The impact of the Fossil Resource Consumption on the Carbon Footprint: Evidence from Turkey

Yıl 2021, Cilt: 6 Sayı: 4, 467 - 474, 31.12.2021

Hakan Yıldız , A. Yusuf Yüksel , Ümit Özdemir

https://doi.org/10.35229/jaes.865257

Öz

Global climate change is the most important reason for the health and the environmental crises which are experienced in recent years. The main source of this problem is that the rapidly increasing energy demand is supplied by consumption highly of fossil resources (FRC). The increase of the data on Turkey carbon footprint (CK) is the most significant indicator for this consumption. In this study, the relationship between CK data and FRC for the period of 1971-2017 was examined by the Johansen cointegration analysis. According to these results of the test statistics, it was seen that there was a long-term relationship between the two variables. At the same time, the error correction model was applied to view in the short-term effects of this relationship, and the error correction value was discovered to be meaningful at the end of the test. Thus, it was determined that the long-term relationship between the two variables was consistent. Besides, the cointegration test was examined then, it was achieved that the cointegration between its result and the two variables were correct. As a result, the increase of the CK is caused by the consumption of the FRC was discovered to be statistically meaningful.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Carbon footprint, climate change, fossil resource consumption, Johansen cointegration test

Fosil Kaynak Tüketiminin Karbon Ayak İzine Etkisi: Türkiye’den Kanıtlar

Öz

Küresel iklim değişikliği, son yıllarda yaşanan sağlık ve çevre krizlerinin en önemli nedenidir. Hızla artan enerji talebinin, yüksek oranda fosil kaynak tüketiminden (FKT) karşılanması, bu problemin ana kaynağıdır. Türkiye karbon ayak izi (KAİ) verilerindeki artış bu tüketimin en önemli göstergesidir. Bu çalışmada 1971-2017 dönemi, KAİ verileri ve FKT arasındaki ilişki Johansen eşbütünleşme analizi ile incelenmiştir. Yapılan test istatistiklerinin sonuçlarına göre iki değişken arasında uzun dönemli bir ilişkinin olduğu görülmüştür. Aynı zamanda bu ilişkinin kısa dönemde etkilerini görmek için hata düzeltme modeli uygulanmış ve test sonucunda hata düzeltme değeri de anlamlı çıkmıştır. Böylelikle iki değişken arasında uzun dönemli ilişkinin tutarlı olduğu belirlenmiştir. Ayrıca eşbütünleşme testinin sınaması yapılmış elde edilen sonuçlar ile iki değişken arasında kurulan eşbütünleşmenin doğru olduğu tespit edilmiştir. Sonuç olarak FKT’nin, KAİ’de neden olduğu artış istatistiksel olarak da anlamlı bulunmuştur.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Fosil kaynak tüketimi, iklim değişikliği, Johansen eşbütünleşme testi, karbon ayak izi

