Evaluation of Food Codex in Terms of Agriculture and Food Products Foreign Trade

Yıl 2019, Cilt: 9 Sayı: 2, 1177 - 1185, 01.06.2019

Sinan Duru , Aykut Gül Seyit Hayran

https://doi.org/10.21597/jist.466223

Cited By: 1

Öz

Food is compulsory material that provides energy for the maintenance of human life. With the establishment World Trade Organization in 1994, the decision to reduce tariff barriers, increase technical and regulatory barriers in foreign trade of agricultural and food products was taken and the importance of food codex standards increased. The neccesity of making food codexs and updating based on scientific validity a large part of the export revenues was agricultural and food products negative affect to underdeveloped and developing countries, increased share of developed countries. In this study the development of food codex in the world and Turkey has been revealed and the effects of The WTO Agreement on the Application of Sanitary and Photosanitary Measures (SPS) and The Agreement on Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) which were initiated by the establishment of the WTO have been investigated and these developments have been proposed as solutions to increase the competitive power and share of Turkey’s agricultural and food product foreign trade.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Foreign Trade, World Trade Organization, Food Codex, Republic of Turkey

Gıda Kodekslerinin Tarım ve Gıda Ürünleri Dış Ticareti Bakımından İncelenmesi

Öz

Gıda insanlığın yaşamanın sürdürmesi için enerji sağlayan ve tüketimi zorunlu bir maddedir. 1994 yılında Dünya Ticaret Örgütü’nün (WTO) kurulmasıyla tarım ve gıda ürünleri dış ticaretinde tarife engellerinin azaltılması, teknik ve düzenleyici engellerin artırılması kararı alınmış ve gıda kodeks standartlarının önemi artmıştır. Gıda kodekslerinin zorunlu hale getirilmesi ve bilimsel geçerliliğe dayalı olarak güncellenmesi ihracat gelirlerinin büyük bir kısmı tarım ve gıda ürünleri olan az gelişmiş ve gelişmekte olan ülkeleri olumsuz yönde etkilemiş, gelişmiş ülkelerin payını artırmıştır. Bu çalışmada gıda kodekslerinin dünyada ve ülkemizde gelişimi, WTO’nun kurulmasıyla uygulanmaya başlanan Sağlık ve Bitki Sağlığı (SPS) ve Ticarette Teknik Engeller (TBT) Anlaşmalarının uluslararası tarım ve gıda ürünleri dış ticaretinde etkileri incelenmiş ve bu gelişmeler ışığında Türkiye’nin tarım ve gıda ürünleri dış ticaretinde rekabet gücünün ve payını artması için öneriler getirilmiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Dış ticaret, Dünya Ticaret Örgütü, gıda kodeksi, Türkiye

