Analyzing Technology Readiness Level of Tourism Academicians based on Certain Demographic Variables

Yıl 2023, Cilt: 4 Sayı: 2, 56 - 76, 28.10.2023

Selda Güven , Bayram Şahin

https://doi.org/10.54493/jgttr.1351477

Öz

Recent crises and technological advancements have prompted the integration of technology in education. Nonetheless, for technology to be effectively implemented in the education system, it must be accepted by all stakeholders involved. This study examines the inclination of tourism academicians towards technology based on specific demographic variables, analysed using statistical methods. In this quantitative study, tourism academicians self-identify as explorer, while also considering both face-to-face and hybrid education options, beyond solely distance education. Notably, high scores for optimism and insecurity were observed among the participants. The technology readiness index's discomfort and insecurity dimensions remain unchanged by socio-demographic variables. Optimism regarding technology differs by gender, with male generally having a more positive outlook than female. Both optimism and innovation differ depending on the teaching system employed. Moreover, the innovativeness dimension varies depending on technology clusters. Assisting tourism academics in adopting new technologies could reveal more favourable attitudes towards technology.

Anahtar Kelimeler

technology readiness, tourism academicians, individual technological trends

Turizm Akademisyenlerinin Teknolojiye Hazır Bulunma Düzeyinin Bazı Demografik Değişkenler Açısından İncelenmesi

Öz

Son dönemde yaşanan krizler ve teknolojik gelişmeler teknolojinin eğitime entegrasyonunu hızlandırmıştır. Ancak teknolojinin eğitim sisteminde etkili bir şekilde uygulanabilmesi için ilgili tüm paydaşlar tarafından kabul edilmesi gerekmektedir. Bu çalışma, turizm akademisyenlerinin teknolojiye yönelik eğilimlerini istatistiksel yöntemlerle analiz edilen belirli demografik değişkenlere göre incelenmiştir. Bu niceliksel çalışmada turizm akademisyenleri kendilerini kaşif olarak tanımlarken, uzaktan eğitimden ziyade hibrit ve yüzyüze eğitim seçeneklerini tercih ettikleri görülmüştür. İyimserlik ve güvensizlik boyutlarının aritmetik ortalamalarının diğer boyutlara göre daha yüksek olduğu gözlenmiştir. Teknolojiye hazırlık bulunma düzeyinin rahatsızlık ve güvensizlik boyutları sosyo-demografik değişkenlere göre değişmemektedir. İyimserlik ise cinsiyete göre farklılaşmaktadır; teknoloji konusunda erkekler kadınlara göre daha optimistik bir bakış açısına sahiptir. Hem iyimserlik hem de yenilikçilik, kullanılan öğretim sistemine bağlı olarak farklılık göstermektedir. Ayrıca yenilikçilik boyutu teknoloji kümelerine göre farklılık göstermektedir. Turizm akademisyenlerinin yeni teknolojileri benimsemelerine yardımcı olmak, teknolojiye yönelik daha olumlu tutumları ortaya çıkarabileceği düşünülmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

teknolojiye hazır bulunma, turizm akademisyenleri, bireysel teknolojik eğilimler

Kaynakça

• Acheampong, P., Zhiwen, L., Antwi, H. A., Otoo, A. A., Mensah, W. G., Sarpong, P. B. (2017). Hybridizing an extended technology acceptance model (TAM) to predict e-payment adoption in Ghana. American Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 5(2), 172-184.
• Agarwal, R., & Prasad, J. (1999). Are individual differences germane to the acceptance of new information technologies. Decision Sciences, 30(2), 361-391.
• Akgün, F. (2017). Investigation of instructional technology acceptance and individual innovativeness of academicians. Turkish Online Journal of Qualitative Inquiry, 8(3), 291-322.
• Aksoğan, M., & Duman, M. Ç. (2020). A research on academician opinions on distance education in the COVID-19 process. MTU Journal of Engineering and Natural Sciences, 0(0), 38-49.
• Aldahdouh, T. Z., Murtonen, M., Riekkinen, J., Vilppu, H., Nguyen, T., & Nokelainen, P. (2023). University teachers’ profles based on digital innovativeness and instructional adaptation to COVID 19: Association with learning patterns and teacher demographics. Education and Information Technologies, 0(0), 1-19.
• Alhammadi, K., Marashdeh, H., & Hussain, M. (2023). Assessing the effect of innovation diffusion and technology readiness theories on attitude, behavioral intention and implementation of smart learning. Cross Cultural & Strategic Management, 0(0), 1-19.
• Ali, S., Khalid, N., Javed, H. M., & Islam, D. M. (2021). Consumer adoption of online food delivery ordering (OFDO) services in pakistan: the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic situation. Journal of Open Innovation Technology Market and Complexity, 7(1), 1-23.
• Anderson, T., Varhagen, S., & Campbell, K. (1998). Faculty adoption of teaching and learning technologies: contrasting earlier adopters and mainstream faculty. The Canadian Journal of Higher Education, 28(2,3), 71-98.
• Antón-Sancho, Á., Vergara, D., Sánchez-Calvo, M., & Fernández-Arias, P. (2023). On the influence of the university tenure on the digital pandemic stress in higher education faculty. Behavioral Sciences, 13(4), 1-18.
• Armenakis, A., Harris, S. G., & Mossholder, K. W. (1993). Creating readiness for organizational change. Human Relations, 46(6), 681-703.
• Astuti, N. C., & Nasution, R. A. (2014). Technology readiness and e-commerce adoption among entrepreneurs of SMEs in bandung city, indonesia. Gadjah Mada International Journal of Business, 16(1), 69-88.
• Aydın, C. H., & Tasci, D. (2005). Measuring readiness for e-Learning: reflections from an Emerging Country. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 8(4), 244-257.
• Badri, M. A., Mohaidat, J., & Rashedi, A. A. (2013). Technology readiness of school reachers - an empirical study of measurement and segmentation. Industrial Engineering & Management, 2(4), 1-10.
• Badri, M., Rashedi, A. A., & Mohaidat, J. (2013). School teachers’ technology readiness – An empirical study applying readiness factors and teacher type categorization. International Conference on Information, Business and Education Technology (s. 991-994). Beijing: Atlantis Press.
• Barachi, M. E., Salim, T. A., Nyadzayo, M. W., Mathew, S., Badewi, A., & Amankwah-Amoah, J. (2022). The relationship between citizen readiness and the intention to continuously use smart city services: Mediating effects of satisfaction and discomfort. Technology in Society, 71, 1-19.
• Bjuggren, C. M., & Elert, N. (2019). Gender differences in optimism. Applied Economics, 51(47), 5160-5173. Blakelock, J., & Smith, T. E. (2006). Distance learning: From multiple snapshots, a composite portrait. Computers and Composition, 23(1), 139-161.
• Blut, M., & Wang, C. (2020). Technology readiness: a meta-analysis of conceptualizations of the construct and its impact on technology usage. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 48, 649-669.
• Bower, B. L. (2001). Distance education: facing the faculty challenge. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 4(2), 1-6.
• Brosnan, M. J. (1998). The impact of psychological gender, gender-related perceptions, significant others, and the introducer of technology upon computer anxiety in students. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 18(1), 63-78.
• Bubou, G. M., & Job, G. C. (2022). Individual innovativeness, self efficacy and e-learning readiness of students of Yenagoa study centre, National Open University of Nigeria. Journal of Research in Innovative Teaching & Learning, 15(1), 2-22.
• Bulut, C., Eren, H., & Halac, D. S. (2013). Social innovation and psychometric analysis. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 82, 122-130.
• Cabras, C., & Mondo, M. (2018). Coping strategies, optimism, and life satisfaction among first-year university students in Italy: gender and age differences. Higher Education, 75, 643-654.
• Caison, A. L., Bulman, D., Pai, S., & Neville, D. (2008). Exploring the technology readiness of nursing and medical students at a Canadian University. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 22(3), 283-294.
• Carver, C. S., Scheier, M. F., & Segerstrom, S. C. (2010). Optimism. Clinical Psychology Review, 30(7), 879-889.
• Castanier, C., Scanff, C. L., & Woodman, T. (2010). Who takes risks in high-risk sports? A typological personality approach. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 81(4), 478-484.
• Choucri, N., Maugis, V., Madnick, S., & Siegel, M. (2003). GLOBAL e-READINESS - for WHAT? Cambridge: MIT.
• Cimbaljević, M., Bajrami, D. D., Kovačić, S., Pavluković, V., Stankov, U., & Vujičić, M. (2023). Employees’ technology adoption in the context of smart tourism development: the role of technological acceptance and technological readiness. European Journal of Innovation Management, 0(0), 1-26.
• Coetsee, L. (1999). From resistance to commitment. Public Administration Quarterly, 23(2), 204-222.
• Çakır, F. S. (2019). Sosyal Bilimler İçin Parametrik Veri Analizi. Ankara: Gazi.
• Çelik, B., Bilgin, R., & Yıldız, Y. (2022). The views of instructors in foreign language teaching with distance education model during the covid 19 pandemic process: a study at Tishk International University in Erbil, Iraq. International Journal of Social Sciences & Educational Studies, 9(1), 148-176.
• Demirci, A. E., & Ersoy, N. F. (2008). Technology readiness for innovative high-tech products: how consumers perceive and adopt new technologies. The Business Review, 11(1), 302-308. Dennen, V. P. (2015). Technology transience and learner data. The Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 16(2), 45-59.
• Durbin, K. A., Brown, M., & Mather, M. (2019). Optimism for the future in younger and older adults. Journals of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 74(4), 565-574.
• Elliott, K. M., & Hall, M. C. (2005). Assessing consumers' propensity to embrace self-service technologies: are there gender differences? Marketing Management Journal, 15(2), 98-107.
• Ertmer, P. A., Addison, P., Lane, M., Ross, E., & Woods, D. (1999). Examining teachers' beliefs about the role of technology in the elementary classroom. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 32(1), 54-72.
• Ferreira, J. B., Rocha, A. d., & Silva, J. F. (2014). Impacts of technology readiness on emotions and cognition in Brazil. Journal of Business Research, 865-873.
• Flavian, C., Perez-Rueda, A., Belanche, D., & Casalo, L. V. (2022). Intention to use analytical artificial intelligence (AI) in services – the effect of technology readiness and awareness. Journal of Service Management, 33(2), 293-320.
• Gani, M. O., Rahman, M. S., Faroque, A. R., Sabit, A. A., & Fattah, F. A. (2022). Understanding the determinants of ePharmacy services: the moderating effect of technology discomfort. The Bottom Line, 35(2/3), 90-114.
• Gattiker, U. E. (1988). Technology adaptation: a typology for strategic human resource management. Behaviour and Information Technology, 7(4), 345-359.
• Geng, S., Law, K. M., & Niu, B. (2019). Investigating self-directed learning and technology readiness in blending learning environment. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(17), 1-22.
• Gilly, M. C., Celsi, M. W., & Chau, H. J. (2012). It don’t come easy: overcoming obstacles to technology use within a resistant consumer group. The Journal of Consumer Affairs, 46(1), 62-89.
• Godoe, P., & Johansen, T. S. (2012). Understanding adoption of new technologies: Technology readiness and technology acceptance as an integrated concept. Journal of European Psychology Students, 3(1), 38-52.
• Golan, R., Reddy, R., Muthigi, A., & Ramasamy, R. (2023). Artificial intelligence in academic writing: a paradigm-shifting technological advance. Nature Reviews Urology, 20, 327-328.
• Goldsmith, R. E., & Foxall, G. R. (2003). The measurement of innovativeness. L. V. Shavinina içinde, The International Handbook on Innovation (s. 321-330). Oxford: Pergamon.
• Ha, Y., & Im, H. (2014). Determinants of mobile coupon service adoption: assessment of gender difference. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 42(5), 441-459.
• Haron, H., Abbas, W. F., & Rahman, N. A. A. (2012). The adoption of blended learning among Malaysian academicians. Social and Behavioral Science, 67(10), 175-181
• Harrison, T. (2014). Rethinking readiness. Strategic Studies Quarterly, 8(3), 38-68.
• Héder, M. (2017). From NASA to EU: the evolution of the TRL scale in Public Sector Innovation. The Innovation Journal: The Public Sector Innovation Journal, 22(2), 1-23.
• Hemans, E. (2020). The mediating effects of employee apathy, fear of change and organizational tenure on organizational change initiatives in an information technology organization operating in the Caribbean: an Action Research Mixed Methods study. Liverpool University.
• Hmielowski, J. D., Boyd, A. D., Harvey, G., & Joo, J. (2019). The social dimensions of smart meters in the United States: demographics, privacy, and technology readiness. Energy Research & Social Science, 55, 189-197.
• Ismail, I., Ali, A. S., & Azman, N. (2012). Discomfort in e-learning: does it impact learners? International Journal of Emerging Technology in Learning, 7(2), 39-42.
• Ismail, I., Azizan, S. N., & Azman, N. (2011). Accessing innovativeness of distance learners toward their readiness in embracing technology. African Journal of Business Management, 5(33), 12768-12776.
• Jacobsen, B., Lee, J. B., Marquering, W., & Zhang, C. Y. (2014). Gender differences in optimism and asset allocation. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 107(Part B), 630-651.
• Jain, P. (2013). Technology readiness index: measuring Indian railway employees readiness to embrace online technology. Journal of Marketing & Communication, 9(1), 52-46.
• Jokisch, M. R., Schmidt, L. I., Doh, M., Marquard, M., & Wahl, H.-W. (2020). The role of internet self-efficacy, innovativeness and technology avoidance in breadth of internet use: Comparing older technology experts and non-experts. Computers in Human Behavior, 111, 1-9.
• Kaushik, M. K., & Agrawal, D. (2021). Influence of technology readiness in adoption of e-learning. International Journal of Educational Management, 0(0), 1-14.
• Keramati, A., Afshari-Mofrad, M., & Kamrani, A. (2011). The role of readiness factors in E-learning outcomes: An empirical study. Computers & Education, 57(3), 1919-1929.
• Ketikidis, P., Dimitrovski, T., Lazuras, L., & Bath, P. A. (2012). Acceptance of health information technology in health professionals: An application of the revised technology acceptance model. Health Informatics Journal, 18(2), 124-134.
• Kibici, V. B., & Sarıkaya, M. (2021). Readiness levels of music teachers for online learning during the COVID 19 pandemic. International Journal of Technology in Education, 4(3), 501-515.
• Kılıç, S. (2016). Cronbach’ın Alfa Güvenirlik Katsayısı. Journal of Mood Disorders, 6(1), 47-48.
• Kim, W., Benedetto, C. A., & Lancioni, R. A. (2011). The effects of country and gender differences on consumer innovativeness and decision processes in a highly globalized high‐tech product market. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 23(5), 714-744.
• Kitchell, S. (1997). CEO characteristics and technological innovativeness: a Canadian perspective. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 14(2), 111-125.
• Korsching, P. F., El-Ghamrini, S., & Peter, G. (2001). Rural telephone companies: offering technology innovations to enhance the economic development of communities. Technology in Society, 23(1), 79-91.
• Kupangwa, W., & Dubihlela, J. (2016). Influence of selected demographic variables on the adoption and use of electronic business technologies by smalland medium-sized retailers. International Journal of eBusiness and eGovernment Studies, 8(1), 40-56.
• Kurnaz, E., & Serçemeli, M. (2020). Covid-19 pandemi döneminde akademisyenlerin uzaktan eğitim ve muhasebe eğitimine yönelik bakış açıları üzerine bir araştırma. Uluslararası Sosyal Bilimler Akademi Dergisi, 2(3), 262-288.
• Lai, M.-L. (2008). Technology readiness, internet self-efficacy and computing experience of professional accounting students. Campus-Wide Information Systems, 25(1), 18-29.
• Li, X., Zhou, Y., Liu, Y., Wang, X., & Yuen, K. F. (2023). Psychological antecedents of telehealth acceptance: A technology readiness perspective. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 91, 1-12.
• Lin, C. A. (2004). Webcasting adoption: technology fluidity,-user innovativeness, and media substitution. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 48(3), 157-178.
• Lin, C.-H., Shih, H.-Y., & Sher, P. J. (2007). Integrating technology readiness into technology acceptance: the TRAM model. Psychology & Marketing, 24(7), 641-657.
• Lin, J.-S. C., & Chang, H.-C. (2011). The role of technology readiness in self-service technology acceptance. Managing Service Quality, 21(4), 424-444.
• Ling, L. M., & Moi, C. M. (2007). Professional students' technology readiness, prior computing experience and acceptance of an e-learning system. Malasian Accounting Review, 6(1), 85-99.
• Ling, L. M., & Muhammad, I. (2006). Taxation and technology: technology readiness of Malaysian tax officers in petaling jaya branch. Journal of Financial Reporting & Accounting, 4(1), 147-163.
• Lundblad, J. P. (2003). A review and critique of Rogers' diffusion of innovation theory as it applies to organizations. Organizational Development Journal, 21(4), 50-64.
• Lutz, W., & Striessnig, E. (2015). Demographic aspects of climate change mitigation and adaptation. Population Studies, 69(1), 69-76.
• Magotra, I., Sharma, J., & Sharma, S. K. (2016). Assessing personal disposition of individuals towards technology adoption. Future of Business Journal, 2(1), 81-101.
• Mahmood, A., Imran, M., & Adil, K. (2023). Modeling individual beliefs to transfigure technology readiness into technology acceptance in financial institutions. Sage Open, 0(0), 1-19.
• Malafe, N. S., Ahmadi, M., & Baei, F. (2017). The relationship between demographic characteristics with information and communication technology and empowerment in general organizations (case study: Sari Municipality). International Review of Management and Marketing, 7(2), 71-75.
• Mankins, J. C. (1995). Technology readiness level. Washington: Nasa.
• Mankins, J. C. (2009). Technology readiness assessments: A retrospective. Acta Astronautica, 1226-1223.
• Martínez-Corcoles, M., Teichmann, M., & Murdvee, M. (2017). Assessing technophobia and technophilia: Development and validation of a questionnaire. Technology in Society, 51, 183-188.
• Mayzer, R., & Dejong, C. (2003). Student satisfaction with distance education in a criminal justice graduate course. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 14(1), 37-52.
• Meng, J., Elliott, K. M., & Hall, M. C. (2010). Technology readiness index(TRI): assessing cross-cultural validity. Journal of International Consumer Marketing, 22(1), 19-31.
• Midgley, D. F., & Dowling, G. R. (1978). Innovativeness: the concept and its measurement. Journal of Consumer Research, 4(4), 229-242.
• Min, S., Fung, K. K., & Jeong, M. (2019). Consumer adoption of the uber mobile application: insight from the diffusion of innovation theory and technology acceptance model. Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing, 36(7), 770-783.
• Moerschell, L. (2009). Resistance to technological change in academia. Current Issues in Education, 11(6), 1-10.
• Mohamed, E. B., Baccar, A., Fairchild, R., & Bouri, A. (2012). Does corporate governance affect managerial optimism? evidence from NYSE panel data firms. International Journal of Euro-Mediterranean Studies, 5, 41-56.
• Mukerje, H. S., Deshmukh, G. K., & Prasad, U. D. (2019). Technology readiness and likelihood to use self-checkout services using smartphone in retail grocery stores: empirical evidences from Hyderabad, India. Business Perspectives and Research, 7(1), 1-15.
• Muster, R. (2020). Generationally diversified labor groups in contemporary labor market. a chance or a threat for organizations? Polish Political Science Yearbook, 49(2), 170-188.
• Na, T.-K., Lee, S.-H., & Yang, J.-Y. (2021). Moderating effect of gender on the relationship between technology readiness index and consumers’ continuous use intention of self-service restaurant kiosks. Information, 12(7), 1-13.
• Nasution, R. A., Rusnandi, L. S., Qodariah, E., Arnita, D., & Windasari, N. A. (2018). The evaluation of digital readiness concept: Existing models and future directions. The Asian Journal of Technology Management, 11(2), 94-117.
• Negm, E. (2023). Intention to use Internet of Things in higher education online learning – the effect of technology readiness. Higher Education, Skills and Work-Based Learning, 13(1), 53-66.
• Niva, M., & Mäkelä, J. (2007). Finns and functional foods: socio-demographics, health efforts, notions of technology and the acceptability of health-promoting foods. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 31, 34-45.
• Papadakis, V., & Bourantas, D. (1998). The chief executive officer as corporate champion of technological innovation: aii empirical investigation. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 10(1), 89-110.
• Parasuraman, A. (2000). Technology readiness index: A multiple scale item to measure readiness to embrace new technologies. Journal of Service Research, 2(4), 307-320.
• Parasuraman, A., & Colby, C. L. (2015). An updated and streamlined technology readiness index: TRI 2.0. Journal of Service Research, 18(1), 59-74.
• Paré, G., Jaana, M., & Sicotte, C. (2010). Exploring health information technology innovativeness and its antecedents in Canadian Hospitals. Methods of Information in Medicine, 1, 28-36.
• Pareek, D., & Sharma, N. (2020). Impact of education on optimism/pesimism. (Eds.) R. Bala, C. Kaur, R. Singh, & P. K. Verma, A step towards equitable and inklusive society nep (s. 79-85). Patiala: Twentyfirst Century.
• Parlak, Y. (2019). Teknoloji kabul modeli ölçeğinin Türkçeye uyarlanması: Geçerlik güvenirlik çalışması. İzmir: Ege Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü.
• Patton, W., Bartrum, D. A., & Creed, P. A. (2004). Gender differences for pptimism, Self-esteem, expectations and goals in predicting career planning and exploration in adolescents. International Journal for Educational and Vocational Guidance, 4, 193-209.
• Peled, Y., & Perzon, S. (2022). Systemic model for technology integration in teaching. Education and Information Technologies, 27, 2661-2675.
• Peterson, C. (2000). The future of optimism. American Psychologist, 55(1), 44-55. Perri, C., Giglio, C., & Corvello, V. (2020). Smart users for smart technologies: investigating the intention to adopt smart energy consumption behaviors. Technological Forecating & Social Change, 155, 1-14.
• Pozas, M., Letzel-Alt, V., & Schneider, C. (2022). “The whole is greater than the sum of its parts” – Exploring teachers’ technology readiness profiles and its relation to their emotional state during COVID-19 emergency remote teaching. Frontiers in Education, 7, 1-11.
• Quazi, A., & Talukder, M. (2011). Demographic determinants of adoption of technological innovation. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 52(1), 34-42.
• Ramírez-Correa, P., Grandón, E. E., & Rondán-Cataluña, F. J. (2020). Users segmentation based on the Technological Readiness Adoption Index in emerging countries: The case of Chile. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 155, 1-8.
• Rapanta, C., Botturi, L., Goodyear, P., Guàrdia, L., & Koole, M. (2021). Balancing technology, pedagogy and the new normal: post-pandemic challenges for higher education. Postdigital Science and Education, 3, 715-742.
• Rojas-Méndez, J. I., Parasuraman, A., & Papadopoulos, N. (2017). Demographics, attitudes, and technology readiness: a cross-cultural analysis and model validation. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 35(1), 18-39. Sadin, S. R., Povinelli, F. P., & Rosen, R. (1989). The NASA technology push towards future space mission systems. Acta Astronautica, 20, 73-77.
• Salazar, G., & Russi-Vigoya, M. N. (2021). Technology readiness level as the foundation of human readiness level. Ergonomic in Desing, 29(4), 3-30.
• Schulz-Knappe, C., Koch, T., & Beckert, J. (2019). The importance of communicating change: Identifying predictors for support and resistance toward organizational change processes. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 24(4), 670-685.
• Schumacher, P., & Morahan-Martin, J. (2001). Gender, internet and computer attitudes and experiences. Computers in Human Behavior, 17, 95-110.
• Shetu, S. N., Islam, M. M., & Promi, S. I. (2022). An empirical investigation of the continued usage intention of digital wallets: the moderating role of perceived technological innovativeness. Future Business Journal, 8(43), 1-17.
• Shukla, M., Guelich, U., Bechina, A., & Aurilla, A. (2015). An empirical investigation of gender impact on technological innovativeness among Thai entrepreneurs via GEM database. The International Journal of Management Science and Information Technology, 16, 1-15.
• Silva, G. M., Dias, Á., & Rodrigues, M. S. (2022). Continuity of use of food delivery apps: an integrated approach to the health belief model and the technology readiness and acceptance model. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 8(3), 1-21.
