Saar Statü Referandumu: 1935 yılında Nazi Kartpostal Propagandası Üzerine İnceleme

Yıl 2021, Cilt: 10 Sayı: 4, 3282 - 3315, 30.12.2021

Elif Hatun Önal - Kılıçbeyli

https://doi.org/10.15869/itobiad.927733

Öz

Uluslararası İlişkiler disiplininin alt çalışma alanlarından olan Siyasi Tarih’in diğer bir sosyal bilimler çalışma alanı içinde yer alan iletişim alanlarının ortaklaşmasıyla ‘siyasal iletişim’ aracı olarak kartpostalların propaganda malzemesi olarak kullanılması, bu makalenin çalışma alanıdır. Birinci Dünya Savaşı’nın devam ettiği 28 Haziran 1919 tarihinde Paris’te Barış Konferansında toplanan İttifak Devletleri’nin ilk imzaladığı barış antlaşması Versay’dır. Paris’teki Versay Antlaşması hükümlerini kabul edilmez bularak, antlaşmanın Alman cumhuriyetinin geleceğine konulmuş bir ipotek olduğu beyan eden Şansölye Scheidmann, Alman halkı tarafından haklı görülmüştü. Almanya’da 30 Ocak 1933 günü iktidara gelen Nasyonel Sosyalist Alman İşçi Partisi (NSDAP), tanımladığı ari ırk Germenleri milli olarak güçlendirmeye yönelik propagandalarıyla siyasi gücünü diasporasıyla birleştirmeye yöneltmiştir. 13 Ocak 1935 tarihinde Milletler Cemiyeti’nin yönetiminde bulunan Saarland’da Saar Statü Referandumu üç farklı seçenek üzerine oylanmıştır. Referandum öncesinde Naziler, Saarland’ın Almanya’ya katılımını sağlamak için Almanya Halkı Aydınlatma ve Propaganda Bakanlığı üzerinden Alman diasporasına yönelik yoğun bir propaganda kampanyası gerçekleştirmiştir. Nazi döneminde kartpostallar ilk kez bu referandumda propaganda malzemesi yapılmıştır. Bu çalışmada Saarland Statü Referandumu öncesi ve sonrasında Nazilerin Saarland’daki Alman diasporasına yönelik propaganda amaçlı kullanılan ve araştırmada örneklem olarak belirlenen onüç adet kartpostal, Alman dilbilimci Karl Bühler’in Organon Modeli üzerinden göstergebilim yöntemiyle analiz edilmiştir. Elde edilen bulgularda, kartpostallar üzerinden Saarland’ın Almanya’ya katılmasıyla ‘Güçlü Almanya’ ile Saarland’ın özgürleşeceğine ve Saarland halkının huzura kavuşacağına yönelik algılarla ikna edilmeye çalışıldığı anlaşılmaktadır. Analiz sonucunda kartpostalların da yer aldığı Almanya propagandası, Saarland halkının Avrupa’daki siyasi süreçleri takip eden duyarlılığını ve sosyo-kültürel değerlerden beslenen yapısını etkilemiştir. Propaganda da Alman milli ögeleriyle yaratılan Germen milliyetçiliğin yükseltilmesinin yanısıra, Birinci Dünya Savaşı sonunda Versay Antlaşmasının meydana getirdiği ‘savaşın faturasının ağır yüklenicisi’ ve ‘mağduriyet’ durumu referandum sonucunu Almanya lehine etkilemiştir. Bu nedenle Saar referandumu, iktidardaki NSDAP’nin propaganda başarısı olarak kabul edilerek, Nazizm’in yükselişine ivme kazandıran siyasi ve ekonomik bir süreç olarak değerlendirilmiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Saarland, Fransa, Alman Diasporası, Almanya, Referandum