Kaynakça

• Alagöz M, Ceylan O, 2015. Dünya Ticaretinde Tarife Dışı Engeller: 2008 Krizi Sonrası Yaşanan Gelişmeler. Selçuk Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Sosyal Ekonomik Araştırmalar Dergisi, 15(30): 59-85.
• Anonim, 2003. Ulusal Gıda ve Beslenme Stratejisi Çalışma Grubu Raporu. Devlet Planlama Teşkilatı İktisadi Sektörler ve Koordinasyon Genel Müdürlüğü, Ankara.
• Anonim, 2011. Bitkisel Gıda ve Yemin İhracatında Sağlık Sertifikası Düzenlenmesi ve İhracattan Geri Dönen Ürünler İçin Uygulama Yönetmeliği. TC Resmi Gazete, Ankara.
• Anonim, 2014. 10.Kalkınma Planı Gıda Ürünleri ve Güvenirliği Özel İhtisas Komisyon Raporu. Kalkınma Bakanlığı, 102s. Ankara.
• Anonim, 2017. https://biruni.tuik.gov.tr/disticaretapp/menu.zul. Türkiye İstatistik Kurumu, Ankara. (Erişim Tarihi: 03.09.2018)
• Anonim, 2018a. Güncel Türkçe Sözlük . Türk Dil Kurumu, Ankara.
• Anonim, 2018b. https://www.tarim.gov.tr/GKGM/Belgeler/Mevzuat /TGK_ Mevzuat Listesi. (Erişim Tarihi: 18.07.2018).
• Anonim, 2018c. Hollanda Ülke Raporu (Yaş Meyve Sebze Sektörü Açısından). Uludağ İhracatçı Birlikleri Genel Sekreterliği Arge Şubesi. 32s. Bursa.
• Anonim, 2018d. Bazı Tarım Ürünlerinin İhracatında ve İthalatında Ticari Kalite Denetimi Tebliğ (Ürün Güvenliği ve Denetimi: 2018/21). Ekonomi Bakanlığı, 6s., Ankara.
• Anonymous, 2012. Food Import and Export Inspection and Certification Systems. World Health Organization. Codex Alimentarius Commission, 112 p., Rome-Italy.
• Anonymous, 2018. Codex Standards in the WHO South-East Asia Region. World Health Organization, 58p., Rome-Italy.
• Anonymous.2019.https://www.wto.org/english/res_e/statis_e/statis_bis_e.htm?solution=WTO&path=/Dashboards/MAPS&file=Map.wcdf&bookmarkState={%22impl%22:%22client%22,%22params%22:{%22langParam%22:%22en%22}}. (Date of access:02 February 2019).
• Beckman J, Dyck J, Heerman KER, 2017. The Global Landscape of Agricultural Trade, 1995-2014. United States Department of Agriculture Economic Research Service Economic Information Bulletin Number 181, 104p., Washington-USA.
• Beghin JC, 2014. The Protectionism of Food Safety Standards in International Agricultural Trade. Agricultural Policy Review, 1(5): 7-9.
• Black R, 2017. Reflections on Biosecurity Legislation in Developing Countries: Increasing Market Access or Maintaining Unequal Terms of Trade. 13 February 2017, Institute of Advanced Legal Studies. London-England. (Submitted)
• Cufaoğlu G, Doğru AK, Ayaz ND, 2015. Türk Gıda Mevzuatında Risk Analizi. Etlik Vet Mikrobiyal Dergisi, 26(1): 23-28.
• Disdier AC, Fontagne L, Mimouni M, 2006. The Impact of Regulations on Agricultural Trade: Evidence from SPS and TBT Agreements. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 90(2): 336-350.
• Dong F, Jensen HH, 2007. Challenges for China’s Agricultural Exports: Compliance with Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures. Choicesmagazine, 22(1):19-24.
• Ewers J, 2000. Dueling Risk Assessments: Why the WTO and Codex Threaten U.S. Food Standards. The National Agricultural Law Center. University of Arkansas System Division of Agriculture, Vol 30: 387-412.
• George A, 2018. Antimicrobial Resistance, Trade, Food Safety and Security. One Health, 5(2018): 6-8.
• Gültekin S, 2010. Tarımsal Ticarette Teknik Engeller, Sağlık, Bitki Sağlığı Önlemleri ve Standartlar. Girişimcilik ve Kalkınma Dergisi, 5(2):31-44.
• Halabi SF, 2015. The Codex Alimentarius Comission, Corporate Influence, and International Trade: A Perspective on FDA’s Global Role. 41 Am. J.L. & Med, 41: 406-421.
• Halabi SF, Lin CF, 2017. Assessing the Relative Influence and Efficacy of Public and Private Food Safety Regulation Regimes: Comparing Codex and Global GAP Standards 72 Food & Drug L.J.262.
• Hamlyn OA, 2017. Beyond Rhetoric: Closing the Gap Between Policy and Practice in the EU’s Regulation of Risky Technologies. University College London, PhD Thesis (Printed).
• Haslberger AG, 2003. Codex Guidlines for GM Foods Include the Analysis of Unintended Effects. Nature Biotechnology. 21(7): 739-741.
• Ireland JD, Moller A, 2000. Review of International Food Classification and Description. Jounal of Food Composition and Analysis, 13(2000): 529-538.
