Investigation of the Effects of Authoritarian vs. Democratic Parental Attitudes, and Parental Attachment on Shame and Guilt by Quasi-Experimental Method

Yıl 2018, Cilt: 38 Sayı: 2, 95 - 127, 28.12.2018

F. Zeynep Saylık , Meral Gezici Yalçın

Öz

In this research, the effects of authoritarian-democratic parental attitudes and children’s attachment to parents, on emotions of guilt and shame, were investigated. Authoritarian-democratic parental attitudes have been manipulated through vignettes presented to the participants, and emotions of guilt and shame have been measured in a scenario-based manner. To this end, two quasi-experimental studies have been carried out. A total of 143 primary school students, 72 in the first study (41 females, 31 males), and 71 in the second study (37 females, 34 males) participated in the research. In the first study, parental attachments were obtained before the manipulation, and they were included in the MANCOVA as a covariant variable. According to the results, attachment to the mother had a significant main effect on shame. On the other hand, authoritarian-democratic parental attitudes did not have significant effects either on guilt or on shame. Therefore, attachments to the parents were measured after the manipulation in order to eradicate its priming effect on emotions in the second study. The second study showed that both insecure attachments to the mother and to the father have significant moderation effects on shame. However, according to bootstrapping done on 5000 samples, only the moderation effect of insecure attachment to the father was significant. That is, participants who are insecurely attached to their fathers reported more shame when parents in the vignettes responded with democratic attitudes towards adolescents’ lying. A highly positive correlation between guilt and shame was observed in both studies as well, but no significant effect of gender on shame and guilt was found.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Authoritarian vs. democratic parents’ attitude, guilt, parental attachment, quasi-experimental research, shame

Otoriter veya Demokratik Ebeveyn Tutumunun ve Ebeveyne Bağlanma Biçiminin Suçluluk ve Utanç Duygularına Etkisinin Yarı-Deneysel Yöntemle İncelenmesi

Öz

Bu araştırmada, yalan söyleyen bir ergenin otoriter veya demokratik ebeveyn tutumuyla karşılaşmasının, ayrıca, ebeveyne bağlanma biçiminin suçluluk ve utanç duygularını ne derece etkilediği incelenmiştir. Otoriter-demokratik ebeveyn tutumları, katılımcılara sunulan senaryolar vasıtasıyla değişimlenmiş, suçluluk ve utanç duyguları da senaryo-temelli bir biçimde ölçülmüştür. Bu amaçla iki yarı-deneysel çalışma gerçekleştirilmiştir. Birinci çalışmada 72 (41 kız, 31 erkek), ikinci çalışmada 71 (37 kız, 34 erkek) olmak üzere toplam 143 ilköğretim öğrencisi araştırmaya katılmıştır. Birinci çalışmada anneye ve babaya bağlanma envanteri, manipülasyondan önce uygulanarak MANCOVA’ya kovaryant değişken olarak dâhil edilmiştir. Sonuçlar, anneye güvenli bağlanmanın suçluluk duygusu üzerindeki temel etkisinin anlamlı olduğunu göstermiştir. Buna karşın, senaryo aracılığıyla değişimlenen otoriter-demokratik ebeveyn tutumları, katılımcıların suçluluk veya utanç duyguları üzerinde anlamlı bir etki ortaya çıkarmamıştır. Ebeveyne bağlanma envanterini başta uygulamanın duygular üzerinde hazırlayıcı bir etki ortaya çıkarabileceği düşünüldüğünden, ikinci çalışmada bağlanma ölçümü manipülasyondan sonra alınmıştır. İkinci çalışmanın analizleri sonunda hem anneye hem babaya güvensiz bağlanmanın demokratik ebeveyn tutumu koşulundaki katılımcıların suçluluk duygusu üzerinde anlamlı bir düzenleyici etkiye sahip olduğu bulunmuştur. 5000 örneklem üzerinde yapılan bootstrapping analizi, babaya güvensiz bağlanmanın suçluluk üzerindeki düzenleyici etkisinin anlamlı olduğunu göstermiştir. Babaya güvensiz bağlanan ergenler, yalan söyledikleri durumda senaryodaki gibi demokratik bir baba tutumuyla karşılaştığında, hatayı onarıcı bir duygu olan suçluluk duygusunu anlamlı olarak daha fazla hissettiklerini belirtmişlerdir. Her iki çalışmada da suçluluk ve utanç duyguları birbiriyle yüksek düzeyde pozitif ilişki göstermiştir. Buna karşın, cinsiyetin suçluluk ve utanç duyguları üzerinde anlamlı bir etkisi gözlenmemiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

otoriter-demokratik ebeveyn tutumu, suçluluk, utanç, Ebeveyne bağlanma, yarı-deneysel çalışma

