Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Sivil Havacılık Sektöründe Çevik ve Dijital Liderlik Tarzlarının Örgütsel Çeviklik ve Çalışan Performansları İle İlişkisi

Yıl 2024, Cilt: 9 Sayı: 2, 129 - 147

Öz

Çalışmanın amacı, günümüz sektörleri içinde teknoloji ve performans olgularını yapısı gereği mecburen kullanması gereken sivil havacılık sektöründe, liderlik türleri içinde diğerlerine oranla daha güncel olan dijital ve çevik liderlik tarzlarının örgütsel çeviklik ve çalışan performansı ile etkileşiminin incelenmesidir. Türkiye’de sivil havacılık sektöründe çalışan yöneticilerin liderlik tarzlarının astları tarafından nasıl algılandığının anlaşılması ve bu algının iş performansları ile örgütsel çevikliğe etkilerinin belirlenmesi de araştırmanın amaçları arasında belirlenmiştir. Bunun yanında belirtilen kavramlar arasında çalışan performansının aracı etkisi de incelenmiştir. Yapılan korelasyon analizleri sonucunda elde edilmiş istatistiksel neticelere göre çevik liderlik, dijital liderlik, çalışan performansı ve örgütsel çeviklik arasında pozitif ilişkilerin olduğu görülmüştür. Ayrıca çoklu regresyon analizi sonucu çalışan performansı üzerinde hem dijital liderliğin hem de çevik liderliğin pozitif etkilerinin olduğu anlaşılmaktadır.

Kaynakça

  • Abbasov, A., & Tolay, E. (2021). Dijital Liderliğin Bireysel Performans Üzerindeki Etkisi-Azerbaycan’da Endüstri 4.0 Teknolojilerini Uygulayan Bir Firmada Araştırma. İzmir Yönetim Dergisi, 2(1), 59-74.
  • Aghina, W., De Smet, A., Murarka, M., & Collins, L. (2015). The Keys to Organizational Agility. McKinsey & Company.
  • Akkaya, B., Kayalıdere, U. K., Aktaş, R., & Karğın, S. (2020). Çevik Liderlik Yaklaşımı ve Çevik Lider Davranışlarını Ölçmeye Yönelik Bir Ölçek Geliştirme Çalışması. İşletme Araştırmaları Dergisi, 12(2): 1605-1621.
  • Akkaya, B., Panait, M., Apostu, S. A., & Kaya, Y. (2022). Agile Leadership and Perceived Career Success: The Mediating Role of Job Embeddedness. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(8), 4834.
  • Akkaya, B., & Tabak, A. (2018). Örgütsel Çeviklik Ölçeğinin Türkçeye Uyarlanması: Geçerlik ve Güvenirlik Çalışması. İş ve İnsan Dergisi, 5(2): 185-206.
  • AlTaweel, I. R., & Al-Hawary, S. I. (2021). The Mediating Role of Innovation Capability on The Relationship Between Strategic Agility and Organizational Performance. Sustainability, 13(14), 7564.
  • Anak Agung Sagung, M. A., & Sri Darma, G. (2020). Revealing The Digital Leadership Spurs in 4.0 Industrial Revolution. Asri, AASMAN, & Darma, GS, Revealing The Digital Leadership Spurs in, 3(1): 93-100.
  • Anitha, J. (2014). Determinants of Employee Engagement and Their Impact on Employee Performance. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 63(3): 308-323.
  • de Araujo, L. M., Priadana, S., Paramarta, V., & Sunarsi, D. (2021). Digital Leadership in Business Organizations. International Journal of Educational Administration, Management, and Leadership, 2(1): 45-56.
  • Armstrong, M., (1996). Employee Reward, Institute of Personnel and Development IPD House, London.
  • Arsawan, I. W. E., ssy De Hariyanti, N. K., Atmaja, I. M. A. D. S., Suhartanto, D., & Koval, V. (2022). Developing organizational agility in SMEs: An investigation of innovation’s roles and strategic flexibility. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 8(3), 149.
  • Artüz, S. D. (2020). Dijital Liderlik Uygulaması İle Öğrenen Örgüt İlişkisinin Bireysel Performansa Etkisi (Master's thesis, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü).