• Karaman S, Acar B, 2006. Uluslararası Gıda Ürünleri Ticareti ve Aflatoksin Yasal Düzenlemeleri. Doğuş Üniversitesi Dergisi, 7(2): 190-197.
• Karunasagar I, 2015. International Risk Assessment Leading to Development of Food Safety Standards. Procedia Food Science, 6(2016): 34-36.
• Kim M, 2014. A Legal Analysis of “Standard” in the WTO Agreement on Technical Barriers to Trade. Seoul National University, Phd Thesis (Printed).
• Klingbeil DF, Todd EWC, 2018. A Review on the Rising Prevalence of International Standards: Threats or Oppurtunities for the Agri-Food Produce Sector in Developing Countries, with a Focus on Examples from the MENA Region. Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute, 7(3): 33.
• Livermore MA, 2006. Authority and Legitimacy in Global Governance: Deliberation, Institutional Differentiation, and The Codex Alimentarius. New York University Law Review, 81(2): 766-801.
• Lupien JR, 2000. The Codex Alimentarius Commision: International Science – Based Standards, Guidelines and Recommedations. AgBioForum, 3(4): 192-196.
• MacLean WC, Van Dael P, Clemens R, Davies J, Underwood E, O’Risky L, Rooney D, Schrijver J, 2010. Upper Levels of Nutrients in Infant Formulas: Comparison of Analytical Data with the Revised Codex infant Formula Standard. Journal of Food Composition and Analysis, 23(2010): 44-53.
• Mert İ, 2002. Küreselleşme ve Su Ürünlerinde Kalite Kontrol. Sumae Yunus Araştırma Bülteni, 2(1): 6-8.
• Millstone E, Zwanenberg PV, 2002. The Evolution of Food Safety Policy – Making Institutions in the UK, EU and Codex Alimentarius. Social Policy & Administration, 36(6): 593-609.
• Otsuki T, Wilson JS, Sewadeh M, 2001. Saving two in a billion: quantifying the trade effect of European food safety standards on African Export. Food Policy, 26(2001): 495-514.
• Önen E, 2008. DTÖ Yükümlükleri Kapsamında Türkiye ile Avrupa Birliği Arasındaki Tarım Ürünleri Ticareti ve Bu Ticarette Önem Arz Eden Tarife Dışı Engeller. T.C. Tarım ve Köyişleri Bakanlığı Dış İlişkiler ve Avrupa Birliği Kooordinasyon Dairesi Başkanlığı. AB Uzmanlık Tezi 159 s., Ankara.
• Randell AW, Whitehead AJ, 1997. Codex Alimentarus: Food Quality and Safety Standards for International Trade. Rev. sci. tech. Off. int. Epiz., 16(2): 313-321.
• Ravi AP, 2008. Why Would International Administrative Activity Be Any Less Legitimate. A Study of the Codex Alimentarius Commission, 9 GER. L.J. 1693, 1703 (2008)
• Sims AK, 2015. Obesity Prevention: Assessing the Role of State and Non-State Actors under International Law. Chicago Journal of International Law, 16(1): 215-248.
• Slorach SA, 2006. Assuring Food Safety: The Complementary Tasks and Standards of the World Organisation for Animal Health and the Codex Alimentarius Commission, Rev. sci. Off. int. Epiz., 25(2): 813-821.
• Somogyi A, Hathcock J, Biesalski HK, Blumberg JB, Antoine JM, Edwards G, Prock P, 2011. Scientific Issues Related to Codex Alimentarius Goals: A Review of Principles, with Examples. Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology. 60(2011): 161-164.
• Stewart RB, Badin MRS, 2011. The World Trade Organization: Multiple Dimension of Global Administrative Law. International Journal of Constitutional Law, 9(3-4): 556-586.
• Yang Q, Honda K, Otsuki T, 2018. Structure Demand Estimation of the Response to Food Safety Regulations in the Japanese Poultry Market. OSIPP Discussion Paper, DP-2018-003. 35p.
• Yue C, Beghin JC, Jensen HH, 2005. Tariff Equivalent of Technical Barriers to Trade with Imperfect Substitution and Trade Costs. American Jounal of Agricultural Economics, 88(4): 947-960.
• Wilson Nobert LW, 2017. Labels, Food Safety, and International Trade. Asian Development Bank Institute (ADBI) Working Paper Series, No:657, 13p., Tokyo-Japan.
• Winickoff DE, Bushey DM, 2010. Science and Power in Global Food Regulation: The Rise of the Codex Alimentarius. Science, Techonology & Human Values, 35(3): 356-381.
• Zahrnt V, 2011. Transparency of Complex Regulation: How Should WTO Trade Policy Reviews Deal with Sanitary and Phytosanitary Policies? World Trade Review, 10(2): 217-247.