Spatial Models for Identifying Factors in Student Academic Achievement

Yıl 2020, , 735 - 752, 20.12.2020

Filiz Akbaş-yeşilyurt , Hüseyin Koçak , Muhammet Ensar Yeşilyurt

https://doi.org/10.21449/ijate.722460

Cited By: 2

Öz

In the literature, estimation results of the determinants of academic achievement are controversial. There may be several reasons for these controversial results, including sample or cultural differences. Conversely, these results may arise from ignoring certain important facts, such as an interaction effect. Some studies do not consider interactions among students, and some studies may not use effective models. Surprisingly, very few studies have focused on student academic achievement using spatial models, which may be one of the most suitable models for testing interaction effects. In this study, we estimated student achievement using spatial models and a data sets from Turkey. We observed an interaction between students who live in the same neighbourhood and found evidence of an interaction among students in terms of their achievement based on a spatial error model.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Student achievement, Interaction, Spatial models

Kaynakça

• Aaronson, D. (1998). Using sibling data to estimate the impact of neighborhoods on children’s educational outcomes. Journal of Human Resources, 33, 915 946. https://doi.org/10.2307/146403
• Adejoro, O. E. (2016), Does location also matter? A spatial analysis of social achievements of young south Australians [Unpublished Master Thesis]. Department of Physical Geography and Ecosystem Science, Lund University, Lund, 2016.
• Akerhielm, K. (1995). Does class size matter?. Economics of Education Review, 14(3), 229-241. https://doi.org/10.1016/0272-7757(95)00004-4
• Akerlof, G. A. (1997). Social distance and social decisions. Econometrica, 65(5), 1005-1027. https://doi.org/10.2307/2171877
• Anselin, L. (1988). Spatial Econometrics: Methods and Models. Springer Science & Business Media.
• Aslund, O., Edin, Per-Anders, Fredriksson, P., & Grönqvist, H. (2011). Peers, neighborhoods, and immigrant student achievement: evidence from a placement policy. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 3(2), 67-95. https://doi.org/10.1257/app.3.2.67
• Bayer, P., Hjalmarsson, R., & Pozen, D. (2009). Building criminal capital behind bars: Peer effects in juvenile corrections. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 124(1), 105–147. https://doi.org/10.3386/w12932
• Bernheim, B. D. (1994). A theory of conformity. Journal of Political Economy, 102, 841-877. https://doi.org/10.1086/261957
• Blatchford, P., & Mortimore, P. (1994). The issue of class size for young children in schools: What can we learn from the research?. Oxford Review of Education, 20(4), 411-428. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305498940200402
• Booth, A., & Kee, H. (2006). Birth order matters: The effect of family size and birth order on educational attainment. Journal of Population Economics, 22(2), 367 397. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00148-007-0181-4
• Brannstrom, L. (2008). Making their mark: The effects of neighbourhood and upper secondary school on educational achievement. European Sociological Review, 24(4), 463–478. https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcn013
• Bray, M. (2013). Shadow education: comparative perspectives on the expansion and implications of private supplementary tutoring. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 77(22), 412-420. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.03.096
• Brock, W. A., & Durlauf, S. N. (2001). Discrete choice with social interactions. The Review of Economic Studies, 68(2), 235-260. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-937X.00168
• Bronfenbrenner, U. (1994). Ecological models of human development. Readings on the Development of Children, 2(1), 37-43.
• Brooks-Gunn, J., Duncan, G. J., Klebanov, P. K., & Sealand, N. (1993). Do neighborhoods influence child and adolescent development?. American Journal of Sociology, 99, 353-95. https://doi.org/10.1086/230268
• Coleman, J. S. (1961). The adolescent society: the social life of the teenager and its impact on education. Free Press of Glencoe.
• Correa, H. (1993). An economic analysis of class size and achievement in education. Education Economics, 1(2), 129-35. https://doi.org/10.1080/09645299300000019
• Dietz, R. D. (2002). The estimation of neighborhood effects in the social sciences: An interdisciplinary approach. Social Science Research, 31(4), 539 575. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0049-089X(02)00005-4
• Dincer, M. A. & Uysal, G. (2010). The determinants of student achievement in Turkey, International Journal of Educational Development, 30(6), 592 598. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2010.05.005
