational Business Review, 23(1), 15-24. google scholar
• Breznik, L., & Hisrich, R. D. (2014). Dynamic capabilities vs. innovation capability: Are they related?. Jo-urnal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 21(3), 368-384. google scholar
• Brouthers, K. D., & Hennart, J. F. (2007). Boundaries of the firm: Insights from international entry mode research. Journal ofManagement, 33(3), 395-425. google scholar
• Chakrabarty, S. I., & Wang, L. (2012). The long-term sustenance of sustainability practices in MNCs: A dynamic capabilities perspective of the role of R&D and internationalization. Journal ofBusiness Ethics, 110, 205-217. google scholar
• Child, J., & Rodrigues, S. B. (2005). The internationalization of Chinese firms: A case for theoretical exten-sion?. Management and Organization Review, 1 (3), 381-410. google scholar
• Chittor, R. (2009). Internationalization of emerging economy firms-need for new theorizing. Indian Journal of Industrial Relations, 45(1), 27-40. google scholar
• Collison, S. C., & Narula, R. (2014). Asset recombination in international partnerships as a source of impro-ved innovation capabilities in China. The Multinational Business Review, 22(4), 394-417. google scholar
• Colpan, A., Hikino, T., & Lincoln, J. (2010). The Oxford Handbook of Business Groups. Oxford University Press, New York. google scholar
• Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research design qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. USA: Sage Publications. google scholar
• Dau, L. A., Randall, M., & Yeung, B. Y. (2021). Business groups and the study of international business: A Coasean synthesis and extension. Journal of International Business Studies, 52, 161-211. google scholar
• Deilos, A., & Henisz, W. (2000). Japanese firms’ investment strategies in emerging economies. The Academy of Management Journal, 43(3), 305-323. google scholar
• Douma, S., George, R., & Kabir, R. (2006). Foreign and domestic ownership, business groups, and firm performance: Evidence from a large emerging market. Strategic Management Journal, 27(7), 637-657. google scholar
• Dunning, J. H. (1998). Location and the multinational enterprise: A neglected factor?. Management Interna-tional Review, 33, 7-15. google scholar
• Dunning, J. H., & Lundan, S. M. (2010). The institutional origins of dynamic capabilities in multinational enterprises. Industrial and Corporate Change, 19(4), 1225-1246. google scholar
• Egan, P. J. W. (2013). R&D in the periphery? Foreign direct investment, innovation, and institutional quality in developing countries. Business and Politics, 15(1), 1-32. google scholar
• Ellonen, H. K., Jantunen, A., & Kuivalainen, O. (2011). The role of dynamic capabilities in developing inno-vation-related capabilities. International Journal of Innovation Management, 15(3), 459-478. google scholar
• Eng, Y., & Spickett-Jones, J. (2009). An investigation of marketing capabilities and upgrading performance of manufacturers in mainland China and Hong Kong. Journal of World Business, 44, 463-75. google scholar
• Erdener, C., & Shapiro, D. M. (2005). The internationalization of Chinese family enterprises and Dunning’s eclectic MNES paradigm. Management and Organization Review, 1(3), 411-436. google scholar
• Fainshmidt, S., Pezeshkan, A., Frazier, L., Nair, A., & Markowski, E. (2016). Dynamic capabilities and organizational performance: A meta-analytic evaluation and extension. Journal of Management Studies, 53(8), 1348-1380. google scholar
• Filatotchev, I., & Piesse, J. (2009). R&D, internationalization and growth of newly listed firms: European evidence. Journal of International Business Studies, 40, 1260-76. google scholar
• Fisak, B., Bryant, A., & Klein, K. (2020). Self-focused attention as a predictor of post-event and anticipa-tory processing: Examination of a moderation model. International Journal of Cognitive Therapy, 13, 203-217. google scholar
• Gölgeci, I., & Arslan, A. (2014). Internationalization of emerging economy firms to developed economies: A discussion on institutional pressures and marketing and supply chain capabilities. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 22(7), 587-602. google scholar
• Griffith, D. A., & Harvey, M. (2001). A resource perspective of global dynamic capabilities. Journal of Inter-national Business Studies, 32(3), 597-606. google scholar
• Gürbüz, S. (2019). Sosyal bilimlerde aracı, düzenleyici ve durumsal etki analizleri (1st ed.). Ankara, Turkey: Seçkin Yayıncılık. google scholar
• Hayes, A. F. (2018). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis. New York: The Guilford Press. google scholar
• He, X., & Zhang, J. (2018). Emerging market MNCs’ cross-border acquisition completion: Institutional image and strategies. Journal of Business Research, 93, 139-150. google scholar
• Hillman, A. J., & Wan, W. P. (2005). The determinants of MNES subsidiaries’ political strategies: Evidence of institutional duality. Journal ofInternational Business Studies, 36, 322-340. google scholar
• Hsu, C., & Wang, C. (2012). Clarifying the effect of intellectual capital on performance: The mediating role of dynamic capability. British Journal ofManagement, 23(2), 179-205. google scholar