Kaynakça

• Ainsworth, M. D. S., Bell, S. M., & Stayton, D. J. (1971). Individual differences in strange- situation behavior of one-year-olds. In H. R. Schaffer (Ed.), The origins of human social relations (pp. 17–58). London and New York: Academic Press.
• Akbağ, M. ve Erden-İmamoğlu, S. (2010). Cinsiyet ve bağlanma stillerinin utanç, suçluluk ve yalnızlık duygularını yordama gücünün araştırılması. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri, 10(2), 651–682.
• Armsden, G. C., & Greenberg, M. T. (1987). The inventory of parent and peer attachment: Individual differences and their relationship to psychological well-being in adolescence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 16, 427–454.
• Bafunno, D., & Camodeca, M. (2013). Shame and guilt development in preschoolers: The role of context, audience and individual characteristics. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 10(2), 128–143.
• Baldwin, K. M., Baldwin, J., R., & Ewalt, T. (2006). The relationship among shame, guilt, and self-efficacy. American Journal of Psychotherapy, 60(1), 1–21.
• Balkaya, F. (2001). Çok boyutlu öfke ölçeğinin geliştirilmesi ve bazı semptom gruplarındaki etkisi. (Yüksek Lisans Tezi) Ankara Üniversitesi, Ankara.
• Barrett, K. C. (1995). A functionalist approach to shame and guilt. In J. P. Tangney & K. W. Fischer (Eds.), Self-conscious emotions (pp. 25–63). New York, NY: The Guildford Press.
• Bargh, A. J., Chen, M., & Burrows, L. (1996). Automaticity of social behavior: direct effects of trait construct and stereotype activation on action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(2), 230–244.
• Baumeister, R. F., Stillwell, A. M., & Heatherton, T. F. (1995). Interpersonal aspects of guilt: Evidence from narrative studies. In J. P. Tangney & K. W. Fischer (Eds.), Self-conscious emotions: The psychology of shame, guilt, embarrassement, and pride (pp. 255–273). New York, NY: The Guildford Press.
• Baumrind, D. (1966). Effects of authoritative parental control on child behavior, Child Development, 3(4), 888–907.
• Baumrind, D. (1971). Current patterns of parental authority. Development Psychology, 4(1), 1–103.
• Baumrind, D. (1995). Child maltreatment and optimal caregiving in social contexts. New York, NY: Garland Publishing Inc.
• Boratav, B. H., Fişek, G. O. ve Eslen-Ziya, H. (2017). Erkekliğin Türkiye halleri. İstanbul: İstanbul Bilgi Üniversitesi Yayınları.
• Bowlby, J. (1973). Attachment and loss, Vol. 2: Seperation. New York, NY: Basic Books.
• Broucek, F. (1991). Shame and the self. New York, NY: Guildford.
• Brüne, M., & Brüne-Cohrs, U. (2006). Theory of mind-evolution, ontogeny, brain mechanisms and psychopathology. Neuroscience Biobehavioral Reviews, 30(4), 437–455.
• Carver, C. S., & White, T. L. (1994). Behavioral inhibition, behavioral activation and affective responses to impending reward and punishment: BIS/BAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 319–333.
• Cassidy, J. (1999). The nature of the child’s ties. In J. Cassidy & P. Shaver (Eds.), Handbook of attachment: Theory, research and clinical applications (pp. 3–20). New York, NY: Guilford.
• Choi, C. S., & Jo, H. (2011). Relations of shame-proneness and guilt-proneness with parenting attitudes, motivation for self-determination and adaptation to school life. Korean Journal of Youth Studies, 18(4), 29–48.
• Dekoviç, M. (1999). Parent-adolescent conflict: Possible determinants and consequences. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 23, 977–1000.
• Dost, A. ve Yağmurlu, B. (2006). Suçluluk ve utanç duygularının kavramsallaştırılmasına ilişkin sorular. Türk Psikoloji Yazıları, 9(17), 37–52.
• Eisenberg, N. (2000). Emotion, regulation, and moral development. Annual Review of Psychology, 51, 665–697.
• Elchert, M. D., & Gaasedelen J. O. (2016). Morality and adult attachment style as predictors of psychotherapy process and outcome expectations. Counseling and Value, 61(1), 80–96.
