Kazuo Ishiguro'nun Günden Kalanlar Romanında Stevens'ın Katarsisi

Yıl 2023, , 56 - 67, 31.05.2023

Pınar Süt Güngör

https://doi.org/10.33709/ictimaiyat.1212694

Öz

Aristoteles ve Sigmund Freud'un katarsis teorileri arasındaki ilişkinin ele alınması, edebiyattaki etkinliğinin revize edilmesi açısından önemlidir. Buradaki görüş, edebiyattaki katarsis kavramının, tüm bastırılmış duyguların, arzuların ve ıstırabın yüzeye çıktığı ve bu şekilde hepsinin tinden atıldığı bir arınma ve temizlenme sürecini temsil ettiği yönündedir. Bu çalışma, katarsis kuramı ile Kazuo Ishiguro'nun Günden Kalanlar adlı romanı arasında yinelemeli bir ilişki kurmaktadır. Bu romanda Ishiguro, yaşlanmış bir uşak olan Stevens'ın hikâyesini birbirinden kopuk dönemler ve doğrusal olmayan anlarda anlatmaktadır. Pişmanlıklarla dolu olan Stevens, kendini suçlamayı, zihinsel baskıyı, nesnellikten yoksunluğu ve ahlaki, entelektüel ve etik anlamda parçalanmayı ortaya koymaktadır. Katarsis üzerine Aristotelesçi ve Freudcu görüşler, Stevens'ın durumunda belleğin rolünün arınma için fark edilebilir bir örnek teşkil edebileceğine tanıklık etmektedir. Tarihe dayalı bir kitap olarak değer gören Günden Kalanlar'ın marjinal bir bakış açısıyla "anlatma" ve "serbest bırakma" arasındaki gerçek ilişkiyi örneklediği doğrulanmaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Katarsis, Aristo, Freud, Kazuo Ishiguro, Günden Kalanlar

Stevens’ Catharsis in The Remains of the Day by Kazuo Ishiguro

Öz

Consideration of the relationship between Aristotle’s and Sigmund Freud’s catharsis theories is significant to revise its efficacy in literature. The view is that the concept of catharsis in literature represents a process of purification and clearing, in which all repressed emotions, desires, and anguish come to the surface and, in this way, they are all eliminated from the psyche. This study establishes a recursive relationship between catharsis theory and Kazuo Ishiguro’s novel, The Remains of the Day. In this novel, Ishiguro narrates the story of an aging butler, Stevens, in disjointed periods and sporadic moments. Being full of regrets, Stevens reveals self-accustaions, mental repression, lack of objectivity, and fragmentation in moral, intellectual, and ethical senses. The Aristotelian and Freudian views on catharsis testify that the role of memory in Stevens’ case may form a discernible sample for purification. It has been confirmed that, being celebrated as a historically grounded book, The Remains of the Day exemplifies the true correlation between ‘telling’ and ‘release’ from a marginalized point of view.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Catharsis, Aristotle, Freud, Kazuo Ishiguro, The Remains of the Day

Kaynakça

• Alex, P.C. & Adetuyi, C. A. (2019). The tragedy of repressed emotions: A modernist reading of Kazuo Ishiguro’s the remains of the day. Bulletin of Advanced English Studies, 3 (1), 60-69.
• Burke, K. (1959). On catharsis, or resolution. The Kenyon Review, 21 (3), 337-375.
• Donnelly, M.C. (1953). Freud and literary criticism. College English, 15 (3), 155-158.
• Emara, M. A. M. (2015). Kazuo Ishiguro’s the remains of the day: A historiographical approach. English Language and Literature Studies, 5 (4), 8-20.
• Furst, L. R. (2007). Memory’s fragile power in Kazuo Ishiguro’s “remains of the day” and W. G. Sebald’s “Max Ferber.” Contemporary Literature, 48 (4), 530-553.
• Gardner, C. (1985). Catharsis from Aristotle to Mafika Gwala. Theoria: A Journal of Social and Political Theory, No. 64 (May 1985), 29-41.
• Golden, L. (1962). Catharsis. Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association, Vol. 93, 51-60.
• Golden, L. (1973). The purgation theory of catharsis. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 31 (4), 473-479.
• Holmes, F. M. (2005). Realism, dreams and the unconscious in the novels of Kazuo Ishiguro. In J. Acheson (Ed.), The contemporary British novel since 1980 (11-22). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
• Ishiguro, K. (1989). The remains of the day. London: Faber and Faber.
• Kearney, R. (2007). Narrating pain: The power of catharsis. Paragraph, 30 (1), 51-66.
• Keesey, D. (1979). On some recent interpretations of catharsis. The Classical World, 72 (4), 193-205.
• Khalaf, M. F. H. (2017). Reconstructing the past as a means of rationalizing the present: A study of Kazuo Ishiguro’s the remains of the day. International Journal of Applied Linguistics&English Literature, 6 (4), 173-183.
• Lang, J. M. (2000). Public memory, private history: Kazuo Ishiguro’s the remains of the day. CLIO, 29(2), 1-12.
• Lawtoo, N. (2018). Violence and the mimetic unconscious (part one): The cathartic hypothesis: Aristotle, Freud, Girard. Contagion: Journal of Violence, Mimesis, and Culture, Vol. 25, 159-192.
• McCombe, J. P. (2002). The end of (Anthony) Eden: Ishiguro’s “the remains of the day” and midcentury Anglo- American tensions. Twentieth Century Literature, 48 (1), 77-99.
• Phelan, J. & Martin, P. (1999). The lessons of Weymouth: Homodiegesis, unreliability, ethics, and the remains of the day. In David Herman (Ed.), Narratologies: New perspectives on narrative analysis (88-109), Columbus: The Ohio State University Press.
• Tamaya, M. (1992). Ishiguro’s “remains of the day”: The empire strikes back. Modern Language Studies, 22 (2), 45-56.
• Tuairisc, E. O. (2003). Catharsis. Irish Pages, 1 (2), 174-180.
• Westerman, M. (2004). Is the butler home? Narrative and split subject in “the remains of the day.” Mosaic: An Interdisciplinary Critical Journal, 37 (3), 157-170.