The Saar Status Referendum : A Review of Nazi Postcard Propaganda in 1935

Öz

The use of postcards as propaganda material as a means of ‘political communication’ with the commonisation of communication areas within another social science field of political history, which is a sub-field of study of the discipline of international relations, is the field of study of this article. Versailles was the first peace treaty signed by the states of the Alliance, which met at the Peace Conference in Paris on June 28, 1919, when the 1st World War continued. Chancellor Scheidmann, who found the provisions of the Treaty of Versailles in Paris unacceptable, declared that the treaty was a mortgage on the future of the German republic, was considered justified by the German people. The National Socialist German Workers Party (NSDAP), which came to power in Germany on January 30, 1933, directed it to unite its political power with its diaspora with its propaganda aimed at nationally strengthening the ari race Germans it identified. On 13 January 1935, a referendum on Saar status was voted on in the Saarland under the administration of the League of Nations on three different options. Prior to the referendum, the Nazis conducted an intense propaganda campaign against the German diaspora through the German Ministry of Public Information and Propaganda to ensure the participation of the Saarland in Germany. During the Nazi era, postcards were first made propaganda material in this referendum. In this study, thirteen postcards used by the Nazis for propaganda purposes against the German diaspora in the Saarland before and after the Saarland status referendum and identified as samples were analyzed using semiotics using the Organon model of German linguist Karl Bühler. In the findings, it was revealed that the postcards tried to convince the perception that the Saarland would be liberated and that the Saarland people would be at peace with the ‘Strong Germany’ when the Saarland joined Germany. As a result of the analysis, German propaganda, including postcards, influenced the sensitivity of the Saarland people following political processes in Europe and the structure fed by socio-cultural values. In addition to the promotion of Germanic nationalism created by German national elements, the ‘heavy contractor of the bill of war’ and ‘victimization’ situation caused by the Treaty of Versailles at the end of the 1st World War affected the referendum result in favor of Germany. Therefore, the Saar referendum was considered a propaganda success of the ruling NSDAP and was a political and economic process that gave impetus to the rise of Nazism.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Saarland, France, German Diaspora, Germany, Referendum

