Validity and Reliability of the Turkish Version of the Self-care Activities Screening Scale during COVID-19 Lockdown

Yıl 2024, Cilt: 8 Sayı: 1, 20 - 29, 31.01.2024

Hamide Arslan Tarus , Rüveyda Ölmez Yalazı , Tuğba Öz , Nurdan Demirci

https://doi.org/10.30621/jbachs.1116974

Öz

Purpose: This study aims to adapt the Self-Care Activities Screening Scale (SASS-14) to Turkish as well as to determine its validity and reliability.
Methods: The sample of this methodological study conducted during Covid-19 lockdown consists of 140 individuals. For the adaptation of the SASS-14 scale to Turkish, its translation into Turkish and its cultural adaptation were performed. Then, its psychometric properties were assessed through exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis.
Results: The SASS-14 consists of 14 items and four dimensions. The fit index values were found to be acceptable in the confirmatory factor analysis. The intraclass correlation coefficient of the test-retest reliability was 0.81 and the Cronbach’s alpha coefficient was 0.85.
Conclusion: The Turkish version of the SASS-14 is a valid and reliable tool that can be used to screen self-care activities in general population.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Self-care activities, scale, reliability, validity

Validity and Reliability of the Turkish Version of the Self-care Activities Screening Scale during COVID-19 Lockdown

