Judah Halevi’s Defense of Judaism and Critique of Islam As Put Forth in His Kuzari

Yıl 2019, , 1 - 44, 31.01.2019

Salime Leyla Gürkan

https://doi.org/10.26570/isad.476254

Cited By: 1

Öz

Moses Maimonides, a famous medieval Jewish thinker, is perhaps the most recognized

Jewish scholar in the western world as well as in Turkish academia. This is

due primarily to his famous philosophical work entitled Dalālat al-ģā’irīn (known

as Guide for the Perplexed to English speaking people), which is a classic of religious

rationalism. Judah Halevi, on the other hand, is another important medieval

Jewish thinker and poet, who, known as the most fervent defender of traditional

Judaism and a fierce critic of religious rationalism, belongs to the opposite camp.

Despite the fact that a huge body of scholarly work exists on Halevi in the West,

including those that deal with the Arabic-Islamic background of his thought, he

has not gained much recognition in Turkish academia. This paper aims to draw

attention to Halevi’s al-Kitāb al-Khazarī, widely known as Sefer ha-Kuzari, by analyzing

its background and content. In this way, this paper presents an evaluation

of the main points of Halevi’s defense of the Jewish religion and critique of Islam

as he put forth in his Kuzari.

Halevi, through his religious-nationalist poems as well as his polemical book, the

Kuzari, had a significant impact on the Jews of his time and of later periods. In

his Kuzari, which is written as a dialogue between a Khazar king (Khazari) and a

Jewish scholar (haver), Halevi defends the Jewish religion and criticizes, directly

or indirectly, the main beliefs and opinions of certain groups that he considers to

be either external (philosophers, Muslims and Christians) or internal (Karaites)

adversaries of Rabbinic Judaism. The Kuzari is also regarded as the first Jewish

polemical book written against Islam. Even more important is the fact that since

Halevi lived in a time and place that was dominated by Muslim Arab culture, he

makes use of Islamic terminology to a great extent in the Kuzari. As demonstrated

by a long chain of scholars including David Kaufmann, Ignaz Goldziher, Julius

Guttman, David Baneth, Israel Efros, Harry Wolfson, Shlomo Pines, Diana Lobel

and Ehud Krinis, Halevi borrows Arabic words and concepts not only from the

Islamic (both Sunni and Shiite) literature of philosophy, kalām and taŝawwuf,

but also directly from the Qur’an and the ģadīth, integrating them into his own

system of thought, i.e., into a Jewish context. The most important of these Islamic

words or concepts are amr/amr Allāh, ittiŝāl, ŝafwa, qiyās, ijtihād, sanad, taqlīd, etc.

It is also important to note that the main adversary groups that Halevi critiques

in his Kuzari –namely, the philosophers (especially the Aristotelians), the kalām

scholars and the Karaites– have one point in common: they all flourished in a

Muslim culture and, in the case of the first two groups, consisted mostly of Muslim

scholars. Accordingly, Greek philosophy, which was criticized by Halevi, had

gained ascendency through the writings of Muslim philosophers and influenced

Jewish scholars as well. As for Karaite Judaism, which emerged in Muslim Iraq, it

was also influenced by the Muslim kalām tradition. Thus, for some scholars, the

Kuzari should be seen as a clarion call made to persuade the Jewish elite of Spain,

who came under the influence of Muslim culture with its emphasis on philosophy

(i.e., Athens), to return to an authentic Jewish tradition (i.e., Jerusalem). This helpsto explain the eventual decision of the haver, the main character of the Kuzari, as

well as of Halevi himself to travel to the holy land to live and die there.