  • Attar, M., & Abdul-Kareem, A. (2020). The Role of Agile Leadership in Organisational Agility. In Agile Business Leadership Methods for Industry 4.0 (pp. 171-191). Emerald Publishing Limited.
  • Avant, L. L., & Lyman, P. J. (1975). Stimulus Familiarity Influences Perceived Duration in Prerecognition Visual Processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1(3): 205-213.
  • Badayai, A. R. A. (2012). A Theoretical Framework and Analytical Discussion on Uncongenial Physical Workplace Environment and Job Performance Among Workers in Industrial Sectors. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 42: 486-495.
  • Bahrami, M. A., Kiani, M. M., Montazeralfaraj, R., Zadeh, H. F., & Zadeh, M. M. (2016). Osong Public Health and Research Perspectives. Osong Public Health and Research Perspectives, 7(3): 190-196.
  • Barreto, I. (2010). Dynamic Capabilities: A Review of Past Research and An Agenda for The Future. Journal of management, 36(1): 256-280.
  • Becerikli, Y. S. (2013). Takım Çalışmaları ve Verimlilik İlişkisi: Karar Alma Süreçlerinin Etkinlik Kazanmasında Liderin Rolü. Verimlilik Dergisi, (3): 93-116.
  • Bedarkar, M., & Pandita, D. (2014). A Study on The Drivers of Employee Engagement Impacting Employee Performance. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 133: 106-115.
  • Bhanap, R. (2015). Who is Responsible for Digital Leadership in the Boardrom. Computer Weekly, 7(13): 18-19.
  • Biçer, G., & Düztepe, Ş. (2003). Yetkinlikler ve Yetkinliklerin İşletmeler Açısından Önemi. Journal of Aeronautics and Space Technologies, 1(2): 13-20.
  • Bolden, R., & O’Regan, N. (2016). Digital Disruption and The Future of Leadership: An Interview with Rick Haythornthwaite, Chairman of Centrica and MasterCard. Journal of Management Inquiry, 25(4): 438-446.
  • Boyatzis, R. E. (1991). The Competent Manager: A Model for Effective Performance. John Wiley & Sons.
  • Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2002). Faktör Analizi: Temel Kavramlar ve Ölçek Geliştirmede Kullanımı. Kuram ve Uygulamada Egitim Yönetimi Dergisi, 8(4): 470-483.
  • Cestou, J. (2020). The Role of Gender Expression in Agile Leadership (Doctoral Dissertation, Benedictine University).
  • Clerkin, C. (2015). Creative Leadership and Social Intelligence: The Keys to Leading in The Digital Age. Leadership, 2050: 175-187.
  • Çöl, G. (2008). Algılanan Güçlendirmenin İşgören Performansı Üzerine Etkileri. Doğuş Üniversitesi Dergisi, 9(1): 35-46.
  • Dahmardeh, N., & Banihashemi, S. A. (2010). Organizational Agility and Agile Manufacturing. European Journal of Economics, Finance and Administrative Sciences, 27: 178-184.
  • Darvishmotevali, M., & Tajeddini, K. (2019). Understanding Organizational Agility: Evidence From The Hotel Industry in Iran. In Tourism, Hospitality and Digital Transformation (pp. 73-88). Routledge.
  • Demirgil, Z., & Antalyali, Ö. L. (2017). Kamu Sektöründe Süreç Odaklı Örgütsel Değişimin Hizmet Kalitesi Ve İş Tatmini Üzerine Etkileri. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Vizyoner Dergisi, 8(18): 127-140.
  • Devlet Hava Meydanları İşletmesi Genel Müdürlüğü. (2020). 2019 Faaliyet Raporu. Ankara.
  • Downes, L., & Nunes, P. (2014). Big Bang Disruption: Strategy in The Age of Devastating Innovation. Penguin.
  • Eberl, J. K., & Drews, P. (2021). Digital Leadership‒Mountain or molehill? A literature review. Innovation Through Information Systems: Volume III: A Collection of Latest Research on Management Issues: 223-237.
  • Eisenhardt, K. M., & Martin, J. A. (2000). Dynamic Capabilities: What Are They?. Strategic Management Journal, 21(10‐11): 1105-1121.
