A WEB-BASED SOFTWARE FOR REPORTING GUIDELINES OF SCIENTIFIC RESEARCHES

Year 2021, Volume: 6 Issue: 1, 39 - 43, 29.06.2021

Burak Yağın , Fatma Hilal Yağın , Harika Gözükara , Cemil Çolak

https://doi.org/10.52876/jcs.916182

Cited By: 6

Abstract

Abstract— Aim: It is very important to use accurate reporting guidelines when reporting a study in cognitive science and health. This study aims to develop a web-based tool that leads to a reporting guideline that includes checklists and flowcharts for relevant research by type of research designs (qualitative, descriptive, experimental, and methodological studies, etc.)

Materials and Methods: The current study covers qualitative research, systematic review/meta-analysis, case presentations, case series, correlational (ecological), case-control, cross-sectional, cohort, randomized clinical trial, non-randomized clinical trial, field studies (for there are reporting guideline for primary protection measures), health care research (animal experiments, etc.), validity studies, consistency studies, simulation studies. For this purpose, the researcher is asked which epidemiological research design is useful and is directed to the reporting guideline for the relevant research type. During the development of the software, the DASH Library in the Python programming language was used.

Results: The Scientific Research Guidelines Software developed in this study can improve the reporting quality of the studies by guiding researchers to the correct reporting guide. The web-based software developed can be accessed at http://biostatapps.inonu.edu.tr/BAKY/. The software has English and Turkish language options.

Conclusion: Scientific Research Guidelines Software allows researchers to clearly state what they do and what they don't do in their study, how they do it, and what they find as a result. Besides, this software provides access to guides where they can learn about the meaning, strengths, and weaknesses of the study being done.

