Uluslararası Öğrencilerin Üniversite Web Sitesine Yönelik Tutumları İle Üniversite Çekiciliği Arasındaki İlişki

Yıl 2018, Cilt: 19 Sayı: 1, 200 - 211, 30.04.2018

Yaser Arslan , Evren Şumuer , Soner Polat

https://doi.org/10.17679/inuefd.326662

Öz

Bu çalışmanın amacı uluslararası öğrenci algılarına
göre, üniversite web sitesine yönelik tutum ile üniversite çekiciliği arasındaki
ilişkiyi incelemektir. Çalışmanın katılımcılarını 2016-2017 eğitim öğretim
yılında Kocaeli üniversitesine kayıt yaptıran 134 uluslararası öğrenci
oluşturmaktadır. Veriler Web Sitesi Tutum Ölçeği ve Örgütsel Çekicilik Ölçeği
kullanılarak toplanmıştır. Veriler Pearson momentler çarpımı korelasyon analizi
kullanılarak analiz edilmiştir. Sonuçlar uluslararası öğrencilerin web sitesine
yönelik tutumları ile üniversitenin çekiciliği arasında olumlu bir ilişki
olduğunu göstermiştir. Çalışmanın sonuçlarına dayalı olarak bazı önerilerde
bulunulmuştur. 

Anahtar Kelimeler

Uluslararası Öğrenci, Üniversite Web Sitesi, Örgütsel Çekicilik, Üniversite

The Relationship between International Students` Attitude toward the University Website and University Attractiveness

Öz

The purpose of
this study is to investigate the relationship between international students’
attitudes toward the official website of university and their perception of
university attractiveness. The participants of the study consisted of 134 international
students registered at Kocaeli University in 2016-2017. Data were collected
through the Attitude toward the Site Scale and the Organizational Attraction
Scale. The data were analyzed using Pearson's product-moment correlation
analysis. The findings indicated that there was a positive relationship between
international students’ attitudes toward the university website and the
attractiveness of the university. Based on the results, some suggestions and
practical implications were offered in the study.

Anahtar Kelimeler

International Students, University Websites, Organizational Attractiveness, University

