Yenilenebilir Enerji Kaynaklarından Biyogazın Enerjisinin Çankırı İl’i İçin Potansiyelinin Belirlenmesi ve Kullanılabilirliği

Year 2020, Volume: 3 Issue: 3, 325 - 341, 15.12.2020

Olcay Gençyılmaz , Gamze Seçkin

https://doi.org/10.38001/ijlsb.756288

Cited By: 1

Abstract

Son yıllarda, tüm dünya artan enerji ihtiyacının karşılanması ve çevresel sorunların çözümü için yenilenebilir kaynakların kullanımı üzerine yoğunlaşılmıştır. Türkiye’de yenilenebilir enerji kaynaklarının kullanımını arttırmak ve enerji bağımlılığını azaltmak için çeşitli çalışmalar yapılmaktadır. Bu yüzden, Türkiye’deki alternatif kaynak arayışı biyogaz enerjisi üretiminin yaygınlaşmasına sebep olmuştur. Özellikle bölgesel olarak tarım ve hayvancılığa uygun olan bölgelerde biyogaz üretimini arttırmak için çalışmalar yapılmaktadır. Bu bölgelerde bitkisel ve hayvansal atıkların biyogaz üretiminde kullanılması alternatif enerji üretimine ve atık yönetimine olumlu katkı sağlamaktadır.
Bu çalışmada, biyogaz enerji potansiyeli ve kullanılabilirliği Türkiye’nin İç Anadolu Bölgesi’ndeki Çankırı İl’i için araştırılmıştır. Yoğun olarak tarım ve hayvancılık sektörünün geliştiği, sanayileşme oranının düşük olduğu bu ilde elde edilen hayvansal atıklardan üretilebilecek biyogaz enerji potansiyeli belirlenmiştir. Biyokimyasal metan üretim potansiyeli (BMP) ve elektrik üretimine katkısı hesaplanarak her bir ilçe için ayrı ayrı bölgesel harita ve grafikleri çizilerek biyogaz enerji potansiyeli analizi yapılmıştır. Ayrıca, biyogaz üretiminden elde edilecek elektrik geliri ve CO2 emisyon değerleri belirlenmiştir.