In light of this background knowledge, it is fair to consider Halevi’s defense of

Judaism in parallel to his critique of Islam. In dealing with different topics, Halevi

often makes a comparison between the two religions and most of the time

the main point of this comparison is the contrast made between particularism

and universalism. According to Halevi, what is special about Judaism is that it is

based upon the reality and experience of one people, i.e., the Jews, and therefore

is particularistic and exclusivist in nature; Islam, on the contrary, has a universalistic

and inclusivist orientation. From the Islamic point of view, the dependence

of Jewish religion on ethnicity makes it a limited one, to say the least, whereas

for Halevi this element of ethnicity or peoplehood, which is an inherent feature

of Jewish religion, becomes the indicator of its authenticity. The reason for this

is that Judaism, according to Halevi, is the only religion that depends on the religious

experience of a whole people and not only of certain individuals. This element

of peoplehood, namely the public experience of divine revelation (i.e., Sinai

revelation) and its transmission by chosen individuals (i.e., prophets and sages)

throughout the following generations, makes it a reliable and genuine revelation

and tradition at one and the same time. Islam, on the other hand, is depicted by

Halevi as a feeble and failed religion of universalism. However, this paper argues

that this picture presented by Halevi does not go beyond a caricature of Islam,

on the one hand, and a romantic and idealistic embellishment of Judaism, on the

other.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Judah (Yehuda) Halevi, Sefer ha-Kuzari, al-Kitāb al-Khazarī, Judaism, Islam, Jews

Yehuda Halevi’nin el-Kitâbü’l-Hazerî’de (Kuzari) Ortaya Koyduğu Yahudilik Savunusu ve İslâm’a Yönelik Eleştirileri

Öz

Ortaçağ Yahudi düşüncesinde akılcı çizgiye karşı gelenekçi çizginin en
önemli savunucularından olan Endülüslü Yahudi şair ve düşünür Yehuda Halevi (ö.
1141), Siyon üzerine yazdığı dinî-milliyetçi mahiyetteki şiirlerinin yanı sıra el-Kitâbü’l-Hazerî ya da Sefer ha-Kuzari adlı polemik kitabıyla,
hem kendi döneminde hem de sonraki dönemlerde Yahudiler üzerinde etkili olmuş
bir şahsiyettir. Halevi, Türk akademyasında fazla tanınmasa da, gerek şiirleri
gerekse Kuzari’de ortaya koyduğu
görüşleri üzerine Batı’da önemli çalışmalar yapılmıştır. Bu makale, konu
üzerine oluşturulmuş zengin ikincil literatürü dikkate alacak şekilde, Halevi’yi
ve Kuzari’sini tanıtmayı ve Kuzari’de ortaya konan Yahudilik
savunusu ve İslâm eleştirisini temel noktalar üzerinden değerlendirmeyi amaçlamaktadır.    

Anahtar Kelimeler

Yehuda Halevi, el-Kitâbü’l-Hazerî, Kuzari, Yahudilik, İslâm, İsrâiloğulları, Yahudiler, seçilmişlik, reddiye