Kaynakça

• Akel, V. (2015). Kırılgan Beşli Ülkelerinin Hisse Senedi Piyasaları Arasındaki Eşbütünleşme Analizi. Uluslararası Yönetim İktisat ve İşletme Dergisi, 11, 24.
• Arbex, M. & Batu, M. (2020). What if people value nature? Climate changeand welfare costs. Resource and Energy Economics, 61, 101176.
• Arı, E. & Yıldız, A. (2017). Eşbütünleşme Analizi İle Genç İşsizliği Etkileyen Değişkenlerin Araştırılması. Alphanumeric journal, 5, 310-316.
• Bilim ve Teknik. (2016). Fosil Yakıtlar. https://bilimteknik.tubitak.gov.tr/content/fosil-yakitlar. (22.12.2020).
• Buono, D.D. (2021). Can biostimulants be used to mitigate the effect of anthropogenic climate change on agriculture? It is time to respond. Science of the Total Environment, 751, 141763.
• Cai, M., Murtazashvili, I., Murtazashvili, J.B. & Salahodjaev, R. (2020). Patience and climate change mitigation: Global evidence. Environmental Research, 186, 109552.
• Coelho, S., Rafael, S., Lopes, D., Miranda, A.I. & Ferreira, J. (2020). How changing climate may influence air pollution control strategies for 2030?. Science of the Total Environment, 9697, 37442-8.
• Çiftci, N. (2014). Türkiye’de Cari Açık, Reel Döviz Kuru ve Ekonomik Büyüme Arasındaki İlişkiler: Eş Bütünleşme Analizi. Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi. 14, 129-142.
• Dickey, D.A. & Fuller, W.A. (1997). Distribution of the estimators for autoregressive time series with a unit root. J. Am. Stat. Assoc, 74, 427–431.
• Engle, R.F. & Granger, C.W.J. (1987). Cointegration and error correction: Representation.,estimation and testing. Econometrica, 55, 251–76.
• GFP. (2020a). Global Footprint (GFP). https://data.footprintnetwork.org. (21.12.2020).
• GFP. (2020b). Global Footprint (GFP). Turkey Ecological Footprint Data. https://data.footprintnetwork.org. (21.12.2020).
• Haines, A. & Ebi, K. (2019). The Imperative for Climate Action to Protect Health. The new england journal of medicine, 80, 263-73.
• Haines, A., Kovats, RS., Lendrum, D.C. & Corvalan, C. (2005). Climate change and human health: Impacts, vulnerability and public health. Public Health, 120, 585–596.
• Hiatt, R.A. & Beyeler, N. (2020). Cancer and climate change. Lancet Oncol, 21, 519–527.
• Hrabok, M., Delorme, A. & Agyapong, V.I.O. (2020). Threats to Mental Health and Well-Being Associated with Climate Change. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 76, 102295.
• Hughes, J., Heays, K.J., Olesson, E. & Bell, R. (2020). Stroombergen A, Impacts and implications of climate change on wastewater systems: A New Zealand perspective. Climate Risk Management, S2212-0963(20), 30052-8.
• IEA (International Energy Agency). (2016). Energy Policies of IEA Countries Turkey.
• IEA. (2020). International Energy Agency. Explore energy data by category: World Total final consumption. https://www.iea.org.data-and-statisticsdata-tables country. (21.12.2020).
• IEA. (2020a). International Energy Agency (IEA). Explore energy data by category: Turkey Total final consumption. https://www.iea.org.data-and-statistics.data-tablescountry. 21.12.2020).
• IEA. (2020b). International Energy Agency (IEA). Total energy supply (TES) by source, Turkey 1990-2018. https://www.iea.org.data-and statistics country. (21.12.2020).
• IPCC. (2014). Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), Climate Change 2014 Mitigation of Climate Change. Working Group III Contribution to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.
• IPCC. (2019). Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), Global warming of 1,5 °C.
• Johansen, S. (1988). Statistical analysis of cointegration vectors. Journal of Economics Dynamic and Control, 12(2-3), 231–254.
• Jóhannesson, E.S., Heinonen, J. & Davíðsdóttir, B. (2020). Data accuracy in Ecological Footprint’s carbon footprint. Ecological Indicators, 111, 105983.
• Khan, I., Hou, F. & Le, H.P. (2021). The impact of natural resources, energy consumption, and population growth on environmental quality: Fresh evidence from the United States of America. Science of the Total Environment, 754, 142222.
• Kober, T., Schiffer, H.W., Densing, M. & Panos, E. (2020). Global energy perspectives to 2060 – WEC’s World Energy Scenarios 2019. Energy Strategy Reviews, 31: 100523.
• Kocabıyık, T. (2016). Johansen Eşbütünleşme Testinde Karar Aşamalarının Analizi. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, CİEP Özel Sayısı.