• Huang, X., & Renyong, C. (2014). Chinese private firms’ outward foreign direct investment: Does firm ow-nership and size matter?. Thunderbird International Business Review, 56(5), 393-406. google scholar
• Konara, P., & Shirodkar, V. (2018). Regulatory institutional distance and MNCs’ subsidiary performance: Climbing up vs. climbing down the institutional ladder. Journal of International Management, 24(4), 333-347. google scholar
• Kor, Y., & Mahoney, J.T. (2005) How dynamics, management, and governance of resource deployments influence firm-level performance. Strategic Management Journal, 26, 489-96. google scholar
• Luo, Y. (2000). Dynamic capabilities in international expansion. Journal of World Business, 35(4), 355-378. google scholar
• Luo, Y., & Tung, R. L. (2018). A general theory of springboard MNESs. Journal of International Business Studies, 49, 129-152. google scholar
• Michailova, S., & Zhan, W. (2015). Dynamic capabilities and innovation in MNC subsidiaries. Journal of World Business, 50, 576-583. google scholar
• Ngo, L.V., & O’Cass, A. (2012). In search of innovation and customer-related performance superiority: The role of market orientation, marketing capability, and innovation capability interactions. Journal of Pro-duct Innovation Management, 29(5), 861-877. google scholar
• Ngo, L. V., Bucic, T., Sinha, A., & Lu, V. (2019). Effective sense-and-respond strategies: Mediating roles of exploratory and exploitative innovation. Journal ofBusiness Research, 94(1), 154-161. google scholar
• North, D. (1990). Institutions, institutional change, and economic performance. New York: Cambridge Uni-versity Press. google scholar
• O’Cass, A., & Sok, P. (2012). Examining the role of within functional area resource-capability complemen-tarity in achieving customer and product-based performance outcomes. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 20, 345-63. google scholar
• Öniş, Z., & Türem, U. (2002). Entrepreneurs, democracy, and citizenship in Turkey. Comparative Politics, 34(4), 439-456. google scholar
• Perkins S. E. (2014). When does prior experience pay? Institutional experience and the multinational corpo-ration. Administrative Science Quarterly, 59(1), 145-181. google scholar
• Pinho, J. C., & Prange, C. (2016). The effect of social networks and dynamic internationalization capabilities on international performance. Journal of World Business, 51(3), 391-403. google scholar
• Pitelis, C. N., & Teece, D. (2015). Dynamic capabilities, the multinational corporation, and (Capturing co-created value from) innovation. Oxford Handbook of the Corporation. New York: Oxford University Press. google scholar
• Ramachandran, I., Clark, K., Mclver, D., & Miller S. R. (2011). Selecting state or private joint venture part-ners in emerging markets: Impact of liability of foreignness and rule of law. Advances in International Management, 24, 153-179. google scholar
• Ripolles, M., & Blesa, A. (2012). International new ventures as “Small multinationals”: The importance of marketing capabilities. Journal of World Business, 47(2), 277-287. google scholar
• Rodenbach, M. & Brettel, M. (2012). CEO experience as micro-level origin of dynamic capabilities. Mana-gement Decision, 50(4), 611-634. google scholar
• Singh, D., Oberoi, J. S., & Ahuja, I. (2013). An empirical investigation of dynamic capabilities in managing strategic flexibility in manufacturing organizations. Management Decision, 51, 1442-1461. google scholar
• Stevens, C. E., & Shenkar, O. (2012). The liability of home: Institutional friction and firm disadvantage abroad.” Institutional Theory in International Business and Management Advances in International Ma-nagement, 25, 127-148. google scholar
• Stoian, C. (2013). Extending Dunning’s investment development path: The role of home country institutio-nal determinants in explaining outward foreign direct investment. International Business Review, 22(3), 615-637. google scholar
• Tartaglione, A., & Formisano, V. (2018). A dynamic view of marketing capabilities for SMEs’ export perfor-mance. International Journal of Marketing Studies, 10(1), 126-135. google scholar
• Teece, D. J. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and micro foundations of sustainable en-terprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28(13), 1319-1350. google scholar
• Teece, D. J. (2009). Dynamic capabilities and the essence of the multinational enterprise. In Dynamic capa-bilities and strategic management, New York: Oxford University Press Inc. google scholar
• Vithessonthi, C., & Racela, O. (2016). Short-and long-run effects of internationalization and R&D intensity on firm performance. Journal of Multinational Financial Management, 34, 28-45. google scholar
• Weber, P. (1990). Basic content analysis. USA: Sage Publications. google scholar
• Winter, S. G. (2003). Understanding dynamic capabilities. Strategic Management Journal, 24, 991-995. google scholar
• Yang, M. (2015). Ownership participation of cross-border mergers and acquisitions by emerging market firms. Management Decision, 53(1), 221-246. google scholar
• Zaheer, S. (1995). Overcoming the liability of foreignness. The Academy of Management Journal, 38(2), 341-363. google scholar