• Elgin, M. V., & Gezici Yalçın, M. (2017). Examining culture through interpersonal relations: Honor culture, lying and evil eye in Turkey. Erişim adresi: http://www.easpgranada2017.com/index.php?seccion=scientificArea&subSeccion=program.
• Erkuş, A. (2013). Davranış bilimleri için bilimsel araştırma süreci (4. bs). Ankara: Seçkin.
• Fedewa, B. A., Burns, L. R., & Gomez, A. A. (2005). Positive and negative perfectionism and the shame/guilt distinction: Adaptive and maladaptive characteristics. Personality and Individual Differences, 38, 1609–1619.
• Gray, J. (1987). Perspectives on anxiety and impulsivity: A commentary. Journal of Research in Personality, 21, 493–509.
• Gray, J. (1990). Brain systems that mediate both emotion and cognition. Cognition and Emotion, 4, 269–288.
• Greenfield, P. M., Keller, H., Fuligni, A., & Maynard, A. (2003). Cultural pathways through universal development. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 461–490.
• Günaydın, G., Selçuk, E., Sümer, N. ve Uysal, A. (2005). Ebeveyn ve akranlara bağlanma envanteri kısa formunun psikometrik açıdan değerlendirilmesi. Türk Psikoloji Yazıları, 8(16), 13–23.
• Güner Algan, A. ve Şendil, G. (2013). Okul öncesi çocuklar ve ebeveynlerinin bağlanma güvenlikleri ile çocuk yetiştirme tutumları arasındaki ilişkiler. Psikoloji Çalışmaları / Studies in Psychology, 33(1), 55–68.
• Haidt, J. (2003). The moral emotions. In R. J. Davidson, K. R. Scherer & H. H. Goldsmith (Eds.), Handbook of affective sciences (pp. 852–870). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
• Haidt, J., Rozin, P., Lowery, L., & Imada, S. (1999). The CAD trial hypothesis: A mapping between three moral emotions (contempt, anger, disgust) and three moral codes (community, autonomy, divinity). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76(4), 574–586.
• Harris, J. L., Bargh, J. A., & Brownell, K. D. (2009). Priming effects of television food advertising on eating behavior. Health Psychology, 28(4), 404–413.
• Harrison, T. L. (2012). Parenting styles and self-forgiveness: Are guilt and shame mediators? (Doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses. (UMI No. 1466299947).
• Hayes, A. F. (2018). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford Publications.
• Hermans, D., Houwer, J. D., & Eelen, P. (1994). The affective priming effect: Automatic activation of evaluative information in memory. Journal of Cognition and Emotion, 8(6), 515–533.
• Hermans, D., Houwer, J. D., & Eelen, P. (2001). A time course analysis of the affective priming effect. Journal of Cognition and Emotion, 15(2), 143–165.
• Hoffman, M. L. (1982). Development of prosocial motivation: emphaty and guild. In N. Eisenberg-Berg (Ed.), The development of prosocial behavior (pp. 281–313). New York, NY: AcademicPress.
• International Business Machines. (2015). International Business Machines SPSS statistics for Windows, Version 23.0. Armonk, NY: Author.
• İnan, E. (2016). The relations between parental attitudes, guilt, shame, and self-compassion and differentiation of guilt-prone and shame-prone individuals in terms of their responses and expectations: A mixed study. (Doktora Tezi). Orta Doğu Teknik Üniversitesi, Ankara.
• Janoff-Bulman, R., Sheikh, S., & Hepp, S. (2009). Proscriptive versus prescriptive morality: Two faces of morality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96(3), 521–537.
• Kandiyoti, D. (1997). Cariyeler, bacılar, yurttaşlar: Kimlikler ve toplumsal dönüşümler. İstanbul: Metis.
• Karavasilis, L., Doyle, A. B., & Markiewicz, D. (2003). Associations between parenting style and attachment to mother in middle childhood and adolescence. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 27(2), 153–164.
• Kochanska, G., Forman, D., Aksan, N., & Dunbar, S. (2005). Pathways to conscience: Early mother-child mutually responsive orientation and children’s moral emotion, conduct and congnition. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 46, 19–34.