• Koomson, D., Vollum, K.T.S. & Raha, D. (2020). Characterising the vulnerability of fishing households to climate and environmental change: Insights from Ghana. Marine Policy, 120, 104142.
• Kowalski, M.F., Rovenskaya. E., Krausmann, F., Pallua, I. & Neill, J.R.M. (2019). Energy transitions and social revolutions. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 138, 69–77.
• Lidicker, W.Z. (2020). A Scientist’s Warning to humanity on human population growth. Global Ecology and Conservation, 24, 01232.
• Martins, F., Felgueiras, C. & Smitková, M. (2018). Fossil fuel energy consumption in European countries. Energy Procedia, 153, 107-111.
• MGM. (2017). Meteoroloji Genel Müdürlüğü: İklim Değişikliği ve Mevcut Durum. https://mgm.gov.tr/iklim/iklim-degisikligi.aspx. (22.12.2020).
• Monserrate, A.Z., Ruano, M.A., Candelario, V.O. & Loor, D.A.S. (2020). Global ecological footprint and spatial dependence between countries. Journal of Environmental Management, 272, 111069.
• Nicholas, P.K., Breakey, S., McKinnon, S., Eddy, E.Z., Fanuele, J. & Starodub, R. (2020). A clımate: a tool for assessment of Clımate-change–related health. Emergency Nurses Association, 20:1-11.
• Nicholas, P.K., Breakey, S., Tagliareni, E., Simmonds, K. & Sabo, K.K. (2020). Climate Change and Population Health: Incorporating Stages of Nursing’s Political Development. Nursing Outlook, 0 0 0, 1-9.
• Özgül, S., Koçar, G. & Eryaşar, A. (2020). The progress, challenges, and opportunities of renewable energy cooperatives in Turkey. Energy for Sustainable Development, 59, 107–119.
• Paramati, S.R., Apergis, N. & Ummalla, M, (2017). Dynamics of renewable energy consumption and economic activities across the agriculture, industry, and service sectors: evidence in the perspective of sustainable development. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 25, 1375–1387.
• Petrov, O., Bi, X. & Lau, A. (2017). Impact assessment of biomass-based district heating systems in densely populated communities. Part II: Would the replacement of fossil fuels improve ambient air quality and human health?. Atmospheric Environment, 161, 191-199.
• Phillips, P.C.B. & Perron, P. (1988). Testing for a Unit Root in Time Series Regression. Biometrika (Printed Gt. Britain), 75, 335–346.
• Qayyum, U., Anjum, S. & Sabir, S. (2021). Armed conflict, militarization and ecological footprint: Empirical evidence from South Asia. Journal of Cleaner Production, 281, 125299.
• Qin, P., Xu, H., Liu, M., Xiao, C., Forrest, K.E., Samuelsen, S. & Tarroja, B. (2020). Assessing concurrent effects of climate change on hydropower supply, electricity demand, and greenhouse gas emissions in the Upper Yangtze River Basin of China. Applied Energy, 279, 115694.
• Rauf, A., Liu, X., Amin, W., Rehman, O.U., Li, J., Ahmad, F. & Bekun, F.V. (2020). Does sustainable growth, energy consumption and environment challenges matter for Belt and Road Initiative feat? A novel empirical investigation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 262, 121344.
• Rees, W.E. (1992). Ecological Footprints and appropriated carrying capacity: what urban economics leaves out. Environment and Urbanization, 4(2), 121–130.
• Salvia, A.L., Filho, W.L., Brandli, L.L. & Griebeler, J.S. (2019). Assessing research trends related to Sustainable Development Goals: local and global issues. Journal of Cleaner Production, 208, 841-849.
• Schachtel, A., Dyer, J.A. & Boos, M.D. (2020). Climate change and pediatric skin health. International Journal of Women’s Dermatology, Baskıda.
• Sintayehu, D.W., Dalle, G. & Bobasa, A.F. (2020). Impacts of climate change on current and future invasion of Prosopis juliflora in Ethiopia: environmental and socio-economic implications. Heliyon, 6, e04596.
• TUİK. (2020). Türkiye İstatistik Kurumu; Sera Gazı Emisyon İstatistikleri, 1990-2018.
• https://tuikweb.tuik.gov.tr/PreHaberBultenleri.do?id=33624. (21.12.2020).
• UN. (1987). United Nations (UN), Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future.
• UN. (1992). Unıted Natıons (UN) Framework Conventıon on Clımate Change.
• UN. (2015). United Nations (UN), Transforming our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development.
• UN. (2019). United Nations (UN), 2019 Revision of World Population Prospects.
• WWF. (2012). World Wide Fund for Nature (WWF), Türkiye’nin Ekolojik Ayak İzi Raporu.