The Examination of Suicide Cases with Antidepressant Use Applied to National Poisoning Counseling Center Between 2015-2018

Yıl 2021, Cilt: 6 Sayı: 1, 1 - 6, 01.04.2021

Nur Köroğlu Sultan Mehtap Büyüker

Öz

Abstract: Objective: In this study; antidepressant drug poisoning cases between 2015-2018 which applied to National Poisoning Counseling Center (NPCC) has examined. Turkey’s and other countries’ poisoning reports has compared. Suicidal behavior, which has reached such a crucial point, have examined in the perspective of increasing antidepressant use. Materials and Methods: Cases of antidepressant poisoning between 2015-2018 reported to NPCC were examined, suicidal and accidental poisoning rates were compared with suicide rates and antidepressant use by years. It was evaluated by comparison with the literature. Results: Number of cases applied to NPCC due to antidepressant poisoning were 16 656 cases (8.26%) in 2015, 16 708 (7.66%) cases in 2016, 16 218 (7.59%) cases in 2017 and 17 017 (7.83%) cases in 2018. Total cases of poisonings are 201 646 at 2015 and it increased to 217 331 at 2018. Suicide rates with antidepressant poisoning were determined as 77.10% in 2016, 76.84% in 2017 and 77.20% in 2018. By the datas from Turkish Statistical Institute (TURKSTAT) suicides by poisoning is rated as 4th place. In 2017 antidepressant consumption reached to 48 millon and it shows that antidepressants are more acquirable recently. Conclusions: Poisoning cases with antidepressant drugs are high among the all applications reported to NPCC. In addition, the high level of suicide cases in poisoning with antidepressants is remarkable. When high rates considered by toxicovigilance, it is an issue that has to be investigated if antidepressant use increase the suicide risk or not.

Anahtar Kelimeler

suicide, poisoning, toxicovigilance, antidepressants

Kaynakça

• 1. Aydın N, Çetin M, Kurt E, Savaş H, Açıkel C, Kılıç S, et al. A report by Turkish Association for Psychopharmacology on the Psychotropic Drug Usage in Turkey and Medical , Ethical and Economical Consequences. Bull Clin Psychopharmacol. 2013;23(4):390–401. https://doi.org/10.5455/bcp.20131230121254
• 2. Caner A, Çokgezen M, Yetkiner H. Some Socio-Economic Determinants of Antidepressant Use: Province Level Evidence from Turkey. Proceedings of the 25th Annual Conference of the Economic Research Forum; 2019 March 10-12; Kuwait City, Kuwait; 2019.
• 3. OECD. Pharmaceutical consumption. Health at a Glance. 2019;184–5. https://doi.org/10.1787/4dd50c09-en.
• 4. Özeken G. 7 Soruda Antidepresan Kullanan Hastayı Mutlu Etmek. Farmazi Akademi İstanbul. 2018. [Last Accessed: 11.10.2019]. Available from: http://eczacininsesi.com/?yon=haber&id=11043.
• 5. Temel MK. Modern Psikososyoklinik Etmenlerin Eseri “Antidepresan Kullanım Bozukluğu:” Tıp Etiğince Sorun Teşkil Eden Bir Olgu. Anadolu Klin Tıp Bilim Derg. 2019;24(3):206–16. https://doi.org/10.21673/anadoluklin.568664
• 6. Örsel S. Depresyonda Tedavi : Genel İlkeler ve Kullanılan Antidepresan İlaçlar. Klin Psikiyatr. 2004;7(4):17–24.
• 7. Özcan N, İkincioğulları D. Ulusal Zehi̇r Danışma Merkezi̇ 2008 Yılı Çalışma Raporu Özeti. Türk Hij ve Deney Biyol Derg. 2009;66(3):29–58.
• 8. Yakıştıran S, İkincioğlu D. 2006 Yılı Türkiye Ulusal Zehir Danışma Merkezine Yapılan Antidepresan İlaç Zehirlenmelerine Bağlı Başvuruların Değerlendirilmesi. Türk Klin Laboratuvar Derg. 2010;1(1):17–26.
• 9. Yeşiler Fİ, Şendur ÜG, İnan Demiroğlu G. Yoğun bakım ünitesinde akut intoksikasyon vakalarının incelenmesi. Ege Tıp Bilim Derg. 2019;2(1):14–8. https://doi.org/10.33713/egetbd.472719
• 10. Sungur S. ESOGÜ Tıp Fakültesi Acil Servis’e Başvuran Yetişkin Zehirlenme Vakalarının Aile Hekimliği Bakış Açısıyla Geriye Dönük İncelenmesi. Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi Aile Hekimliği Anabilim Dalı, Uzmanlık Tezi; 2017.
• 11. Yılmaz A. Adli Tıp Boyutu İle Zehirlenmeler. Klinik Gelişim. 2009;22(1): 81–84.
• 12. TUİK. İntihar İstatistikleri. 2018. [Last Accessed: 10.03.2020]. Available from: http://www.tuik.gov.tr/PreTablo.do?alt_id=1060
• 13. National Poisons Information Service Report 2017/2018. [Last Accessed: 14.03.2020]. Available from: http://www.npis.org/annualreports.html
• 14. Gummin DD, Mowry JB, Spyker DA, Brooks DE, Beuhler MC, Rivers LJ, et al. 2018 Annual Report of the American Association of Poison Control Centers’ National Poison Data System (NPDS): 36th Annual Report. Clin Toxicol. 2019;57(12):1220–413. https://doi.org/10.1080/15563650.2019.1677022
• 15. South Africa Tygerberg Poison Information Centre Annual Statistics. 2018. [Last Accessed: 25.12.2019]. Available from: http://www.sun.ac.za/english/faculty/healthsciences/Clinical%20Pharmacology/Poison%20Information%20Centre/Pages/default.aspx
• 16. Myrkytystietokeskuksen vuositilasto (National Poisoning Center Report of Finland). 2018. [Last Accessed: 19.02.2020]. Available from: https://www.hus.fi/en/medical-care/medical-services/Poison%20Information%20Centre/Pages/default.aspx
• 17. World Health Organisation Suicide data. 2019. [Last Accessed: 06.03.2020]. Available from: apps.who.int/gho/data/node.main.MHSUICIDE
• 18. Kalkan Ş, Tunçok Y, Güven H. İlaç ve Zehir Danışma Merkezlerine Bildirilen Olgular. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Derg. 1998;12(3):275–83.
• 19. Özcan N, İkincioğulları D. UZEM Ajan Sınıflandırma Sistemine Göre Başvuru Sayı ve Yüzdeleri. Türk Hij ve Deney Biyol Derg. 2009;66(3):60–8.