  • Ekber, Ş., & Mirzayeva, G. (2016). Motivasyon Yönümlü Performans Değerlendirme-Örnek Olay Çalışması. Elektronik Mesleki Gelişim ve Araştırmalar Dergisi, 4(1): 122-133.
  • El Sawy, O. A., Kræmmergaard, P., Amsinck, H., & Vinther, A. L. (2016). How LEGO Built The Foundations and Enterprise Capabilities for Digital Leadership. MIS Quarterly Executive (15:2).
  • Gaebler, T. (1993). Reinventing Government: How The Entrepreneurial Spirit is Transforming The Public Sector. Plume.
  • Ganguly, A., Nilchiani, R., & Farr, J. V. (2009). Evaluating Agility in Corporate Enterprises. International Journal of Production Economics, 118(2): 410-423.
  • Gosselin, M. (2005). An Empirical Study of Performance Measurement in Manufacturing Firms. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 54(5/6): 419-437.
  • Gruman, J. A., & Saks, A. M. (2011). Performance Management and Employee Engagement. Human Resource Management Review, 21(2): 123-136.
  • Güçray, S. S. (2001). Ergenlerde Karar Verme Davranışlarının Öz Saygı ve Problem Çözme Becerileri Algısı İle İlişkisi. Çukurova Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 8(8): 106-121.
  • Hayes, A. F. (2012). Process: A Versatile Computational Tool for Observed Variable Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Modeling.
  • Hayward, S. (2021). The Agile Leader: How to Create An Agile Business in The Digital Age. Kogan Page Publishers.
  • Hoek, V.R.I., Harrison, A., & Christopher, M. (2001). Measuring Agile Capabilities in The Supply Chain. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 21(1/2): 126-148.
  • Hormozi, A. M. (2001). Agile Manufacturing: The Next Logical Step. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 8(2): 132-143.
  • Horney, N., Pasmore, B., & O'Shea, T. (2010). Leadership Agility: A Business Imperative for A VUCA World. Human Resource Planning, 33(4): 33-38.
  • Jain, K. K., & Das, R. (2017). Risks of Results Oriented Leadership: A Perspective in Need of a Re-evaluation. NHRD Network Journal, 10(4), 104-110.
  • Jain, V., Benyoucef, L., & Deshmukh, S. G. (2008). What's The Buzz About Moving From ‘Lean’to ‘Agile’ Integrated Supply Chains? A Fuzzy Intelligent Agent-Based Approach. International Journal of Production Research, 46(23): 6649-6677.
  • Joiner, B. (2009). Creating A Culture of Agile Leaders: A Developmental Approach. People and Strategy, 32(4): 28-35.
  • Joiner, B., & Josephs, S. (2007). Developing Agile Leaders. Industrial and Commercial Training, 39(1): 35-42.
  • Kanten, P., Kanten, S., Keceli, M., & Zaimoglu, Z. (2017). The Antecedents of Organizational Agility: Organizational Structure, Dynamic Capabilities and Customer Orientation. PressAcademia Procedia, 3(1): 697-706.
  • Karaman, F. (2023). Türk Sivil Havacılık Sektöründe Farklılaştırma Uygulamalarının Toplam Kalite Yönetimine Etkisinde Çalışan Performansının Aracı Rolü. Elektronik Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 22(88), 1472-1491.
  • Kestek, S. B., Çolakoğlu, Ü., & Atay, H. (2018). Otel Çalışanlarının Algılanan Örgütsel Destek Düzeylerinin Demografik Özelliklerine Göre İncelenmesi: Kuşadası Örneği. 1. Journal of Travel and Tourism Research, (13): 53-68.
  • Kettunen, P. (2009). Adopting Key Lessons From Agile Manufacturing to Agile Software Product Development—A Comparative Study. Technovation, 29(6-7): 408-422.
  • Khalil, S., & Winkler, T. J. (2023). How software as a service simultaneously affords organizational agility and inertia. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 32(4), 101804.
  • Kirkman, B. L., & Rosen, B. (1999). Beyond Self-Management: Antecedents and Consequences of Team Empowerment. Academy of Management Journal, 42(1), 58-74.