Keywords

Yenilenebilir Enerji, Biyogaz, Co2 Emisyonu

References

• 1. W. Choia., et al ., Greenhouse gas emissions of conventional and alternative vehicles: Predictions based on energy policy analysis in South Korea, Applied Energy Volume 2651 May 2020 Article 114754.
• 2. C. A. Simona, and M. C. Moltz, Going native? Examining nativity and public opinion of environment, alternative energy, and science policy expenditures in the United States , Energy Research & Social Science, Volume 46, December 2018, Pages 296-302.
• 3. D. Yang., et al., Sectoral energy-carbon nexus and low-carbon policy alternatives: A case study of Ningbo, China Journal of Cleaner ProductionVolume 15610 July 2017Pages 480-490.
• 4. T. Hui Oh., et al., Energy policy and alternative energy in Malaysia: Issues and challenges for sustainable growth – An update Renewable and Sustainable Energy ReviewsVolume 81, Part 2 January 2018, Pages 3021-3031.
• 5. K. Steinbacher and S. Röhrkasten, An outlook on Germany’s international energy transition policy in the years to come: Solid foundations and new challenges, Energy Research & Social ScienceVolume 49March 2019Pages 204-208.
• 6. I. T Santos, Confronting governance challenges of the resource nexus through reflexivity: A cross-case comparison of biofuels policies in Germany and Brazil Energy Research & Social ScienceVolume 65July 2020Article 101464.
• 7. J. Malinauskaite., et al., Energy efficiency in industry: EU and national policies in Italy and the UK Energy Volume 1721 April 2019 Pages 255-269.
• 8. C. Stagnaro., et al., Managing the liberalization of Italy's retail electricity market: A policy proposal Energy PolicyVolume 137February 2020Article 111150.
• 9. K. Hofman, and X. Li, Canada’s energy perspectives and policies for sustainable development, Applied EnergyVolume 86, Issue 4April 2009Pages 407-415.
• 10. I. Kyprianoua., et al., Energy poverty policies and measures in 5 EU countries: A comparative study, Energy and BuildingsVolume 1961 August 2019Pages 46-60.
• 11. K.J.Chua., et al ., Achieving better energy-efficient air conditioning – A review of technologies and strategies, Applied Energy Volume 104, April 2013, Pages 87-104.
• 12. S. Safarzadeh., et al., A review of optimal energy policy instruments on industrial energy efficiency programs, rebound effects, and government policies, Energy Policy 139 (2020) 111342.
• 13. J.Yan., et al ., Efficient and affordable energy for a sustainable future, Applied Energy Volume 185, Part 2, 1 January 2017, Pages 953-962.
• 14. Stefan Frank., et al ., Dynamics of the land use, land use change, and forestry sink in the European Union: the impacts of energy and climate targets for 2030, Climatic Change (2016) 138:253–266.
• 15. N. S. Bentsen, D. Nilsson, and S. Larsen, Agricultural residues for energy - A case study on the influence of resource availability, economy and policy on the use of straw for energy in Denmark and Sweden, Biomass and BioenergyVolume 108January 2018Pages 278-288.
• 16. E.C. Pischke ., et al ., From Kyoto to Paris: Measuring renewable energy policy regimes in Argentina, Brazil, Canada, Mexico and the United States, Energy Research & Social ScienceVolume 50April 2019Pages 82-91.
• 17. S. Akerboom., et al ., Meeting goals of sustainability policy: CO2 emission reduction, cost-effectiveness and societal acceptance. An analysis of the proposal to phase-out coal in the Netherlands Energy PolicyVolume 138March 2020Article 111210.
• 18. R. A. Al-Masri, J. Chenoweth, and R. J. Murphy, Exploring the Status Quo of Water-Energy Nexus Policies and Governance in Jordan, Environmental Science & PolicyVolume 100October 2019Pages 192-204.
• 19. K. Hansen, B.V. Mathiesen, and I. R Skov, Full energy system transition towards 100% renewable energy in Germany in 2050, Renewable and Sustainable Energy ReviewsVolume 102March 2019Pages 1-13.
• 20. J. Blazejczak., et al ., Economic effects of renewable energy expansion: A model-based analysis for Germany, Renewable and Sustainable Energy ReviewsVolume 40December 2014Pages 1070-1080.
• 21. S. Safarzadeh, M. Rasti-Barzoki, and S.R Hejazi, A review of optimal energy policy instruments on industrial energy efficiency programs, rebound effects, and government policies, Energy PolicyVolume 139April 2020Article 111342.
• 22. K. Bariş, and S. Kucukali, Availibility of renewable energy sources in Turkey: Current situation, potential, government policies and the EU perspective, Energy PolicyVolume 42March 2012Pages 377-391.
• 23. K. Baris, The role of coal in energy policy and sustainable development of Turkey: Is itcompatible to the EU energy policy?, Energy Policy 39 (2011) 1754–1763.
• 24. O.G. Austvik, and G. Rzayeva, Turkey in the geopolitics of energy, Energy PolicyVolume 107August 2017Pages 539-547.
• 25. I. Yüksel, Energy production and sustainable energy policies in Turkey, Renewable EnergyVolume 35, Issue 7July 2010Pages 1469-1476.
• 26. B. Hacisalihoglu, Turkey's natural gas policy, Energy PolicyVolume 36, Issue 6June 2008Pages 1867-1872.
• 27. E. Kulińska, and M. Dendera – Gruszka, Green cities – problems and solutions in Turkey, Transportation Research ProcediaVolume 392019Pages 242-251.
• 28. S. Oksay, and E. Iseri, A new energy paradigm for Turkey: A political risk-inclusive cost analysis for sustainable energy, Energy PolicyVolume 39, Issue 5May 2011Pages 2386-2395.