Kaynakça

• Adam, Baki, Yahudi Kaynaklarına Göre Tevrat, İstanbul: Pınar Yayınları, 2002.
• A‘zamî, M. Mustafa, Vahyedilişinden Derlenişine Kur’ân Tarihi: Eski ve Yeni Ahit ile Karşılaştırmalı Bir Araştırma, çev. Ömer Türker – Fatih Serenli, İstanbul: İz Yayıncılık, 2006.
• Baron, Salo W., “Yehudah Halevi: An Answer to an Historic Challenge”, Jewish Social Studies, 3/3 (1941): 243-72.
• Baer, Yitzhak, A History of the Jews in Christian Spain, çev. Louis Schoffman, I-II, Skokie: Varda Books, 5761/2001.
• Baneth, David Hartwig, “Judah Halevi and al-Ghazali”, çev. G. Hirschler, Studies in Jewish Thought: An Anthology of German Jewish Scholarship, ed. Alfred Jospe, Detroit: Wayne State University Press, 1981, s. 181-99.
• Baneth, David Hartwig, “Some Remarks on the Autographs of Yehudah Hallevi and the Genesis of the Kuzari”, Tarbiz, 26 (1957): 297-303 [İbrânîce].
• Beinart, Haim, “Toledo”, Encyclopaedia Judaica (EJd.), 2. ed., I-XXII, Detroit 2007, XX, 23-26.
• Berger, Michael S., “Toward a New Understanding of Judah Halevi’s ‘Kuzari’”, The Journal of Religion, 72/2 (1992): 210-28.
• Birnbaum, Ruth, “Judah Halevi and Martin Buber on the Radicalization of Judaism”, Judaism, 34/4 (1985): 391-400.
• Bodoff, Lippman, “Was Yehudah Halevi Racist?”, Judaism, 38/2 (1989): 174-84.
• Brann, Ross, “Judah Halevi”, The Literature of Al-Andalus, ed. Maria Rosa Menocal v.dğr., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000, s. 265-81.
• Brann, Ross, “Judah Halevi: The Compunctious Poet”, Prooftexts, 7 (1987): 123-43.
• Brook, Kevin Alan, The Jews of Khazaria, 3. ed., New York: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, 2018; Türkçe’si: Hazar Yahudileri: Bir Türk İmparatorluğu, çev. İsmail Tulçalı, İstanbul: Nokta Kitap, 2005.
• Cohen, Richard A., “Rosenzweig’s Rebbe Halevi: From the Academy to the Yeshiva”, Judaism, 44 (1995): 448-66.
• Cohon, Samuel S., “Jehuda Halevi”, The American Jewish Year Book, 43 (1941-42/5702): 447-88.
• Dover, Cedric, “The Racial Philosophy of Jehuda Halevi”, Phylon, 13/4 (1952): 312-22.
• Dunlop, D. M., The History of the Jewish Khazars, New York: Schocken Books, 1967.
• Efros, Israel, “Some Aspects of Yehudah Halevi’s Mysticism”, Proceedings of the American Academy for Jewish Research, 11 (1941): 27-41.
• Epstein, Isidore, “Judah Halevi as Philosopher”, The Jewish Quarterly Review, 25/3 (1935): 201-25.
• Feyyûmî, Saîd b. Yûsuf, el-Emânât ve’l-i‘tiḳādât, nşr. S. Landauer, Leiden: Brill, 1880.
• Fontaine, Resianne, “Was Maimonides an Epigone?”, Studia Rosenthaliana, Epigonism and the dynamic of Jewish culture, 40 (2007-2008): 9-26.
• Fontaine, Resianne, “Ibn Daud, Abraham ben David Halevi”, EJd., IX, 662-65.
• Frank, R. M., “Al-Ghazālī on Taqlīd: Scholars, Theologians, and Philosophers”, Zeitschrift für Geschichte der Arabisch-Islamischen Wissenschaften, 7 (1991-92): 207-52.
• Friedman, Mordechai A., “Judah Ha-Levi on Writing the Kuzari: Responding to a Heretic”, From a Sacred Source: Genizah Studies in Honour of Professor Stefan C. Reif, ed. B. M. Outhwaite - S. Bhayro, Leiden: Brill, 2011, I, 158-69.
• Gazzâlî, Tehâfütü’l-felâsife, nşr. Süleyman Dünyâ, 6. bs., Kahire: Dârü’l-maârif, 1392/1972.
• Goitein, Shelomo Dov, “The Biography of Rabbi Judah Ha-Levi in the Light of the Cairo Geniza Documents”, Proceedings of the American Academy for Jewish Research, 28 (1959): 41-56.