  • Kline, S. (2002). Türk Havacılık Kronolojisi. Havaş Havaalanları Yer Hizmetleri, İstanbul.
  • Lado, M., & Alonso, P. (2017). The Five-Factor Model and Job Performance in Low Complexity Jobs: A Quantitative Synthesis. Revista de Psicología del Trabajo y de las Organizaciones, 33(3): 175-182.
  • Lebas, M., & Euske, K. (2002). A Conceptual and Operational Delineation of Performance. Business Performance Measurement: Theory and Practice, 65-79.
  • Lin, C. T., Chiu, H., & Chu, P. Y. (2006). Agility Index in The Supply Chain. International Journal of Production Economics, 100(2): 285-299.
  • Lyu, J. (2023). How Does Digital Leadership Improve Organizational Sustainability: Theory and evidence. Journal of Cleaner Production, 140148.
  • MacKinnon, D. P., Lockwood, C. M., & Williams, J. (2004). Confidence Limits for The Indirect Effect: Distribution of The Product and Resampling Methods. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 39(1), 99-128.
  • Mack, T. C. (2015). Leadership in The Future. Leadership, 2050: 9-22.
  • Mansi, G., & Levy, Y. (2013). Do Instant Messaging Interruptions Help or Hinder Knowledge Workers’ Task Performance?. International Journal of Information Management, 33(3): 591-596.
  • Marhraoui, M. A., & El Manouar, A. (2017, October). IT Innovation and Firm's Sustainable Performance: The Mediating Role of Organizational Agility. In Proceedings of The 9th International Conference on Information Management and Engineering (pp. 150-156).
  • Mathis, R. L. ve Jackson, J. H. (2000). Human Resources Management, 9th ed. South-Western College Publishing: Ohio.
  • Mensah, J. K. (2015). A “Coalesced Framework” of Talent Management and Employee Performance: For Further Research and Practice. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 64(4): 544-566.
  • Meydan, C. H., & Şeşen, H. (2011). Yapısal Eşitlik Modellemesi AMOS Uygulamaları, Ankara: Detay Yayıncılık.
  • Miller, C. L. (2018). Digital Leadership: Using The Internet and Social Media to Improve The Lives, Well-Being and Circumstances of Others. Journal of Family & Consumer Sciences, 110(1): 45-48.
  • Miller, V. D., Allen, M., Casey, M. K., & Johnson, J. R. (2000). Reconsidering The Organizational Identification Questionnaire. Management Communication Quarterly, 13(4): 626-658.
  • Molla, A., & Peszynski, K. (2012). Enterprise Systems and Organizational Agility: A Review of The Literature and Conceptual Framework. Communications of The Association for Information Systems, 31(1): 167-193.
  • Müller, S. D., Konzag, H., Nielsen, J. A., & Sandholt, H. B. (2024). Digital transformation leadership competencies: A contingency approach. International Journal of Information Management, 75, 102734.
  • Nafei, W. A. (2016). Organizational Agility: The Key to Organizational Success. International Journal of Business and Management, 11(5): 296-309.
  • Narci, M. T. (2024). Examination of Turkish-Made Products with The Theory of Planned Behavior: A Research on Regular Migrants in Turkey. Journal of Asian Scientific Research, 14(1), 58-67.
  • Nejatian, M., Zarei, M. H., Nejati, M., & Zanjirchi, S. M. (2018). A Hybrid Approach to Achieve Organizational Agility: An Empirical Study of A Food Company. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 25(1): 201-234.
  • Noe, R.A., Hollenbeck, J.R., Gerhart, B. ve Wright, P.M., (1997). Human Resource Management, “Gaining A Competitive Advantage”, Second Edition, McGraw-Hill, Irwin, Chicago, ss.238-242.
  • Olbert, S., Prodoehl, H. G., & Worley, C. G. (2017). Organizational Agility as A Competitive Factor: The “Agile Performer Index”. NEOMA Business School, Reims Cedex, France.
  • Overby, E., Bharadwaj, A., & Sambamurthy, V. (2006). Enterprise Agility and The Enabling Role of Information Technology. European Journal of Information Systems, 15: 120-131.
  • Park, Y. K. (2011). The Dynamics of Opportunity and Threat Management in Turbulent Environments: The Role of Information Technologies. ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, PO Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106.