• 29. K. Kaygusuz, Sustainable energy, environmental and agricultural policies in Turkey, Energy Conversion and ManagementVolume 51, Issue 5 May 2010Pages 1075-1084.
• 30. M. Ozturk, Y. E. Yuksel, and N. Ozek, A Bridge between East and West: Turkey's natural gas policy Renewable and Sustainable Energy ReviewsVolume 15, Issue 9December 2011Pages 4286-4294.
• 31. M. Acaroğlu, Biyokütle enerjisinin global potansiyeli, Biyokütle enerji politikaları, Avrupa Birliği ve Türkiye I. Ege Sempozyumu ve Sergisi, Denizli, Türkiye, 22-13 Mayıs 2003.
• 32. F. T. Özbaşer, Biyogaz Üretimi ve Kullanımı, Lalahan Hay. Araşt. Enst. Derg. 213, 53 (2), 115-124.
• 33. A.D. Korberg, Iva Ridjan Skov, Brian Vad Mathiesen, The role of biogas and biogas-derived fuels in a 100% renewable energy system in Denmark, EnergyVolume 19915 May 2020Article 117426.
• 34. R. Lybæk, and T. Kjær, Pre-assessment of the circular economic benefits and challenges of biogas production in Denmark when utilizing sand bedding in dairy cow stables, Journal of Cleaner ProductionVolume 21910 May 2019Pages 268-277.
• 35. R.G. Cong, D. Caro, and M.Thomsen, Is it beneficial to use biogas in the Danish transport sector? – An environmental-economic analysis, Journal of Cleaner ProductionVolume 1651 November 2017Pages 1025-1035.
• 36. M. Lauer, U.Leprich, and D. Thrä, Economic assessment of flexible power generation from biogas plants in Germany's future electricity system, Renewable EnergyVolume 146February 2020Pages 1471-1485.
• 37. S. Auburger., et al ., Economic optimization of feedstock mix for energy production with biogas technology in Germany with a special focus on sugar beets – Effects on greenhouse gas emissions and energy balances, Renewable EnergyVolume 89April 2016Pages 1-11.
• 38. L. Deng., et al ., Application and development of biogas technology for the treatment of waste in China, Renewable and Sustainable Energy ReviewsVolume 70April 2017Pages 845-851.
• 39. M.Khalil., et al ., Waste to energy technology: The potential of sustainable biogas production from animal waste in Indonesia, Renewable and Sustainable Energy ReviewsVolume 105May 2019Pages 323-331.
• 40. M. H. Khoshgoftar Manesh, A. Rezazadeh, and S. Kabiri, A feasibility study on the potential, economic, and environmental advantages of biogas production from poultry manure in Iran, Renewable EnergyIn press, journal pre-proofAvailable online 7 June 2020.
• 41. M. Banja., et al ., Support for biogas in the EU electricity sector – A comparative analysis, Biomass and BioenergyVolume 128September 2019Article 105313.
• 42. N. Scarlat, J.F. Dallemand, and F. Fahl, Biogas: Developments and perspectives in Europe, Renewable EnergyVolume 129, Part ADecember 2018Pages 457-472.
• 43. N. Scarlat., et al ., A spatial analysis of biogas potential from manure in Europe, Renewable and Sustainable Energy ReviewsVolume 94October 2018Pages 915-930.
• 44. A. K. P. Meyer, E. A. Ehimen, and J. B. Holm-Nielsen, Future European biogas: Animal manure, straw and grass potentials for a sustainable European biogas production, Biomass and BioenergyVolume 111April 2018Pages 154-164.
• 45. M. Melikoglu, Vision 2023: Assessing the feasibility of electricity and biogas production from municipal solid waste in Turkey, Renewable and Sustainable Energy ReviewsVolume 19March 2013Pages 52-63.
• 46. C. Coskun., et al ., Investigation of biogas and hydrogen production from waste water of milk-processing industry in Turkey, International Journal of Hydrogen EnergyVolume 37, Issue 21November 2012Pages 16498-16504.
• 47. L. Rincon., et al ., The contribution of sustainable bioenergy to renewable electricity generation in Turkey: Evidence based policy from an integrated energy and agriculture approach, Energy PolicyVolume 130July 2019Pages 69-88.
• 48. H. Şenol, and H. Zenk, Determination of the biogas potential in cities with hazelnut production and examination of potential energy savings in Turkey, Fuel Volume 27015 June 2020Article 117577.
• 49. A. Meyer-Aurich., et al ., Impact of uncertainties on greenhouse gas mitigation potential of biogas production from agricultural resources, Renewable Energy 37, (2012), 277-284.
• 50. M. Öztürk, Hayvan gübresinden biyogaz üretimi. T.C. Çevre ve Orman Bakanlığı Müsteşarlığı, 2005. Ankara.
• 51. BEPA. https://www.enerjiportali.com/
• 52. Çankırı Belediyesi. Coğrafi yapı, http://www.cankiri.bel.tr/sayfa-16/cografi-yapi.php
• 53. Çankırı Valiliği. http://www.cankiri.gov.tr/ilcelerimiz
• 54. TUİK. Çankırı Nüfus Verileri
• 55. Çankırı İl Gıda Tarım ve Hayvancılık Müdürlüğü, 2016 Çalışma Raporu, p. 24
• 56. Bahtiyar Ö., Emin O., Temmuz, 2008, Membran yöntemiyle biyogazdan karbondioksitin ayrıştırılması ve metan saflaştırma projesi, PROJE NO: 105Y084
• 57. Nagamani, B. and Ramasamy, K., Biogas production technology: An Indian perspective. http://www.ias.ac.in/currsci/jul10/articles13.htm
• 58. C. Karaca, ve M. Eşgünoğlu, Türkiye’nin 2023 Yili Yenilenebilir Enerji Yatirim Hedeflerinin İşsizliğe Etkisi, Icomep 2016 | 26-27 October | İstanbul, Turkey.
• 59. BEPA. https://bepa.enerji.gov.tr/
• 60. Enerji ve Tabii Kaynaklar Bakanlığı, http://www.eigm.gov.tr/tr-TR/Denge-Tablolari/Denge-Tablolari
• 61. C. Ilkiliç, H. Deviren, Biyogazın Üretimi ve Üretimi Etkileyen Faktörler, 6. Uluslararası İleri teknolojiler Sempozyumu, 16-18 Mayıs 2011, Elazığ, Turkey