• Goitein, Shelomo Dov, “Autographs of Yehuda Hallevi”, Tarbiz, 25 (1955-56): 393-412 [İbrânîce].
• Goitein, Shelomo Dov, A Mediterranean Society: The Jewish Communities of the Arab World as Portrayed in the Documents of the Cairo Geniza V: The Individual, Berkeley: University of California Press, 1988.
• Guttman, Julius, Philosophies of Judaism: The History of Jewish Philosophy from Biblical Times to Franz Rosenzweig, New York: Anchor Books, 1966.
• Gürkan, Salime Leyla, Yahudilik, 5. bs., İstanbul: İSAM, 2015.
• Halevi, Yehuda, Sefer Ha-Kuzari: Makor ve-Targum, çev. Yosef Kafih [Kafah], Kiryat Ono: Makhon Mishnat Ha-Rambam, 5765/2005.
• [Halevi] Lâvî, Ebü’l-Hasan Yehûdâ b. Semev’el, el-Kitâbü’l-Hazerî: er-Red ve’d-delîl fi’d-dîni’z-zelîl, nşr. Nebîh Beşîr, Beyrut/Köln: Menşûratü’l-cemel, 2012.
• Halkin, Hillel, Yehuda Halevi, New York: Schocken, 2010.
• Halper, Yehuda, ed., Philosophy and the Jewish Tradition: Lectures and Essays by Aryeh Leo Motzkin, Leiden: Brill, 2012.
• Heinemann, Isaac, ed., “Judah Halevi: Kuzari”, Three Jewish Philosophers, ed. Hans Lewy v.dğr., Cleveland: Meridian Books, 1960.
• Hellig, Jocelyn, “The Jewish Golden Age of Spain Revisited”, Religion in Southern Africa, 3/2 (1982): 23-33.
• Hirschfeld, Hartwig, “Introduction”, Judah Hallevi’s Kitab Al Khazari, çev. Hartwig Hirschfeld, London: George Routledge and Sons Ltd., 1905, s. 1-35.
• Hughes, Aaron W., “The Art of Philosophy: The Use of Dialogue in Halevi’s Kuzari and Abravanel’s Dialoghi d’Amore”, Medieval Encounters, 13 (2007): 470-98. Husik, Isaac, A History of Medieval Jewish Philosophy, New York: Atheneum, 1969.
• Irmak, Adem, “Yehuda Halevi ve Ahiret Düşüncesi”, Bülent Ecevit Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi, 2/2 (2015): 301-18.
• İbn Meymûn, Delâletü’l-hâirîn, nşr. Hüseyin Atay, Kahire: Mektebetü’s-sekāfeti’d-dîniyye, t.y.
• The Itenerary of Rabbi Benjamin of Tudela, çev. ve ed. A. Asher, I-II, London-Berlin: A. Asher & Co., 1840-41.
• Judah Hallevi’s Kitab Al Khazari, çev. Hartwig Hirschfeld, London: George Routledge and Sons Ltd., 1905.
• Kaplan, Lawrence, “‘The Starling’s Caw’: Judah Halevi as Philosopher, Poet and Pilgrim”, The Jewish Quarterly Review, 101/1 (2011): 97-132.
• Katzew, Jan D., “Moses Ibn Ezra and Judah Halevi: Their Philosophies in Response to Exile”, Hebrew Union College Annual, 55 (1984): 179-95.
• Kfir, Uriah, A Matter of Geography: A New Perspective on Medieval Hebrew Poetry, Leiden: Brill, 2018.
• Kogan, Barry S., “Judah Halevi”, History of Islamic Philosophy, ed. Seyyed Hossein Nasr - Oliver Leaman, New York: Routledge, 1996, s. 718-724; Türkçesi: “Judah Halevî”, İslâm Felsefesi Tarihi, çev. Şamil Öçal - Hasan Tuncay Başoğlu, İstanbul: Açılım Kitap, 2007, s. 395-402.
• Kogan, Barry S., “Judah Halevi and His Use of Philosophy in the Kuzari”, The Cambridge Companion to Medieval Jewish Philosophy, ed. Daniel H. Frank - Oliver Leaman, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003, s. 111-35.
• Kogan, Barry S., “Al-Ghazali and Halevi on Philosophy and the Philosophers”, Medieval Philosophy and the Classical Tradition: In Islam, Judaism and Christianity, ed. John Inglis, London-New York: Routledge Curzon, 2002, s. 54-68.
• Kreisel, Howard, “Judah Halevi’s Influence on Maimonides: A Preliminary Appraisal”, Maimonidean Studies, 2 (1991): 95-121.
• Kreisel, Howard, Prophecy: The History of an Idea in Medieval Jewish Philosophy, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2001.