• Dubow, E.F., Boxer, P., & Huesmann, L. R. (2009). Long-term effects of parents’ education on children’s educational and occupational success: Mediation by family interactions, child aggression, and teenage aspirations, Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 55(3), 224-249. https://doi.org/10.1353/mpq.0.0030
• Duncan, G. J., Yeung, W. J., Brooks-Gunn, J., & Smith, J. R. (1998). How much does childhood poverty affect the life chances of children?. American Sociological Review, 63(3), 406-423. https://doi.org/10.2307/2657556
• Duncan, G., & Magnuson, K. (2005). Can family socioeconomic resources account for racial and ethnic test score gaps?. Future of Children, 15(1), 35 54. https://doi.org/10.1353/foc.2005.0004
• Duncan, G J. (1994). Families and neighbors as sources of disadvantage in the schooling decisions of black and white adolescents. American Journal of Education, 103(1), 20-53. https://doi.org/10.1086/444088
• Elhorst, J. P. (2010). Dynamic panels with endogenous interaction effects when T is small, Regional Science and Urban Economics, 40(5), 272 282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2010.03.003
• Elhorst, J. P. (2013). Spatial Econometrics: From Cross-Sectional Data to Spatial Panels. Springer-Verlag.
• Elhorst, P., Zandberg, E., & de Haan, J. (2013). The impact of interaction effects among neighbouring countries on financial liberalization and reform: A dynamic spatial panel data approach. Spatial Economic Analysis, 8(3), 293 313. https://doi.org/10.1080/17421772.2012.760136
• Ertur, C., & Koch, W. (2007). Growth, technological interdependence and spatial externalities: Theory and evidence. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 22(6), 1033 1062. https://doi.org/10.1002/jae.963
• Evans, W. N., Oates, W. E., & Schwab, R. M. (1992). Measuring peer group effects: A study of teenage behavior. The Journal of Political Economy, 100(5), 966-991. https://doi.org/10.1086/261848
• Farber, A., Huu Tu, N., Tran, D., & Vuong, Q. H. (2008). The financial storms in Vietnam's transition economy: A reasoning on the 1991-2008 period. Working Papers CEB, ULB.
• Fisher, S., Frazer, N. &Murray, K. (1986). Homesickness and health in boarding school children. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 6(1), 35 47. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-4944(86)80033-0
• Fowler, M. G., Davenport, M. G., & Garg, R. (1992). School functioning of US children with asthma. Pediatrics, 90(6), 939-944.
• Gibbons, S., Silva, S., & Weinhardt, F. (2013). Everybody needs good neighbours? Evidence from students’ outcomes in England. The Economic Journal, 123(571), 831-874. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecoj.12025
• Gould, E., Lavy, V., & Paserman, S. D. (2009). Sixty years after the magic carpet ride: The long-run effect of the early childhood environment on social and economic outcomes. Review of Economic Studies, 78(3), 938-973. https://doi.org/10.3386/w14884
• Hanushek, E. A. (1997). Assesing the effect of school resources on student performace: An update. Educational Evoluation and Policy Analysis, 19(2), 141 164. https://doi.org/10.3102/01623737019002141
• Hanushek, E. A. (1979). Conceptual and empirical issues in the estimation of educational production functions. Journal of Human Resources, 14(3), 351 88. https://doi.org/10.2307/145575
• Heck, R. H. (2009). Teacher effectiveness and student achievement: Investigating a multilevel cross-classified model. Journal of Education Administration, 7(22), 227-249. https://doi.org/10.1108/09578230910941066
• Hopland, A. O. (2012). School Building Conditions and Student Achievement: Norwegian Evidence. Working Paper No. 2/2012, Department of Economics, Norwegian University of Science and Technology.
• Hoxby, C. M. (2000). Peer Effects in the Classroom: Learning from Gender and Race Variation, NBER Working Paper no. 7867, National Bureau of Economic Research.
• Hsieh, C. S., & Lin, X (2019), Social Interactions and Social Preferences in Social Networks, Working Paper.
• https://spatial-panels.com/software/, (15.06.2018)
• https://www.spatial-econometrics.com/, (15.06.2018)
• Huesman, R L. Jr, Brown, A. K., Lee, G., Kellogg, J. P., & Radcliffe, P. M. (2007). Modeling Student Academic Success: Does Usage of Campus Recreation Facilities Make a Difference?. Retrieved from the University of Minnesota Digital Conservancy, http://hdl.handle.net/11299/159766, (30.03.2017)
• Jensen, B., & Harris, M. N. (2008). Neighbourhood measures: quantifying the effects of neighbourhood externalities. The Economic Record, 84(264), 68 81. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4932.2008.00447.x