Keywords

Epidemiological Research Designs, Research Reporting Guidelines, Python

References

• I. Simera, D. Moher, J. Hoey, K. F. Schulz, and D. G. Altman, "A catalogue of reporting guidelines for health research," European journal of clinical investigation, vol. 40, pp. 35-53, 2010.
• [2] D. Moher, K. F. Schulz, I. Simera, and D. G. Altman, "Guidance for developers of health research reporting guidelines," PLoS med, vol. 7, p. e1000217, 2010.
• [3] D. G. Altman, I. Simera, J. Hoey, D. Moher, and K. Schulz, "EQUATOR: reporting guidelines for health research," Open Medicine, vol. 2, p. e49, 2008.
• [4] I. Simera, D. Moher, A. Hirst, J. Hoey, K. F. Schulz, and D. G. Altman, "Transparent and accurate reporting increases reliability, utility, and impact of your research: reporting guidelines and the EQUATOR Network," BMC medicine, vol. 8, pp. 1-6, 2010.
• [5] A. Stevens, L. Shamseer, E. Weinstein, F. Yazdi, L. Turner, J. Thielman, et al., "Relation of completeness of reporting of health research to journals’ endorsement of reporting guidelines: systematic review," Bmj, vol. 348, 2014.
• [6] D. G. Altman and D. Moher, "Developing guidelines for reporting healthcare research: scientific rationale and procedures," Medicina clinica, vol. 125, pp. 8-13, 2005.
• [7] Z. Q. Al-Busaidi, "Qualitative research and its uses in health care," Sultan Qaboos University Medical Journal, vol. 8, p. 11, 2008.
• [8] Z. Karaçam, "Sistematik derleme metodolojisi: Sistematik derleme hazırlamak için bir rehber," Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Hemşirelik Fakültesi Elektronik Dergisi, vol. 6, pp. 26-33, 2013.
• [9] S. Polat and A. Osman, "Meta-sentez: Kavramsal bir çözümleme," Eğitimde Nitel Araştırmalar Dergisi, vol. 4, pp. 52-64, 2016.
• [10] A. C. Tricco, E. Lillie, W. Zarin, K. K. O'Brien, H. Colquhoun, D. Levac, et al., "PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): checklist and explanation," Annals of internal medicine, vol. 169, pp. 467-473, 2018.
• [11] T. Maribo, C. M. Jensen, L. S. Madsen, and C. Handberg, "Experiences with and perspectives on goal setting in spinal cord injury rehabilitation: a systematic review of qualitative studies," Spinal Cord, vol. 58, pp. 949-958, 2020.
• [12] M. Kılıçkap, "Meta-analizleri nasıl yorumlayalım: Türkiye’de kardiyovasküler risk faktörlerine yönelik yapılan meta-analizlerin metodolojik açıdan değerlendirilmesi," Turk Kardiyol Dern Ars, vol. 46, pp. 624-635, 2018.
• [13] D. Moher, D. J. Cook, S. Eastwood, I. Olkin, D. Rennie, and D. F. Stroup, "Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement," Oncology Research and Treatment, vol. 23, pp. 597-602, 2000.
• [14] A. Rajasekhar, R. Lottenberg, L. Lottenberg, H. Liu, and D. Ang, "Pulmonary embolism prophylaxis with inferior vena cava filters in trauma patients: a systematic review using the meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology (MOOSE) guidelines," Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis, vol. 32, pp. 40-46, 2011.
• [15] R. A. Agha, A. J. Fowler, A. Saeta, I. Barai, S. Rajmohan, D. P. Orgill, et al., "The SCARE statement: consensus-based surgical case report guidelines," International Journal of Surgery, vol. 34, pp. 180-186, 2016.
• [16] D. M. Zucker, "How to do case study research," School of nursing faculty publication series, p. 2, 2009.
• [17] R. L. Morgan, K. A. Thayer, L. Bero, N. Bruce, Y. Falck-Ytter, D. Ghersi, et al., "GRADE: Assessing the quality of evidence in environmental and occupational health," Environment international, vol. 92, pp. 611-616, 2016.
• [18] S. Cuschieri, "The STROBE guidelines," Saudi journal of anaesthesia, vol. 13, p. S31, 2019.
• [19] D. Moher, K. F. Schulz, D. Altman, and C. Group, "The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomized trials," Jama, vol. 285, pp. 1987-1991, 2001.
• [20] E. Treasure, "The TREND statement," Evidence-based dentistry, vol. 5, pp. 88-91, 2004.
• [21] P. N. Newton, S. J. Lee, C. Goodman, F. M. Fernández, S. Yeung, S. Phanouvong, et al., "Guidelines for field surveys of the quality of medicines: a proposal," PLoS Med, vol. 6, p. e1000052, 2009.
• [22] N. Percie du Sert, V. Hurst, A. Ahluwalia, S. Alam, M. T. Avey, M. Baker, et al., "The ARRIVE guidelines 2.0: Updated guidelines for reporting animal research," Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism, vol. 40, pp. 1769-1777, 2020.
• [23] C. Çolak and H. Parlakpınar, "Hayvan deneyleri: in vivo denemelerin bildirimi: ARRIVE Kılavuzu-Derleme," 2012.
• [24] P. M. Bossuyt, J. B. Reitsma, D. E. Bruns, C. A. Gatsonis, P. P. Glasziou, L. Irwig, et al., "STARD 2015: an updated list of essential items for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies," Clinical chemistry, vol. 61, pp. 1446-1452, 2015.
• [25] B. N. De França and G. H. Travassos, "Reporting guidelines for simulation-based studies in software engineering," 2012.
• [26] E. Von Elm, D. G. Altman, M. Egger, S. J. Pocock, P. C. Gøtzsche, and J. P. Vandenbroucke, "The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies," Annals of internal medicine, vol. 147, pp. 573-577, 2007.
• [27] A. Liberati, D. G. Altman, J. Tetzlaff, C. Mulrow, P. C. Gøtzsche, J. P. Ioannidis, et al., "The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration," Journal of clinical epidemiology, vol. 62, pp. e1-e34, 2009.