Outdoor and indoor sports that require skill executive branches of the personality types of athletes

Yıl 2018, Cilt: 2 Sayı: 1, 19 - 29, 20.12.2018

Hasan Erdem Mumcu , Sema Alay Özgül

https://doi.org/10.46463/ijrss.457042

Cited By: 2

Öz

There are many studies in the areas
of personality and motivation. However, there are limited studies on the
association of skills to personality trait and motivation in our country. The
purpose of this study is to examine the effects of the personality types of the
athletes, who perform sports requiring outdoor and indoor skills, on the
motivation using the Basic Personality Scale for Turkish Culture and the
Motivation in Sports Scale. The conclusions drawn here are thought to be that
the motivations and personality traits of the athletes will contribute to the
selection of the athletes in the future, the selection of the athletes' sports
branches and the process of continuing the sports. The sample of the study
consisted of 239 national athletes in judo, taekwondo, shooting, wrestling,
table tennis, boxing, weightlifting, tennis, swimming, karate, bocce,
billiards, chess, badminton and archery branches. Totally 239 national athletes
participated in the survey, of which 98 are girls and 141 are boys. When
comparing open skills required athletes with closed skills required athletes,
the effects of gender, age, educational status, the age of sport, the age of
national athletic age on personality types and motivations were examined by
Multiple Regression Analysis, Binary and Partial Correlation Analysis.
Statistically significant differences were found on the motivations of the
athletes who perform sports that require both indoor and outdoor skills.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Skill, Personality, Personality traits, Motivation, Sports, Sports activities

Açık ve kapalı becerileri icra eden sporcuların kişilik tiplerinin güdülenmeleri üzerine etkileri

Öz

Kişilik ve güdülenme alanlarında pek çok çalışma
yapılmıştır. Fakat ülkemizde becerilerin, kişilik ve güdülenme ile
ilişkilendirilmesi üzerine çalışmalar sınırlıdır. Bu araştırmanın amacı; Türk
Kültürü için Temel Kişilik Ölçeği ve Sporda Güdülenme Ölçeği kullanılarak, açık
ve kapalı beceri gerektiren sporları icra eden sporcuların kişilik tiplerinin,
sporcuların güdülenmeleri üzerine etkileri incelenmiştir. Buradan çıkan
sonuçların sporcuların güdülerinin ve kişilik özelliklerinin ileride
sporcuların seçimine, sporcuların spor dallarının seçimine ve spora devam etme
süreçlerine katkı sağlamayacağı düşünülmektedir. Araştırmanın örneklemini ise;
judo, tekvando, atıcılık, güreş, masatenisi, boks, halter, tenis, yüzme,
karate, bocce, bilardo, satranç, badminton ve okçuluk dallarında milli olmuş
239 sporcu oluşturmaktadır. Araştırmaya katılan milli olmuş sporcuların, 98‟i
kız, 141‟i erkek olmak üzere toplam 239 sporcu katılmıştır. Açık beceri
gerektiren sporcuların, kapalı beceri gerektiren sporcuları ile
karşılaştırılmasında cinsiyet, yaş, eğitim durumu, spor yaşı, milli sporculuk
yaşı değişkenlerinin kişilik tiplerinin ve güdülenmeleri üzerine etkilerini Çok
Yönlü Regreasyon Analizi, İkili ve kısmi Kolarasyon Analizi ile incelenmiştir. Sonuç
olarak, açık ve kapalı beceri gerektiren sporları icra eden sporcuların kişilik
tiplerinin, sporcuların güdülenmeleri üzerinde istatistiksel anlamlı
farklılıklar tespit edilmiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Beceri, Kişilik, Kişilik özellikleri, Motivasyon, Spor, Spor aktiviteleri