• Koehn, A. J., & Kerns, A. K. (2018). Parent–child attachment: Meta-analysis of associations with parenting behaviors in middle childhood and adolescence. Attachment & Human Development, 20(4), 378–405.
• Köksal, F. ve Gençdoğan, B. (2007). Depresif olanlar ile olmayanların suçluluk, utanç ve öfke tarzlarının incelenmesi. Atatürk Ünviversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 9(1), 163–175.
• Kugler, K., & Jones, W. H. (1992). On conceptualizing and assessing shame and guilt. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62(2), 318–327.
• Lewis, M. (1998). Emotional competence and development. In D. Pushkar et al. (Eds.), Improving competence across the lifespan (pp. 27 –36). New York, NY: Plenum.
• Lewis, H. B. (1987). Introduction: shame the ‘sleeper’ in psychopathology, the role of shame. In H. B. Lewis (Ed.), Symptom formation (pp. 1–28). London, UK: Lawrence Erlbaum.
• Lickel, B., Schmader, T., Curtis, M., Scarnier, M., & Ames, D. R. (2005). Vicarious shame and guilt. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 8, 145–147.
• Luoma, J., Guinther, P., Potter, J., & Cheslock, M. (2017). Experienced-based versus scenario-based assessments of shame and guilt and their relationship to alcohol consumption and problems. Substance Use & Misuse, 52(13), 1692–1700.
• Maccoby, E. E., & Martin, J. A. (1983). Socialization in the context of the family: Parent-child interaction, socialization, personality and social development. In P. H. Mussen & E. M. Hetherington (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology (pp. 1–101). New York, NY: Willey.
• Malatesta-Magai, C. Z., & Dorval, B. (1992). Language, affect, and social order. Minnesota Symposia on child psychology. In M. Gunnar & M. Maratsos (Eds.), Modularity and constraints in language and cognition (pp. 139–178). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
• Michl, P., Meindl, T., Meister, F., Born, C., Engel, R. R., Reiser, M., & Hennig-Fast, K. (2014). Neurobiological underpinnings of shame and guilt: A pilot fMRI study. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 2, 150–157.
• Menesini, E., & Camodeca, M. (2008). Shame and guilt as behaviour regulators: Relationships with bullying, victimization and prosocial behaviour. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 26(2), 183–196.
• Mintz, G., Etengoff, C., & Grysman, A. (2017). The relation between childhood parenting and emerging adults’ experiences of shame and guilt. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 26(10), 2908–2920.
• Murray, K. M., Ciarrocchi, J. W., & Murray-Swank, N. A. (2007). Spiritualty, religiosity, shame and guilt as predictorof sexual attitudes and experiences. Journal of Psychology and Theology, 35(3), 222–234.
• Nunes, F. & Mota, C. P. J (2017). Parenting styles and suicidal ideation in adolescents: Mediating effect of attachment. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 26(3), 734–747.
• Ögelman, H., G., Önder, A., Seçer, Z. ve Erten, H. (2013). Anne tutumlarının 5-6 yaş çocuklarının sosyal becerilerini ve okula uyumlarını yordayıcı etkisi. Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 29, 143–152. 
• Özer, M. (2011). Suçluluk-utanç, bağlanma, algılanan ebeveynlik (anne) tarzı ve psikolojik belirtiler arasındaki ilişkiler. (Yüksek Lisans Tezi). Kara Harp Okulları Savunma Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Ankara.
• Öztürk, Ö. (2005). İstanbul H tipi cezaevinde kalan ergenlerde suçluluk-utanç duygusunun değerlendirilmesi. (Yüksek Lisans Tezi). Zonguldak Karaelmas Üniversitesi, Zonguldak.
• Parisette-Sparks, A., Bufferd, S. J., & Klein, D. N. (2015). Parental pedictors of children’s shame and guilt at age 6 in a multimethod, longitudinal study. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescence Psychology, 46(5), 721–731.
• Parkinson, B., Fischer, A. H., & Manstead, A. S. R. (2005). Emotion in social relations: Cultural, group, and interpersonal processes. Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.
