MOBILITIES: ITS SCOPE AND REFLECTIONS ON TURKISH TOURISM STUDIES

Yıl 2018, Cilt: 10 Sayı: 2, 63 - 77, 31.12.2018

Yalçın Arslantürk Bahadır İnanç Özkan

Öz

There is no doubt that tourism is under current influence of the cultural, social
and economic factors taking place across the world. Along with the brisk
developments under consideration, the scope of tourism is on the change, too. The
mobilities paradigm is one of the concepts that were born into this mutable
context. Thanks to this “mobile” structure, the traditional boundaries as to what
tourism is have changed to a great extent. The repercussions of mobilities
approach have been felt among tourism scholars all over the world. This in mind,
this study sets out to perform to functions. The first one is to outline what
mobilities approach is and the second one is to examine the extent it is employed
in studies of Turkish origin using a bibliometric analysis. The results are
astounding in that “mobilities” is an approach with no scientific devotion in
tourism studies in Turkey. 

Anahtar Kelimeler

mobilities approach, tourism studies, tourism

Kaynakça

• Aguiar, M. (2011). Tracking Modernity: India’s Railway and the Culture of Mobility. Minneapolis, MN:University of Minnesota Press.10.5749/minnesota/9780816665600.001.0001
• Archer, N. (2012). The French Road Movie: Space, Mobility, I Identity. Oxford: Berghahn Books.
• Bauman, Z. (2000). Liquid Modernity. Cambridge: Polity.
• Berensmeyer, I., and C. Ehland, (2013). Perspectives on Mobility. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
• Bispo, S.M. (2016). Tourism as Practice. Annals of Tourism Research, 61, 170- 179.
• Blunt, A (2007) “Cultural Geographies of Migration: Mobility, Transnationality and Diaspora.” Progress in Human Geography, 31(5): 684–694.
• Borden, I. (2013). Drive: Journeys through Film, Cities and Landscapes. London: Reaktion Books.
• Cohen, E. (1988). Traditions in the Qualitative Sociology of Tourism. Annals of Tourism Research, (15) 1, 29-46.
• Cohen, E. (1994). The Sociology of Tourism: Approaches, Issues, and Findings. Annual Review of Sociology, 10, 373 – 392.
• Cohen, E., & Cohen, S. A. (2012). Current sociological theories and issues in tourism. Annals of Tourism Research, 39(4), 2177–2202. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2012.07.009.
• Coles, T., & Hall, M. (2006). Editorial: The Geography of Tourism is Dead. Long Live Geographies of Tourism and Mobility. Current Issues in Tourism, 9(4–5), 289–292.
• Cresswell, T. (2010). Towards a Politics of Mobility. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 28, 17–31.
• Daim, T. U., Rueda, G., Martin, H., and Gerdsri, P. (2006). Forecasting emerging technologies: Use of bibliometrics and patent analysis. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 73(8), 981-1012.
• De Souza e Silva, A and Gordon, E (2011). Net-Locality: Why Location Matters in a Networked World. Malden and Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
• Divall, C., ed. 2015. Cultural Histories of Sociabilities, Spaces and Mobilities London: Pickering & Chatto.
• Edensor, T. (2007). Mundane Mobilities, Performances and Spaces of tourism. Social & Cultural Geography, 8(2), 199–215.
• Franklin, A. (2003). Tourism: An introduction. London: Sage.
• Franklin, A., & Crang, M. (2001). The Trouble with Tourism and Travel Theory? Tourist Studies, 1(1), 5–22.
• Forster , N. (1994) . The Analysis of Company Documentation. C.Cassell and G. Symon (Eds.) Qualitative methods in organizational research: A practical Guide. London: Sage.
• Hannam, K and Knox, D (2010) Understanding Tourism: A Critical Introduction. London: Sage.
• Hannam, K., & Knox, D. (2010). Understanding Tourism. London: Sage.
• Hannam, K., Butler, G., & Paris, C. M. (2014). Developments and Key Issues in Tourism Mobilities. Annals of Tourism Research, 44, 171–185.
• Hannam, K., Sheller, M., and Urry, J. (2006). Editorial: Mobilities, Immobilities and Moorings. Mobilities 1 (1), pp. 1–22.
