Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster
Yıl 2023, Cilt: 10 Sayı: 4, 217 - 223, 31.12.2023

Öz

Kaynakça

  • Aker, Y., & Karavardar, A. (2023). Using machine learning methods in financial distress prediction: sample of small and medium sized enterprises operating in Turkey. Ege Akademik Bakis, 23(2), 145-162
  • Aksoy, B., & Boztosun, D. (2018). Financial failure prediction by using discriminant and logistics regression methods: evidence from BIST manufacturing sector. Finans Politik & Ekonomik Yorumlar, 646, 9–32.
  • Zhang, L., Altman, E. I. & Yen, J. (2010). Corporate financial distress diagnosis model and application in credit rating for listing firms in China. Frontiers of Computer Science in China, 4, 220-236.
  • Altman Edward I. (1968). Financial ratios, discriminant analysis and the prediction of corporate bankruptcy. Journal of Finance, 23(4), 189–209.
  • Oude Avenhuis, J. (2013). Testing the generalizability of the bankruptcy prediction models of Altman, Ohlson and Zmijewski for Dutch listed and large non-listed firms (Master's thesis, University of Twente).
  • Beaver, W. H. (1966). Financial ratios as predictors of failure. Journal of Accounting Research, 71-111.
  • Breiman, L. (2001). Random forests. Machine Learning, 45, 5-32.
  • Cortes, C., & Vapnik, V. (1995). Support-vector networks. Machine Learning, 20, 273-297.
  • DeAngelo, H., & DeAngelo, L. (1990). Dividend policy and financial distress: an empirical investigation of troubled NYSE firms. Journal of Finance, 45(5), 1415-1431.
  • Elhoseny, M., Metawa, N., Sztano, G., & El-Hasnony, I. M. (2022). Deep learning-based model for financial distress prediction. Annals of Operations Research, 11(2), 1-23.
  • Hill, N. T., Perry, S. E., & Andes, S. (1996). Evaluating firms in financial distress: An event history analysis. Journal of Applied Business Research (JABR), 12(3), 60-71.
  • İçerli, M. Y. (2005). Prediction of Financial Failure in Businesses and an Application (PhD thesis, University of Dokuz Eylül)
  • Institute of International Finance. (2021). Global Debt Monitor COVID Drives Debt Surge — Stabilization Ahead ?
  • Kinay, B. (2010). Ordered Logit Model approach for the determination of financial distress. Numéro spécial, 119-131.
  • Li, H., & Sun, J. (2008). Ranking-order case-based reasoning for financial distress prediction. Knowledge-Based Systems, 21(8), 868-878.
  • Lin, F., Liang, D., & Chen, E. (2011). Financial ratio selection for business crisis prediction. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(12), 15094-15102.
  • Malik, H., Fatema, N., & Iqbal, A. (2021). Intelligent data-analytics for condition monitoring: smart grid applications. Academic Press.
  • Nicodemus, K. K. (2011). On the stability and ranking of predictors from random forest variable importance measures. Briefings in Bioinformatics, 12(4), 369-373.
  • Ohlson, J. A. (1980). Financial ratios and the probabilistic prediction of bankruptcy. Journal of Accounting Research, 5(2), 109-131.
  • Oribel, T., & Hanggraeni, D. (2021). An application of machine learning in financial distress prediction cases in Indonesia. International Journal of Business and Technology Management, 3(2), 98-110.
  • Oz, I. O., & Simga-Mugan, C. (2018). Bankruptcy prediction models' generalizability: Evidence from emerging market economies. Advances in Accounting, 41, 114-125.
  • Oz, I. O., & Yelkenci, T. (2017). A theoretical approach to financial distress prediction modeling. Managerial Finance, 43(2), 212-230.
  • Özlem, Ş., & Tan, O. F. (2022). Predicting cash holdings using supervised machine learning algorithms. Financial Innovation, 8(1), 1-19.
  • Özparlak, G., & Dilidüzgün, M. Ö. (2022). Corporate bankruptcy prediction using machine learning methods: the case of the USA. Uluslararası Yönetim İktisat ve İşletme Dergisi, 18(4), 1007-1031.
  • Qian, H., Wang, B., Yuan, M., Gao, S., & Song, Y. (2022). Financial distress prediction using a corrected feature selection measure and gradient boosted decision tree. Expert Systems with Applications, 190, 116202.
  • Samuel, A. L. (1959). Some studies in machine learning using the game of checkers. IBM Journal of Research and Development, 3(3), 210-229.
  • Tsai, C. F., Hsu, Y. F., & Yen, D. C. (2014). A comparative study of classifier ensembles for bankruptcy prediction. Applied Soft Computing, 24, 977-984.
  • Zhang, Z. (2016). Introduction to machine learning: k-nearest neighbors. Annals of Translational Medicine, 4(11), 213-229.
  • Zmijewski, M. E. (1984). Methodological issues related to the estimation of financial distress prediction models. Journal of Accounting Research, 3(4), 59-82

