BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

-

Yıl 2015, Cilt: 1 Sayı: 1, 53 - 63, 07.09.2015

Önder Aksu , Muzaffer Harlıoğlu

Öz

Freshwater crayfish are an important part of the food chain in the aquatic environment. But many live feeds on crayfish look like when they do protect themselves from predators. Use as shelter or shelter for the protection of crayfish or under or hidden within objects that can create their own. Studies have shown that the shelters can be generated in various ways. Besides this, crayfish aquaculture environments in the hair as the shelter roof, automobile tires, egg boxes, pebbles, brick fragments, and the pipe is released as it is known that parts of the refuge. Crayfish, while using their shelter shelters appropriate to their body size can change. On the other hand, has a significant effect on the survival of the crayfish shelters and kanibalizm studies have shown that reduces

Anahtar Kelimeler

Crayfish shelter predator cannibalism aquaculture

Kaynakça

  • Ackefors, H., 1996. The development of crayfish culture in Sweden during the last decade. Freshwater Crayfish, 11: 627-6
  • Ackefors, H., 2000. Freshwater crayfish farming technology in the 1990s: A
  • European and global perspective. Fish and Fisheries, 1: 337-359. Aksu, Ö., Harlıoğlu, M.M., 2003. Tatlı su istakozu Astacus leptodactylus’un barınak kullanımı. Fırat Üniversitesi Mühendislik 15(2): 273-280. Dergisi,
  • Aksu, Ö., 2008. Keban Baraj Gölü Keban
  • Avlak Sahasından yakalanan Astacus leptodactylus (Eschscholtz, 1823)’un bazı populasyon özellikleri ve doğal ortamına barınak yerleştirmenin hasada etkisi. Doktora Tezi, Fırat
  • Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, 85 s. Atay, D., 1984. Kabuklu su ürünleri ve üretim tekniği. Ankara Üniversitesi Ziraat
  • Fakültesi Yayınları No: 914, 257, Ankara, 192s. Curtis, M.C., Jones, C.M., 1995. Overwiev of redclaw quadricarinatus, farming practices in Northern Crayfish, 10: 447-455. Cherax Freshwater
  • Du Boulay, A.J.H., Sayer, M.D.J., Holdich, D.M., 1993. İnvestigations into intensive culture of Austuralian red claw quadricarinatus. Crayfish, 9: 70-78. Cherax Freshwater
  • Fellows, C. J., 1989. Comparison between two types of synthetic fiber as shelter for early tenuimanus. Freshwater Crayfish, 8: 518-5 Cherax
  • Foster, J., 1993. The relationship between refuge size and body size in the crayfish Austropotamobius pallipes
  • (Lareboullet). Freshwater Crayfish, 9: 345-349. Geddes, M., C., Smallridge, M, Clark, S., 19 The effect of stocking density, food type and shelters on survival and growth of the Australian freshwater crayfish, experimental Crayfish, 9: 57-69. in ponds. Freshwater Guan, R.Z., 1994. Burrowing behavior of signal leniusculus (DANA), in the River
  • Ouse, England. Freshwater Forum, 4: 155-168. Pacifastacus Gutierrez, P., Martinez. J.M., Bravo-Utrera, M.A., Montes, C., 1999. The status of crayfish populations in Spain and Portugal, In: Gherardi, F. and Holdich, D.M. (eds). Crayfish in
  • Europe as Alien Species – How to make the best of a bad situation? Brookfield, 161-192. Gydemo, R., 1994. On the noble crayfish in
  • Sweden. Nordic J., Freshwater Res., 69: 173-175. Harlıoğlu, M.M., Holdich, D.M., 2001. Meat yields in the introduced crayfish,
  • Pacifastacus leniusculus and Astacus leptodactylus, from British waters. Aquaculture Research, 32: 411-417. Harlıoğlu, M.M., 2004. The present situation of freshwater leptodactylus (Eschscholtz, 1823) in
  • Turkey. Aquaculture, 230: 181-187. Harlıoğlu, M.M., Barım, Ö., Türkgülü, İ., Harlıoğlu, A.G., 2004. The potential fecundity population of freshwater crayfish,
  • Astacus leptodactylus (Eschscholtz, 1823). Aquaculture, 230: 189-195.
  • Harlıoğlu, M.M., Çakmak Duran, T., 2010.
  • The effect of darkness on mating and pleopodal egg production time in a freshwater leptodactylus Aquaculture International, 18: 843- 8 Astacus Eschscholtz. Hasiotis, S.T., 1993. Ichnology of triassic and holocene cambarid crayfish of North
  • America: an overview of burrowing behaviour reflected morphologies record. Freshwater Crayfish, 9: 407- 4 as by burrow geological Hasiotis, S.T, Bown, M. T., 1996. A short note about crayfish burrows from the paleocene-eocene claron formation, southwestern Utah, USA. Freshwater Crayfish, 11: 121-129.
  • Hasiotis, S.T., Kirkland, D.J., 1996. Crayfish fossils and burrows (Decapoda; Cambaridae) formation, Colorado Plateau, USA.
  • Freshwater Crayfish, 11: 106-120. Hogger, J. B., 1988. Ecology, population biology and behaviour, In: D.M.
  • Holdich and R.S. Lowery (eds.), Freshwater Menagement Cambridge, 114-144. D.M., background morphology. Freshwater Crayfish (edited by: Holdich, D.M.), 3-30. Biology, and functional Biology of Horwitz, P.H.J., Richardson, A.M.M., 1986.
  • An ecological classification of the burrows of Australian freshwater crayfish. Australian Journal Mar. Freshwater Resourch, 37: 237-242. Huner, J.V., Barr, J.E., 1991. Red swamp crayfish: Biology and exploitation.
  • Luisiana Sea Grant College Program, Centerfor Luisiana State Üniversty, Luisiana, 128 p. Resources Karplus, I., Barki, A., Levi, T., Hulata, G., Harpaz, S., 1995. Effects of kinship and shelters on growth and survival of crayfish (Cherax quadricarinatus),
  • Freshwater Crayfish, 10: 494-505. Köksal, G., 1985. Kültür koşullarında tatlısu istakozu salinus) Ürünleri Dergisi, 7, 8: 61-71.
  • Köksal, G., 1988. Astacus leptodactylus in
  • Europa, In: D. M. Holdich and R. S. Lowery (eds.), Freshwater Crayfish, Biology, Exploitation, Cambridge, 365-400. and Lochead, H.J., 1961. Burrowing, locomotion, organs, sense behaviour. In: T.H. Waterman (eds.),
  • The Physiology of Crustacea II, Department University, academic press, New York and London, 313-364. Mason, J.C., 1977. Reproductive efficiency of
  • Pacifastacus leniusculus (DANA) in culture. Freshwater Crayfish, 4: 305- 3
  • Mason, J.C., 1978. Effects of temperature, photoperiod, substrate and shelter on survival, accumulation
  • Pacifastacus leniusculus in culture. Freshwater Crayfish, 9: 101-117. Momot, W.T., 1995. Redefining the role of crayfish in aquatic ecosystems.
  • Reviews in Fisheries Science, 3, 1: 33- O’Sullivan, D., 1995. Techniques for semi- intensive crayfish in Austuralia. Freshwater Crayfish, 10: 969-982. freshwater
  • Ranta, E., Lindström, K., 1992. Power to hold sheltering burrows by juveniles of the signal leniusculus. Ethology, 92: 217-226. Pacifastacus