• Krinis, Ehud, “The Arabic Background of the Kuzari”, Journal of Jewish Thought and Philosophy, 27 (2013): 1-56.
• The Kuzari: In Defense of the Despised Faith, 2. ed., çev. N. Daniel Korobkin, Jerusalem: Feldheim, 2009.
• Kuzgun, Şaban, Hazar ve Karay Türkleri: Türklerde Yahûdilik ve Doğu Avrupa Yahûdilerinin Menşei Meselesi, Ankara: Se-da Yayınları, 1985.
• Langermann, Y. Tzvi, “Science and the Kuzari”, Science in Context, 10/3 (1997): 495-522.
• Lasker, Daniel J., “Proselyte Judaism, Christianity, and Islam in the Thought of Judah Halevi”, The Jewish Quarterly Review, 81/1-2 (1990): 75-91.
• Lasker, Daniel J., “Judah Halevi and Karaism”, From Ancient Israel to Modern Judaism: Intellect in Quest of Understanding, Essays in Honour of Marvin Fox, ed. Jacob Neusner v.dğr., Atlanta: Scholars Press, 1989, III, 111-25.
• Lasker, Daniel J., “Judah Halevi”, Encyclopedia Judaica, 2. bs., XI, 492-500.
• Lasker, Daniel J., “Translations of Rabbi Judah Halevi’s Kuzari” (seforim.blogspot.co.il /2017/06/translations-of-rabbi-judah-halevis.html; son erişim: 17.08.2018).
• Lobel, Diana, Between Mysticism and Philosophy: Sufi Language of Religious Experience in Judah Ha-Levi’s Kuzari, New York: State University of New York Press, 2000.
• Malkiel, David J., “Three Perspectives on Judah Halevi’s Voyage to Palestine”, Mediterranean Historical Review, 25/1 (2010): 1-15.
• Menocal, María Rosa, The Ornament of the World: How Muslims, Jews, and Christians Created a Culture of Tolerance in Medieval Spain, Boston - New York- London: Little, Brown and Company, 2002.
• Meral, Yasin, “Petrus Alfonsi’nin ‘Yahudilere Reddiye’sinde İslam Eleştirisi”, Dinî Araştırmalar, 16/43 (2013): 173-92.
• Meral, Yasin, “Ortaçağ İslam Dünyasında Yahudi Düşüncesi”, Doğu’dan Batı’ya Düşüncenin Serüveni: Aklî Düşünce ve Felsefenin Doğu’dan Doğuşu, ed. Bayram Ali Çetinkaya - Ali Osman Kurt, İstanbul: İnsan Yayınları, 2015, I, 989-1018.
• Mes‘ûdî, Mürûcü’z-zeheb ve meâdinü’l-cevher, nşr. Muhammed Muhyiddîn Abdülhamîd, I-II, Beyrut: Dâru’l-fikr, t.y.
• Moses Maimonides, The Guide for the Perplexed, çev. M. Friedländer, Skokie, Illinois: Varda Books, 2002.
• Moses Maimonides, Code of Maimonides (Mishneh Torah), çev. Isaac Klein, ed. Leon Nemoy, I-XXI, New Haven: Yale University Press, 1972.
• Moses Maimonides, “The Epistle to Yemen”, Epistles of Maimonides: Crisis and Leadership, çev. Abraham S. Halkin, Philadelphia: Jewish Publication Society, 1993. Nemoy, Leon, “Contributions to the Textual Criticism of Judah ha-Levi’s Kitāb al-Khazarī”, The Jewish Quarterly Review, new series, 26/3 (1936): 221-26.
• Oğuz, Emine Okumuş, Yehuda Halevi ve Kitabu’l-Huzari’si (yüksek lisans tezi), Sakarya Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, 2009.
• Özervarlı, M. Sait, “Gazzâlî (Kelâm İlmindeki Yeri)”, DİA, 1996, XIII, 505-11.
• Pines, S., “Shī‘ite Terms and Conceptions in Judah Halevi’s Kuzari”, Jerusalem Studies in Arabic and Islam, 2 (1980): 165-251.
• Pines, S., “Translator’s Introduction: The Philosophic Sources of the Guide of the Perplexed”, The Guide of the Perplexed, çev. Shlomo Pines, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1963, I, s. LVII-CXXXIV.
• Rosenzweig, Franz, Ninty-Two Poems and Hymns of Yehuda Halevi, ed. Richard A. Cohen, çev. Thomas Kovach v.dğr., New York: State University of New York Press, 2000.