Kaynakça

• Bakker, F. C., Whiting, H.T.A. & Van Der Brug, H. (1990). Sport Psyclogy: Concept and Applicantions: New York John Wiley and Sons.
• Brasile, F. M., Kleiber, D. A., Harnisch, D. (1991). Analysis Of Participation İncentives Among Athletes With And Without Disabilities: Therapeutic Recreation Journal, 25 (1), 18-33.
• Burtscher J, Furtne, M., Sachse, P. & Burtscher, M. (2011). Validation of a German Version of the Sport Motivation Scale (SMS28) and Motivation Analysis İn Competitive Mountain Runners. https://doi.org/10.2466%2F05.06.25.PMS.112.3.807-820
• Deci, E. L., & Rayn, R.M. (1985). İntrinsic Motivation and Self Determination İn Human Behavior: New York Plenum.
• Deci, E. L., & Rayn, R.M. (1990a). A Motivational Approach to Self İntegration in Personality: Nebraska Symposium On Motivation. 38:238-88 https://www.researchgate.net/publication/21026291_A_Motivational_Approach_to_Self_Integration_in_Personality
• Deci, E. L., & Rayn, R.M. (1990b). The Support of Autonmy and The Control Of Behavior: Journal Of Personality and Social Pschology 53:1024-1037
• Deci, E. L., & Rayn, R.M. (2008). Facilitating Optimal Motivation and Psychological Well Being Across Life’s Domains: Canadian Psychology Vol. 49: 1, 14 –23 0708-5591/08/$12.00 DOI: 10.1037/0708-5591.49.1.14
• Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2012). Motivation, Personality, And Development Within Embedded Social Contexts: An Overview Of Self-Determination Theory: The Oxford Handbook Of Human Motivation, 85-107.
• Dyrstad, S. M., Miler, B.W. & Hallen, J. (2002). Physical Fitness Traning Volume, and Self Determined Motivation in Soldiers During a Peacekeeping Mission: Millitary Medicine 2:121-127.
• Gençöz., T. & Öncül, Ö. (2003). Development of Basic Personality Traits Inventory: Psychometric characteristics in a Turkish sample.
• Gill, D. L., Gros, J. B. & Huddlestone, S. (1983). Participant Motivation İn Youth Sport: İnternational Journal of Sport Psycology 14:1-14
• Gould, D. (1982). Sport Psychology İn 1980s Status, Direction And Challenge İn Youth Sport Research: Journal Sport Psychology. 4 (3), 203-218.
• Hagger, M., & Chatzisarantis, N. (2007). Intrinsic Motivation And Self-Determination In Exercise And Sport: Leeds, England Human Kinetics Europe Ltd.
• Kazak, Z. (2004). Sporda Güdülenme Ölçeği’nin (SGÖ) Türk Sporcuları İçin Geçerlilik ve Güvenirlilik Çalışması: Hacettepe Spor Bilimleri Dergisi 15(4), 56-67
• Lindner, K.J., & Kerr, J.H. (2001). Predictability Of Sport Participation Motivation From Metamotivational Dominances And Orientations: Personality And Individual Differences, 30 (5): 759-773.
• Martin, J. J., & Mushett, C. A. (1996). Social Support Mechanisms Among Athletes With Disabilities: Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 13(1), 74-83.
• Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2007). Active Human Nature: Self-Determination Theory And The Promotion And Maintenance Of Sport, Exercise, And Health: Intrinsic Motivation And Self-Determination In Exercise And Sport, 1-19.
• Sarrazin, P., Vallerand, R., Guillet, E., Pelletier, L., & Cury, F. (2002). Motivation And Dropout In Female Handballers: A 21‐Month Prospective Study: European Journal Of Social Psychology, 32(3), 395-418.
• Standage, M., & Ryan, R.M. (2012). Self-Determination Theory And Exercise Motivation Facilitating Self-Regulatory Processes To Support And Maintain Health And Well-Being: Advances In Motivation In Sport And Exercise Pp. 233-270
• Vallerand. R. J., Deci. E. L.. & Ryan. R. M. (1987). Intrinsic Motivation In Sport: New York Macmillan. Exercise and Sport Sciences Reviews Vol. 15. 389-425).
• Vallerand, R. J., & Losier, G. F. (1999). An Integrative Analysis Of Intrinsic And Extrinsic Motivation In Sport: Journal Of Applied Sport Psychology, 11(1), 142-169.
• Vansteenkiste, M., & Deci, E. L. (2003). Competitively Contingent Rewards And Intrinsic Motivation: Can Losers Remain Motivated?. Motivation And Emotion, 27(4), 273-299.