Numerical investigation of airfoils aerodynamic performances

Yıl 2022, Cilt: 9 Sayı: 1, 1 - 5, 31.03.2022

Halil Bayram

https://doi.org/10.31593/ijeat.1033107

Cited By: 1

Öz

In this study, the aerodynamic performance of seven different airfoils named CLARK Y, CLARK YH, Curtis C-72, FX 66-S-196 V1, NACA4412, NACA4415, and NACA4418 was numerically investigated under seven different angles of attack ranging from 0° to 30° in increments of 5°. 2D (two-dimensional) CFD (Computational Fluid Dynamics) models of airfoils were created and performed under steady-state conditions. When the changes of the lift coefficient and drag coefficient with the angles of attack were examined, it was observed that the drag coefficient increased with the increasing angle of attack. On the other hand, the lift coefficient firstly increased and then decreased a little and remained constant. For all airfoils, this value is calculated to be the highest around 10 to 15°. The obtained results from the numerical simulations were also analyzed by using the GRA (Grey Relation Analysis) method. While determining the best aerodynamic performance with this method, “higher is the better” and “lower is the better” normalization processes were used for lift coefficient and drag coefficient, respectively. As a result of the GRA analysis made with the numerical results, it was seen that the best and the worst performances were presented by Curtis C-72 and Clark Y airfoil profiles at 10° angle of attack condition, respectively. On the other hand, at 15° and higher angle of attack conditions, the best and the worst performances were presented by NACA4418 and Clark YH airfoil profiles, respectively. The performance of the best model was also seen in the velocity distribution compared to other models.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Angle of attack, Airfoil, Aerodynamic performance, CFD, GRA

Destekleyen Kurum

-

Proje Numarası

-

Teşekkür

-

Kaynakça

• Jain, R., Jain, M. S. and Bajpai, M. L. 2016. Investigation on 3-D Wing of commercial aeroplane with Airfoil NACA 2415 using CFD fluent. IRJET, 3(6), 243-249.
• Ockfen, A. E. and Matveev, K. I. 2009. Aerodynamic characteristics of NACA 4412 airfoil section with flap in extreme ground effect. International Journal of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering, 1(1), 1-12.
• Şahin, İ. and Acir, A. 2015. Numerical and experimental investigations of lift and drag performances of NACA 0015 wind turbine airfoil. International Journal of Materials, Mechanics and Manufacturing, 3(1), 22-25.
• Aftab, S. M. A. and Ahmad, K. A. 2017. CFD study on NACA 4415 airfoil implementing spherical and sinusoidal Tubercle Leading Edge. PloS one, 12(8), e0183456.
• Mehdi, H., Gaurav, S. and Sharma, M. 2016. Numerical investigation of fluid flow and aerodynamic performance on a 2D NACA-4412 airfoil. International Journal of Research in Engineering and Innovation, 1(1), 5.
• Sagat, C. 2012. Experimental and CFD analysis of Airfoil at low Reynolds number, Int. J. Mech. Eng. Robot. Res., 1 (3), 227–283.
• Leary, J. 2010. Computational Fluid Dynamics Analysis of a Low Cost Wind Turbine. Mini-Project Report. University of Sheffield.
• Sarkar, S. and Mughal, S. B. 2017. CFD Analysis of Effect of Flow Over NACA 2412 Airfoil Through The Shear Stress Transport Turbulence Model. International Journal of Mechanical And Production Engineering, 5(7), 2320-2092.
• Parashar, H. 2015. Calculation of aerodynamic characteristics of NACA 2415, 23012, 23015 airfoils using computational fluid dynamics (CFD). IJSETR, 4 (3), 610–614.
• Dash, A. 2016. CFD analysis of wind turbine airfoil at various angles of attack. J. Mech. Civ. Eng. 13, 18–24.
• Patil, B. S. and Thakare, H. R. 2015. Computational fluid dynamics analysis of wind turbine blade at various angles of attack and different Reynolds number. Procedia Engineering, 127, 1363-1369.
• Haque, M. N., Ali, M. and Ara, I. 2015. Experimental investigation on the performance of NACA 4412 aerofoil with curved leading edge planform. Procedia Engineering, 105, 232-240.
• Eleni, D. C., Athanasios, T. I. and Dionissios, M. P. 2012. Evaluation of the turbulence models for the simulation of the flow over a National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics (NACA) 0012 airfoil. Journal of Mechanical Engineering Research, 4(3), 100-111.
• Fernandes, E. C. R., Belo, A. C., Araújo, A. M., da Silva, A. A. C., de Araújo Bezerra, C. C. and Rocha, G. J. D. A. M. 2020. An assessment of different turbulence models on a cfd simulation of air flow past a s814 airfoil. Brazilian Journal of Development, 6(8), 58335-58348.
• https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Angle_of_attack#:~:text=The%20critical%20or%20stalling%20angle,reached%2C%20regardless%20of%20pilot%20input. (28 December 2021).
• Kumbhar, D. G. and Sane, N. K. 2015. Numerical analysis and optimization of heat transfer and friction factor in dimpled tube assisted with regularly spaced twisted tapes using Taguchi and grey relational analysis. Procedia Engineering, 127, 652-659.
• Uzun, G. 2019. Analysis of grey relational method of the effects on machinability performance on austempered vermicular graphite cast irons. Measurement, 142, 122-130.
• Gunes, S., Senyigit, E., Karakaya, E. and Ozceyhan, V. 2019. Optimization of heat transfer and pressure drop in a tube with loose-fit perforated twisted tapes by Taguchi method and grey relational analysis. Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry, 136(4), 1795-1806.