Using a Transactional Model and Thematic Analysis to Evaluate a Minority Male Student Success Initiative to Improve Participants’ Campus Experience and Retention

Yıl 2018, , 713 - 730, 16.12.2018

Kathryn Todd Bliss Richard Mensah Kelly D. Bradley Alexis Rodgers Falynn Thompson

https://doi.org/10.21449/ijate.478278

Öz

While the national discourse about the call for increased effort to help strengthen retention and graduation rates among minority college students seems to be losing its vigor, concerned citizens continue to find other means to sustain the momentum. Similarly, the office for institutional diversity at a public southeastern university established a minority male student success initiative in 2010 to help improve the educational experience of its members. The evaluators’ objectives for this transactional, formative, and qualitative evaluation were to understand this initiative from the different vantage points of its stakeholders, and to determine if they were satisfied thus far with its trajectory. The evaluators found that while some stakeholders held similar perspectives, others differed in their views on the initiative’s goal(s). The majority, however, expressed satisfaction with the initiative's direction at the time of the evaluation.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Evaluation, Minority students, Higher education, Transactional model

Using a Transactional Model and Thematic Analysis to Evaluate a Minority Male Student Success Initiative to Improve Participants’ Campus Experience and Retention

Öz

While the national discourse about the call for
increased effort to help strengthen retention and graduation rates among
minority college students seems to be losing its vigor, concerned citizens continue
to find other means to sustain the momentum. Similarly, the office for institutional diversity at
a public southeastern university established a minority male
student success initiative
in 2010 to help improve the educational experience of its members. The evaluators’
objectives for this transactional,
formative, and qualitative evaluation
were to understand this initiative from the different vantage points
of its stakeholders, and to determine if they were satisfied thus far with its trajectory. The evaluators found that while some
stakeholders held similar
perspectives, others differed
in their views on the initiative’s goal(s). The majority, however, expressed
satisfaction with the initiative's
direction at the time of the evaluation.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Evaluation, Minority students, Higher education, Transactional model

Kaynakça

• Coffey, A., & Atkinson, P. (1996). Concepts and coding. In Making sense of qualitative data: Complementing research strategies, pp. 26-53. SAGE Publications: Thousand Oaks, CA.
• CUNY Black Male Initiative. (2005). http://www1.cuny.edu/sites/bmi/wp-content/uploads/sites/24/page-assets/about/CUNY_BMI_Overview.pdf
• Ford, D. Y. (2012). Culturally different students in special education: Looking backward to move forward. Exceptional Children, 78(4), 391-405.
• Glesne, C. (2006). Being there: Developing understanding through participant observation. In Becoming qualitative evaluators: An introduction (3rd Ed.), pp. 49-78. Pearson Educational: New York, NY.
• Gurin, P., Dey, E., Hurtado, S., & Gurin, G. (2002). Diversity and education: Theory and impact on educational outcomes. Harvard Educational Review, 72(3), 330-366.
• House, E. R. (1978). Assumptions underlying evaluation models. Educational Researcher, 7(3), 4-12.
• Initiative Leadership at PSEU. (2013-01-22). Electronic mailing list message. Male Scholars Mentoring Program.
• Jackson, B. A. (2012). Bonds of brotherhood: Emotional and social support among college Black men. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 642(1), 61-71. doi: 10.1177/0002716212438204.
• Jones, L., Castellanos, J., & Cole, D. (2002). Examining the ethnic minority student experience at predominantly White institutions: A case study. Journal of Hispanic Higher Education, 1(1), 19-39.
• Kim, M. M., & Conrad, C. F. (2006). The impact of historically Black colleges and universities on the academic success of African-American students. Research in Higher Education, 47(4), 399-427.
• Lascher, E. L. (2008). Retaining Latino and non-Latino college students: Key similarities and differences. A report for the Serna Center and the Institute of Higher Education Leadership and Policy, http://www.csus.edu/sernacenter/assets/publications/retention.pdf. Accessed March 06, 2013.
• Lewis, W. D., Oliver, S. T, & Burris, J. L. (2011). A work in progress: The lived experiences of Black male undergraduates at one predominantly White university. Kentucky Journal of Higher Education Policy and Practice, 1(1), 1-30.
• McGee, E. B., & Martin, D. B. (2011). You would not believe what I have to go through to prove my intellectual value! Stereotype management among academically successful Black mathematics and engineering students. American Educational Research Journal, 48(6), 1347–89. doi: 10.3102/0002831211423972.
• Mishler, E. G. (2003). Representing discourse: The rhetoric of transcription. In Lincoln Y. & Denzin N. (eds.), Turning Points in Qualitative Research: Tying Knots in a Handkerchief, pp. 297-326. Alta Mira Press: Walnut Creek.
• Office of Diversity and Inclusion-UCO. (2014). Black Male Initiative and Fellows Program. University of Central Oklahoma. http://sites.uco.edu/student-life/diversity/diversity-initiatives/black-male-initiative.asp
• Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publication.
• PSEU public relations representative. Document found on PSEU’s website (2012). Accessed March 15, 2013.
• Redden, E. (2009, July 14). Reaching Black men. Inside Higher Education. Accessed March 6, 2013. http://www.insidehighered.com/news/2009/07/14/blackmale
• Rippey, R. M. (1973). The nature of transactional evaluation. In Rippey R. M. (ed.), Studies in transactional evaluation, pp. 8-13. McCutchan Publishing Corporation: Berkeley, CA.
• Roderick, M. (2003). What’s happening to the boys? Early high school experiences and school outcomes among African American male adolescents in Chicago. Urban Education, 38(5), 538-607. doi: 10.1177/0042085903256221.
• Santos, S. J., & Reigadas, E. T. (2002). Latinos in higher education: An evaluation of a university faculty mentoring program. Journal of Hispanic Higher Education, 1(1), 40- 50.
• Seidman, A. (2005). Minority student retention: Resources for practitioners. In Gaither, G H (ed.), Minority retention: What works?, pp. 7-24. Jossey-Bass: San Francisco, CA.
• Spitzberg, I. J., & Thorndike, V. V. (1992). Creating community on college campuses. State University of New York Press: Albany, NY.
• Stake, R. E. (1973). Program evaluation, particularly responsive evaluation. New Trends in Evaluation, keynote presentation at a conference at the Institute of Education, Göteborg University, Gothenburg, Sweden, pp. 1 - 15. http://education.illinois.edu/circe/Publications/Responsive_Eval.pdf, accessed April 30, 2014.
• Strayhorn, T. L. (2010). When race and gender collide: Social and cultural capital’s influence on the academic achievement of African American and Latino males. The Review of Higher Education, 33(3), 307-332. doi: 10.1353/rhe.0.0147.
• Teddlie, C., & Yu, F. (2007). Mixed methods sampling: A typology with examples. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(1), 77-100.
• Thile, E. L., & Matt, G. E. (1995). The ethnic mentor undergraduate program: A brief description and preliminary findings. Journal of Multicultural Counseling and Development, 23(2), 116-126.
• Thompson, R. A. (1995). What is social support? In Preventing child maltreatment through social support: A critical analysis, pp. 43-65. Sage Publications: Thousand Oaks, CA. Tinto, V. (1987). Leaving college: Rethinking the causes and cures of student attrition. University of Chicago Press: Chicago, IL.
• University System of Georgia’s African - American Male Initiative. (2002). https://www.usg.edu/assets/aami/files/AAMIAssessmentBrochure.pdf