Scrutinizing the Changes in the Aggression of the Students of Schools of Sports Sciences studying at different Departments

Yıl 2019, Cilt: 1 Sayı: 2, 74 - 78, 31.08.2019

Dilek Uyar Merve Söylemez Ömer Faruk Gönül Oğuzhan Çumralıgil Bengü Alkan Eyüp Buğra Güvendi Fatma Ilgın Mustafa Ballı Mehmet Altın

Öz

The objective of
this study is to examine the aggressive behaviors and proclivity of the
students of Faculty of Sports Sciences of Selçuk University, studying at
different departments. The study group is constituted by total 349 students,
being 155 males and 194 females, studying at different departments of Faculty
of Sports Sciences of Selçuk University. While the personal information form
was used for the socio-demographic information, a 7-item likert-type Aggression
Scale developed by Kiper (1984) was utilized to obtain the values of
aggression. Following testing the homogeneousness and variances of the data,
Independent Sample t Test was used in identifying the changes for the gender
factor, One-Way Anova for multiple comparisons, and Tukey HSD test in
determining the source of the difference. The Crombach Alpha value for this
study was determined as 0,82. Statistical changes were observed in the
aggression values depending on the gender and department factors (p<0.05).
While no change was found in the destructive aggression category in view of the
gender variable, it was determined that the average values of males were
statistically higher than females in the categories of assertiveness,
passivity, and overall aggression (p<0.05). It was found that the students
of the coaching department have the highest average value in the entire
aggression subcategories and that the changes are statistically significant
(p<0.05). In the light of such findings, it is considered that the new
functional model charged by the society on females and males will be effective
in the changes found between the male and female students, along with the  socio-cultural structure, social status, and
roles. In addition, the reason for the changes depending on the department
factor among the students can be considered as the fact that they are made
subject to different recruitment criteria and examinations when being placed
into departments, in addition to the differences of their sportive fields where
they are studying. It is a noteworthy result that the aggression scores of the
coaching students is high despite the fact that they take more practice-based
classes. Regardless of its cause and source, sense of aggression must be
considered as a sense and behavior that must be brought under control without
reaching a dimension that inflicts damage on persons and the society.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Aggression, Sports, University Student

Kaynakça

• Ağlamaz, T. (2006). High school students’ aggression point interms of examining self-disclosure, school type, sex, class level, parent’s education level and families monthly income level. Unpublished Master’s Thesis, Samsun University, Samsun.
• Anderson, C.A., & Bushman, B.J. (2002). Human Aggression, Annual Reviews of Psychology.
• Atkinson, R.L., Atkinson, R.C., Smith, E.E., Bem, D.J., Hoeksema, S.N. (2002). Hilgard's Introduction to Psychology (Y. Alogan, Çev.). Ankara: Arkadaş Yayınevi. Cüceloglu D. (2005). Human and Behavior. Remzi Bookstore, Istanbul.
• Dervent, F., Arslanoğlu, E., & Şenel, Ö. (2010) Agressivity levels of the high school students and relation with their participation to sport activities (Sample of Istanbul), Journal of Human Sciences, 7 (1), 523–525.
• Efilti, E. (2006). Orta öğretim kurumlarında okuyan öğrencilerin saldırganlık, denetim odağı ve kişilik özelliklerinin karşılaştırmalı olarak incelenmesi. Unpublished Doctoral Thesis, Selçuk University, Konya.
• Eroğlu, S. (2009). Saldırganlık davranışının boyutları ve ilişkili olduğu faktörler: lise ve üniversite öğrencileri üzerine karşılaştırmalı bir çalışma. Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi. 21, 206- 221.
• Freedman, J. L., Sears, D. O., Carlsmıth, J. M. (1998). Social Psychology (A. Dönmez, Çev.). Ankara: İmge Kitabevi.
• Gergen K.J., & Gergen M.M. (1986). Social Psychology (Second Edition). New York: Springer- Verlag,226.
• Gönültaş, O., & Atıcı, M. (2014) Ortaokul son sınıf öğrencilerinin öfke düzeyleri ve saldırganlık düzeylerinin bazı değişkenlere göre incelenmesi, Ç.Ü. Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 23 (1), 370-386.
• Halıcı, P., Baran, G. (2006). Yatılı İlköğretim Bölge Okullarına Devam Eden ve Ailesiyle Birlikte Yaşayan 12-14 Yaş Grubundaki Çocukların Saldırganlık Eğilimlerinin İncelenmesi, Adli Psikiyatri Dergisi, 3(2), 23-30.
• Hasta, D., & Güler, M. E. (2013). Saldırganlık: Kişilerarası ilişki tarzları ve empati açısından bir inceleme. Ankara Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 4 (1).
• Karataş, Z. (2008). Lise Öğrencilerinde öfke ve Saldırganlık. Ç.Ü. Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 17, (3).
• Kiper, İ. (1984). Saldırganlık türlerinin çeşitli ekonomik, sosyal ve akademik değişkenlerle İlişkisi. Unpublished Master’s Thesis, Ankara.
• Kocatürk R. (1982) Saldırganlık güdüsünün spor ve eğitim alanında meslek seçimine etkisi, Unpublished Master’s Thesis, Ankara.
• Krech, D.,Crutchfield, R.S. (1980). Sosyal Psikoloji Teori ve Problemler. (E. Güngör, Çev.). İstanbul: Ötüken Neşriyat.
• Lorenz, K. (1968). Das Sogenannte Böse. Zur Naturgeschichte der Aggression. 1nd ed. Wien, Borotha-Schoeler Press, 21-22.
• Partal, M., & Kılcıgil, E. (2003). Süper ligde oynayan bir futbol takımı taraftarlarının şiddete neden olan tahrik olma unsurları üzerine bir araştırma. Gazi Üniversitesi Beden Eğitimi ve Spor Bilimleri Dergisi, 2.
• Tutkun, E., Güner, B.Ç., Ağaoğlu, S.A., & Soylu, R. (2010). Assessment on the Aggression Levels of the Sportspeople doing Team Sports and Individual Sports. Sports and Performance Studies Journal, 1(1), 23-29.
• Yavuzer, H. (1992). Child Psychology. Istanbul: Remzi Publishing House.