Öz

Kaynakça

• 1. Kılıçgün MY. Development and standardization of parental support inventory for self-care skills. KEFAD 2013;14(3):19-36.
• 2. Orem DE. Self-care deficit theory of nursing: concepts and applications. 7th ed., USA: Mosby-year book 2001; 99-135.
• 3. Kızılcı S, Avdal EU. Diabetes and self-care deficit nursing theory’s concept analysis. DEUHYO ED 2010;3(3):164-168.
• 4. Kordalı G. Risks for workers during the pandemic-support for workers and self-care. https://idealsosyalhizmet.com/icerik/uploads/2020/08/Pandemi surecindecalisana-yonelik-riskler-calisana-destek-ve-ozbakimmmm.pdf. 2020.
• 5. Rajkumar RP. Covid-19 and mental health: a review of the existing literature. Asian Journal of Psychiatry 2020;52:102066.
• 6. World Health Organization. Coronavirus disease (Covid-19) advice for the public. https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/needextra-precautions/people-at-higher-risk.html. 2020.
• 7. Republic of Turkey Ministry of Health. Covid-19 daily status report 08/08/2020. https://dosyamerkez.saglik.gov.tr/Eklenti/38315, Covid-19-gunluk-durum raporu. 2020.
• 8. Turkish Academy of Sciences. Covid-19 pandemic assessment report; http://www.tuba.gov.tr/files/images/2020/kovidraporu/Covid-19%20Raporu-Final+.pdf. 2020.
• 9. UNICEF. Briefing on addressing mental health and psychosocial aspects of Covid-19 Outbreak. URL: https://www.unicef.org/documents/briefing-note-addressing-mentalhealth-psychosocial-aspects-coronavirus-disease-Covid-19. 2020.
• 10. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19). Url: https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/daily-life coping/managingstressanxiety.html?CDC_AA_refVal=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.cdc.gov%2Fcoronavirus%2 F2019-ncov%2Fprepare%2Fmanaging-stress-anxiety.html. 2020.
• 11. Wu Z, McGoogan JM. Characteristics of and important lessons from the coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) outbreak in China: Summary of a report of 72314 cases from the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention. JAMA 2020.
• 12. Gulia KK, Kumar VM. Reverse quarantine: management of Covid-19 by Kerala with its higher number of aged population. Psychogeriatrics 2020;20:794–795.
• 13. Kaya H. Validity and reliability of Turkish version of the Self Care Assessment Tool. Florence Nightingale Journal of Nursing 2005;13(55):139-148.
• 14. Karadağlı F, Ecevit-Alpar S. A scale development study: Scale of self-care behaviors according to the theory of self-care deficiency in patients who were administered chemotherapy. Mersin University Journal of Health Sciences 2017;10:168-181.
• 15. Hanerlioğlu S. Validity and reliability of Turkish version of the Self Care Management Process in chronic illness. Postgraduate thesis, Ege University, Faculty of Health Sciences, Izmir. 2014.
• 16. Ergun A, Yüce E. Turkish validity and reliability of Adolescent Dysmenorrhea Self-Care Scale. Postgraduate Thesis, Marmara University Faculty of Health Sciences, Istanbul. 2018.
• 17. Sünbül ZA, Malkoc A, Gördesli MA, Arslan R, Çekici F. Mindful Self-Care Scale (MSCS): adaptation and validation in a normative Turkish sample. European Journal of Educational Research 2018;7(4):887-892.
• 18. Nahcivan NO. A Turkish language equivalence of the Exercise of Self-Care Agency Scale. Western Journal of Nursing Research 2004;26(7):813-824.
• 19. Boateng GO, Neilands TB, Frongillo EA, Melgar-Quiñonez HR, Young SL. Best practices for developing and validating scales for health, social, and behavioral research: a primer. Frontiers in Public Health 2018;6:149.
• 20. Martínez M, Luis EO, Oliveros EY, Fernández-Berrocal P, Sarrionandia A, Vidaurreta M, Bermejo-Martins E. Validity and reliability of the Self-Care Activities Screening Scale (SASS-14) during Covid-19 lockdown. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes 2021;19(1):1-12.
• 21. Judson TJ, Odisho AY, Neinstein AB, Chao J, Williams A, Miller C, Moriarty T, Gleason N, Intinarelli G, Gonzales R. Rapid design and implementation of an integrated patient self-triage and self-scheduling tool for Covid-19. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 2020;27(6):860-866.
• 22. Bermejo-Martins E, Luis EO, Sarrionandia A, Martínez M, Garcés MS, Oliveros EY, Cortés-Rivera C, Belintxon M, Fernández-Berrocal P. Different responses to stress, health practices, and self-care during Covid-19 lockdown: a stratified analysis. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021;18(5):2253.
• 23. Dorukoğlu SA. Reliability and validity of Turkish version of the Pregnancy-related Empowerment Scale. Postgraduate thesis, Ege University, Faculty of Health Sciences, Izmir. 2021.
• 24. Lawshe CH. A quantitative approach to content validity. Personnel psychology 1975;28(4):563-575.
• 25. Veneziano L. & Hooper J. (1997). A method for quantifying content validity of health-related questionnaires. American Journal of Health Behavior, 21 (1), p. 67-70.
• 26. Kagaigai A, Anaeli A, Mori AT, Grepperud S. Do household perceptions influence enrolment decisions into community-based health insurance schemes in Tanzania? BMC Health Services Research 2021;21(1):1-11.
• 27. Kurt G, Arslan H. Turkish version of the Pregnancy‐related Anxiety Scale: A psychometric study. Perspectives in Psychiatric Care 2021;57(1):157-166.
• 28. Şimşek OF. Introduction to structural equation modeling-basic principles and LISREL applications (1st ed.), Ekinoks Publishing, Ankara. 2007.
• 29. Erkorkmaz U, Etikan I, Demir O, Özdamar K. Confirmatory factor analysis and fit indices: review. Turkiye Klinikleri Journal of Medical Sciences 2013;3(1):210-223.
• 30. Meydan CH, Şeşen H. Structural equation modeling AMOS applications. Detay Publishing, Ankara. 2011.
• 31. Kalaycı S. SPSS applied multivariate statistical techniques, “reliability analysis”, (Ed. Şeref Kalaycı), Asil Publications, Ankara. 2010.
• 32. Esin MN. Data collection methods and tools & Reliability and validity of data collection tools. Erdogan, S., Nahcivan, N., & Esin, M. N (Ed.), Research in nursing: Process, practice, and critical (pp. 193-235). Edition 2, Nobel Medical Bookstore Press, Istanbul. 2020.