Kaynakça

• Abrahamsson, C. (2013). On the Genealogy of Lebensraum. Geographica Helvetica, 68(1), 37-44.
• Apendiyev, T. A., Abdukadyrov, N. M., & Kubeyev, R. D. (2019). History of German Diaspora in Kazakhstan in the Context of Migration System. Bull. Georg. Natl. Acad. Sci, 13(4), 127-134.
• Baranowski, S. (2016). Legacies of Lebensraum: German Identity and Multi-Ethnicity. Ed. Manuel Borutta and Jan C. Jansen. In Vertriebene and Pieds-Noirs in Postwar Germany and France (pp. 35-52). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
• Bedjaoui, M.(1994). The New World Order and the Security Council: Testing the Legality of Its Acts .Martinus Nijhoff.
• Bergen, D. L. (1994). The Nazi Concept of 'Volksdeutsche' and the Exacerbation of Anti-Semitism in Eastern Europe, 1939-45. Journal of Contemporary History, 29(4), 569-582.
• Bie, Y.(2016). The visual arts influence in Nazi Germany. SHS ICITCE 2 shsconf/20162502022https://www.shs-conferences.org/articles/shsconf/pdf/2016/03/shsconf_icitce2016_02022.pdf
• Blanke, R. (1990). The German Minority in inter-war Poland and German Foreign Policy—Some Reconsiderations. Journal of Contemporary History, 25(1), 87-102.
• Blood, P. W. (2010). Securing Hitler's Lebensraum: The Luftwaffe and Białowieża Forest, 1942–1944. Holocaust and Genocide Studies, 24(2), 247-272.
• Callagher, M (2014). The Saar Plebiscite, 1935. Archived from the original on 12 February 2018. Retrieved 2 May 2014.
• Caplan, Jane (2012). Hitler Almanyası (1933-1945), Çev. İdem Erman, İnkılap Kitabevi, 1.Baskı, İstanbul.
• Carlson, C.K.(2016). The Saarland votes to rejoin Germany. The Deseret News Jan 14, 2016,
• Cordell, K. (2009). Memory, Identity and Poland's German Minority. German Politics and Society, 27(4), 1-23.
• Cornwall, M. (1992). Dr Edvard Beneš and Czechoslovakia’s German Minority, 1918–1943. Ed. John Morison. In The Czech and Slovak Experience (pp. 167-202). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
• Çankaya, E. (2019). Siyasal İletişim Dünyada ve Türkiye’de. İmge Kitabevi. 2019.Ankara
• Çetinkaya, G . (2019). İkinci Dünya Savaşı Öncesinde Nazilerin İktidara Gelişi ve Türk-Alman İlişkileri . Uluslararası Sosyal Bilimler ve Eğitim Dergisi ,1(1),87-97. Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/usbed/issue/48285/594892
• Eldem, E.(2014). 1.Dünya Savaşı’nda İttifak Cephesinde Savaş ve Propaganda Koç Üniversitesi Anadolu Medeniyetleri Araştırma Merkezi, Vehbi Koç Vakfı.
• Erol, E. (2020). Nazi Almanya’sında Yayıncılık, Nazizm İdeolojisinin Yaydığı Anti-Semitist Söylemlerin İnşası ve Kitapların Propaganda Amaçlı Kullanımı. Türk Kütüphaneciliği, 34(4), 693-722.
• Erdoğan, A. (2016). Versay Antlaşması: Almanya’nın Sınırları ve Avrupa için siyasi hükümler. Retrieved from https://www.tuicakademi.org/versay-antlamasi-almanyanin-sinirlari/
• E. W. (1952). The Saar as an International Problem. The World Today,8(7), 299-307. Retrieved August 27, 2021, from http://www.jstor.org/stable/40392581
• Facing History and Ourselves. https://www.facinghistory.org/educator-resources Erişim Tarihi: 21.08.2021.
• Florinsky A. (19234). The Saar Struggle. N.Y. Macmillan.
• Guiraud, P. (2016). Göstergebilim. İmge Kitabevi.
• Graafland, P. (2012). Government Policies on the Development Potential of the Bosnian Diaspora in Germany. The Interdisciplinary Journal of International Studies, 8, 1-22.
• Grabowski, A.& Sante, G.W. (1934). Die Grundlagen des Saar-kampfes. Berlin. Heymanns.
• Greenwood, H. Powys (1935). Lessons of the Saar. The Spectator. Retrieved 21.08.2021.
• Grunberger, R.(2014).The 12-Year Reich: A Social History of Nazi Germany, 1933–1945 . New York: Henry Holt & Com.
• Halas, M. (2014). Searching for the Perfect Footnote: Friedrich Ratzel and the Others at the Roots of Lebensraum. Geopolitics, 19(1), 1-18.
• Hansen, H. H. (2012). Zur politischen Vertretung der deutschen Minderheit in Dänemark nach der Kommunalreform von 2007. Europäisches Journal für Minderheitenfragen, 5(3), 181-186.
• Henlein, K. (1936). The German Minority in Czechoslovakia. International Affairs (Royal Institute of International Affairs 1931-1939), 15(4), 561-572.
• Hughes, T.(1935) Saar status referendum, 1935... Rare and Early Newspapers. Retrieved from on 22 08 2021. https://www.rarenewspapers.com/view/638265?list_url=%2Flist%3Flist_results_format%3Dstandard%2525page%3D532%2525per_page%3D30%2525q%255Bsearch_method%255D%3DAll%2BWords%253Frc%253Dblog%2525q%255Btext%255D%3Dneil%2Bsteps%2Bon%2Bmoon%2525sort%3Ditems.id%2525sort_direction%3DASC&imagelist=1
