Modeling and Analysis of Kamikaze UAV Design with 3 Different Wing Configurations

Yıl 2024, Cilt: 7 Sayı: 2, 90 - 111, 31.08.2024

Ahmed Receb Demirel , Mustafa Murat Yavuz , Nehir Tokgöz

https://doi.org/10.33187/jmsm.1505481

Öz

Appropriate design parameters need to be determined for unmanned aerial vehicles that can perform kamikaze missions. In this study, a UAV with 3 different wing configurations and a fuselage and tail wings were designed, and the flow around the wing was examined using computational fluid mechanics. Advanced modeling techniques were employed to simulate and analyze the aerodynamic behavior of these configurations. The effect of angle of attack (AoA), wing positioning on the fuselage, and wing configurations were investigated. Due to the effect of the wing sweep angle, high-pressure values in the arrow-angle wing were lower than in rectangular and trapezoidal wings. In a similar situation, the flow separation on the arrow-angle wing is less advanced towards the wing tip. When the wing type and connection location were examined, the highest ${{C}_{l}}/{{C}_{d}}$ ratio was obtained in the trapezoidal model connected to the fuselage in the middle. The results of numerical wing models compared with the theoretical lift coefficient were consistent. Trapezoidal and rectangular wings had a high lift coefficient, but after ${{15}^{\circ }}$ of AoA, the lift coefficient decreased. At angles of attack beyond ${{15}^{\circ }}$, the arrow-angle wing still has an increasing lift coefficient. As the angle of attack increased, the drag coefficient was also enhanced. The lowest drag coefficient occurred in the arrow-angle wing model. Up to ${{5}^{\circ }}$of AoA, all wing models raised the ${{C}_{l}}/{{C}_{d}}$ ratio. The ${{C}_{l}}/{{C}_{d}}$ ratio decreased at higher angles of attack. As a result of the examination, it would be more correct to choose trapezoidal and arrow-angle wings.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Angle of Attack, Kamikaze, UAV, Pressure

Kaynakça

• [1] J. Karimi, S. H. Pourtakdoust, Optimal maneuver-based motion planning over terrain and threats using a dynamic hybrid PSO algorithm, Aerosp. Sci. Technol., 26(1) (2013), 60-71.
• [2] J. P. Skrinjar, P. Skorput, M. Furdic, Application of Unmanned Serial Vehicles in Logistic Processes, In New Technologies, Development and Application 4, Springer, 2019, 359-366.
• [3] V. Hassija, et al., A survey on IoT security: Application areas, security threats, and solution architectures, IEEE Access, 7 (2019), 82721-82743.
• [4] Y. Unpaprom, N. Dussadeeb, R. Ramaraj, Modern Agriculture Drones, Modern Agriculture Drones Chapter: Modern Agriculture Drones the Development of Smart Farmers, 2018, 13-19.
• [5] I. Jeelani, M. Gheisari, Safety challenges of UAV integration in construction: Conceptual analysis and future research roadmap, Safety Science, 144 (2021), 105473.
• [6] O. Adepoju, et al., Drone/unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) technology, Re-skilling Human Resources for Construction 4.0: Implications for Industry, Academia and Government, (2022), 65-89.
• [7] F. Zeng, Nested vehicle routing problem: Optimizing drone-truck surveillance operations, Trans. Res. Part C: Emerging Tech., 139 (2022), 103645.
• [8] P. Garg, et al., Isdnet: Ai-enabled instance segmentation of aerial scenes for smart cities, ACM Trans. Internet Tech. (TOIT), 21(3) (2021), 1-18.
• [9] A. Restas, Drone applications for supporting disaster management, World Journal of Engineering and Technology, 3(3) (2015), 316-321.
• [10] A. Straubinger, H.L. de Groot, E. T. Verhoef, E-commerce, delivery drones and their impact on cities, Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 178 (2023), 103841.
• [11] H. Shakhatreh, et al., Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs): A survey on civil applications and key research challenges, IEEE Access, 7 (2019), 48572-48634.
• [12] S. A. Hoseini, et al. Trajectory optimization of flying energy sources using q-learning to recharge hotspot UAVs, in IEEE INFOCOm 2020-IEEE conference on computer communications workshops (INFOCOm WKSHPS), 2020, IEEE, 683-688.
• [13] M. Prieto, M.S. Escarti-Guillem, S. Hoyas, Aerodynamic optimization of a VTOL drone using winglets, Results in Engineering, 17 (2023) 100855.
• [14] V. Chamola, et al., A comprehensive review of the COVID-19 pandemic and the role of IoT, drones, AI, blockchain, and 5G in managing its impact, IEEE Access, 8 (2020), 90225-90265.
• [15] K. Li, et al., Energy efficient legitimate wireless surveillance of UAV communications, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 68(3) (2019), 2283-2293.
• [16] G. Bai, et al., Network approach for resilience evaluation of a UAV swarm by considering communication limits, Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 193 (2020), 106602.
• [17] S. R. Edulakanti, S. Ganguly, The emerging drone technology and the advancement of the Indian drone business industry, The Journal of High Technology Management Research, 34(2) (2023), 100464.
• [18] S.G. Kontogiannis, J.A. Ekaterinaris, Design, performance evaluation and optimization of a UAV, Aerosp. Sci. Technol., 29(1) (2013), 339-350.
• [19] C. Fu, et al., Adaptive robust backstepping attitude control for a multi-rotor unmanned aerial vehicle with time-varying output constraints, Aerosp. Sci. Technol., 78 (2018), 593-603.
• [20] P. Panagiotou, K. Yakinthos, Aerodynamic efficiency and performance enhancement of fixed-wing UAVs, Aerosp. Sci. Technol., 99 (2020), 105575.
• [21] J. Anderson, EBOOK: Fundamentals of Aerodynamics (SI units), McGraw Hill, 2011.
• [22] A. Quintana, et al., Aerodynamic analysis and structural integrity for optimal performance of sweeping and spanning morphing unmanned air vehicles, Aerosp. Sci. Technol., 110 (2021), 106458.
• [23] M. Voskuijl, Performance analysis and design of loitering munitions: A comprehensive technical survey of recent developments, Defence Technology, 18(3) (2022), 325-343.
• [24] D. Zampronha, A. Albuquerque, Cheaper Precision Weapons: An Exploratory Study about the HESA Shahed 136, Advances in Aerosp. Sci. Technol., 9(1) (2024), 40-59.
• [25] T. Sarac¸yakupog˘lu, H. D. Delibas¸, A. D. O¨ zc¸elik, An experimental determination and numerical analysis of a loiter munition unmanned aerial vehicle system, International Journal of 3D Printing Technologies and Digital Industry, 6(1) (2022), 83-101.
• [26] E. Sakarya, A. Alkan, Savunma sanayiinde kullanilabilecek Kamikaze ˙Iha uygulaması, Bilgisayar Bilimleri ve Teknolojileri Dergisi, 2(1) (2021), 24-28.
• [27] A. Sadikin, et al., A comparative study of turbulence models on aerodynamics characteristics of a NACA0012 airfoil, International Journal of Integrated Engineering, 10(1) (2018).
• [28] C. Suvanjumrat, Comparison of turbulence models for flow past NACA0015 airfoil using OpenFOAM, Engineering J., 21(3) (2017), 207-221.