VOLATILITY AND BUSINESS CYCLE PROPERTIES OF FOREIGN FINANCIAL AID INTO DEVELOPING COUNTRIES

Yıl 2016, Cilt: 5 Sayı: 1, 1 - 16, 30.03.2016

Elif Akben Selcuk , Duygu Undeger Soguktas

https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2016116549

Öz

The objective of this study is to investigate the
volatilities and business cycle characteristics of three components of foreign
financial aid into developing countries, namely emergency, program and project
aid from the viewpoint of both recipients and donors. Results show that
emergency aid inflows are more volatile than both program and project aid in
both African and non-African countries and program aid is found to be more
volatile than project aid in both subsamples. Although the volatility of total
aid inflows is lower than component-wise volatilities, it is still higher than
the volatility of GDP for recipient countries. The volatility of donors’ total
aid outflows is also found to be greater than the volatility of their GDP.
Results further showed that total aid is acyclical for the African countries in
the sample. The same finding applies to emergency aid, project aid, and program
aid. For the non-African countries, project aid inflows were found to be
procyclical. Emergency aid and program aid were acyclical while total aid
inflows to the countries outside Africa were found to be procyclical/acyclical.
The final result that emerged from the analysis is that donors give foreign aid
in an acyclical fashion to the recipients in the sample.  

Anahtar Kelimeler

Foreign financial aid, developing countries, business cycle, volatility

Kaynakça

• Arellano, C., Bulir, A., Lane, T., & Lipschitz, L. 2005. “The dynamic implications of foreign aid and its variability”. IMF Working Paper No. 05/119. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=874986
• Barrett, C. B. 2001. “Does food aid stabilize food availability?”. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 49(2), 335-349.
• Boone, P. 1994. The impact of foreign aid on savings and growth. London School of Economics and Political Science, Centre for Economic Performance.
• Boone, P. (1996). “Politics and the effectiveness of foreign aid”. European Economic Review, 40(2), 289-329.
• Bulir, A., & Hamann, A. J. 2006. Volatility of development aid: From the frying pan into the fire? (Vol. 6). International Monetary Fund.
• Burnside, C., & Dollar, D. 2000. “Aid, growth, the incentive regime, and poverty reduction”. The World Bank: Structure and Policies, 3, 210.
• Burnside, C., & Dollar, D. 2004. “Aid, policies, and growth: reply”. American Economic Review, 94(3), 781-784.
• Collier, P., & Dehn, J. 2001. Aid, shocks, and growth (Vol. 2688). World Bank Publications.
• Collier, P., & Dollar, D. 2002. “Aid allocation and poverty reduction”. European Economic Review, 46(8), 1475-1500.
• Dalgaard, C. J., Hansen, H., & Tarp, F. 2004. “On the empirics of foreign aid and growth”. The Economic Journal, 114(496), F191-F216.
• Dalgaard, C. J., & Hansen, H. 2001. “On aid, growth and good policies”. Journal of Development Studies, 37(6), 17-41.
• Dayton-Johnson, J., & Hoddinott, J. 2003. “Aid, policies, and growth, redux”. Halifax: Department of Economics, Dalhousie University. Mimeo.
• Durbarry, R., Gemmell, N., & Greenaway, D. 1998. New evidence on the impact of foreign aid on economic growth. Centre for Research in Economic Development and International Trade, University of Nottingham.
• Easterly, W. 1999. “The ghost of financing gap: testing the growth model used in the international financial institutions”. Journal of Development Economics, 60(2), 423-438.
• Economides, G., Kalyvitis, S., & Philippopoulos, A. 2008. “Does foreign aid distort incentives and hurt growth? Theory and evidence from 75 aid-recipient countries”. Public Choice, 134(3-4), 463-488.
• Gemmell, N., & McGillivray, M. 1998. Aid and tax instability and the government budget constraint in developing countries. Centre for Research in Economic Development and International Trade, University of Nottingham.
• Gounder, R. 2001. “Aid-growth nexus: empirical evidence from Fiji”. Applied Economics, 33(8), 1009-1019.
• Gounder, R. 2002. “Political and economic freedom, fiscal policy, and growth nexus: some empirical results for Fiji”. Contemporary Economic Policy, 20(3), 234-245.
• Ghura, D., Mühleisen, M., & Nord, R. 1995. Sub-Saharan Africa: growth, savings, and investment, 1986-93 (Vol. 118). International Monetary Fund.
• Gupta, S., Clements, B., & Tiongson, E. R. 2004. “Foreign aid and consumption smoothing: evidence from global food aid”. Review of Development Economics, 8(3), 379-390.
• Hamann, M. A. J., & Bulir, M. A. 2001. How volatile and unpredictable are aid flows, and what are the policy implications? (No. 1-167). International Monetary Fund.
• Hansen, H., & Tarp, F. 2001. “Aid and growth regressions”. Journal of Development Economics, 64(2), 547-570.
• Hodrick, R., & Prescott, R. 1980. “Postwar U.S. business cycles: An empirical investigation”. Discussion paper no. 451, Carnegie-Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA.
• Hudson, J., & Mosley, P. 2001. “Aid policies and growth: In search of the Holy Grail”. Journal of International Development, 13(7), 10231038.
• Jepma, C. 1997. “On the effectiveness of development aid”. World Bank, unpublished.
• Kudlyak, M. 2002. “Foreign aid and growth: do the transition economies have a different story to tell”. Economic Education and Research Consortium, Ukraine, processed.
• Kydland, F. E., & Prescott, E. C. 1990. “Business cycles: Real facts and a monetary myth”. Quarterly Review, 14(2), 3-18.
• Lensink, R., & Morrissey, O. 2000. “Aid instability as a measure of uncertainty and the positive impact of aid on growth”. The Journal of Development Studies, 36(3), 31-49.
• Lu, S., & Ram, R. 2001. “Foreign aid, government policies, and economic growth: Further evidence from cross-country panel data for 19701993”. Economia Internazionale/International Economics, 54(1), 15-29.
• Lucas, R. E. 1977. “Understanding business cycles”. In Carnegie-Rochester conference series on public policy (Vol. 5, pp. 7-29). NorthHolland.
• Mosley, P., Huson, J., & Horrell, S. 1987. “Aid, the public sector and the market in less developed countries”. Economic Journal, 97(6), 1664.
• Pallage, S., & Robe, M. A. 2001. “Foreign aid and the business cycle”. Review of International Economics, 9(4), 641-672.
• Pallage, S., & Robe, M. A. 2003. “On the welfare cost of economic fluctuations in developing countries”. International Economic Review, 44(2), 677-698.
• Pallage, S., Robe, M. A., & Bérubé, C. 2004. “On the potential of foreign aid as insurance”. Cahier de recherche/Working Paper, 4, 04.
• Singh, R. D. 1985. “State intervention, foreign economic aid, savings and growth in LDCs: Some recent evidence”. Kyklos, 38(2), 216-232.
• Svensson, J. 1999.” Aid, growth and democracy”. Economics and Politics, 11(3), 275-297.
• Svensson, J. 2003. “Why conditional aid does not work and what can be done about it?”. Journal of Development Economics, 70(2), 381402.
• Torsvik, G. 2005. “Foreign economic aid: should donors cooperate?”. Journal of Development Economics, 77(2), 503-515.