• Jerca, L. (2012). The Beginnings of the Repression against the German Minority in Romania: A Case Study of Transylvanian Saxon Communities, 1945-1949. Martor. Revue d’Anthropologie du Musée du Paysan Roumain, (17), 101-115.
• Jurek, T. (2020). Physical Education and School Sport of the German Minority in Poland in the Interwar Period of the 20th Century. Central European Journal of Sport Sciences and Medicine, 30(2), 25-31.
• Kerwin, J. (1932). The German Reichstag Elections of July 31, 1932. The American Political Science Review,26(5), 921-926. doi:10.2307/1947146
• Kilicbeyli, E.H.(2004).Yevraaziskaya Geopolitika : Turtsiya i Rassiya (stariye panyatiye, noviye padhodi ).str. 274 – 297. Turtsiya vı XX veke. Otv.Red. Dr. Yelena İzmailovna Urazova. Nauk Izdatelstva. Maskva.2004
• Kosiarski, J. (1992). The German Minority in Poland. Polish Quarterly of International Affairs, 1(Issues 1-2), 47-68.
• Kotzian, O. (2010). Deutsche Minderheiten in Europa und Landsmannschaften in Deutschland: Ein Vergleich (II). Europäisches Journal für Minderheitenfragen, 2(4), 200-211.
• Kouli, Y. (2017). The German Minority in Poland between 1945 and 1960: A Key Element of Poland's Postwar Economy. Region: Regional Studies of Russia, Eastern Europe, and Central Asia, 6(1), 29-53.
• Krantz, D. (2019). The Israeli "Diaspora" in Germany: One of a Kind. Palestine-Israel Journal of Politics, Economics, and Culture, 24(3/4), 137-143.
• Kreisslová, S., & Novotný, L. (2018). Between Language Revitalization and Assimilation: On the Language Situation of the German Minority in the Czech Republic. Journal of Nationalism, Memory & Language Politics, 12(1), 121-139.
• Kruszewski, C. (1940). Germany's Lebensraum. American Political Science Review, 34(5), 964-975.
• Kugel, A.F. (1936). Allied Plebiscite Activity in the Saar Territory, 1935. Military Postal History Society.
• Kuechler, Manfred. The NSDAP vote in the Weimarer Republic: an assessment of the state-of-the-Art in view of modern electoral research .SSOAR. https://doi.org/10.12759/hsr.17.1992.1.22-52
• League of Nations (1934). Official Journal. Geneva.
• Lebach (2020). Saarland’da Kullanılan Nazi Almanya’sının Propaganda Kartpostalları, https://hv-lebach.de/Bilder/Saarabstimmung_1935/index.htm, Erişim Tarihi: 18.01.2021.
• Lumans, V. O. (1982). The Ethnic German Minority of Slovakia and the Third Reich, 1938-45. Central European History, 15(3), 266-296.
• MacQueen, N. (ed.)(2011), The United Nations, Peace Operations and the Cold War, 2nd ed. Routledge. Doc.1.
• Maier, E. (1970). Die deutsche Minderheit in der Tschechoslowakei. Der Donauraum, 15(1-2), 74-76.
• Manz, S. (2014). Constructing a German Diaspora: The "Greater German Empire", 1871-1914. The United Kingdom: Routledge.
• Maxwell, A., & Davis, S. E. (2016). Germanness beyond Germany: Collective Identity in German Diaspora Communities. German Studies Review, 39(1), 1-15.
• Mazower, M.(2013). Hitler İmparatorluğu İşgal altındaki Nazi Yönetimi. Alfa Tarih.
• Mentzel, P. (1993). The German Minority in Inter‐war Yugoslavia. Nationalities Papers, 21(2), 129-143.
• Nelde, P. H. (1984). Deutsche Minderheiten und ihre Sprache in Europa. Language Problems and Language Planning, 8(1), 1-20.
• Noakes, J. (2010). Lebensraum: Hitler's Territorial Expansion in the East. Agora, 45(3), 33-36.
• Oğuz Bülbül, B.(1986). Türk dilinde ‘yol’kavramının toplumsal dilbilim açısından incelenmesi. Celal Bayar Üniversitesi. Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü
• Patterson, E. J. (1958). The Saar Referendum. Ed. B. Landheer, W. Horsfall Carter. In Annuaire Européen/European Yearbook (pp. 226-242). Dordrecht: Springer.
• Philippi, P. (2009). Zur Erhaltung autochthoner Minderheiten unter Diasporabedingungen am Beispiel der deutschen Minderheit in Rumänien. Europäisches Journal für Minderheitenfragen, 2(1), 32-38.
• Pollock, J. (1935). International Affairs: The Saar Plebiscite. The American Political Science Review. (2), 275-282. doi:10.2307/1947508
• Prinz, C.(2015). Die Saarabstimmung 1935. Deutsches Historisches Museum, Berlin.
• Rachwał, G. (2018). Press of the German Minority in Poland in 1989-2017. Social Communication, 4(1), 64-76.
