The effect Criteria of Mate-Selection on Emotional Needs of Married Couples

Yıl 2024, , 502 - 512, 25.05.2024

Al-dowsari Haifa, Sh , Al-farraj Hanan, A Meiri, El Waleed Aa Khatatbeh, Yahya, M Waed Mistarihi

https://doi.org/10.33438/ijdshs.1418077

Öz

Background and Aims: Partner selection has emerged as an important topic and research direction in behavioral ecology. This study aimed at determining life partner selection factors affect married couples' emotional requirements. Methods: Three hundred eighty-seven couples joined. For an efficient sample, we removed four individuals, owing to neglect and inadequate effort to answer survey items, from 383 people. The population was 25–45 years old, with 171 men and 212 women. Results: The mean and standard deviations for couples' Marital selection criteria (CMS) and emotional needs scale (ENS) were (49.6), psychological (10.5), and religious (5.36). Couples had high ENS (50.98). No indirect relationship existed between gender, number of children, (CMS) choice satisfaction, (ENS) among married couples, and (ENS) satisfaction. Child count and marital choice variables are directly and statistically associated with ENS satisfaction in married couples. The direct and indirect linkage model demonstrated that CMS and children had a statistically significant influence on married couples' ENS. There were no statistically significant differences in the criteria for choosing a life partner and satisfying (ENS) married couples by gender. However, education level affected intellectual, religious, physical, and formal dimensions and the total score. Education level did not affect favoring postgraduate education when meeting emotional needs. Conclusion: Despite the differences in some points of view between both genders about considering the criteria for choosing a future spouse, according to all participants, it was important for the participants to include psychological, cultural, familial, and social criteria for choosing a mate‐selection