  • Plonka, F. E. (1997). Developing A Lean and Agile Work Force. Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries, 7(1): 11-20.
  • Prasongko, A., & Adianto, T. (2019). The Role of The Agile Leadership Model as a Competitive Advantage for The Future Leader in The Era of Globalization and Industrial Revolution 4.0. Jurnal Pertahanan: Media Informasi Tentang Kajian & Strategi Pertahanan Yang Mengedepankan Identity, Nasionalism & Integrity, 5(3): 126-133.
  • Prentice, A. E. (2013). Leadership for The 21st Century. ABC-CLIO.
  • Promsri, C. (2019). The developing Model of Digital Leadership for A Successful Digital Transformation. GPH-International Journal of Business Management, 2(08): 01-08.
  • Ravichandran, T. (2018). Exploring The Relationships Between IT Competence, Innovation Capacity and Organizational Agility. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 27(1): 22-42.
  • Saha, N., Gregar, A., & Sáha, P. (2017). Organizational Agility and HRM Strategy: Do They Really Enhance Firms’ Competitiveness?. International Journal of Organizational Leadership, 6: 323-334.
  • Samsudin, A., Saputra, N., & Abdinegoro, S. B. (2020, December). Authentic Leadership, Work Engagement and Performance. In The International Conference on Business and Management Research, 160: 276-283.
  • Schermerhorn, J.R., Hunt, J.G. ve Osborn, R.N. (1994). Managing Organizational Behavior, 5. Baskı, John Wiley & Sons., New York, USA, 332s.
  • Schuster, J. R., & Zingheim, P. K. (1992). The New Pay: Linking Employee and Organizational Performance. (No Title).
  • Setiawati, L. (2021). The Effect of Agile Leadership and Work Environment to Employees’ Performance in A VUCA World (Study on Millennial Generation Employees in Jabodetabek). International Journal of Social Science and Human Research, 4(11), 3123-3131.
  • Shahaei, B. (2008). Paradigm of Agility, Definitions, Features and Concepts. Tadbir Publication, 194th Issue, 14-18.
  • Sharifi, H., Colquhoun, G., Barclay, I., & Dann, Z. (2001). Agile Manufacturing: A Management and Operational Framework. Proceedings of The Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture, 215(6): 857-869.
  • Sharifi, H., & Zhang, Z. (1999). A Methodology for Achieving Agility in Manufacturing Organisations: An Introduction. International Journal of Production Economics, 62(1-2): 7-22.
  • Sharifi, H., & Zhang, Z. (2001). Agile Manufacturing in Practice‐Application of A Methodology. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 21(5/6), 772-794.
  • Sharp, J. M., Irani, Z., & Desai, S. (1999). Working Towards Agile Manufacturing in The UK Industry. International Journal of Production Economics, 62(1-2): 155-169.
  • Sheninger, E. (2019). Digital Leadership: Changing Paradigms for Changing Times. Corwin Press.
  • Shippmann, J. S., Ash, R. A., Batjtsta, M., Carr, L., Eyde, L. D., Hesketh, B., ... & Sanchez, J. I. (2000). The Practice of Competency Modeling. Personnel Psychology, 53(3): 703-740.
  • Silva-Martinez, J. (2024). Practical implications to becoming agile organizations: NASA case study. Acta Astronautica, 215, 102-106.
  • Sivil Havacılık Genel Müdürlüğü. (2018). 2019-2023 Stratejik Planı. Ankara.
  • Sivil Havacılık Genel Müdürlüğü. (2019). Faaliyet Raporu. Ankara.
  • Sivil Havacılık Genel Müdürlüğü. (2022). Faaliyet Raporu. Ankara.
  • Sürücü, L., Yıkılmaz, İ., & Maşlakçı, A. (2022). Dijital Liderlik: Bir Ölçek Uyarlama Çalışması. Abant Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 22(3), 1038-1050.
  • Tanniru, M. R. (2018). Digital Leadership. In Management of Information Systems. IntechOpen.
  • Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic Capabilities and Strategic Management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7): 509-533.