• Raja, S. N., McGee, R., & Stanton, W. R. (1992). Perceived attachments to parents and peers and psychological well-being in adolescence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 21, 471–485.
• Ruckstaetter, J., Sells, J., Newmeyer, M. D., & Zink, D. (2017). Parental apologies, empathy, shame, guilt, and attachment: A path analysis. Journal of Counseling and Development, 95(4), 389–400.
• Rudy, D., & Grusec, J. E. (2006). Authoritarian parenting in individualist and collectivist groups: Associations with maternal emotion and cognition and children’s self-esteem, Journal of Family Psychology, 20(1), 68–78.
• Sayıl, M., Uçanok, Z. ve Güre, A. (2002). Erken ergenlik döneminde duygusal gereksinimler, aileyle çatışma alanları ve benlik kavramı: Betimsel bir inceleme. Çocuk ve Gençlik Ruh Sağlığı Dergisi, 9(3), 155–166.
• Schaefer, E., S., & Bell, R. Q. (1959). Development of a parental attitude research instrument. Child Development, 29, 339–361.
• Schmader, T., & Lickel, B. (2006). The approach and avoidance function of guilt and shame emotions: Comparing reactions to self-caused and other-caused wrongdoing. Motivation and Emotion, 30(1), 42–55.
• Shaver, P. R., & Mikulincer, M. (2012). An attachment perspective on morality: Strengthening authentic forms of moral decision making. In P. Shaver & M. Mikulincer (Eds.), The social psychology of morality: Exploring the causes of good and evil (pp. 257–274). Washington, U.S.: APA.
• Sheikh, S., & Janoff-Bulman, R. (2010a). The ‘shoulds’ and ‘should not’ of moral emotions: A self-regulatory perspective on shame and guilt. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36(2), 213–224.
• Sheikh, S., & Janoff-Bulman, R. (2010b). Tracing the self regulatory bases of moral emotions. Emotion Review, 2(4), 386–396.
• Stuewig, J., & McCloskey, L. A. (2005). The relation of child maltreatment to shame and guilt among adolescents: Psychological routes to depression and delinquency. Child Maltreatment, 10(4), 324–336.
• Stuewig, J., Tangney, J. P., Kendall, S., Folk, J. B., Meyer, C. R., & Dearing, R. L. (2014). Children’s proneness to shame and guilt predict risky and illegal behaviors in young adulthood. Child Psychiatry & Human Development, 46(2), 217–227.
• Şanlı, D. ve Öztürk, C. (2015). Anne babaların çocuk yetiştirme tutumları ve tutumlar üzerine kültürün etkisi. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Hemşirelik Fakültesi Elektronik Dergisi, 8(4), 240–246.
• Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (1989). Using multivarite statistics. New York, NY: Harper Collins Publishers.
• Tangney, J. P. (1995). Shame and guilt in interpersonal relationships. In J. P. Tangney & K. W. Fischer (Eds.), Self- conscious emotions: The psychology of shame, guilt, embarrassement, and pride (pp. 114–139). New York, NY: The Guildford Pres.
• Tangney, J. P., & Dearing, R. (2002). Shame and guilt. New York, NY: The Guildford Press.
• Tangney, J. P., Stuewig, J., & Mashek, D. J. (2007). Moral emotions and moral behavior. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 345–372.
• Tipper, S. P. (1985). The negative priming effect: Inhibitory priming by ignored objects. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A Human Experimental Psychology, 37(4), 571–590.
• Uskul, A. K., Cross, S. E., Sunbay, Z., Gercek-Swing, B., & Ataca, B. (2012). Honor bound: The cultural construction of honor in Turkey and the northern US. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 43, 1131–115.
• Walter, J. L., & Bumaford, S. M. (2006). Developmental changes in adolescents’ guilt and shame: The role of family climate and gender. North American Journal of Psychology, 8(1), 321–338.
• Yau, J., & Smetana, J. D. (2003). Adolescent-parent conflict in Hong Kong and Shenzhen: A comparison of youth in two cultural content. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 2(3), 201–211.
• Zhu, R., Wu, H., Xu, Z., Tang, H., Shen, X., Mai, X., & Liu, C. (2017). Early distinction between shame and guilt processing in an interpersonal context. Social Neuroscience, 17, 1–14.