Adaptation of the Leisure Crafting Scale into Turkish: The Validity and Reliability Study

Yıl 2022, Cilt: 9 Sayı: 1, 79 - 92, 28.04.2022

Lütfi Sürücü , Şenay Sahil Ertan

https://doi.org/10.17336/igusbd.717930

Öz

Although, there are studies about leisure crafting in the literature, many of them are qualitative studies. Leisure crafting scale was developed by Petrou and Bakker (2016) to measure it in a quantitative way. The scale developed by Petrou and Bakker (2016) was not previously adapted to Turkish. In this direction, the aim of the study is to adapt and translate leisure crafting scale developed by Petrou and Bakker (2016) into Turkish. Thus, a questionnaire was applied to 391 students in Istanbul who were studying at one of the private universities. The validity and reliability of the scale were tested according to the obtained data. Findings showed that, leisure crafting scale is a reliable and valid measurement tool and it can be used in the sample research groups in Turkey.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Leisure Crafting Scale, Reliability, Validity, Adaptation, University Students

Boş Zaman Becerikliliği Ölçeğinin Türkçeye Uyarlanması: Geçerlik ve Güvenirlik Çalışması

Öz

Boş zaman becerikliliğine yönelik literatürde birçok çalışma olmakla birlikte bu araştırmaların çoğu nitel çalışmalardan oluşmaktadır. Petrou ve Bakker (2016) tarafından geliştirilen ölçekle beraber boş zaman becerikliliği nicel olarak da ölçmek mümkün olmuştur. Petrou ve Bakker (2016) tarafından geliştirilen ölçek daha öncesinde Türkçeye uyarlanmamıştır. Bu doğrultuda, çalışmanın amacı ise Petrou ve Bakker (2016) tarafından geliştirilen boş zaman becerikliliği ölçeğini Türkçeye uyarlamak ve çevirmektir. Bu maksatla İstanbul’da özel üniversitelerde okuyan 391 öğrenciye anket uygulanmıştır. Ölçeğin geçerliliği ve güvenilirliği elde edilen verilere göre test edilmiştir. Bulgular, boş zaman becerikliliği ölçeğinin güvenilir ve geçerli bir ölçüm aracı olduğunu ve Türkiye'deki örnek araştırma gruplarında kullanılabileceğini göstermiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Boş Zaman Becerikliliği Ölçeği, Güvenilirlik, Geçerlik, Uyarlama, Üniversite Öğrencileri

