Assessing Measurement Invariance of Achievement Emotions Questionnaire for Teachers in Prospective Teacher Sample

Yıl 2021, , 842 - 854, 04.12.2021

Sevilay Kilmen

https://doi.org/10.21449/ijate.756500

Öz

The purpose of the current study is to determine whether the Achievement Emotions Questionnaire for Teachers (AEQT) is a psychometrically sound instrument to measure prospective teachers' teaching-related emotions. The three-factor model of the AEQT was confirmed in a prospective teacher sample. Also, reliability results showed that the AEQT is a reliable measurement tool. Measurement invariance results revealed that configural, metric, and scalar invariance were provided across gender. These findings support the use of the AEQT when examining differences based on achievement emotions across gender. For teacher training programs, only configural invariance was provided. Although configural invariance suggests that the three-factor structure of the AEQT is the same across the teacher training programs, the lack of metric invariance indicates that the relationship between the items and the underlying latent variable the AEQT factors is not the same across these groups. The observed variables are not related to the latent variable equivalently across teacher training programs. This result does not allow the comparison of path coefficients and covariances between observed and latent variables across teacher training programs. Also, the lack of scalar invariance indicates that different teacher training programs may interpret some items differently and prevent a comparison of averages between these groups.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Measurement invariance, Emotions about teaching, Convergent validity, Achievement emotions, Self-efficacy

