First aid in snakebites: an evaluation of the usefulness and quality of YouTube videos

Yıl 2023, , 140 - 145, 31.01.2023

M. Murat Oktay , Muhammet Esat Karaduman , Hasan Gümüşboğa , Mustafa Sabak

https://doi.org/10.16899/jcm.1214139

Öz

Abstract
Aim: YouTube has become an increasingly used platform for obtaining health information such as first aid knowledge of snake bites rescuers in recent years. Aim of the study is to evaluate the quality of existing YouTube videos on first aid interventions for snake bites and whether they are of an educational nature.
Materials and Methods: Descriptive study. On February 20, 2021, determined search terms such as; “Snake bite emergency aid, Snake bite treatment medicine, first aid in snake bite“ were searched separately on YouTube (https://youtube.com). A total of 360 YouTube videos were listed. It was analyzed according to the Global Quality Scale (GQS) developed to evaluate internet-based resources and the DISCERN scale developed to determine reliability.
Results: A total of 72 videos meeting the criteria were identified. The median duration of the videos were 292 seconds. The median number of views were 13.8, the number of comments were 0.01, likes were 0.11, and the number of dislikes were 0.01. When the DISCERN scores and uploaded sources were compared, significant differences were found (p = 0.031). DISCERN scores of videos shared by doctors were found to be significantly higher than other sources (p <0.05). While 4.2% (n = 3) of the videos gave incorrect information such as sucking with mouth, cutting, it was suggested to apply a tourniquet incorrectly in 5.6%. Limb immobilization and bandage application was shown in 73.6% of all videos.
Conclusions: YouTube videos uploaded by doctors and health-related websites on first aid practices on snake bites contain useful first aid information.

Anahtar Kelimeler

first aid, snake bites, quality, YouTube videos

Yılan Isırıklarında İlk Yardım: YouTube Videolarının Faydası ve Kalitesi Üzerine Değerlendirme

Öz

Öz
Amaç: YouTube, son yıllarda yılan ısırığına müdahale edenlerin ilk yardım bilgisi gibi sağlık bilgilerinin elde edilmesi için giderek daha fazla kullanılan bir platform haline gelmiştir. Çalışmanın amacı, yılan ısırmalarında ilk yardım müdahaleleri ile ilgili mevcut YouTube videolarının kalitesini ve eğitici nitelikte olup olmadığını değerlendirmektir.
Gereç ve Yöntem: Tanımlayıcı çalışma. 20 Şubat 2021 tarihinde; YouTube (https://youtube.com) internet sitesinde “Yılan ısırması acil yardımı, Yılan sokması tedavisi, yılan ısırmasında ilk yardım” ayrı ayrı tarandı. Toplam 360 YouTube videosu listelendi. İnternet tabanlı kaynakları değerlendirmek için geliştirilen Global Kalite Ölçeği (GQS) ve güvenilirliği belirlemek için geliştirilen DISCERN ölçeğine göre analiz edilmiştir.
Bulgular: Kriterleri karşılayan toplam 72 video belirlendi. Videoların medyan süresi 292 saniyeydi. Ortalama görüntülenme sayısı 13.8, yorum sayısı 0.01, beğeni sayısı 0.11 ve beğenilmeyen sayısı 0.01 olarak gerçekleşti. DISCERN puanları ve yüklenen kaynaklar karşılaştırıldığında anlamlı bir fark saptandı (p=0.031). Doktorların paylaştığı videoların DISCERN puanları diğer kaynaklara göre anlamlı olarak yüksek bulundu (p<0.05). Videoların %4,2'si (n=3) ağızdan emme, kesme gibi yanlış bilgi verirken, %5,6'sında yanlış turnike uygulanması önerilmiştir. Ekstremite sabitleme ve bandaj uygulaması tüm videoların %73,6'sında gösterildi.
Sonuç: Doktorlar ve sağlıkla ilgili web siteleri tarafından yüklenen yılan sokmalarında ilk yardım uygulamalarıyla ilgili YouTube videoları yararlı ilk yardım bilgileri içermektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