Anahtar Kelimeler

Marital selection criteria (CMS), The emotional needs scale (ENS), couples

Kaynakça

• Abdullah, H. S. (2011). Gender differences in mate selection criteria among Malaysian undergraduate students. Sarjana, 26(2), 33-50.
• Al-Alawi, A. R. S., & Al Gharaibeh, F. (2022). Criteria of Spouse Selection among Omani Youth and their impact on Marital Concordance: A field study. Al-Adab Journal, 1(142). [CrossRef]
• Alavi, M., Alahdad, R., & Shafeq, S. M. (2014). Mate selection criteria among postgraduate students in Malaysia. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 5075-5080. [CrossRef]
• Andersson, M., & Simmons, L. W. (2006). Sexual selection and mate choice. Trends in ecology & evolution, 21(6), 296-302. [PubMed]
• Badahdah, A. M., & Tiemann, K. A. (2005). Mate selection criteria among Muslims living in America. Evolution and Human Behavior, 26(5), 432-440. [CrossRef]
• Bensayah, M. (2018). The marriage choice of the university students in laghouat. Basic Education College Magazine For Educational and Humanities Sciences(41).
• Brassard, A., Vallée-Destrempes, M., Binet, M.-A., Brault-Labbé, A., Lafontaine, M.-F., & Péloquin, K. (2023). Attachment, Sexual Motives, and Sexual Satisfaction among Couples Expecting their First Child. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 1-17. [PubMed]
• Buss, D. M. (1989). Sex differences in human mate preferences: Evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures. Behavioral and brain sciences, 12(1), 1-14. [CrossRef]
• Buss, D. M. (2023). The Sexual Selection of Human Mating Strategies: Mate Preferences and Competition Tactics. The Oxford Handbook of Evolutionary Psychology and Romantic Relationships, 15. [CrossRef]
• Buss, D. M., & Barnes, M. (1986). Preferences in human mate selection. Journal of Personality and social psychology, 50(3), 559. [CrossRef]
• Buss, D. M., & Schmitt, D. P. (2019). Mate preferences and their behavioral manifestations. Annual review of psychology, 70, 77-110. [CrossRef]
• Buunk, B. P., Dijkstra, P., Fetchenhauer, D., & Kenrick, D. T. (2002). Age and gender differences in mate selection criteria for various involvement levels. Personal relationships, 9(3), 271-278. [CrossRef]
• Chen, R., Austin, J. P., Miller, J. K., & Piercy, F. P. (2015). Chinese and American individuals’ mate selection criteria: updates, modifications, and extensions. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 46(1), 101-118. [CrossRef]
• Choi, K. H., & Wagner, B. G. (2023). Mate Selection Behavior of GED Recipients. Journal of Family Issues, 44(6), 1525-1546. [CrossRef]
• Collins, N. L., Ford, M. B., Guichard, A. C., Kane, H. S., & Feeney, B. C. (2010). Responding to need in intimate relationships: Social support and caregiving processes in couples. [CrossRef]
• Conroy-Beam, D., & Buss, D. M. (2016). Do mate preferences influence actual mating decisions? Evidence from computer simulations and three studies of mated couples. Journal of Personality and social psychology, 111(1), 53. [CrossRef]
• Corp, N., Tsaroucha, A., & Kingston, P. (2008). Human givens therapy: The evidence base. Mental Health Review Journal, 13(4), 44-52. [CrossRef]
• Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The" what" and" why" of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological inquiry, 11(4), 227-268. [CrossRef]
• Din, S., Shah, M., Jamal, H., & Bilal, M. (2015). Rehabilitation and social adjustment of people with burns in society. Burns, 41(1), 106-109. [PubMed]
• Dutta, S., Mallipeddi, R., & Das, K. N. (2023). Adaptive mating selection based on weighted indicator for Multi/Many-objective evolutionary algorithm. Applied Soft Computing, 139, 110223. [CrossRef]
• Fathollahzadeh, N., Mirsaififard, L., Kazemi, M., Saadati, N., & Navabinejad, S. (2017). Effectiveness of marital life enrichment based on Choice Theory on quality of marital relationship and couples' intimacy. Journal of Applied Psychology, 11(3), 43. [CrossRef]
• Feingold, A. (1990). Gender differences in effects of physical attractiveness on romantic attraction: A comparison across five research paradigms. Journal of Personality and social psychology, 59(5), 981. [CrossRef]
• Frederick, D. A., & Haselton, M. G. (2007). Why is muscularity sexy? Tests of the fitness indicator hypothesis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33(8), 1167-1183. [CrossRef]
• Olcay Ima, Ghyzan, W. K. I. (2019). Standards of Choosing one's spouse and it's relation with marital compatibility a sample of married couples working in schools of the Directorate of Education in Ramallah and AL_Bireh Al-Quds Open University].
• Gonçalves, N., Echevarría-Guanilo, M. E., Carvalho, F. d. L. d., Miasso, A. I., & Rossi, L. A. (2011). Biopsychosocial factors that interfere in the rehabilitation of burn victims: integrative literature review. Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem, 19, 622-630. [CrossRef]
• Gough, B., McFadden, M., & McDonald, M. (2013). Critical social psychology: An introduction. Bloomsbury Publishing. [CrossRef]
• Griffin, J., & Tyrrell, I. (2013). Human givens: The new approach to emotional health and clear thinking. HG Publishing.