• Johnson, R. C., Nagoshi, C. T., Ahren, F. M., Wilson, J. R., DeFries, J. C., & McClearn, G. E. (1983). Family background, cognitive ability, and personality as predictors of educational and occupational attainment. Social Biology, 30(1), 86 100. https://doi.org/10.1080/19485565.1983.9988519
• Kang, C. (2007). Does Money Matter? The Effect of Private Educational Expenditures on Academic Performance, Departmental Working Papers, National University of Singapore, Department of Economics.
• Karweit, N., & Slavin, R. E. (1981). Measurement and Modelling Choices in Studies of Time and Learning. American Educational Research Journal, 18(2), 157 171. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312018002157
• Lavy, V., & Schlosser, A. (2011). Mechanisms and impacts of gender peer effects at school. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 3(2), 1 33. https://doi.org/10.1257/app.3.2.1
• LeSage, J. P. (2014). Spatial econometric panel data model specification: A Bayesian approach. Spatial Statistics, 9, 122-145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spasta.2014.02.002
• LeSage, J. P., & Pace, K. (2014). The Biggest Myth in Spatial Econometrics. Econometrics, 2 (4), 217–249. https://doi.org/10.3390/econometrics2040217
• LeSage, J. P. (2015). Software for Bayesian cross section and panel spatial model comparison. Journal of Geographical Systems, 17(4), 297-310. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10109-015-0217-3
• MacGowenn, R. S. (2007). The Impact of School Facilities on Student Achievement, Attendance, Behavior, Completion Rate and Teacher Turnover Rate in Selected Texas High Schools, PhD Thesis, Texas A&M Universities.
• Manski, C. F. (2000). Economic analysis of social interactions. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 14(3), 115-136. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.14.3.115
• Manski, C. M. (1993). Identification of endogenous social effects: The reflection problem. Review of Economic Studies, 60(3), 531-542. https://doi.org/10.2307/2298123
• Matlock, K., Song, J. J. & Goering, C. Z. (2014). Spatial dependency and contextual effects on academic achievement, International Journal of Educational Administration and Policy Studies, 6(3), 32-42. https://doi.org/10.5897/IJEAPS2013.0327
• Mayer, S., & Jencks, C. (1989). Growing up in poor neighborhoods: How much does it matter? Science, 243(4897), 1441–1445. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.243.4897.1441
• Maylor, U., Glass, K., Issa, T, Kuyok, K. A., Minty, S. Rose, Anthea. Ross, Alistair, Tanner, E., Finch, S., Low, N., Taylor, E., Tipping, S., Purdon, (2010). Impact of Supplementary Schools on Pupils’ Attainment: An Investigation into what Factors Contribute to Educational Improvements, Research Reports, London: DSCF, (12.07.2018)
• Mizruchi, M. S., & Neuman, E. J. (2008). The effect of density on the level of bias in the network autocorrelation model. Social Networks, 30(3), 190 200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2008.02.002
• Moffitt, R. A. (2001). Policy Interventions, Low-level Equilibria, and Social Interactions, in Social Dynamics, edited by S. Durlauf and P. Young. MIT Press.
• Murillo, F. J., & Román, M. (2011). School infrastructure and resources do matter: analysis of the incidence of school resources on the performance of Latin American students. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 22(1), 29 50. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2010.543538
• Needham, B. L., Crosnoe, R., & Muller, C. (2004). Academic failure in secondary school: The inter-related role of health problems and educational context. Social Problems, 51(4), 569-586. https://doi.org/10.1525/sp.2004.51.4.569
• Niehaus, K., Rudasill, K. M., & Rakes, C. R. (2012). A longitudinal study of school connectedness and academic outcomes across sixth grade. Journal of School Psychology, 50(4), 443-460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2012.03.002
• O’Neill, D., & Oates, A. (2001). The impact of school facilities on student achievement, behavior, attendance, and teacher turnover rate in central texas middle schools. Educational Facility Planner, 36(3), 14-22.
• Paelinck, J., & Klaassen, L. (1979). Spatial Econometrics. Saxon House.
• Parke, M. (2003). Are Married Parents Really Better for Children? What Research Says About The Effects of Family Structure On Child Well-Being. Research Paper, Center for Law and Social Policy.
• Reardon, S. F. (2011). The Widening Socioeconomic Status Achievement Gap: New Evidence and Possible Explanations. In Whither opportunity? Rising Inequality and the Uncertain Life Chances of Low-Income Children, R. J. Murnane and G. J. Duncan (Eds.), Russell Sage Foundation.
• Shapson, S. M., Wright, E. N., Eason, G., & Fitzgerald, J. (1980). An experimental study of the effects of class size. American Educational Research Journal, 17(2), 141-152. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312017002141
