AVRUPA BİRLİĞİ ADALET DİVANININ AVRUPA BİRLİĞİ SOSYAL POLİTİKASININ GELİŞİMİNE ETKİSİ

Yıl 2020, , 791 - 810, 28.12.2020

Canan Uğur Rızzı

https://doi.org/10.37093/ijsi.837765

Öz

Sosyal politika refah devletinin bir konusu olarak çoğunlukla yurttaşlık hakları bağlamında çalışılmıştır. Fakat Avrupa Birliği seviyesinde giderek daha fazla düzenlenen sosyal politika, zamanla Avrupa bütünleşmesi araştırmalarının da önemli bir konusunu oluşturmuştur. Bu nedenle ulusal politikaların temel düzenleme alanı olarak algılanan bir konunun nasıl olup da Avrupa Birliği mevzuatının bir parçası olduğu cevap aranması gereken bir sorudur.
Bu çalışmanın amacı bu soruya cevap aramaktır. Çalışma, sosyal politika ve Avrupa Bütünleşmesi arasındaki ilişkinin değerlendirilmesinin yanısıra, Avrupa Birliği Adalet Divanı (ABAD)’nın kararlarını açıklayıcı bir faktör olarak kullanılmaktadır. Böylelikle farklı refah devletleri sistemleriyle bütünleşmiş bir Avrupa Birliği (AB) sosyal politikası arasında bir köprü kurulacaktır. Seçilmiş örnek vakalar olan Viking ve Laval yargılamalarının da gösterdiği gibi, ABAD sosyal politikaların AB düzeyinde geliştirilmesi için önemli bir aktördür. Bu vakalar ABAD’nin yalnızca varolan sosyal politika sorunlarını çözmediğini, aynı zamanda hem AB düzeyinde hem de üye ülkeler düzeyinde sosyal politikaların giderek birbirleriyle uyumlu hale geldiğini göstermektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Avrupa Sosyal Politikası, Sosyal Politika, Avrupa Bütünleşmesi, Avrupa Birliği Adalet Divanı, Avrupalılaşma

THE IMPACT OF THE COURT OF JUSTICE OF THE EUROPEAN UNION ON THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE EUROPEAN UNION SOCIAL POLICY

Öz

Social policy as a subject of welfare state has been studied mostly from the point of citizenship rights. Yet, the regulations of social policies at the European Union (EU) level are increasing day by day, which makes it an important subject for the European studies. Therefore, it is necessary to seek an answer to the question of how social policies that have been perceived as main subject of national policies have become part of the European legislation.
This research attempts to answer this question. The research benefits from the cases of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) as an explanatory factor, following the elaboration of social policy and European integration relationship. Thus, a bridge between various welfare systems and a uniformed EU social policy is more likely to be built. The paper argues that as the selected cases, Viking and Laval indicate, the CJEU is an important actor that promotes the argument about social policies at the EU level. The cases are not offering only a solution to the pertinent problem but also supporting more consistent social policies in the member states of the EU thanks to its “spill- over” impact.

Anahtar Kelimeler

European Social Policy, Social Policy, European Integration, The European Court of Justice, Europeanization