PREDICTING FINANCIAL DISTRESS USING SUPERVISED MACHINE LEARNING ALGORITHMS: AN APPLICATION ON BORSA ISTANBUL

Yıl 2023, Cilt: 10 Sayı: 4, 217 - 223, 31.12.2023

Öz

Purpose- The main purpose of this study is to identify the most significant variables to detect financial distress earlier and to find the best machine learning algorithm model.
Methodology-This study has used Support Vector Machine, Logistic Regression, Random Forest and K-nearest neighbors method techniques to predict the financial distress prediction for the companies of Turkey between 2012 and 2021.
Findings- As a result of the study, it has been determined that Random Forest provides the best results in terms of precision, accuracy, and recall. Further, this study has found the most important five independent variables to determine the financial distress status of the firms. In this way, it has been found that Current Assets/ Current Liabilities, Working Capital / Total Assets, Gross profit / Revenue, Retained Earnings / Total Assets and Sales growth rate are the most useful variables to determine financial distress status of Turkish firms earlier.
Conclusion- This study has concluded that cash ratios and profitability ratios and sales growth are the most important independent variables to determine financial distress one-year ahead. Furthermore, it has been found that random forest is the best machine learning method among other supervised machine learning methods used in this study.

Kaynakça

  • Aker, Y., & Karavardar, A. (2023). Using machine learning methods in financial distress prediction: sample of small and medium sized enterprises operating in Turkey. Ege Akademik Bakis, 23(2), 145-162
  • Aksoy, B., & Boztosun, D. (2018). Financial failure prediction by using discriminant and logistics regression methods: evidence from BIST manufacturing sector. Finans Politik & Ekonomik Yorumlar, 646, 9–32.
  • Zhang, L., Altman, E. I. & Yen, J. (2010). Corporate financial distress diagnosis model and application in credit rating for listing firms in China. Frontiers of Computer Science in China, 4, 220-236.
  • Altman Edward I. (1968). Financial ratios, discriminant analysis and the prediction of corporate bankruptcy. Journal of Finance, 23(4), 189–209.
  • Oude Avenhuis, J. (2013). Testing the generalizability of the bankruptcy prediction models of Altman, Ohlson and Zmijewski for Dutch listed and large non-listed firms (Master's thesis, University of Twente).
  • Beaver, W. H. (1966). Financial ratios as predictors of failure. Journal of Accounting Research, 71-111.
  • Breiman, L. (2001). Random forests. Machine Learning, 45, 5-32.
  • Cortes, C., & Vapnik, V. (1995). Support-vector networks. Machine Learning, 20, 273-297.
  • DeAngelo, H., & DeAngelo, L. (1990). Dividend policy and financial distress: an empirical investigation of troubled NYSE firms. Journal of Finance, 45(5), 1415-1431.
  • Elhoseny, M., Metawa, N., Sztano, G., & El-Hasnony, I. M. (2022). Deep learning-based model for financial distress prediction. Annals of Operations Research, 11(2), 1-23.
  • Hill, N. T., Perry, S. E., & Andes, S. (1996). Evaluating firms in financial distress: An event history analysis. Journal of Applied Business Research (JABR), 12(3), 60-71.
  • İçerli, M. Y. (2005). Prediction of Financial Failure in Businesses and an Application (PhD thesis, University of Dokuz Eylül)
  • Institute of International Finance. (2021). Global Debt Monitor COVID Drives Debt Surge — Stabilization Ahead ?
  • Kinay, B. (2010). Ordered Logit Model approach for the determination of financial distress. Numéro spécial, 119-131.
  • Li, H., & Sun, J. (2008). Ranking-order case-based reasoning for financial distress prediction. Knowledge-Based Systems, 21(8), 868-878.
  • Lin, F., Liang, D., & Chen, E. (2011). Financial ratio selection for business crisis prediction. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(12), 15094-15102.
  • Malik, H., Fatema, N., & Iqbal, A. (2021). Intelligent data-analytics for condition monitoring: smart grid applications. Academic Press.
  • Nicodemus, K. K. (2011). On the stability and ranking of predictors from random forest variable importance measures. Briefings in Bioinformatics, 12(4), 369-373.
  • Ohlson, J. A. (1980). Financial ratios and the probabilistic prediction of bankruptcy. Journal of Accounting Research, 5(2), 109-131.
  • Oribel, T., & Hanggraeni, D. (2021). An application of machine learning in financial distress prediction cases in Indonesia. International Journal of Business and Technology Management, 3(2), 98-110.
  • Oz, I. O., & Simga-Mugan, C. (2018). Bankruptcy prediction models' generalizability: Evidence from emerging market economies. Advances in Accounting, 41, 114-125.
  • Oz, I. O., & Yelkenci, T. (2017). A theoretical approach to financial distress prediction modeling. Managerial Finance, 43(2), 212-230.
  • Özlem, Ş., & Tan, O. F. (2022). Predicting cash holdings using supervised machine learning algorithms. Financial Innovation, 8(1), 1-19.
  • Özparlak, G., & Dilidüzgün, M. Ö. (2022). Corporate bankruptcy prediction using machine learning methods: the case of the USA. Uluslararası Yönetim İktisat ve İşletme Dergisi, 18(4), 1007-1031.
  • Qian, H., Wang, B., Yuan, M., Gao, S., & Song, Y. (2022). Financial distress prediction using a corrected feature selection measure and gradient boosted decision tree. Expert Systems with Applications, 190, 116202.
  • Samuel, A. L. (1959). Some studies in machine learning using the game of checkers. IBM Journal of Research and Development, 3(3), 210-229.
  • Tsai, C. F., Hsu, Y. F., & Yen, D. C. (2014). A comparative study of classifier ensembles for bankruptcy prediction. Applied Soft Computing, 24, 977-984.
  • Zhang, Z. (2016). Introduction to machine learning: k-nearest neighbors. Annals of Translational Medicine, 4(11), 213-229.
  • Zmijewski, M. E. (1984). Methodological issues related to the estimation of financial distress prediction models. Journal of Accounting Research, 3(4), 59-82
Toplam 29 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Konular Finans, İşletme
Bölüm Articles
Yazarlar