• Shaw, S. R., Gomes, P., Polotskaia, A. & Jankowska, A. M. (2015). The relationship between student health and academic performance: Implications for school psychologists. School Psychology International, 36(2), 115-134. https://doi.org/10.1177/0143034314565425
• Spernak, S. M., Schottenbauer, M. A., Ramey, S. L., & Ramey, C. T. (2006). Child health and academic achievement among former head start children. Children and Youth Services Review, 28(10), 1251-1261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2006.01.006
• Stakhovych, A., & Bijmolt, T. H. A. (2009). Specification of spatial models: A simulation study on weights Matrices. Regional Science, 88(2), 389-408. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1435-5957.2008.00213.x
• Stipek, D. (1998). Motivations to Learn: From Theory to Practice. 4th edition, Allyn and Bacon.
• Sykes, B. (2009). Spatial Order and Social Position: Neighbourhoods, Schools and Educational Inequalit. [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Amsterdam Institute for Social Science Research
• Sykes, B., & Kuyper, H. (2009). Neighbourhood effects on youth educational achievement in the netherlands: Can effects be identified and do they vary by student background characteristics?. Environment and Planning A, 41, 2417 2436. https://doi.org/10.1068/a41255
• Tansel, A., & Bircan, F. (2006). Demand for education in Turkey: A Tobit Analysis of Private Tutoring Expenditures in Turkey. Economics of Education Review, 25, 303-313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2005.02.003
• Tansel, A. (2002). Determinants of Schooling Attainment for boys and girls in Turkey. Economics of Education Review, 21(5), 455-470. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-7757(01)00028-0
• Tansel, A., (2013). Supplemantary Education in Turkey: Recent Developments and Future Prospects, Koç University-TUSIAD Economic Research Forum Working Paper Series.
• Todd, P. E., & Wolpin, K. I. (2003). On the specification and estimation of the production function for cognitive achievement. Economic Journal, 113(485), F3-F33. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0297.00097
• Wang, J., & Li, B. (2018). Supplementary education, student development and education equity: Evidence from primary schools in Beijing-China. Education Economics, 26(5), 459-487. https://doi.org/10.1080/09645292.2018.1460653
• Way, N., Reddy, R., & Rhodes, J. (2007). Students' perceptions of school climate during the middle school years: Associations’ with trajectories of psychological and behavioral adjustment. American Journal of Community Psychology, 40, 194 213. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10464-007-9143-y
• Weinhart, F. (2014). Social housing, neighborhood quality and student performance. Journal of Urban Economics, 82, 12-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jue.2014.06.001
• Winship, C., Harding, D. J., Gennetian, L., Sanbonmatsu, L., & Kling, J. (2011). Unpacking Neighborhood Influences on Education Outcomes: Setting the Stage for Future Research. In: Opportunity? Rising Inequality, Schools and Children’s Life Chances; Edited by Duncan G and Whither, M. R.
• Yaylalı, M., Kızıltan, A., Oktay, E., Doğan, E. M., Özer, H., Naralan, A., Özen, Ü., Özçomak, M. S., Akan, Y., & Aktürk, E. (2006). Üniversite Gençliğinin Gelir-Harcama Kalıpları Araştırması. [Survey of Income-Spending Patterns of University Students]. Ataturk University Publication, Erzurum
• Yesilyurt, M. E., & Say, D. (2016). Factors affecting success of high school students in Turkey. Ege Academic Review, 16(3), 541-554.
• Yesilyurt, M. E., & Elhorst, J. P. (2017). Impacts of neighboring countries on military expenditures: A dynamic spatial panel approach. Journal of Peace Research, 54(6), 777-790. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022343317707569
• Yeşilyurt, M. E., Karadeniz, O., Gülel, F. E., Çağlar, A., & Kangallı-Uyar, S. G. (2016). Türkiye’de İllere Göre Ortalama ve Beklenen Okullaşma Yılı, [Mean and expected years of schooling for provinces in Turkey]. Pamukkale Journal of Eurasian Socioeconomics Studies, 3(1), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.5505/pjess.2016.55706
• Yeşilyurt, F., Koçak, H., & Yeşilyurt, M. E. (2020). Factors Determining the Development of Minimum Comparable Areas and Spatial Interaction. Submitted.
• Zangger, C. (2016), The Spatial Structure of Educational Achievement, Researchgate.net.
• Zavarrone, E., & Vitali, A. (2012). School Performance and Network Effects among Classmates. Population Association of America 2012 Annual Meeting.
• Zimmerman, D. J. (2003). Peer effects in academic outcomes: evidence from a natural experiment. Review of Economics and Statistics, 85(1), 9 23. https://doi.org/10.1162/003465303762687677