• Rubin, Uri, “Prophets and Progenitors in Early Shī‘a Tradition”, Jerusalem Studies in Arabic and Islam, 1 (1979): 41-65.
• Scheindlin, Raymond P., The Song of the Distant Dove: Judah Halevi’s Pilgrimage, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.
• Scheindlin, Raymond P., “The Jews in Muslim Spain”, The Legacy of Muslim Spain, ed. Salma Khadra Jayyusi, Leiden: Brill, 1992, s. 188-200.
• Schweid, Eliezer, The Classic Jewish Philosophers: From Saadia Through the Renaissance, çev. Leonard Levin, Leiden: Brill, 2008.
• Semev’el el-Mağribî, İfhâmü’l-Yehûd: Silencing the Jews, nşr. ve çev. Moshe Perlmann, New York: American Academy for Jewish Research, 1964; Türkçe’si: Yahudiliği Anlamak, çev. Osman Cilacı, İstanbul: İnsan Yayınları, 1995.
• Shear, Adam, The Kuzari and the Shaping of Jewish Identity, 1167–1900, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008.
• Shear, Adam, “Canonicity and the Authority of Works of ‘Jewish Thought’: Theoretical Perspectives and Some Examples from the Early Modern Reception of the Kuzari”, Iggud: Selected Essays in Jewish Studies, vol. I: The Bible and Its World, Rabbinic Literature and Jewish Thought, ed. Baruch Schwartz v.dğr., Jerusalem: World Union of Jewish Studies, 2009, s. 115-28.
• Silman, Yochanan, Philosopher and Prophet: Judah Halevi, the Kuzari and the Evolution of His Thought, çev. Lenn J. Schramm, New York: State University of New York Press, 1995.
• Spero, Shubert, “Yehudah Halevi and Philosophical Use of Metaphor”, Tradition, 45/3 (2012): 7-20.
• Stampfer, Shaul, “Did the Khazars Convert to Judaism?”, Jewish Social Studies, 19/3 (2013): 1-72.
• Strauss, Leo, “The Law of Reason in the Kuzari”, Proceedings of the American Academy for Jewish Research, 13 (1943): 47-96.
• Taşağıl, Ahmet, “Hazarlar”, DİA, 1998, XVII, 116-20.
• Toprak, M. Faruk, “Yehuda Halevi ve Şiirleri”, Eski Yeni, 1 (2006) 109-11.
• Tudela’lı Benjamin - Ratisbon’lu Petachia, Ortaçağda İki Yahudi Seyyahın İslâm Dünyası Gözlemleri, çev. Nuh Arslantaş, İstanbul: MÜ İlâhiyat Fakültesi Vakfı Yayınları, 2009.
• Wasserstrom, Steven M., Between Muslim and Jew: The Problem of Symbiosis under Early Islam, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1995.
• Wiener, Max, “Judah Halevi’s Concept of Religion and a Modern Counterpart”, Hebrew Union College Annual, Hebrew Union College Seventy-fifth Anniversary Publication 1875-1950, 23/1 (1950-51): 669-82.
• Wolfson, Elliot R., “Merkavah Traditions in Philosophical Garb: Judah Halevi Reconsidered”, Proceedings of the American Academy for Jewish Research, 57 (1990-91): 179-242.
• Wolfson, Harry Austryn, “Hallevi and Maimonides on Prophecy”, The Jewish Quarterly Review, new series, 32/4 (1942): 345-70; 33/1 (1942): 49-82.
• Wolfson, Harry Austryn, “Maimonides and Halevi: A Study in Typical Jewish Attitudes Towards Greek Philosophy in the Middle Ages”, The Jewish Quarterly Review, 2/3 (1912): 297-337.
• Yahalom, Joseph, “Judah Halevi: Records of a Visitor from Spain”, The Cambridge Genizah Collections: Their Contents and Significance, ed. Stefan C. Reif, New York: Cambridge University Press, 2002, s. 123-33.
• Zuckerman, Constantine, “On the Date of the Khazars’ Conversion to Judaism and the Chronology of the Kings of the Rus Oleg and Igor: A Study of the Anonymous Khazar Letter from the Genizah of Cairo”, Revue des Études Byzantines, 53 (1995): 237-70.