Kerevitlerin Barınak Çeşitleri ve Barınak Kullanımları

Yıl 2015, Cilt: 1 Sayı: 1, 53 - 63, 07.09.2015

Önder Aksu , Muzaffer Harlıoğlu

Öz

Tatlı su istakozları (kerevit) su ortamında besin zincirinin önemli bir parçasıdırlar. Kendilerini koruyabilecekmiş gibi görünmelerine karşın pek çok predatör canlı kerevitler üzerinden beslenir. Kerevitler ise korunmak için ya kendi barınaklarını oluşturur veya barınak olarak kullanabileceği nesnelerin altında ya da içinde gizlenir. Yapılan çalışmalar barınakların çeşitli şekillerde oluşturulabildiğini göstermiştir. Bunun yanında; yetiştiricilik ortamlarında kerevitlere barınak olarak çatı sacları, otomobil lastikleri, yumurta kutuları, çakıl taşları, tuğla parçaları ve boru parçalarının barınak olarak bırakıldığı bilinmektedir. Kerevitler, barınaklarını kullanırken kendi vücut ölçülerine uygun barınakları seçmektedirler. Diğer yandan, yapılan çalışmalar barınakların kerevitlerin hayatta kalmaları üzerinde önemli bir etkiye sahip olduğunu ve kanibalizmi azalttığını göstermiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Kerevit barınak predatör kanibalizm yetiştiricilik