İlk yardım, yılan ısırması, kalite, Youtube videoları

Kaynakça

• 1. David Warrell. Snakebites. World Health Organization, Guidelines for the management of snakebites. 2nd Edition. WHO/Regional Office for South-East Asia. 2016. [Cited 20 March 2021]. Available from https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789290225300
• 2. Bhargava S, Kumari K, Sarin RK, Singh R. First-hand knowledge about snakes and snake-bite management: an urgent need. Nagoya J Med Sci 2020; 82(4): 763-774.
• 3. Amante DJ, Hogan TP, Pagoto SL, English TM, Lapane KL. Access to care and use of the Internet to search for health information: results from the US National Health Interview Survey. J Med Internet Res 2015; 17(4): e106.
• 4. Madathil KC, Rivera-Rodriguez AJ, Greenstein JS, Gramopadhye AK. Healthcare information on YouTube: A systematic review. Health Informatics J 2015; 21: 173- 94.
• 5. Koçyiğit FB, Akaltun MS, Şahin AR. YouTube as a source of information on COVID-19 and rheumatic disease link. ClinRheumatol 2020; 39(7): 2049-2054.
• 6. Crocco AG, Villasis-Keever M, Jadad AR. Analysis of cases of harm associated with use of health information on the internet. JAMA 2002; 287: 2869-71.
• 7. Akyol A. Karahan İ. Is YouTube a quality source of information on sarcopenia? Eur Eur Geriatr Med 2020; 11: 693-697.
• 8. Yaylaci S, Serinken M, Eken C, Karcioglu O, Yilmaz A, E Hayri, et al. Are YouTube videos accurate and reliable on basic life support and cardiopulmonary resuscitation? Emerg Med Australas 2014; 26: 474-477.
• 9. Rittberg R, Dissanayake T, Katz SJ. A qualitative analysis of methotrexate self-injection education videos on YouTube. Clin Rheumatol 2016; 35: 1329-33.
• 10. Kocyigit BF, Nacitarhan V, Koca TT, Berk E. YouTube as a source of patient information for ankylosing spondylitis exercises. Clin Rheumatol 2019; 38(6): 1747-1751.
• 11. Charnock D, Shepperd S, Needham G, Gann R. DISCERN: an instrument for judging the quality of written consumer health information on treatment choices. J Epidemiol Community Health 1999; 53(2): 105-11
• 12. Kocyigit FB, Tuba Tulay Kocal, Mazlum Serdar Akaltun. Quality and readability of online information on ankylosing spondylitis. Clin Rheumatol 2019; 38: 3269-3274.
• 13. Ahmad T, Sattar K, Akram A. Medical professionalism videos on YouTube: Content exploration and appraisal of user engagement. Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 2020; 27: 2287-2292.
• 14. Şahin A, Şahin M, Türkcü FM. YouTube as a source of information in retinopathy of prematurity. Ir J Med Sci. 2019; 188(2): 613-617.
• 15. Villafañe JH, Cantero-Tellez R, Valdes K, Usuelli FG, Berjano P. Educational Quality of YouTube Videos in Thumb Exercises for Carpometacarpal Osteoarthritis: A Search on Current Practice. HAND 2018; 13(6): 715-719.
• 16. Bora K, Das D, Barman B, Borah P. Are internet videos useful sources of information during global public health emergencies? A case study of YouTube videos during the 2015-16 Zika virus pandemic. Pathog Glob Health 2018; 112(6): 320-328.
• 17. Bae SS, Baxter S. YouTube videos in the English language as a patient education resource for cataract surgery. Int Ophthalmol 2018, 38: 1941-1945.
• 18. Mahmood MA, Halliday D, Cumming R, Thwin KT, Myitzu M et al. Inadequate knowledge about snakebite envenoming symptoms and application of harmful first aid methods in the community in high snakebite incidence areas of Myanmar. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2019; 13(2): e0007171.
• 19. Michael GC, Aliyu I, Grema BA, Paul De-Kaa NL. Prehospital care practices for venomous snakebites in resource-limited settings: A narrative review. Arch Med Health Sci 2017; 5: 237-41.
• 20. Kularatne AM, Silva A, Maduwage K, Ratnayake I, Walathara C, Ratnayake C, et al. Victims' response to snakebite and socio-epidemiological factors of 1018 snakebites in a tertiary care hospital in Sri Lanka. Wilderness Environ Med. 2014; 25(1): 35-40.