Kaynakça

• Anderson, Karen M. (2015). Social Policy in the European Union. Macmillan International Higher Education.
• Barnard, Catherine (2008). "Viking and Laval: An Introduction". Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies, 10, 463–492. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1528887000001403.
• Case C-341/05, Laval un Partneri Ltd v Svenska Byggnadsarbetareförbundet, Svenska Byggnadsarbetareförbundets avdelning 1, Byggettan and Svenska Elektrikerförbundet, (ECJ December 18, 2007), https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A62005CJ0341 (Accessed: 13.05.2020).
• Case C-438/05, International Transport Workers’ Federation, Finnish Seamen’s Union v Viking Line ABP, (ECJ December 11, 2007). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A62005CJ0438 (Accessed: 13.05.2020).
• Celik, Aziz (2014). Avrupa Birliği Sosyal Politikası ve Türkiye. İstanbul: Kitap Yayınevi.
• Davesne, Alban (2009). The Laval Case and the Future of Labour Relations in Sweden. Social Science Research Network. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1522235.
• Davies, Anne C. L. (2008). "One Step Forward, Two Steps Back? The Viking and Laval Cases in the ECJ". Industrial Law Journal, 37(2), 126–148. https://doi.org/10.1093/indlaw/dwn001.
• Directorate-General for Internal Policies (2010). The Impact of the ECJ judgements on Viking, Laval, Rüffert and Luxembourg on the Practice of Collective Barbaining and the Effectiveness of Social Action. European Parliament.
• Esping-Andersen, Gosta (1989). The Three Political Economies of the Welfare State. Canadian Review of Sociology/Revue Canadienne de Sociologie. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-618X.1989.tb00411.x.
• Evers, Adalbert, Guillemard, Anne-Marie (2012). Social Policy and Citizenship: The Changing Landscape. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Faist, Thomas (2001). "Social Citizenship in the European Union: Nested Membership". JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 39(1), 37–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5965.00275.
• Falkner, Gerda (1998). EU Social Policy in the 1990s | Towards a Corporatist Policy Community. Abindgon: Routledge.
• Ferrera, Maurizio (1996). "The 'Southern Model' of Welfare in Social Europe". Journal of European Social Policy, 6(1), 17–37. https://doi.org/10.1177/095892879600600102.
• Gallie, Duncan (2013). Economic Crisis, Quality of Work, and Social Integration: The European Experience. Oxford: OUP.
• Haas, Ernst B. (2006). "Does Constructivism Subsume Neofunctionalism?", Debates on European Integration: A Reader. UK: Macmillan Education.
• Heisenberg, Dorothee (2005), The Institution of 'Consensus' in the European Union: Formal versus Informal Decision-Making in the Council". European Consortium for Political Research, 44(1), 65-90.
• Joerges, Christian, Rödl, Florian (2009). "Informal Politics, Formalised Law and the ‘Social Deficit’ of European Integration: Reflections after the Judgments of the ECJ in Viking and Laval". European Law Journal, 15(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0386.2008.00448.x.
• Kleinman, Mark (2002). A European Welfare State? European Union Social Policy in Context. London: Palgrave.
• Malmberg, Jonas (2008). Collective Agreements and Collective Bargaining: Analyses of the Impact of the European Court of Justice Rulings on Laval & Viking. European Parliament. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/note/join/2008/404896/IPOL-EMPL_NT(2008)404896_EN.pdf.
• Marshall, Thomas H. (2006). "Citizenship and Social Class", Pierson, C.; Castles, F. G.; (Eds.). The Welfare State Reader, UK: Polity, 30–40.
• Moravcsik, Andrew (1998). The Choice for Europe Social Purpose and State Power from Messina to Maastricht. Abington: Routledge.
• O’leary, Siofra (1996). The Evolving Concept of Community Citizenship: From the Free Movement of Persons to Union Citizenship. Philadelphia: Kluwer Law International.
• Peonovsky, Pieter (2016). "Evolutions in the Social Case Law of the Court of Justice: The Follow-up Cases of the Laval Quartet: ESA and Regiopost". European Labour Law Journal, 7(2), 294–309. https://doi.org/10.1177/201395251600700206.
• Scharpf, Fritz W. (2002). "The European Social Model". JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 40(4), 645–670. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5965.00392.
• Scharpf, Fritz W. (2010). "The Asymmetry of European Integration, or Why the EU cannot be a ‘Social Market Economy’". Socio-Economic Review, 8(2), 211–250. https://doi.org/10.1093/ser/mwp031.
• Schömann, Isabella (2010). "The Lisbon Treaty: A More Social Europe at last?". Etui, 2010(1). https://www.etui.org/publications/policy-briefs/european-economic-employment-and-social-policy/the-lisbon-treaty-a-more-social-europe-at-last (Accessed: 12.05.2020).
• Treaty of Lisbon Amending, The Treaty on European Union and The Treaty Establishing - The European Community, OJ C306/01 (2007). http://www.europarl.europa.eu/factsheets/en/sheet/5/the-treaty-of-lisbon (Accessed: 13.05.2020).
• Zahn, Rebecca (2008). "The Viking and Laval Cases in the Context of European Enlargement". Web Journal of Current Legal Issues, 3, 1–20.