Kaynakça

• Becker, E. S., Keller, M. M., Goetz, T., Frenzel, A. C., & Taxer, J. (2015). Antecedents of teachers’ emotions in the classroom: An intraindividual approach. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1-12.
• Brígidoa, M., Borrachero, A. B., Bermejo, M. L., & Mellado, V. (2013) Prospective primary teachers’ self-efficacy and emotions in science teaching. European Journal of Teacher Education, 36(2), 200-217.
• Brown, M. W. & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In: K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136-162). Beverly Hills, Sage.
• Brown, T. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. The Guilford Press.
• Burić, I., Slišković, A., & Sorić, I. (2020). Teachers’ emotions and self-efficacy: A test of reciprocal relations. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 1650.
• Byrne, B. M., & Watkins, D. (2003). The issue of measurement invariance revisited. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 34(2), 155-175.
• Chen, F. (2007). Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modelling, 14(3), 464-504.
• Chen, F. F., Sousa, K. H., & West, S. G. (2005). Teacher's corner: Testing measurement invariance of second-order factor models. Structural Equation Modeling, 12(3), 471-492.
• Cheung, G. W. & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9(2), 233-255.
• Eren, A. (2014). Relational analysis of prospective teachers’ emotions about teaching, emotional styles, and professional plans about teaching. Australian Educational Researcher, 41(4), 381-409.
• Frenzel, A. C., Goetz, T., Stephens, E. J., & Jacob, B. (2009). Antecedents and effects of teachers’ emotional experiences: An integrated perspective and empirical test. In P.A. Schutz & M. Zembylas (Eds.), Advances in teacher emotion research: The impact on teachers’ lives (pp. 129-152). Springer.
• Frenzel, A. C., Pekrun, R., & Goetz, T. (2010). Achievement emotions questionnaire for teachers (AEQ-T teacher)-user’s manual. Program of Psychology, University of Munich.
• Frenzel, A.C., Pekrun, R., Goetz, T., Daniels, L.M., Durksen, T.L., Becker-Kurz, B., & Klassen, R.M. (2016). Measuring teachers’ enjoyment, anger, and anxiety: the teacher emotions scales (TES). Contemporary Educational Psychology, 46, 148-163.
• Frenzel, A. C., Becker-Kurz, B., Pekrun, R., Goetz, T., & Lüdtke, O. (2018). Emotion transmission in the classroom revisited: A reciprocal effects model of teacher and student enjoyment. Journal of Educational Psychology, 110(5), 628-639.
• Hagenauer, G., Hascher T., & Volet, E. (2015). Teacher emotions in the classroom: associations with students’ engagement, classroom discipline, and the interpersonal teacher-student relationship. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 30, 385-403.
• Hascher, T., & Hagenauer, G. (2016). Openness to theory and its importance for preservice teachers’ self-efficacy, emotions, and classroom behavior in the teaching practicum. International Journal of Educational Research, 77, 15-25.
• Henao-Arias, J. F., Marin-Rodriguez, A. E., & Vanegas-Garcia, J. H. (2017). Education hinging on emotions: An emotional view of education. Educación y Educadores [online]. 20(3), 451-465.
• Hong, J., Nie, Y., Heddy, B., Monobe, G., Ruan, J., You, S., & Kambara, H. (2016). Revising and validating achievement emotions questionnaire-teachers (AEQ-T-T). International Journal of Educational Psychology, 5(1), 80-107.
• Horn, J. L. (1965). A rationale and test for the number of factors in factor analysis. Psychometrika, 30(2), 179-185.
• Hu, L. & Bentler, P. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indices in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1-55.
• Karagianni E., Papaefthymiou-Lytra S. (2018). EFL Teachers’ Emotions: The driving force of sustainable professional development. In A. J. Martínez (Ed.), Emotions in Second Language Teaching (pp. 385-401). Cham: Springer.
• Klassen, R. M., Perry, N. E., & Frenzel, A. C. (2012). Teachers’ relatedness with students: An underemphasized component of teachers’ basic psychological needs. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(1), 150-165.
• Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. Guilford Publications, Inc.
• Kunter, M., Tsai, Y. M., Klusmann, U., Brunner, M., Krauss, S., & Baumert, J. (2008). Students’ and mathematics teachers’ perceptions of teacher enthusiasm and instruction. Learning and Instruction, 18(5), 468-482.
• Little, R. J. A. (1988). A test of missing completely at random for multivariate data with missing values. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 83(404), 1198-1202.
• Marsh, H. W., Morin, A. J., Parker, P. D., & Kaur, G. (2014). Exploratory structural equation modeling: An integration of the best features of exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 10, 85-110.
• Moè, A., Pazzaglia, F., & Ronconi, L. (2010). When being able is not enough. The combined value of positive affect and self-efficacy for job satisfaction in teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(5), 1145-1153.
• Pekrun, R., Goetz, T., Perry, R. P., Kramer, K., Hochstadt, M., & Molfenter, S. (2004). Beyond test anxiety: Development and validation of the Test Emotions Questionnaire (TEQ). Anxiety, Stress & Coping, 17(3), 287-316.
• Pitkäniemi, H. (2017). A teacher’s practical theories, self-efficacy, and emotions - What connections do they have, and how can they be developed? Nordisk Tidskrift för Allmän Didaktik, 3(1), 2-23.
• Raykov, T., Marcoulides, G. A., & Li, C-H. (2012) Measurement invariance for latent constructs in multiple populations: A critical view and refocus. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 72(6), 954-974.
• Stephanou, G., Gkavras, G., & Doulkeridou, M. (2013). The role of teachers’ self- and collective-efficacy beliefs on their job satisfaction and experienced emotions in school. Psychology, 4(3A), 268-278.
• Sutton, R. E., & Wheatley, K. F. (2003). Teachers’ emotions and teaching: A review of the literature and directions for future research. Educational Psychology Review, 15(4),327-358.
• Sutton, R.E. (2004). Emotional regulation goals and strategies of teachers. Social Psychology of Education 7(4), 379-398.
• Timmerman, M. E., & Lorenzo-Seva, U. (2011). Dimensionality assessment of ordered polytomous items with parallel analysis. Psychological Methods, 16(2), 209-220.
• Tschannen-Moran, M., & Woolfolk-Hoy, A. (2001). Teacher Efficacy: Capturing an elusive construct. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17(7), 783-805.
• Van de Schoot, R., Lugtig, P., & Hox, J. (2012). A checklist for testing measurement invariance. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 9(4), 486-492.
• Vandenberg, R. J., & Lance, C. E. (2000). A review and synthesis of the measurement invar ance literature: Suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 3(1), 4-70.