Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

ARE CENTRAL BANK RESERVES AN IMPORTANT INSTRUMENT FOR STABILITY IN EXCHANGE RATES?

Yıl 2018, Cilt: 7 Sayı: 4, 376 - 381, 30.12.2018

Yunus Acci

https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2018.998

Öz

Purpose- In developing countries, the most important macroeconomic variable shaping individuals' expectations for economic stability is the nominal exchange rate. For this reason, the first impact of central banks monetary policy implementation results comes out at nominal exchange rate. In this study, the relationship between the nominal exchange rate and the gross foreign exchange reserves of the central bank has been investigated.
Methodology- In this study, Dickey-Fuller (1981, ADF) and Phillips-Perron (1988, PP) unit root tests, asymmetrical causality test and lastly Bootstrap Rolling Window Causality tests developed by Balcılar et al. (2010) have been used.
Findings- There is a causal relationship between the nominal exchange rate and central bank reserves. Central bank interfere in nominal exchange rate with its reserves rather than interest policy.
Conclusion- As a result of the empirical analysis, causality has been found from positive shocks coming to nominal exchange rates to positive shocks in central bank gross foreign exchange reserves and from positive shocks formed in central bank gross foreign exchange reserves to negative shocks coming in nominal exchange rate.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Exchange rates central banking causality asymmetric causality bootstrap rolling window causality

Kaynakça

  • Açcı, Y. (2015). Türkiye’de döviz kuru geçişkenliğinin ihracat ve ithalat fiyatları üzerindeki etkisi. İnönü Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Doktora Tezi, Malatya.
  • Alper, E., Ardıç, P. (2006). Serbest kur rejimi döneminde döviz kuru öngörüsü: Türkiye’ye uygulama. Uluslararası Ekonomi ve Dış Ticaret Politikaları, 1(1), pp. 51-68.
  • Balaylar N., Ural, M. (2007). Bankacılık sektöründe yüksek risk ve baski endeksleri. Finans, Politik ve Ekonomik Yorumlar, 44(509), pp. 47-57.
  • Balaylar, N. (2011). Türkiye’de döviz piyasasi müdahalelerinin sterilizasyon maliyeti. DokuzEylül Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 13(3), pp. 19-38.
  • Balcilar, M., Ozdemir, Z. A., Arslanturk, Y. (2010). Economic growth and energy consumption causal nexus viewed through a bootstrap rolling window. Energy Economics. 32(6), 1398-1410.
  • Bayat, T., Senturk, M., Kayhan, S. (2014). Exchange rates and foreign exchange reserves in Turkey: nonlinear and frequency domain causality approach. Theoretical & Applied Economics, 21(11).
  • Bayat, T. Özcan ,B., Taş, Ş. (2015). Türkiye’de döviz kuru geçiş etkisinin asimetrik nedensellik testleri ile analizi. Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi İİBF Dergisi,10(2), 7-30.
  • Calvo, G., Reinhart, C. (2001). The twin crises: the causes of balance-of payments problems. George Washington University Department of Economics Working Paper, 89(3), pp. 473-500.
  • Dickey, D., Fuller, W. (1979). Distribution of the estimators for autoregressive time series with a unit root. Journal Of The American Statistical Association, 74, Ss:427- 431.
  • Dickey, D., Fuller, W. (1981). Likelihood ratio statistics for autoregressive time series with a unit root. Econometrica, 49, Ss:1057-72.
  • Hatemi-J, A., Roca, E. (2014). BRICs and PIGS in the presence of Uncle Sam and big brothers: who drive who? Evidence based on asymmetric causality tests. Griffith University, Department of Accounting, Finance and Economics.
  • Kar, M., Bayat, T., Kayhan, S. (2016). Impacts of credit default swaps on volatility of the exchange rate in Turkey. International Journal of Economics and Finance, 4(14).
  • Kasman, A., Ayhan, D. (2008). Foreign exchange reserves and exchange rates in Turkey: structural breaks, unit root and cointegration. Economic Modeling, 25, pp. 83-92.
  • Koçyiğit, A., Kayhan, K., Bayat, T. (2013). Enflasyon hedeflemesi rejiminde öğrenme süreci ve asimetri: Markov Switching yaklaşımı. Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi İİBF Dergisi,8(1), 191-212.
  • MacKinnon, J. (1996). Numerical distribution functions for unit root and cointegration tests. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 11, ss:601–618.
  • Parlaktuna, I. (2005). Exchange market pressure in Turkey 1993–2004: an application of theGirton–Roper monetary model. International Economic Journal, 19 (1), pp. 51-62.
  • Phillips, P., Perron, P. (1988). Testing for a unit root in time series regressions. Biometrica, 75, 335-346.
  • Sevüktekin, M., Nargeleçekenler M. (2010). Ekonometrik zaman serileri analizi. 3. Baskı, Ankara: Nobel Yayınevi.