Kaynakça

  • Ackefors, H., 1996. The development of crayfish culture in Sweden during the last decade. Freshwater Crayfish, 11: 627-6
  • Ackefors, H., 2000. Freshwater crayfish farming technology in the 1990s: A
  • European and global perspective. Fish and Fisheries, 1: 337-359. Aksu, Ö., Harlıoğlu, M.M., 2003. Tatlı su istakozu Astacus leptodactylus’un barınak kullanımı. Fırat Üniversitesi Mühendislik 15(2): 273-280. Dergisi,
  • Aksu, Ö., 2008. Keban Baraj Gölü Keban
  • Avlak Sahasından yakalanan Astacus leptodactylus (Eschscholtz, 1823)’un bazı populasyon özellikleri ve doğal ortamına barınak yerleştirmenin hasada etkisi. Doktora Tezi, Fırat
  • Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, 85 s. Atay, D., 1984. Kabuklu su ürünleri ve üretim tekniği. Ankara Üniversitesi Ziraat
  • Fakültesi Yayınları No: 914, 257, Ankara, 192s. Curtis, M.C., Jones, C.M., 1995. Overwiev of redclaw quadricarinatus, farming practices in Northern Crayfish, 10: 447-455. Cherax Freshwater
  • Du Boulay, A.J.H., Sayer, M.D.J., Holdich, D.M., 1993. İnvestigations into intensive culture of Austuralian red claw quadricarinatus. Crayfish, 9: 70-78. Cherax Freshwater
  • Fellows, C. J., 1989. Comparison between two types of synthetic fiber as shelter for early tenuimanus. Freshwater Crayfish, 8: 518-5 Cherax
  • Foster, J., 1993. The relationship between refuge size and body size in the crayfish Austropotamobius pallipes
  • (Lareboullet). Freshwater Crayfish, 9: 345-349. Geddes, M., C., Smallridge, M, Clark, S., 19 The effect of stocking density, food type and shelters on survival and growth of the Australian freshwater crayfish, experimental Crayfish, 9: 57-69. in ponds. Freshwater Guan, R.Z., 1994. Burrowing behavior of signal leniusculus (DANA), in the River
  • Ouse, England. Freshwater Forum, 4: 155-168. Pacifastacus Gutierrez, P., Martinez. J.M., Bravo-Utrera, M.A., Montes, C., 1999. The status of crayfish populations in Spain and Portugal, In: Gherardi, F. and Holdich, D.M. (eds). Crayfish in
  • Europe as Alien Species – How to make the best of a bad situation? Brookfield, 161-192. Gydemo, R., 1994. On the noble crayfish in
  • Sweden. Nordic J., Freshwater Res., 69: 173-175. Harlıoğlu, M.M., Holdich, D.M., 2001. Meat yields in the introduced crayfish,
  • Pacifastacus leniusculus and Astacus leptodactylus, from British waters. Aquaculture Research, 32: 411-417. Harlıoğlu, M.M., 2004. The present situation of freshwater leptodactylus (Eschscholtz, 1823) in
  • Turkey. Aquaculture, 230: 181-187. Harlıoğlu, M.M., Barım, Ö., Türkgülü, İ., Harlıoğlu, A.G., 2004. The potential fecundity population of freshwater crayfish,
  • Astacus leptodactylus (Eschscholtz, 1823). Aquaculture, 230: 189-195.
  • Harlıoğlu, M.M., Çakmak Duran, T., 2010.
  • The effect of darkness on mating and pleopodal egg production time in a freshwater leptodactylus Aquaculture International, 18: 843- 8 Astacus Eschscholtz. Hasiotis, S.T., 1993. Ichnology of triassic and holocene cambarid crayfish of North
  • America: an overview of burrowing behaviour reflected morphologies record. Freshwater Crayfish, 9: 407- 4 as by burrow geological Hasiotis, S.T, Bown, M. T., 1996. A short note about crayfish burrows from the paleocene-eocene claron formation, southwestern Utah, USA. Freshwater Crayfish, 11: 121-129.
  • Hasiotis, S.T., Kirkland, D.J., 1996. Crayfish fossils and burrows (Decapoda; Cambaridae) formation, Colorado Plateau, USA.
  • Freshwater Crayfish, 11: 106-120. Hogger, J. B., 1988. Ecology, population biology and behaviour, In: D.M.
  • Holdich and R.S. Lowery (eds.), Freshwater Menagement Cambridge, 114-144. D.M., background morphology. Freshwater Crayfish (edited by: Holdich, D.M.), 3-30. Biology, and functional Biology of Horwitz, P.H.J., Richardson, A.M.M., 1986.
  • An ecological classification of the burrows of Australian freshwater crayfish. Australian Journal Mar. Freshwater Resourch, 37: 237-242. Huner, J.V., Barr, J.E., 1991. Red swamp crayfish: Biology and exploitation.
  • Luisiana Sea Grant College Program, Centerfor Luisiana State Üniversty, Luisiana, 128 p. Resources Karplus, I., Barki, A., Levi, T., Hulata, G., Harpaz, S., 1995. Effects of kinship and shelters on growth and survival of crayfish (Cherax quadricarinatus),
  • Freshwater Crayfish, 10: 494-505. Köksal, G., 1985. Kültür koşullarında tatlısu istakozu salinus) Ürünleri Dergisi, 7, 8: 61-71.
  • Köksal, G., 1988. Astacus leptodactylus in
  • Europa, In: D. M. Holdich and R. S. Lowery (eds.), Freshwater Crayfish, Biology, Exploitation, Cambridge, 365-400. and Lochead, H.J., 1961. Burrowing, locomotion, organs, sense behaviour. In: T.H. Waterman (eds.),
  • The Physiology of Crustacea II, Department University, academic press, New York and London, 313-364. Mason, J.C., 1977. Reproductive efficiency of
  • Pacifastacus leniusculus (DANA) in culture. Freshwater Crayfish, 4: 305- 3
  • Mason, J.C., 1978. Effects of temperature, photoperiod, substrate and shelter on survival, accumulation
  • Pacifastacus leniusculus in culture. Freshwater Crayfish, 9: 101-117. Momot, W.T., 1995. Redefining the role of crayfish in aquatic ecosystems.
  • Reviews in Fisheries Science, 3, 1: 33- O’Sullivan, D., 1995. Techniques for semi- intensive crayfish in Austuralia. Freshwater Crayfish, 10: 969-982. freshwater
  • Ranta, E., Lindström, K., 1992. Power to hold sheltering burrows by juveniles of the signal leniusculus. Ethology, 92: 217-226. Pacifastacus
Toplam 34 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil Türkçe
Bölüm Makaleler
Yazarlar