  • Teece, D., Peteraf, M., & Leih, S. (2016). Dynamic Capabilities and Organizational Agility: Risk, Uncertainty, and Strategy in The Innovation Economy. California Management Review, 58(4): 13-35.
  • Todd, R. J. (1999). Transformational Leadership and Transformational Learning: Information Literacy and The World Wide Web. National Association of Secondary School Principals. NASSP Bulletin, 83(605), 4-12.
  • Tunçer, P. (2011). Örgütsel Değişim ve Liderlik. Sayıştay Dergisi, (80), 57-84.
  • Ulaştırma, Denizcilik ve Haberleşme Bakanlığı. (2020). Havacılık ve Uzay Teknolojileri - Ulaşan ve Erişen Türkiye. Ankara.
  • Wamba, S. F. (2022). Impact of Artificial Intelligence Assimilation on Firm Performance: The Mediating Effects of Organizational Agility and Customer Agility. International Journal of Information Management, 67, 102544.
  • Wirtz, B. W., & Wirtz. (2021). Digital Business and Electronic Commerce. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
  • Xia, Y., Liu, X., Wang, X., Deng, H., Han, C., Liu, Z., & Tsai, S. B. (2023). The power of role models in a team: The impact of lead entrepreneur's digital leadership on digital entrepreneurial success. Information Processing & Management, 60(6), 103498.
  • Zaheer, A., & Zaheer, S. (1997). Catching The Wave: Alertness, Responsiveness, and Market Influence in Global Electronic Networks. Management Science, 43(11): 1493-1509.
  • Zhang, Z., & Sharifi, H. (2000). A Methodology for Achieving Agility in Manufacturing Organisations. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 20(4): 496-513.
  • Zeike, S., Bradbury, K., Lindert, L., & Pfaff, H. (2019). Digital Leadership Skills and Associations with Psychological Well-Being. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(14), 2628: 1-12.
  • Žitkienė, R., & Deksnys, M. (2018). Organizational Agility Conceptual Model. Montenegrin Journal of Economics. Podgorica: Economic Laboratory Transition Research Podgorica-Elit, 2018, vol. 14, iss. 2.

The Relationship of Agile and Digital Leadership Styles with Organizational Agility and Employee Performances in the Civil Aviation Sector

Yıl 2024, Cilt: 9 Sayı: 2, 129 - 147

Öz

The aim of the study is to examine the interaction of digital and agile leadership styles, which are more up-to-date than others, with organizational agility and employee performance in the civil aviation sector, which is required to use technology and performance phenomena within today's sectors. Understanding how the leadership styles of managers working in the civil aviation sector in Turkey are perceived by their subordinates and determining the effects of this perception on their job performance and organizational agility were also determined among the aims of the research. In addition, the mediating effect of employee performance among the mentioned concepts was also examined. According to the statistical results obtained as a result of the correlation analyses, it was seen that there were positive relationships between agile leadership, digital leadership, employee performance and organizational agility. In addition, as a result of multiple regression analysis, it is understood that both digital leadership and agile leadership have positive effects on employee performance.

Kaynakça

  • Abbasov, A., & Tolay, E. (2021). Dijital Liderliğin Bireysel Performans Üzerindeki Etkisi-Azerbaycan’da Endüstri 4.0 Teknolojilerini Uygulayan Bir Firmada Araştırma. İzmir Yönetim Dergisi, 2(1), 59-74.
  • Aghina, W., De Smet, A., Murarka, M., & Collins, L. (2015). The Keys to Organizational Agility. McKinsey & Company.
  • Akkaya, B., Kayalıdere, U. K., Aktaş, R., & Karğın, S. (2020). Çevik Liderlik Yaklaşımı ve Çevik Lider Davranışlarını Ölçmeye Yönelik Bir Ölçek Geliştirme Çalışması. İşletme Araştırmaları Dergisi, 12(2): 1605-1621.
  • Akkaya, B., Panait, M., Apostu, S. A., & Kaya, Y. (2022). Agile Leadership and Perceived Career Success: The Mediating Role of Job Embeddedness. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(8), 4834.
  • Akkaya, B., & Tabak, A. (2018). Örgütsel Çeviklik Ölçeğinin Türkçeye Uyarlanması: Geçerlik ve Güvenirlik Çalışması. İş ve İnsan Dergisi, 5(2): 185-206.