Kaynakça

• Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179–211
• Ajzen, I. ve Fischbein, M. (2000). Attitudes and Attitude Behavior Relation: Reasoned and Automatic Processes. European Review of Social Psychology, 10, 1-33.
• Ancheh, K. S. B., Krishnan, A., & Nurtjahja, O. (2007). Evaluative criteria for selection of private universities and colleges in Malaysia. Journal of International Management Studies, 2(1), 1-11.
• Anılan, H., Çemrek, F. ve Anagün, Ş. S. (2008). Ortaöğretim öğrencilerinin meslek seçimi ve üniversite tercihlerine ilişkin görüşleri (Eskişehir örneği). e-Journal of New World Sciences, 3(2), 238-249.
• Arslan, Y. ve Polat, S. (2016). International Students’ Sources of Information about their University Preference. Paper presented at International Symposium on New Trends in Social and Liberal Sciences, April 28 – May 1, Milano.
• Ayhan, S., ve Erdoğmuş, Ş. (2010). Web Sayfası Tasarımında Kaba Küme Teorisi Tabanlı Kansei Mühendisliği Yaklaşımı. Endüstri Mühendisliği Dergisi, 23, 1, 16-27.
• Baker, S. & Brown,B. (2007). Images of excellence: constructions of institutional prestige and reflections in the university choice process. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 28,( 3), 377–391.
• Battleson, B., Booth, A. ve Weintrop J. (2001). Usability testing of an academic library Website: a case study. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 27(3), 188-198.
• Briggs, S. (2007). An exploratory study of the factors influencing undergraduate student choice: the case of higher education in Scotland. Studies in Higher Education, 31(6), 705-722. doi: 10.1080/03075070601004333
• Briggs, S. ve A. Wilson. 2007. Which university? A study of the influence of cost and information factors on Scottish undergraduate choice. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management 29: 57–72.
• Brown, T. A. (2006). Confirmatory Factor Analysis for Applied Research. NY: guilford Publications, Inc.
• Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2005). Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi el kitabı. Ankara: Pegem
• Büyüköztürk, Ş., Çokluk, Ö. ve Köklü, N. (2012). Sosyal Bilimler İçin İstatistik (10. baskı). Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
• Chapman, D. (1981). A model of student college choice. Journal of Higher Education, 52(5), 490-505.
• Chen, Q. ve Wells, W. D. (1999). Attitude toward the site. Journal of advertising research, 39(5), 27-38.
• Coccari, R. ve R. Javalgi, (1995). Analysis of students’ needs in selecting a college or university in a changing environment. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 6(2), 27-39.
• Corry, M., Frick, T. ve Hansen, L. (1997). User-centered design and usability testing of a web site: An illustrative case stud. Educational Technology Research and Development, 45(4), 65 -767.
• Drewes, T. ve Michael, C. (2006). How do students choose a university: an analysis of applications to universities in Ontario, Canada. Research in Higher Education, 47(7), 781-800.
• Fang, X. ve Holsapple, C. W. (2007). An empirical study of web site navigation structures' impacts on web site usability. Decision Support Systems, 43, 476 –491.
• Fishbein, M., ve Azjen, I., (1975) Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behavior. Reading, MA: Addison – Wesley.
• Gatewood, R. D., Gowan, M. A. ve Lautenschlager, G. J. (1993). Corporate image, recruitment image, and initial job choice decisions. The Academy of Management Journal, 36(2), 414-427.
• Hair, J.F. Jr. , Anderson, R.E., Tatham, R.L., & Black, W.C. (1998). Multivariate Data Analysis, (5th Edition). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
• Highhouse, S., Lievens, F. ve Sinar, E. F. (2003). Measuring attraction to organizations. Educational and Psychological Measurement,63(6), 986-1001.
• Jackson, G. A. (1986). Workable, comprehensive models of college choice. Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching: National Institute of Education, Washington, D.C.: Spencer Foundation, Chicago
• Joseph, M. ve B. Joseph (2000). Indonesian students’ perceptions of choice criteria in the selection of a tertiary institution: Strategic implications. International Journal of Educational Management, 14(1), 40-44.
• Jöreskog, K. G., and Sörbom, D. (1993). LISREL 8: User’s reference guide. Chicago: Scientific Software.
• Karasar, N. (2010). Bilimsel Araştırma Yöntemi. Ankara: Nobel Yayın Dağıtım.
• Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford Press.
• Lee, H. Y., Qu, H. ve Kim, Y. S., (2007). A Study of Personal Innovativeness on Online Travel Shopping Behavior-A Case Study of Korean Travelers. Tourism Management, 28, 886-897.
• Lievens, F., Hoye, G. V. ve Schreurs, B. (2005). Examining the relationship between employer knowledge dimensions and organizational attractiveness: An application in a military context. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 78(4), 553-572.
• Lim, H. and Dubinsky, A.J., (2004), Consumers’ perceptions of e-shopping characteristics: An expectancy-value approach, The Journal of Services Marketing, 18 (6), 500-513.
• Mangan, J., Hughes, A., Davies, P., & Slack, K. (2010). Fair access, achievement and geography: explaining the association between social class and students’ choice of university. Studies in Higher Education, 35(3), 335-350.
• Mentz, G. ve Whiteside. 2003. Internet college recruiting and marketing: Web promotion, techniques and law. Journal of College AdmissionFall, 10–17.
• Ming, J. S. K. (2010). Instutional factors influencing students’ college choice decision in Malaysia: A conceptual framework. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 1(3), 53-58
• Monideepa, T. ve Zhang, J. (2005). Analyzing the Influence of Web Site Design Parameters on Web Site Usability. Information Resources Management Journal, 18(4), 62 -80.
• Moogan, Y. J. & Baron, S. (2003) An analysis of student characteristics within the student decision making process. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 27(3), 271–287.
• Özyürek, R. ve Atıcı, M. (2002). Üniversite öğrencilerinin meslek seçimi kararlarında kendilerine yardım eden kaynakların belirlenmesi. Türk Psikolojik Danışma ve Rehberlik Dergisi, 2(17), 33-42.
• Patterson, K. ve Alles, A. (2017). Usability and meeting the needs of educational Web site users. http://uwf.edu/ddawson/d3net/documents/web_usability/Usability%20and%20meeting%20the%20needs%20of%20educational%20Web%20site%20users.pdf, Erişim tarihi: 8 Şubat 2017.
• Paulsen, M. B. (1990). College Choice: Understanding student enrollment behavior. (Report No. EDO-HE-90-60), Washington, D.C.: ERIC clearinghouse on higher education.
• Price, I., Matzdorf, L. ve H. Agahi, (2003). The impact of facilities on student choice of university, International Journal of Educational Management, 21(10), 212-22.
• Robins, D. ve Holmes, J (2006). Aesthetics and credibility in web site design. Information Processing and Management, 44, 386-399.
• Sayan, Y. ve Aksu, H. H. (2005). Akademik personel olmayan lisansüstü eğitim yapan bireylerin karşılaştıkları sorunlar üzerine bir çalışma. Buca Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 17, 59-60.
• Simões, C., & Soares, A. M. (2010). Applying to higher education: Information sources and choice factors. Studies in Higher Education, 35(4), 371-389.
• Soutar, G.N., & Turner, J.P. (2002). Students’ preferences for university: A conjoint analysis. The International Journal of Educational Management, 16(1), 40-45.
• Turan, A. H. (2011). İnternet Alışverişi Tüketici Davranışını Belirleyen Etmenler: Planlı Davranış Teorisi (TBP) İle Ampirik Bir Test. Doğuş Üniversitesi Dergisi, 12(1), 128- 143.
• Turban, D. B. ve Keon, T. L. (1993). Organizational attractiveness: An interactionist perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(2), 184.
• Veloutsou, C., J. W. Lewis ve R. A. Paton. 2004. University selection: Information requirements and importance. International Journal of Educational Management 18: 160–71.
• Yusof, M., S. N. B. Ahmad, , M. Tajudin, ve R. Ravindran, (2008). A study of factors influencing the selection of a higher education institution. UNITAR e-journal, 4(2), 27-40.