• Ragab, N. J., & Koch, K. (2019). The Palestinian Diaspora in Germany. Palestine-Israel Journal of Politics, Economics, and Culture, 24(3/4), 144-154.
• Reinhard, R. (1935). Zur Saarabstimmung am 13. Januar 1935. Geographische Zeitschrift, 41(2. H), 49-55.
• Römhild, R. (1994). Staying or Leaving? Experiences and Expectations of the German Minority in the Former Soviet Union. Anthropological Journal on European Cultures, 3(1), 107-121.
• Russell, Frank (1951). The Saar Battleground And Pawn .(Ed.).Palo Alto, California: Stanford University Press.
• Sandler, W. (2012). Here Too Lies Our Lebensraum: Colonial Space as German Space. Ed. Claus-Christian W. Szejnmann and Maiken Umbach. In Heimat, Region, and Empire (pp. 148-165). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
• Shirer W.L.(2011). The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich: A History of Nazi Germany Oct 11, 2011
• Scriba, A.(2014). Das NS-Regime. Deutsches Historisches Museum, Berlin
• Søndergaard, B., & Byram, M. (1986). Pedagogical Problems and Symbolic Values in the Language Curriculum‐the Case of the German Minority in Denmark. Journal of Multilingual & Multicultural Development, 7(2-3), 147-167.
• Swanson, J. C. (2006). Nation, Volk, Minderheit, Volksgruppe: Die deutsche Minderheit in Ungarn in den Begriffskämpfen der Zwischenkriegsära. Zeitschrift für Ostmitteleuropa-Forschung, 55(4), 526-547.
• Sword, K. (1999). From Ethnic Cleansing to Ethnic Resurgence: The German Minority in Poland, 1945–95. Ed. Roger Bartlett and Karen Schönwälder. In The German Lands and Eastern Europe (pp. 238-259). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
• Szelényi, B. A. (2007). From Minority to Übermensch: The Social Roots of Ethnic Conflict in the German Diaspora of Hungary, Romania and Slovakia. Past and Present, 196(1), 215-251.
• Thoene, U. (2014). Weimar Germany's Foreign Policy and the Protection of Minorities: The Case of the German Minority in Poland. Historia Caribe, 9(25), 39-70.
• Tutsak, A. (2017). Hitler Almanya’sının yayılmacı Politikası ve İkinci Dünya Savaşı (1932-1945) . Akademik Bakış Uluslararası Hakemli Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi ,63)190-208. Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/abuhsbd/issue/35955/403518
• Tseligka, E. D. (2020). Greek Diaspora in Germany: Church as the Ecclesia’s Forerunner and Point of Reference. Ed. Giuseppe Giordan and Siniša Zrinščak. In Global Eastern Orthodoxy (pp. 241-258). Cham: Springer.
• Uhl, K. (2013). The Ideal of Lebensraum and the Spatial order of Power at German Factories, 1900–45. European Review of History: Revue europeenne d'histoire, 20(2), 287-307.
• UNECE (2019). The United Nations Economic Commission for Europe. Case_Study_Saar_Region https://unece.org/fileadmin/DAM/energy/images /CMM/CMM_CE/BPG_AMM_Case_Studies/Case_Study_Saar_Region.pdf
• Van der Goes van Maters, M. (1953). The Future Position of The Saar: One Some Historical, Legal and Economic Aspects of the Saar Problem. Council of Europe Consultative Assembly Fifth Ordinary Session Committee on General Affairs. Fourth Session Parf Rep. Strasbourg.
• Vann, E. (1997). An Argument at the Monument Stone: Manipulation of Nationalist Linguistic Ideology in Identity Claims by the German Minority in Poland. Anthropology of East Europe Review, 15(1), 13-25.
• Vardar, D. (1986). Bireylerarası İletişim ve İletişim. İstanbul Universitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü. Basın Yayın Yüksek Okulu Radyo-TV ABD İstanbul.
• Wambaugh, S. (1934). Plebiscites in the Second World War. Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. Washington.
• Wambaugh, S. (1940). The Saar Plebiscite, with a Collection of Official Documents, Technical Adviser and Deputy Member of the Saar Plebiscite Commission. Cambridge Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.1086/ahr/46.3.649
• Weinberg, M. (1998). Schutz der deutschen Minderheit in Polen nach den Weltkriegen. Ein Vergleich unter Berücksichtigung der aktuellen Rechtslage. VRÜ Verfassung und Recht in Übersee, 31(3), 416-418.
• Wicherkiewicz, T. S. (1995). Sociolinguistic Situation of the German Minority in Poland. Tijdschrift voor Skandinavistiek, 16(2), 133-143.
• Woodruff D. S. (1989) Friedrich Ratzel and the Origins of Lebensraum. German Studies Review. Feb., 1980, Vol. 3, No. 1. pp. 51-68 The Johns Hopkins University Press on behalf of the German Studies Association