  • AlTaweel, I. R., & Al-Hawary, S. I. (2021). The Mediating Role of Innovation Capability on The Relationship Between Strategic Agility and Organizational Performance. Sustainability, 13(14), 7564.
  • Anak Agung Sagung, M. A., & Sri Darma, G. (2020). Revealing The Digital Leadership Spurs in 4.0 Industrial Revolution. Asri, AASMAN, & Darma, GS, Revealing The Digital Leadership Spurs in, 3(1): 93-100.
  • Anitha, J. (2014). Determinants of Employee Engagement and Their Impact on Employee Performance. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 63(3): 308-323.
  • de Araujo, L. M., Priadana, S., Paramarta, V., & Sunarsi, D. (2021). Digital Leadership in Business Organizations. International Journal of Educational Administration, Management, and Leadership, 2(1): 45-56.
  • Armstrong, M., (1996). Employee Reward, Institute of Personnel and Development IPD House, London.
  • Arsawan, I. W. E., ssy De Hariyanti, N. K., Atmaja, I. M. A. D. S., Suhartanto, D., & Koval, V. (2022). Developing organizational agility in SMEs: An investigation of innovation’s roles and strategic flexibility. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 8(3), 149.
  • Artüz, S. D. (2020). Dijital Liderlik Uygulaması İle Öğrenen Örgüt İlişkisinin Bireysel Performansa Etkisi (Master's thesis, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü).
  • Attar, M., & Abdul-Kareem, A. (2020). The Role of Agile Leadership in Organisational Agility. In Agile Business Leadership Methods for Industry 4.0 (pp. 171-191). Emerald Publishing Limited.
  • Avant, L. L., & Lyman, P. J. (1975). Stimulus Familiarity Influences Perceived Duration in Prerecognition Visual Processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1(3): 205-213.
  • Badayai, A. R. A. (2012). A Theoretical Framework and Analytical Discussion on Uncongenial Physical Workplace Environment and Job Performance Among Workers in Industrial Sectors. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 42: 486-495.
  • Bahrami, M. A., Kiani, M. M., Montazeralfaraj, R., Zadeh, H. F., & Zadeh, M. M. (2016). Osong Public Health and Research Perspectives. Osong Public Health and Research Perspectives, 7(3): 190-196.
  • Barreto, I. (2010). Dynamic Capabilities: A Review of Past Research and An Agenda for The Future. Journal of management, 36(1): 256-280.
  • Becerikli, Y. S. (2013). Takım Çalışmaları ve Verimlilik İlişkisi: Karar Alma Süreçlerinin Etkinlik Kazanmasında Liderin Rolü. Verimlilik Dergisi, (3): 93-116.
  • Bedarkar, M., & Pandita, D. (2014). A Study on The Drivers of Employee Engagement Impacting Employee Performance. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 133: 106-115.
  • Bhanap, R. (2015). Who is Responsible for Digital Leadership in the Boardrom. Computer Weekly, 7(13): 18-19.
  • Biçer, G., & Düztepe, Ş. (2003). Yetkinlikler ve Yetkinliklerin İşletmeler Açısından Önemi. Journal of Aeronautics and Space Technologies, 1(2): 13-20.
  • Bolden, R., & O’Regan, N. (2016). Digital Disruption and The Future of Leadership: An Interview with Rick Haythornthwaite, Chairman of Centrica and MasterCard. Journal of Management Inquiry, 25(4): 438-446.
  • Boyatzis, R. E. (1991). The Competent Manager: A Model for Effective Performance. John Wiley & Sons.
  • Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2002). Faktör Analizi: Temel Kavramlar ve Ölçek Geliştirmede Kullanımı. Kuram ve Uygulamada Egitim Yönetimi Dergisi, 8(4): 470-483.
  • Cestou, J. (2020). The Role of Gender Expression in Agile Leadership (Doctoral Dissertation, Benedictine University).
  • Clerkin, C. (2015). Creative Leadership and Social Intelligence: The Keys to Leading in The Digital Age. Leadership, 2050: 175-187.