Yıl 2018, Cilt: 7 Sayı: 4, 376 - 381, 30.12.2018

Yunus Acci

https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2018.998

Öz

Kaynakça

  • Açcı, Y. (2015). Türkiye’de döviz kuru geçişkenliğinin ihracat ve ithalat fiyatları üzerindeki etkisi. İnönü Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Doktora Tezi, Malatya.
  • Alper, E., Ardıç, P. (2006). Serbest kur rejimi döneminde döviz kuru öngörüsü: Türkiye’ye uygulama. Uluslararası Ekonomi ve Dış Ticaret Politikaları, 1(1), pp. 51-68.
  • Balaylar N., Ural, M. (2007). Bankacılık sektöründe yüksek risk ve baski endeksleri. Finans, Politik ve Ekonomik Yorumlar, 44(509), pp. 47-57.
  • Balaylar, N. (2011). Türkiye’de döviz piyasasi müdahalelerinin sterilizasyon maliyeti. DokuzEylül Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 13(3), pp. 19-38.
  • Balcilar, M., Ozdemir, Z. A., Arslanturk, Y. (2010). Economic growth and energy consumption causal nexus viewed through a bootstrap rolling window. Energy Economics. 32(6), 1398-1410.
  • Bayat, T., Senturk, M., Kayhan, S. (2014). Exchange rates and foreign exchange reserves in Turkey: nonlinear and frequency domain causality approach. Theoretical & Applied Economics, 21(11).
  • Bayat, T. Özcan ,B., Taş, Ş. (2015). Türkiye’de döviz kuru geçiş etkisinin asimetrik nedensellik testleri ile analizi. Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi İİBF Dergisi,10(2), 7-30.
  • Calvo, G., Reinhart, C. (2001). The twin crises: the causes of balance-of payments problems. George Washington University Department of Economics Working Paper, 89(3), pp. 473-500.
  • Dickey, D., Fuller, W. (1979). Distribution of the estimators for autoregressive time series with a unit root. Journal Of The American Statistical Association, 74, Ss:427- 431.
  • Dickey, D., Fuller, W. (1981). Likelihood ratio statistics for autoregressive time series with a unit root. Econometrica, 49, Ss:1057-72.
  • Hatemi-J, A., Roca, E. (2014). BRICs and PIGS in the presence of Uncle Sam and big brothers: who drive who? Evidence based on asymmetric causality tests. Griffith University, Department of Accounting, Finance and Economics.
  • Kar, M., Bayat, T., Kayhan, S. (2016). Impacts of credit default swaps on volatility of the exchange rate in Turkey. International Journal of Economics and Finance, 4(14).
  • Kasman, A., Ayhan, D. (2008). Foreign exchange reserves and exchange rates in Turkey: structural breaks, unit root and cointegration. Economic Modeling, 25, pp. 83-92.
  • Koçyiğit, A., Kayhan, K., Bayat, T. (2013). Enflasyon hedeflemesi rejiminde öğrenme süreci ve asimetri: Markov Switching yaklaşımı. Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi İİBF Dergisi,8(1), 191-212.
  • MacKinnon, J. (1996). Numerical distribution functions for unit root and cointegration tests. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 11, ss:601–618.
  • Parlaktuna, I. (2005). Exchange market pressure in Turkey 1993–2004: an application of theGirton–Roper monetary model. International Economic Journal, 19 (1), pp. 51-62.
  • Phillips, P., Perron, P. (1988). Testing for a unit root in time series regressions. Biometrica, 75, 335-346.
  • Sevüktekin, M., Nargeleçekenler M. (2010). Ekonometrik zaman serileri analizi. 3. Baskı, Ankara: Nobel Yayınevi.
Toplam 18 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Bölüm Articles
Yazarlar

Yunus Acci 0000-0002-3385-9087

Yayımlanma Tarihi 30 Aralık 2018
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2018 Cilt: 7 Sayı: 4

Kaynak Göster

APA Acci, Y. (2018). ARE CENTRAL BANK RESERVES AN IMPORTANT INSTRUMENT FOR STABILITY IN EXCHANGE RATES?. Journal of Business Economics and Finance, 7(4), 376-381. https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2018.998

Journal of Business, Economics and Finance (JBEF) is a scientific, academic, double blind peer-reviewed, quarterly and open-access journal. The publication language is English. The journal publishes four issues a year. The issuing months are March, June, September and December. The journal aims to provide a research source for all practitioners, policy makers and researchers working in the areas of business, economics and finance. The Editor of JBEF invites all manuscripts that that cover theoretical and/or applied researches on topics related to the interest areas of the Journal. JBEF charges no submission or publication fee.



Ethics Policy - JBEF applies the standards of Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). JBEF is committed to the academic community ensuring ethics and quality of manuscripts in publications. Plagiarism is strictly forbidden and the manuscripts found to be plagiarized will not be accepted or if published will be removed from the publication. Authors must certify that their manuscripts are their original work. Plagiarism, duplicate, data fabrication and redundant publications are forbidden. The manuscripts are subject to plagiarism check by iThenticate or similar. All manuscript submissions must provide a similarity report (up to 15% excluding quotes, bibliography, abstract, method).


Open Access - All research articles published in PressAcademia Journals are fully open access; immediately freely available to read, download and share. Articles are published under the terms of a Creative Commons license which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Open access is a property of individual works, not necessarily journals or publishers. Community standards, rather than copyright law, will continue to provide the mechanism for enforcement of proper attribution and responsible use of the published work, as they do now.