• IUOTO. (1963). The United Nations' Conference on International Travel and Tourism. International Union of Official Travel Organizations, Geneva: IUOTO
• Jensen, O. B. (2014). Designing Mobilities. Aalborg: Aalborg University Press.
• Jensen, O. B., and D. B. Lanng. (2016). Mobilities Design. London: Routledge.
• Kaplan, C. ( 2003). Transporting the Subject: Technologies of Mobility and Location in the Era of Globalization, in Ahmed, S. et al. (eds), Uprootings/Regroundings of Home and Migration, Oxford:Berg.
• Knowles, R, Shaw, J and Axhausen, K (2006) Transport Geographies: Mobilities, Flows, Spaces. New York:Blackwell.
• Larsen, J., Urry, J., & Axhausen, K. W. (2006). Mobilities, Networks, Geographies. Burlington, VT: Ashgate.
• Leary, J. (2014). Past Mobilities: Archaeological Approaches to Movement and Mobility. Farnham:Ashgate.
• Livesey, R. (2016). Writing the Stage Coach Nation: Locality on the Move in Nineteenth-Century British Literature. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198769439.001.0001
• Massey, D. (1994). Power-geometry and a progressive sense of place. In: Robertson, G., et al. (eds) Mapping the futures. London: Routledge, pp. 59–69.
• Mathieson, C. (2012). “A Moving and a Moving On’: Mobility, Space, and the Nation in Charles Dickens’s ‘Bleak House’.” English 61: 395–405.
• Mathieson, C. (2015). Mobility in the Victorian Novel: Placing the Nation. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9781137545473
• Merriman, P., R. Jones, T. Cresswell, C. Divall, G. Mom, M. Sheller, and J. Urry. (2013). “Mobility: Geographies, Histories, Sociologies.” Transfers: Interdisciplinary Journal of Mobility Studies 3 (1):147–165.
• Mom, G. (2015a). Atlantic Automobilism: Emergence and Persistence of the Car, 1895–1940. Oxford:Berghahn.
• Mom, G. (2015b). “The Crisis of Transport History: A Critique and a Vista.” Mobility in History 6: 7–19.
• Murray, L., and S. Upstone (2014). Researching and Representing Mobilities: Transdisciplinary Encounters. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
• Parkins, W. (2009). Mobility and Modernity in Women’s Novels, 1850s–1930s: Women Moving Dangerously. London: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9780230583115
• Pearce, L. (2016). Drivetime: Literary Excursions in Automotive Consciousness. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
• Schatzki, T. R. (2012). A Primer on Practices: Theory and Research. In J. Higgs, R. Barnett, S. Billett, M. Hutchings, & F. Trede (Eds.), Practice-Based education: Perspectives and Strategies, Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
• Sheller, M., and Urry, J. (2006). The New Mobilities Paradigm. Environment and Planning A 38 (2), pp. 207–226.
• Tribe, J. (2010). Tribe, Territories and Networks in the Tourism Academy. Annals of Tourism Research, 37(1), 7–33.
• UNWTO (2017). Tourism Highlights 2017. [Web Page] United Nations World Tourism Organization. Retrieved May 25, 2011, from http://www.e unwto.org/doi/pdf/10.18111/9789284419029
• Urry, J. (2000). Sociology Beyond Societies. London: Routledge.
• Weingart, P. (2005). Impact of Bibliometrics upon the science system: Inadvertent consequences?. Scientometrics, 62(1), 117-131.
• White, N. R., & White, P. B. (2007). Home and Away: Tourists in a connected world. Annals of Tourism Research, 34(1), 88–104.
• Wilkie, F. (2012). “Site-specific Performance and the Mobility Turn.” Contemporary Theatre Review, 22: 203– 212.10.1080/10486801.2012.666738
• Wilkie, F. (2015). Performance, Transport and Mobility: Making Passage. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9781137476890
• Williams, A. (2013). Mobilities and Sustainable Tourism: Path-creating or Pathdependent Relationships? Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 21(4), 511–531.
• Witzgall, S., Vogl, G., and Kesselring, S. (2013). New Mobilities Regimes in Art and Social Sciences. Farnham: Ashgate.
• Yıldırım, A. ve Şimşek, H. (2003).Sosyal Bilimlerde Nitel Araştırma Yöntemleri, Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık.