Dwight Waldo in Terms of The Effects on Public Administration Discipline

Yıl 2017, Cilt: 8 Sayı: 1, 114 - 136, 30.04.2017

Kadir Caner Doğan

Öz

Dwight Waldo was born in 1913 in the United States of America and died in 2000. In addition, Waldo is a scholar who has put a mark on his works and the thoughts he has put forth in public administration discipline. His book "Administrative State" published in 1948 deeply shook his previous classical public administration theories. In this context, Waldo caused the collapse of the Orthodox concept of public administration and introduced a new perspective in public administration discipline. Waldo's criticism of efficiency, especially the basis of classical public administration, and his attempt to build a democratic public administration theory, and his search for a solution to the identity crisis, especially after the Second World War, led him to lead in discipline. Waldo's critique of positivism and modernity based on public administration, and the new perspective on this framework, are now the basis of postmodern public administration approaches and governance-based theories. In this study, an analysis is made on their basic views and works, examines the role and place of Waldo in the paradigm shift observed in the field of public administration. In addition, other thinkers and researchers have benefited from this work.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Dwight Waldo, Administrative State, Public Administration, Identity Crisis, A New Perspective

Kamu Yönetimi Disiplini Üzerindeki Etkileri Bakımından Dwight Waldo

Öz

Dwight Waldo, Amerika Birleşik Devletleri (ABD)’nde 1913 yılında doğmuş ve 2000 yılında vefat etmiştir. Buna ek olarak Waldo, kamu yönetimi disiplininde ortaya koymuş olduğu düşünceler ve eserlerle damgasını vurmuş bir akademisyendir. 1948 yılında basılan “İdari Devlet” adlı kitabıyla kendisinden önceki klasik kamu yönetimi teorilerini derinden sarsmıştır. Bu çerçevede Waldo, Ortodoks kamu yönetimi anlayışının çökmesine sebep olmuş ve kamu yönetimi disiplininde yeni bir perspektif ortaya koymuştur. Waldo’nun özellikle klasik kamu yönetiminin temelini oluşturan verimlilik üzerindeki eleştirileri ve demokratik bir kamu yönetimi kuramı inşa etme teşebbüsü ve kamu yönetimi disiplininin özellikle İkinci Dünya Savaşı’ndan sonra maruz kaldığı kimlik krizine çözüm bulma arayışları disiplin açısından kendisinin liderlik etmesine yol açmıştır. Waldo’nun pozitivizm ve modernlik esaslı kamu yönetimi anlayışına getirdiği eleştiriler ve bu çerçevede sunduğu yeni perspektif günümüzde postmodern kamu yönetimi yaklaşımları ve yönetişim esaslı teorilerin temelini oluşturmuştur. Bu çalışmada, Waldo’nun kamu yönetimi alanında gözlemlenen paradigma değişimindeki yeri ve önemi incelenerek, temel görüşleri ve eserleri üzerinden bir analiz yapılmaktadır. Ayrıca konu ile ilgili diğer düşünür ve araştırmacıların da eserlerinden yararlanılmıştır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Dwight Waldo, İdari Devlet, Kamu Yönetimi, Kimlik Bunalımı, Yeni Bir Perspektif

Kaynakça

• Adams, Guy B. (1992). Enthraled with Modernity: The Historical Context of Knowledge and Theory Development in Public Administration, Public Administration Review, July/August, 52(4): 363-373.
• Al-Habil, Wasim (2010). The Development of the Concept of the "One Best Method" in Public Administration, Journal of Public Administration and Policy Research, December, 2(6): 96-102.
• Atalay, Mehmet (2008). Kamu Yönetimi Disiplininde Dwight Waldo Düşüncesi, Ankara Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Siyaset Bilimi ve Kamu Yönetimi Yönetim Bilimleri Anabilim Dalı, Ankara.
• Carroll, James D., H. George Frederickson (2001). Dwight Waldo, 1913-2000, Public Administration Review, 61(1) (Jan. - Feb.): 2-8.
• Ciğeroğlu, Mısra, Hüseyin Özgür (2011). H. George Frederickson ve Kamu Yönetimi Disiplinindeki Yeri, Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 29, Nisan: 279-290.
• Dahl, Robert A. (1947). The Science of Public Administration: Three Problems, Public Administration Review, 7(1) (Winter): 1-11.
• Deleon, Linda, Robert B. Denhardt (2000). The Political Theory of Reinvention, Public Administration Review, March/April, 60(2): 89-97.
• Demir, Fatih (2011). Bürokrasi-Demokrasi İlişkisi ve Bürokratların Seçilmişlerce Kontrolü Sorunu, Yönetim ve Ekonomi, 18(2): 63-84.
• Demir, Fatih (2016). Avrupa’da Kamu Sektöründe İnovasyon ve Yenilikçi Yöntemler, Yönetim Bilimleri Dergisi, 14(27): 143-170.
• Denhardt, Robert B., David L. Baker (2007). Five Great Issues in Organization Theory, Handbook of Public Administration, Ed. Jack Rabin, W. Bartley Hildreth, Gerald J. Miller, CRC Press, USA: 121-147.
• Denhardt, Robert B., Thomas J. Catlaw (2015). Theories of Public Organization. Cengage Learning, The United States of America, 2015.
• Dennard, Linda F. (1996). The Maturaiton of Public Administration: The Search for a Democratic Identity, Refounding Democratic Public Administration: Modern Paradoxes, Postmodern Challenges, Ed. Gary L. Wamsley, James E. Wolf, SAGE Publications, The United State of America: 293-326.
• Dobuzinskis, Laurent (1997). Historical and Epistemological Trends in Public Administration, Journal of Management History, 3(4): 298-316.
• Dong, Lisheng (2015). Public Administration Theories: Instrumental and Value Rationalities. Palgrave Macmillan, New York.
• Farazmand, Ali (1999). Globalization and Public Administration, Public Administration Review, November/December, 59(6): 509-522.
• Farazmand, Ali (2002). Organization Theory: From Pre-Classical to Contemporary and Critical Theories-An Overview and Appraisal, Modern Organizations: Theory and Practice, Ed. Ali Farazmand, Praeger Publishers, USA: 19-62.
• Farazmand, Ali (2009). Bureaucracy, Administration, and Politics: An Introduction, Bureaucracy and Administration, Ed. Ali Farazmand, CRC Press, The United State of America: 1-15.
• Frederickson, H. George (1997). The Spirit of Public Administration, Jossey-Bass Publishers, The United States of America.
• Frederickson, H. George (1999). Dwight Waldo and Education for Public Administration, Journal of Public Affairs Education, 5(1) (Jan.): 5-11.
• Frederickson, H. George (2016). Yeni Bir Kamu Yönetimine Doğru, çev. Mehmet Kara, Kamu Yönetimi Klasikleri, Ed. Jay M. Shafritz, Albert C. Hyde, Global Politika ve Strateji, Ankara: 447-470.
• Frederickson, H. George, Kevin B. Smith, Christopher W. Larimer, Michael J. Licari (2012). The Public Administration Theory Primer, Westview Press, The United States of America.
• Fry, Brian R., Jos C. N. Raadschelders (2008). Mastering Public Administration: From Max Weber to Dwight Waldo. CQ Press, The United State of America.
• Gruening, Gernod (2001). Origin and Theoretical Basis of New Public Management, International Public Management Journal, 4: 1-25.
• Güler, Birgül Ayman (1994). Nesnesini Arayan Disiplin: Kamu Yönetimi, Amme İdaresi Dergisi, 27(4), Aralık: 3-19.
• Harmon, Michael M. (1989). The Simon/Waldo Debate: A Review and Update, Public Administration Quarterly, 12(4) (Winter): 437-451.
• Harmon, Michael M., Richard T. Mayer (1986). Organization Theory for Public Administration. Little Brown and Company Ltd., The United State of America.
• Heady, Ferrel (2001). Public Administration: A Comparative Perspective. Marcel Dekker, Inc., The United States of America.
• Henry, Nicolas (1975). Paradigms of Public Administration, Public Administration Review, 35(4) (Jul.-Aug.): 378-386.
• Hergüner, Burak (2015). Kamu Yönetiminde “Yeni” Kavramı ve Kamusal Tartışmalarla İlgisi Üzerine Bir Çalışma, Akademik Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 14, Haziran: 73-84.
• Hindle, Tim (2014). Yönetimde Çığır Açan Fikirler ve Gurular. çev. Ümit Şensoy, Türkiye İş Bankası Kültür Yayınları, İstanbul.
• Jessop, Bob (2003). Post-Fordism and the State, Post-Fordism: A Reader, Ed. Ash Amin, Blackwell Publishers Ltd., UK: 251-279.
• Kalfa, Ceren (2011). Kamu Yönetimi Disiplininin Gelişimi ve Kimlik Tartışmaları, Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 16(1): 403-417.
• Karakul, Selman (2016). Yönetsel Devlet. Seçkin Yayıncılık, Ankara.
• Katsamunska, Polya (2012). Classical and Modern Approaches to Public Administration, Economic Alternatives, 1: 74-81.
• Keller, Lawrence F. (2007). Public Administration and the American Republic: The Continuing Saga of Management and Administration in Politics, Handbook of Public Administration, Ed. Jack Rabin, W. Bartley Hildreth, Gerald J. Miller, CRC Press, USA: 3-48.
• Kettl, Donald F. (2000). Public Administration at the Millennium: The State of the Field, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory (JPART), 10(1): 7-34.
• King, Cheryl Simrell (2007). Citizens, Citizenship, and Democratic Governance, Democracy and Public Administration, Ed. Richard C. Box, M.E. Sharpe, Inc., The United States of America: 64-83.
• Leblebici, Doğan Nadi (2001). Disiplin ve Uygulama Açısından Kamu Yönetiminin “Kimlik Krizine” Yeni Bir Bakış, Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Mayıs, 25(1): 15-24.
• Lynn Jr, Laurence E. (2008). Public Management, The Handbook of Public Administration, Ed. B. Guy Peters, Jon Pierre, SAGE Publications Inc., London: 13-23.
• Marini, Frank (1993). Leaders in the Field: Dwight Waldo, Public Administration Review, 53(5) (Sep.-Oct.): 409-418.
• Marini, Frank (2000). Public Administration, Defining Public Administration: Selections from the International Encyclopedia of Public Policy and Administration, Ed. Jay M. Shafritz, Westview Press, The United States of America: 3-16.
• Marshall, Gary S. (2007). A Brief Tour of Public Organization Theory in the United States, Democracy and Public Administration, Ed. Richard C. Box, M.E. Sharpe, Inc., The United States of America: 40-63.
• Meier, Kenneth J., Laurence j. O’toole Jr. (2006). Bureaucracy in a Democratic State: A Governance Perspective, The Johns Hopkins University Press, The United State of America.
• Molina, Anthony Deforest, Michael W. Spicer (2004). Aristotelian Rhetoric, Pluralism, and Public Administration, Administration & Society, 36(3), July: 282-305.
• Nabatchi, Tina, Holly T. Goerdel, Shelly Peffer (2011). Public Administration in Dark Times: Some Questions for the Future of the Field, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory (J-PART), 21: i29- i43.
• Özer, M. Akif (2006). Kamu Yönetiminde Kimlik Bunalımı Üzerine Değerlendirmeler, Sayıştay Dergisi, 61, Nisan-Haziran: 3-22.
• Özer, M. Akif (2012). “21. Yüzyılın Modern Yönetimi İçin” Geleceğe Yön Veren Yönetim Guruları. Gazi Kitabevi, Ankara.
• Özer, M. Akif (2014). Kamu Yönetiminde Değişim Sürecini Dwight Waldo ile Yeniden Düşünmek, Amme İdaresi Dergisi, 47(4), Aralık: .1-30.
• Özgür, Hüseyin (2003). Yeni Kamu Yönetimi Hareketi, Çağdaş Kamu Yönetimi-I, Ed. Muhittin Acar, Hüseyin Özgür, Nobel Yayın Dağıtım, Ankara: 183-224.
• Özgür, Hüseyin, Mısra Ciğeroğlu Öztepe (2015). Amerikan Yeni Kamu Yönetimi Hareketi (YKYH): Sosyal Adalet ve Hakkaniyet Odaklı Bir Kamu Yönetimi Arayışı, Kamu Yönetiminde Paradigma Arayışları: Yeni Kamu İşletmeciliği ve Ötesi, Ed. Özer Köseoğlu, Mehmet Zahid Sobacı, Dora Yayıncılık, Bursa: 97-127.
• Page, Richard S. (1969). A New Public Administration?, Public Administration Review, 29(3) (May - Jun.): 303-304.
• Parlak, Bekir, Kadir Caner Doğan (2016). Kamu Yönetimi: Kamu Yönetimi Disiplininin Gelişmesinde Rol Oynayan Kuramsal Yönler Üzerine Bir Giriş. Beta Basım Yayım, İstanbul.
• Phidd, Richard (2016). The Profession of Government & Theories of Bureaucracy in the 20th Century, http://www.irss.uoguelph.ca/index.php/csl/article/view/480, Erişim Tarihi: 03.02.2016.
• Porter, David O. (1989). Minnowbrook II: Conclusions, Public Administration Review, 49(2), Special Issue: Minnowbrook II. Changing Epochs of Public Administration (Mar.- Apr.): 223.
• Raadschelders, Jos C. N. (1999). A Coherent Framework for the Study of Public Administration, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory (J-PART), 9(2): 281-303.
• Rosenbloom, David (2008). The Politics-Administration Dichotomy in U.S. Historical Context, Public Administration Review, January-February: 57-60.
• Rosenbloom, David H. (2012). “Public Administrative Theory and the Separation of Powers”, Public Administration: Classic Readings, Ed. Jay M. Shafritz, Albert C. Hyde, Wadsworth Cengage Learning, Canada: 392-402.
• Rosenbloom, David H., Howard E. McCurdy (2006). Introduction: Dwight Waldo’s The Administrative State, Revisiting Waldo’s Administrative State: Constancy and Change in Public Administration, Ed. David H. Rosenbloom, Howard E. McCurdy, Georgetown University Press, Washington, D.C.: 1- 14.
• Rosenbloom, David H., Robert S. Kravchuk, Richard M. Clerkin (2009). Public Administration: Understanding Management. Politics, and Law in the Public Sector, McGraw Hill, USA.
• Rutgers, Mark (2010). Theory and Scope of Public Administration: An Introduction to the Study’s Epistemology, 2010, ASPA, https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/565c/2f428d4b1e5a8817ff986ed8067c96e4a10b.pdf, Erişim Tarihi: 11.11.2016.
• Saklı, Ali Rıza (2013). Kamu Yönetimi Disiplininde Bunalım ve Çıkış Yolu Arayışları, Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi 15(1): 145-171.
• Sayman, Coşkun (2006). Dwight Waldo ve Yönetim Yazını, Ankara Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Kamu Yönetimi ve Siyaset Bilimi (Yönetim Bilimi) Anabilim Dalı, Ankara.
• Stillman II, Richard J. (1987). ABD’nde Anayasanın İkiyüzüncü ve İdari Devlet'in Yüzüncü Yıldönümü, çev. Sait Güran, İdare Hukuku ve İlimleri Dergisi, 8(1-3): 17-29.
• Stillman II, Richard J. (1997). American vs. European Public Administration: Does Public Administration Make the Modern State, or Does the State Make Public Administration?, Public Administration Review, 57(4) (Jul.- Aug.): 332-338.
• Stillman II, Richard J. (2010). The Study of Public Administration in the United States, Public Administration: Concepts and Cases, Ed. Richard J. Stillman II, Wadsworth Cengage Learning, Canada: 17-30.
• Stivers, Camilla (1996). Refusing to Get It Right: Citizenship, Difference, and the Refounding Project, Refounding Democratic Public Administration: Modern Paradoxes, Postmodern Challenges, Ed. Gary L. Wamsley, James E. Wolf, SAGE Publications, The United State of America: 260-278.
• Stivers, Camilla (1999). Between Public Management and Post-Modernism: The Future of Public Administration, Administrative Theory & Praxis, 21(4), Millennium Issue (Dec.): 520-522.
• Stivers, Camilla (2000). Resisting the Ascendancy of Public Management: Normative Theory and PublicAdministration, Administrative Theory & Praxis, 22(1) (Mar.): 10-23.
• Svara, James H. (2001). The Myth of the Dichotomy: Complementarity of Politics and Administration in the Past and Future of Public Administration, Public Administration Review, March/April, 61(2): 176-183.
• Svara, James H. (2008). Beyond Dichotomy: Dwight Waldo and the Interwined Politics-Administration Relationship, Public Administration Review, 68(1) (Jan.-Feb.): 46-52.
• Waldo, Dwight (1952). Development of Theory of Democratic Administration, The American Political Science Review, 46(1), (Mar.): 81-103.
• Waldo, Dwight (1955). The Study of Public Administration. Doubleday and Company, Inc., New York.
• Waldo, Dwight (1968). Government By Procedure, Elements of Public Administration, Ed. Fritz Morstein Marx, Prentice-Hall Inc., New Delhi: 352-370.
• Waldo, Dwight (1976). Public Administration in the Context of Change: Problems and Prospects, Ralph Bunche Journal of Public Affairs, 1(1), Fall: 21-36.
• Waldo, Dwight (1988). Waldo on Wilson, Public Administration Review, 48(4) (Jul.-Aug.): 834-835.
• Waldo, Dwight (2006). Comparative Public Administration: Prologue, Performance, Problems, and Promise, Comparative Public Administration: The Essentıal Readings, Ed. Eric E. Otenyo, Nancy S. Lind, Research in Public Policy Analysis and Management Volume 15, Elsevier, The Netherlands: 129-170.
• Waldo, Dwight (2007). The Administrative State: A Study of the Political Theory of American Public Administration. Transactions Publishers, The United State of America.
• Waldo, Dwight (2010). Public Administration and Ethics: A Prologue to a Preface, Public Administration: Concepts and Cases, Ed. Richard J. Stillman II, Wadsworth Cengage Learning, Canada: 472-482.
• Waldo, Dwight (2012). The Administrative State: Conclusion, Public Administration: Classic Readings, Ed. Jay M. Shafritz, Albert C. Hyde, Wadsworth Cengage Learning, Canada: 127-131.
• Werlin, Herbert H. (2001). Bureaucracy and Democracy: An Essay in Memory of Dwight Waldo, Public Administration Quarterly, 25(3) (Fall): 290-315.
• Yalçın, Lutfi (2010). Kamu Yönetimi Kuramları: Yöntembilimsel Bir Değerlendirme. Ankara Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi, Siyaset Bilimi ve Kamu Yönetimi Yönetim Bilimleri Anabilim Dalı, Ankara.
• Zengin, Ozan (2009). Günümüz Kamu Yönetiminde Ön Plana Çıkan Yaklaşımlar, Kamu Yönetimi: Yapı İşleyiş Reform, Ed. Barış Övgün, Ankara Üniversitesi Siyasal Bilgiler Fakültesi Yayın No: 598, Ankara: 1-41.