Kaynakça

• BAUMEISTER, R. F., & LEARY, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117(3), 497.
• BERG, J. M., WRZESNIEWSKI, A., & DUTTON, J. E. (2010). Perceiving and responding to challenges in job crafting at different ranks: When proactivity requires adaptivity. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31(2‐3), 158-186.
• BRUNING, P. F., & CAMPION, M. A. (2018). A role–resource approach–avoidance model of job crafting: A multimethod integration and extension of job crafting theory. Academy of Management Journal, 61(2), 499-522.
• BYRNE, B. M. (2013). Structural equation modeling with Mplus: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. Routledge.
• CALDWELL, L. L. (2005). Leisure and health: Why is leisure therapeutic?. British Journal of Guidance & Counselling, 33(1), 7-26.
• CRONBACH, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16(3), 297-334.
• DE BLOOM, J., VAZIRI, H., TAY, L., & KUJANPÄÄ, M. (2020). An identity-based integrative needs model of crafting: Crafting within and across life domains. Journal of Applied Psychology.
• DE HAUW, S., & GREENHAUS, J. H. (2015). Building a sustainable career: The role of work–home balance in career decision making. In Handbook of research on sustainable careers. Edward Elgar Publishing.
• DUMAZEDIER, J., & RIPERT, A. (1966). Leisure and culture. Edic. du seuil, Paris.
• FORNELL, C., & LARCKER, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50.
• FRITSCH T., SMYTH K. A, DEBANNE S. M, PETOT G. J., & FRIEDLAND R. P. (2005) Participation in noveltyseeking leisure activities and Alzheimer’s disease. Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry and Neurology 18(3), 134–141.
• GRANT, B. C. & KLUGE, MA (2012). Leisure and physical well-being. Leisure and Aging: Theory and Practice, 129-142.
• GREENHAUS, J. H., & ALLEN, T. D. (2011). Work–family balance: A review and extension of the literature.
• HAIR, J. F., BLACK, W. C., BABIN, B. J., ANDERSON, R. E., & TATHAM, R. L. (1998). Multivariate Data Analysis (Vol. 5, No. 3, pp. 207-219). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice hall.
• HAMBLETON, R. K., & BOLLWARK, J. (1991). Adapting Tests for Use in Different Cultures: Technical Issues and Methods.
• HOBFOLL, S. E. (2001). The influence of culture, community, and the nested‐self in the stress process: advancing conservation of resources theory. Applied Psychology, 50, 337-421.
• HOBFOLL, S. E. (2002). Social and psychological resources and adaptation. Review of General Psychology, 6(4), 307-324.
• KAISER, H. F. (1960). The application of electronic computers to factor analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20(1), 141-151.
• KELLY, C. M., STRAUSS, K., ARNOLD, J., & STRIDE, C. (2019). The relationship between leisure activities and psychological resources that support a sustainable career: The role of leisure seriousness and work-leisure similarity. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 103340.
• KETTERIDGE, A., & BOSHOFF, K. (2008). Exploring the reasons why adolescents participate in physical activity and identifying strategies that facilitate their involvement in such activity. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 55(4), 273-282. doi:10.1111/j.1440-1630.2007.00704.x
• KLINE, R. B. (2015). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. Guilford publications.
• PASSMORE, A., & FRENCH, D. (2001). Development and Administration of a Measure to Assess Adolescents' participation In Leisure Activities. Adolescence, 36(141), 67-67.
• PETROU, P., & BAKKER, A. B. (2016). Crafting one’s leisure time in response to high job strain. Human Relations, 69(2), 507-529.
• PETROU, P., BAKKER, A. B., & VAN DEN HEUVEL, M. (2017). Weekly job crafting and leisure crafting: Implications for meaning‐making and work engagement. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 90(2), 129-152.
• RYAN R. M. & DECI E. L. (2000) Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1): 68–78.
• SIRGY, M. J., UYSAL, M., & KRUGER, S. (2017). Towards a benefits theory of leisure well-being. Applied Research in Quality of Life, 12(1), 205-228. doi:10.1007/s11482-016-9482-7.
• SNIR R. & HARPAZ I. (2002) Work-leisure relations: Leisure-orientation and the meaning of work. Journal of Leisure Research, 34(2): 178–203.
• SONNENTAG S. and FRITZ C. (2007). The Recovery Experience Questionnaire: Development and validation of a measure for assessing recuperation and unwinding from work. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 12(3): 204–221.
• STEBBINS R. A. (2001) Serious leisure. Society 38(4): 53–57. tenBrummelhuis LL and Bakker AB (2012) A resource perspective on the work–home interface: The work–home resources model. American Psychologist, 67(7): 545–556.
• SURUCU, L., MASLAKCİ, A., & SESEN, H. (2020). Zorunlu vatandaşlık davranışı ölçeğinin Türkçeye uyarlanması: Geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Business and Economics Research Journal, 11(2), 571-579.
• TABACHNICK, B. G., FIDELL, L. S., & ULLMAN, J. B. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (Vol. 5). Boston, MA: Pearson.
• TIMS, M., & BAKKER, A. B. (2010). Job crafting: Towards a new model of individual job redesign. SA Journal of Industrial Psychology, 36(2), 1-9.
• VOGEL, R. M., RODELL, J. B., & LYNCH, J. W. (2016). Engaged and productive misfits: How job crafting and leisure activity mitigate the negative effects of value incongruence. Academy of Management Journal, 59(5), 1561-1584.
• WESSELS, B., KESSELRING, S., & PLAUT, P. (2019). 2 How to define social network in the context of mobilities. Digital Social Networks and Travel Behaviour in Urban Environments, 27.
• WRZESNIEWSKI, A., & DUTTON, J. E. (2001). Crafting a job: Revisioning employees as active crafters of their work. Academy of Management Review, 26(2), 179-201.