Önder Aksu

Muzaffer Harlıoğlu

Yayımlanma Tarihi 7 Eylül 2015
Gönderilme Tarihi 7 Eylül 2015
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2015 Cilt: 1 Sayı: 1

Kaynak Göster

APA Aksu, Ö., & Harlıoğlu, M. (2015). Kerevitlerin Barınak Çeşitleri ve Barınak Kullanımları. International Journal of Pure and Applied Sciences, 1(1), 53-63.
AMA Aksu Ö, Harlıoğlu M. Kerevitlerin Barınak Çeşitleri ve Barınak Kullanımları. International Journal of Pure and Applied Sciences. Eylül 2015;1(1):53-63.
Chicago Aksu, Önder, ve Muzaffer Harlıoğlu. “Kerevitlerin Barınak Çeşitleri Ve Barınak Kullanımları”. International Journal of Pure and Applied Sciences 1, sy. 1 (Eylül 2015): 53-63.
EndNote Aksu Ö, Harlıoğlu M (01 Eylül 2015) Kerevitlerin Barınak Çeşitleri ve Barınak Kullanımları. International Journal of Pure and Applied Sciences 1 1 53–63.
IEEE Ö. Aksu ve M. Harlıoğlu, “Kerevitlerin Barınak Çeşitleri ve Barınak Kullanımları”, International Journal of Pure and Applied Sciences, c. 1, sy. 1, ss. 53–63, 2015.
ISNAD Aksu, Önder - Harlıoğlu, Muzaffer. “Kerevitlerin Barınak Çeşitleri Ve Barınak Kullanımları”. International Journal of Pure and Applied Sciences 1/1 (Eylül 2015), 53-63.
JAMA Aksu Ö, Harlıoğlu M. Kerevitlerin Barınak Çeşitleri ve Barınak Kullanımları. International Journal of Pure and Applied Sciences. 2015;1:53–63.
MLA Aksu, Önder ve Muzaffer Harlıoğlu. “Kerevitlerin Barınak Çeşitleri Ve Barınak Kullanımları”. International Journal of Pure and Applied Sciences, c. 1, sy. 1, 2015, ss. 53-63.
Vancouver Aksu Ö, Harlıoğlu M. Kerevitlerin Barınak Çeşitleri ve Barınak Kullanımları. International Journal of Pure and Applied Sciences. 2015;1(1):53-6.
 Kapak Resmi İndir

154501544915448154471544615445