Sekülarizm Söyleminde Cinsiyet Eşitliǧine Dair Faraziyeler

Yıl 2019, Cilt: 8 Sayı: 1, 431 - 446, 30.03.2019

Hesna Serra Aksel

https://doi.org/10.15869/itobiad.492285

Öz

Aydınlanmacı söylemin merkezinde olan sekülerlik insanlığa
bağımsızlık, özgürlük, kurtuluş ve ilerleme vaat eder. Ayni zamanda sekülerlik
söylemi, dogma, köktencilik ve şiddetin kaynağı olarak, dini kendisinin
karşıtına yerleştirir. Bu aydınlanmacı söylem, evrensel bir kurtuluş projesi ve
cinsiyet eşitliği ilkesi olarak, normatiftik iddia eder. Bu calışmada,
sekülerliğin çeşitli bağlamlarda cinsiyet ve cinsellik gözlüğü ile yakın bir
okuması yapılarak, sekülerliğin her zaman cinsiyet eşitliğine dair bir ilerleme
getirdigi dinin ise her zaman eşitsizlik ve baskı ürettiğine dair söylem
sorgulanmaktadır. İlk olarak, sekülerlik ve cinsiyeti anlamada yeni alanlar
açmak için ve sekülerliğin evrensellik iddiasını sorgulamak için, sekülerliğin
Avrupa kökenleri ve “din” konseptinin oluşturulma süreci incelenmektedir. Ardından
birbirlerini farklı bağlamlarda yeniden inşa eden sekülerlik ve dini deneyimlerin
çeşitliliği ele alınmıştır. Son olarak da, cinsiyet, cinsellik ve aile
bağlamında, seküler ve dini olanın somutlaşma şekillerinin, seküler ve dini
ayırımlarını anlamada önemli bir husus olduğu tartışılmıştır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Sekülerizm, Din, Modernite, Cinsiyet, Evrensellik

Assumptions on Gender Equality in the Narrative of Secularism

Öz

Secularism, which is central to the Enlightenment narrative,
promises liberation, freedom, emancipation, and progress to humanity. At the
same time, the narrative of secularism poses religion as its antithesis, which brings dogmatism,
fundamentalism, and violence. In this
project, I read secularism closely in various contexts from a gender and
sexuality perspective and question the assumption that secularism always
provides a progress for gender equality, whereas religion always produces
inequality and oppression. To open up new ways of understanding secularism and
gender, I firstly question the so-called universality of secularism by addressing
the European origin of secularism and the concept of religion. Then, I address
the diversity of secular and religious experiences which reconstruct each other
in various contexts. Finally, I argue that the embodiment of secular or
religious in terms of gender, sexuality and
family is an important matter for the understanding of the division between religious
and secular. 

Anahtar Kelimeler

Modernity, Secularism, Religion, Gender, Universalism

Kaynakça

• Anderson, B. (1983). Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origins and Spread of Nationalism. London: Verso.
• Asad, T. (2003). Formations of the Secular: Christianity, Islam, Modernity. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press.
• Badran, M. (2013). Gendering the Secular and Religious in Modern Egypt: Woman, Family, and Nation. In L.E. Cady & T. Fessenden (Ed.), Religion, The Secular, and the Politics of Sexual Difference. (pp. 103-120). New York: Colombia University Press.
• Baird, RJ. (2008). Late secularism. In J.R. Jakobsen & A. Pellegrini (Ed.), Secularisms (pp. 162-177). Durham: Duke University Press.
• Berger, PL. (2008). Secularization falsified. First Things: A Monthly Journal of Religion and Public Life, 180 (2008), pp. 23-27.
• Butler, J. (2008). Gender trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. New York: Routledge.
• Cady, L.& T. Fessenden. (2013). Gendering the Divide: Religion, the Secular, and the Politics of Sexual Difference. In L.E. Cady & T. Fessenden (Ed.), Religion, The Secular, and the Politics of Sexual Difference. (pp. 3-24). New York: Colombia University Press.
• Fernando, M. (2010). Reconfiguring Freedom: Muslim Piety and the Limits of Secular Public Discourse and law. American Ethnologist, 37 (2010), pp. 19-35. Jakobsen, JR. and Ann P. (2008). Introduction: Times Like These. In J.R. Jakobsen & A. Pellegrini (Ed.), Secularisms (pp. 1-35). Durham: Duke University Press.
• Smith, JZ. (2004). Relating Religion: Essays in the Study of Religion. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
• Karam, A. (2013). Must It Be Either Secular or Religious? Reflections on the Contemporary Journeys of Women’s Rights Acivities in Egypt. In L.E. Cady & T. Fessenden (Ed.), Religion, The Secular, and the Politics of Sexual Difference. (pp. 59-68). New York: Colombia University Press.
• Mahmood, S. (2005). Politics of Piety: The Islamic Revival and the Feminist Subject. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
• Mahmood, S. (2013). Sexuality and Secularism. In L.E. Cady & T. Fessenden (Ed.), Religion, The Secular, and the Politics of Sexual Difference. (pp. 47-58). New York: Colombia University Press.
• Martin, C. (2014). Genealogies of Religion, Twenty Years On: An Interview with Talal Asad. Bulletin for the Study of Religion, 43(1), pp. 12-17.
• Masuzawa, T. (2005). The Invention of World Religions, Or, How European Universalism Was Preserved in the Language of Pluralism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
• Najmabadi, A. (2008). (Un)veiling Feminism. In J.R. Jakobsen & A. Pellegrini (Ed.), Secularisms (pp. 39-57). Durham: Duke University Press.
• Parla, T. and Andrew D. (2008). Secularism and laicism in Turkey. In J.R. Jakobsen & A. Pellegrini (Ed.), Secularisms (pp. 58-75). Durham: Duke University Press.
• Peterson, D. and Darren W. (2002). The Invention of Religion: Rethinking Belief in Politics and History. New Brunswick, N.J.: Rutgers University Press.
• Rajan, R. (2008). Women Between Community and State: Some Implications of the Uniform Civil Code Debates. In J.R. Jakobsen & A. Pellegrini (Ed.), Secularisms (pp. 76-106). Durham: Duke University Press.
• Samantrai, R. (2008). Continuity or Rupture? An Argument for Secular Britain. In J.R. Jakobsen & A. Pellegrini (Ed.), Secularisms (pp. 330-352). Durham: Duke University Press.
• Scott, J. (2013). Secularism and gender Equality. In L.E. Cady & T. Fessenden (Ed.), Religion, The Secular, and the Politics of Sexual Difference (pp. 25-46). New York: Colombia University Press.
• Subramaniam, B. (2008). What tangled webs we weave: science, secularism, and religion in contemporary India. In J.R. Jakobsen & A. Pellegrini (Ed.), Secularisms (pp. 178-202). Durham: Duke University Press.
• Vanaik, A. (1997). The Furies of Indian Communalism: Religion, Modernity and Secularization. New York: Verso.
• Wilson, B. (1982). Religion in Sociological Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Woodhead, L. (2008). Gendering Secularization Theory. Social Compass, 55 (2), pp. 187–93.
• Zubaida, S. (2005). Islam and Secularization. Asian Journal of Social Science, 33(3), pp. 438-448.