Seyfullah Selimefendigil 0000-0001-7017-9673

Yayımlanma Tarihi 31 Aralık 2023
Gönderilme Tarihi 29 Ekim 2023
Kabul Tarihi 21 Aralık 2023
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2023 Cilt: 10 Sayı: 4

Kaynak Göster

APA Selimefendigil, S. (2023). PREDICTING FINANCIAL DISTRESS USING SUPERVISED MACHINE LEARNING ALGORITHMS: AN APPLICATION ON BORSA ISTANBUL. Journal of Economics Finance and Accounting, 10(4), 217-223.

Journal of Economics, Finance and Accounting (JEFA) is a scientific, academic, double blind peer-reviewed, quarterly and open-access online journal. The journal publishes four issues a year. The issuing months are March, June, September and December. The publication languages of the Journal are English and Turkish. JEFA aims to provide a research source for all practitioners, policy makers, professionals and researchers working in the area of economics, finance, accounting and auditing. The editor in chief of JEFA invites all manuscripts that cover theoretical and/or applied researches on topics related to the interest areas of the Journal. JEFA publishes academic research studies only. JEFA charges no submission or publication fee.

Ethics Policy - JEFA applies the standards of Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). JEFA is committed to the academic community ensuring ethics and quality of manuscripts in publications. Plagiarism is strictly forbidden and the manuscripts found to be plagiarized will not be accepted or if published will be removed from the publication. Authors must certify that their manuscripts are their original work. Plagiarism, duplicate, data fabrication and redundant publications are forbidden. The manuscripts are subject to plagiarism check by iThenticate or similar. All manuscript submissions must provide a similarity report (up to 15% excluding quotes, bibliography, abstract and method).

Open Access - All research articles published in PressAcademia Journals are fully open access; immediately freely available to read, download and share. Articles are published under the terms of a Creative Commons license which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Open access is a property of individual works, not necessarily journals or publishers. Community standards, rather than copyright law, will continue to provide the mechanism for enforcement of proper attribution and responsible use of the published work, as they do now.