A Qualitative Research on the Determination of Toxic Personality Traits

Yıl 2023, Sayı: 94, 28 - 36, 26.06.2023

Benan Arda , Pelin Kanten

https://doi.org/10.26650/imj.2023.94.003

Öz

Personality is a concept used to describe individual differences based on the consistent and continuous behavior of the individual. There are many positive and negative (dark) personality traits that can create these differences. In this context, it is possible to define toxic personality as a manifestation of negative personality traits that can be characterized by skeptical, angry, bossy, egocentric, interest-oriented attitudes and opportunistic habits by using methods such as pressure, manipulation, and impression management. It is possible for individuals with personality disorders and/or negative personality traits to negatively affect their environment. Although it is seen that personality disorders and negative personality traits are discussed in the national and international literature, there is a limited concept unity and measurement tool to generalize negative personality traits. In this direction, as a result of interviews with individuals over the age of 18, it was aimed to present toxic personality traits within the framework of a model. Within the scope of the research, interviews were conducted with 36 participants through a semi-structured questionnaire based on different criteria such as gender, age, marital status and level of education. The data obtained from the interviews were coded and categorized using the MAXQDA qualitative data analysis program. Frequency analysis and comparative analysis were used to visualize codes and categories. In the light of the analysis results, within the framework of the main theme of toxic personality traits, there are seven sub-dimensions as "aggressive traits", "depressive traits", "hysterical traits", "reactive traits", "role model traits", "ego dominant traits" and "ego passive traits" classified by theme.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Personality, Personality Traits, Toxic Personality, Dark Personality, Qualitative Research

Kaynakça

• Appelbaum, S. H. & Roy-Girard, D. (2007). Toxins in the workplace: affect on organizations and employees. Corporate Governance, 7(1), 17-28. google scholar
• Amos, B., Longpre, N. & Roos, M. (2022). The dark triad of personality: attitudes and beliefs towards white-collar crime. Journal of White Collar and Corporate Crime, 0(0), 1-16. google scholar
• Baker, J. D., Capron, E. W. ve Azorlosa, J. (1996). Family environment characteristics of persons with histrionic and dependent personality disorders. Journal of Personality Disorders, 10(1), 82-87. google scholar
• Başkale, H. (2016). Nitel araştırmalarda geçerlik, güvenirlik ve örneklem büyüklüğünün belirlenmesi. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Hemşirelik Fakültesi Elektronik Dergisi, 9(1), 23-28. google scholar
• Carver, C. S. ve Scheier, M. F. (2017). Perspectives on personality (8th ed.). USA: Pearson Education. google scholar
• Gümüştekin, G., Kanten, P. & Kanten, S. (2016). Zehirleyici kişilik özelliklerinin sabotaj davranışlarına etkisinde otantik liderliğin düzenleyici rolü. TURAN: Stratejik Arastirmalar Merkezi, 8(32), 146-157. google scholar
• Kanten, P., Kanten, S., Durmaz, M. G. & Arda, B. (2019). Akademik örgütlerde korku kültürü üzerine nitel bir araştırma. 27. Ulusal Yönetim ve Organizasyon Kongresi Bildiriler Kitabı, 18-20 Nisan 2019, Antalya, 476-492. google scholar
• Kaufman, S. B., Yaden, D. B., Hyde, E. & Tsukayama, E. (2019). The light vs. dark triad of personality: contrasting two very different profiles of human. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1-26. google scholar
• Magnavita, J. J. (2004). Handbook of personality disorders: theory and practice. CANADA: John Wiley & Sons. google scholar
• Marcus, D. K. & Zeigler-Hill, V. (2015). A big tent of dark personality traits. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 9(8), 434-446. google scholar
• Mathieu, C. (2021). Dark personalities in the workplace. USA: Elsevier Academic Press. google scholar
• Miles, M. B. & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis. (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications. google scholar
• Mischel, W., Shoda, Y. & Ayduk, O. (2008). Introduction to personality. (8th ed.). USA: John Wiley&Sons. google scholar
• Munn, N. L. (1958). Psikoloji insan intibakının esasları. (Çev. Tendar, N.). İstanbul: Maarif Basımevi. google scholar
• Paulhus, D.L. & Williams, K. M. (2002). The dark triad of personality: narcissism, machiavellianism, and psychopathy. Journal of Research in Personality, 36, 556-563. google scholar
• Rogoza, R., Kowalski, C. M., Saklofske, D. H. & Schermer, J. A. (2022). Systematizing dark personality traits within broader models of personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 186, 1-8. google scholar
• Sığrı, Ü. (2018). Nitel araştırma yöntemleri. İstanbul: Beta Basım Yayım. google scholar
• Southard, A. C., Noser, A.E, Pollock, N. C., Mercer, S. H. & Zeigler-Hill, V. (2015). The interpersonel nature of dark personality features. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 34(7), 555-586. google scholar
• Van Manen, M. (1984). Practicing phenomenological writing. Phenomenology + Pedagogy, 36-64. google scholar
• World Health Organization (2022). ICD 11 (International Classification of DISEASE). Retrieved 10.02.2022 from https://icd.who.int/en. google scholar