• Singh, J., Steele, K., & Singh, L. (2021). Combining the best of online and face-to-face learning: hybrid and blended learning approach for COVID-19, post vaccine, & post pandemic world. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 50(2), 140-171.
• Singh, S. (2001). Gender and the use of the internet at home. New Media & Society, 3(4), 395-415.
• Smith, I. (2005). Achieving readiness for organisational change. Library Management, 26(6/7), 408-412.
• Stock, R., & Groß, M. (2016). How does knowledge workers’ social technology readiness affect their innovative work behavior? 49th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (s. 2166-2175). Hawaii: IEEE.
• Straub, J. (2015). In search of technology readiness level (TRL) 10. Aerospace Science and Technology, 46, 312-320.
• Sulisworo, D., Astuti, A. Y., & Fatimah, N. (2020). Online learning implementation during COVID-19 mitigation in Indonesia: measuring the lecturers’ technology readiness. International Journal of Advanced Science and Technology, 29(7), 2252-2263.
• Summak, M. S., Bağlıbel, M., & Samancıoğlu, M. (2010). Technology readiness of primary school teachers: A case study in Turkey. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2, 2671-2675.
• Şencan, H. (2005). Sosyal ve Davranışsal Ölçümlerde Güvenirlik ve Geçerlik. Ankara: Seçkin.
• Şekkeli, Z. H. (2022). Dijital dönüşme dair algıların teknolojiye hazır olma ve kabul modeli ile analizi: Kahraman Maraş Sütçü İmam Üniversitesi MYO öğrencileri üzerinde amprik bir çalışma. Bilge Uluslararası Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 6(2), 78-89.
• Tartavulea, C. V., Albu, C. N., Albu, N., Dieaconescu, R. I., & Petre, S. (2020). Online teaching practices and the effectiveness of the educational process in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic. Amfiteatru Economic, 22(55), 920-936.
• Taşkın, G. M., & Şıngır, H. (2022). Optimism and system justification tendency of university students. Opus, 477-489.
• Tavera-Mesías, J. F., Klyton, A. v., & Collazos, A. Z. (2023). Technology readiness, mobile payments and gender- a reflective-formative second order approach. Behaviour & Information Technology, 42(7), 1005-1023.
• Thakur, R., Angriawan, A., & Summey, J. H. (2016). Technological opinion leadership: The role of personal innovativeness gadget love, and technological innovativeness. Journal of Business Research, 69, 2764-2773.
• Tsourela, M., & Roumeliotis, M. (2015). The moderating role of technology readiness, gender, and sex in consumer acceptance and actual use of Technology-based services. Journal of High Technology Management Research, 26(2), 124-136.
• Uren, V., & Edwards, J. S. (2023). Technology readiness and the organizational journey towards AI adoption: An empirical study. International Journal of Information Management, 68, 1-12.
• Üzüm, S., & Ünal, A. (2023). Factors affecting teachers’ academic Optimism in secondary schools. Research on Education and Psychology, 7(1), 15-38.
• Verkantsh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: towards a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425-478.
• Vidergor, H. E. (2023). The effect of teachers’ self- innovativeness on accountability, distance learning self-efficacy, and teaching practices. Computers & Education, 199, 1-14.
• Wang, X., & Lee, K. M. (2020). The paradox of technology innovativeness and risk perceptions – a profile of Asian smartphone users. Telematics and Informatics, 51, 1-12.
• Watkins, R., Leigh, D., & Triner, D. (2004). Assessing readiness for e-Learning. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 17(4), 66-79.
• Wiese, M., & Humbani, M. (2020). Exploring technology readiness for mobile payment app users. The International Review of Retail, Distribution and Consumer Research, 30(2), 123-142.
• Yıldırım, S. (2007). Current utilization of ICT in Turkish basic education schools: a review of teacher's ICT use and barriers to integration. International Journal of Instructional Media, 34(2), 171-186.
• Yilmaz, O., & Bayraktar, D. M. (2014). Teachers’ attitudes towards the use of educational technologies and their individual innovativeness categories. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 3458-3461.
• YÖK. (2023, Eylül 8). Yükseköğretim Bilgi Yönetim Sistemi. Yükseköğretim Bilgi Yönetim Sistemi: https://istatistik.yok.gov.tr/