• Hou, J., Shu, T., & Fang, X. (2020). Influence of resources on cue preferences in mate selection. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 574168. [CrossRef]
• Johnson, S. M. (2008). Emotionally focused couple therapy. Clinical handbook of couple therapy, 4, 107-137. Kardan-Souraki, M., Hamzehgardeshi, Z., Asadpour, I., Mohammadpour, R. A., & Khani, S. (2016). A review of marital intimacy-enhancing interventions among married individuals. Global journal of health science, 8(8), 74. [PubMed]
• Keldal, G. (2022). The relationships between personality traits and mate selection strategies of Turkish young adults. Current Psychology, 41(8), 5258-5263. [CrossRef]
• Knudson-Martin, C., & Kim, L. (2022). Socioculturally attuned couple therapy. Clinical handbook of couple therapy, 267.
• Layder, D., & Layder, D. (2009). Psycho-Emotional Needs. Intimacy and Power: The Dynamics of Personal Relationships in Modern Society, 36-50.
• Li, N. P., Bailey, J. M., Kenrick, D. T., & Linsenmeier, J. A. (2002). The necessities and luxuries of mate preferences: testing the tradeoffs. Journal of Personality and social psychology, 82(6), 947. [CrossRef]
• Li, N. P., & Choy, B. K. (2022). The early stages of mate selection.
• Liddon, L., Kingerlee, R., & Barry, J. A. (2018). Gender differences in preferences for psychological treatment, coping strategies, and triggers to help‐seeking. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 57(1), 42-58. [PubMed]
• Litzinger, S., & Gordon, K. C. (2005). Exploring relationships among communication, sexual satisfaction, and marital satisfaction. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 31(5), 409-424. [PubMed]
• Lu, Y. (2023). The criteria of Chinese and South Koreans’ mate selection: A comparative study of long-term and short-term mate selection preferences in the cross-cultural perspective. Heliyon, 9(2). [PubMed]
• Luginbuehl, T., & Schoebi, D. (2020). Emotion dynamics and responsiveness in intimate relationships. Emotion, 20(2), 133. [PubMed]
• Murstein, B. I. (1970). Stimulus. Value. Role: A theory of marital choice. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 465-481. [CrossRef]
• Moğlu, E., Ads, M., & Weisfeld, C. C. (2019). What is the impact of choosing one’s spouse on marital satisfaction of wives and husbands? The case of arranged and self-choice Turkish marriages. Journal of Family Issues, 40(10), 1270-1298. [CrossRef]
• Paul, A. (2002). Sexual selection and mate choice. International Journal of Primatology, 23, 877-904. [CrossRef] Rafiee, G. (2023). The main criteria for mate selection: The nursing students' perspective in the south‐west of Iran during 2020–2021: A cross‐sectional study. Health Science Reports, 6(1), e949. [PubMed]
• Ruan, Y., Le, J. D. V., & Reis, H. T. (2023). How can I help?: Specific strategies used in interpersonal emotion regulation in a relationship context. Emotion. [CrossRef]
• Sala, H. J. (2013). Joyfully Single in a Couples’ World: Knowing Contentment, Peace, and Fulfillment—Now. B&H Publishing Group.
• Scheller, M., de Sousa, A. A., Brotto, L. A., & Little, A. C. (2023). The role of sexual and romantic attraction in human mate preferences. The Journal of Sex Research, 1-14. [PubMed]
• Schibik, A., Strutton, D., & Thompson, K. (2023). Investigating assortative mating processes inside Internet-dating-service settings. Journal of Services Marketing, 37(4), 431-445. [CrossRef]
• SJ, S. S. (2013). Mate selection preferences among college students in Bagalkot, Karnataka. IOSR Journal of Humanities and Social Science (IOSR-JHSS), 15(1), 55-59.
• Stone, E. A., Shackelford, T. K., & Buss, D. M. (2008). Socioeconomic development and shifts in mate preferences. Evolutionary Psychology, 6(3), 147470490800600309. [CrossRef]
• Sullivan, K. T., & Davila, J. (2010). Support processes in intimate relationships. Oxford University Press. Tappolet, C. (2022). Philosophy of emotion: A contemporary introduction. Taylor & Francis. [CrossRef]
• Thomas, A. G., Jonason, P. K., Blackburn, J. D., Kennair, L. E. O., Lowe, R., Malouff, J., Stewart‐Williams, S., Sulikowski, D., & Li, N. P. (2020). Mate preference priorities in the East and West: A cross‐cultural test of the mate preference priority model. Journal of Personality, 88(3), 606-620. [PubMed]
• Valentine, K. A., Li, N. P., Meltzer, A. L., & Tsai, M.-H. (2020). Mate preferences for warmth-trustworthiness predict romantic attraction in the early stages of mate selection and satisfaction in ongoing relationships. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 46(2), 298-311. [CrossRef]
• Van den Broeck, A., Vansteenkiste, M., De Witte, H., & Lens, W. (2008). Explaining the relationships between job characteristics, burnout, and engagement: The role of basic psychological need satisfaction. Work & stress, 22(3), 277-294. [Record #42 is using a reference type undefined in this output style.]
• Yoo, H., Bartle-Haring, S., Day, R. D., & Gangamma, R. (2014). Couple communication, emotional and sexual intimacy, and relationship satisfaction. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 40(4), 275-293. [CrossRef]