  • Çöl, G. (2008). Algılanan Güçlendirmenin İşgören Performansı Üzerine Etkileri. Doğuş Üniversitesi Dergisi, 9(1): 35-46.
  • Dahmardeh, N., & Banihashemi, S. A. (2010). Organizational Agility and Agile Manufacturing. European Journal of Economics, Finance and Administrative Sciences, 27: 178-184.
  • Darvishmotevali, M., & Tajeddini, K. (2019). Understanding Organizational Agility: Evidence From The Hotel Industry in Iran. In Tourism, Hospitality and Digital Transformation (pp. 73-88). Routledge.
  • Demirgil, Z., & Antalyali, Ö. L. (2017). Kamu Sektöründe Süreç Odaklı Örgütsel Değişimin Hizmet Kalitesi Ve İş Tatmini Üzerine Etkileri. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Vizyoner Dergisi, 8(18): 127-140.
  • Devlet Hava Meydanları İşletmesi Genel Müdürlüğü. (2020). 2019 Faaliyet Raporu. Ankara.
  • Downes, L., & Nunes, P. (2014). Big Bang Disruption: Strategy in The Age of Devastating Innovation. Penguin.
  • Eberl, J. K., & Drews, P. (2021). Digital Leadership‒Mountain or molehill? A literature review. Innovation Through Information Systems: Volume III: A Collection of Latest Research on Management Issues: 223-237.
  • Eisenhardt, K. M., & Martin, J. A. (2000). Dynamic Capabilities: What Are They?. Strategic Management Journal, 21(10‐11): 1105-1121.
  • Ekber, Ş., & Mirzayeva, G. (2016). Motivasyon Yönümlü Performans Değerlendirme-Örnek Olay Çalışması. Elektronik Mesleki Gelişim ve Araştırmalar Dergisi, 4(1): 122-133.
  • El Sawy, O. A., Kræmmergaard, P., Amsinck, H., & Vinther, A. L. (2016). How LEGO Built The Foundations and Enterprise Capabilities for Digital Leadership. MIS Quarterly Executive (15:2).
  • Gaebler, T. (1993). Reinventing Government: How The Entrepreneurial Spirit is Transforming The Public Sector. Plume.
  • Ganguly, A., Nilchiani, R., & Farr, J. V. (2009). Evaluating Agility in Corporate Enterprises. International Journal of Production Economics, 118(2): 410-423.
  • Gosselin, M. (2005). An Empirical Study of Performance Measurement in Manufacturing Firms. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 54(5/6): 419-437.
  • Gruman, J. A., & Saks, A. M. (2011). Performance Management and Employee Engagement. Human Resource Management Review, 21(2): 123-136.
  • Güçray, S. S. (2001). Ergenlerde Karar Verme Davranışlarının Öz Saygı ve Problem Çözme Becerileri Algısı İle İlişkisi. Çukurova Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 8(8): 106-121.
  • Hayes, A. F. (2012). Process: A Versatile Computational Tool for Observed Variable Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Modeling.
  • Hayward, S. (2021). The Agile Leader: How to Create An Agile Business in The Digital Age. Kogan Page Publishers.
  • Hoek, V.R.I., Harrison, A., & Christopher, M. (2001). Measuring Agile Capabilities in The Supply Chain. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 21(1/2): 126-148.
  • Hormozi, A. M. (2001). Agile Manufacturing: The Next Logical Step. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 8(2): 132-143.
  • Horney, N., Pasmore, B., & O'Shea, T. (2010). Leadership Agility: A Business Imperative for A VUCA World. Human Resource Planning, 33(4): 33-38.
  • Jain, K. K., & Das, R. (2017). Risks of Results Oriented Leadership: A Perspective in Need of a Re-evaluation. NHRD Network Journal, 10(4), 104-110.
  • Jain, V., Benyoucef, L., & Deshmukh, S. G. (2008). What's The Buzz About Moving From ‘Lean’to ‘Agile’ Integrated Supply Chains? A Fuzzy Intelligent Agent-Based Approach. International Journal of Production Research, 46(23): 6649-6677.
  • Joiner, B. (2009). Creating A Culture of Agile Leaders: A Developmental Approach. People and Strategy, 32(4): 28-35.
  • Joiner, B., & Josephs, S. (2007). Developing Agile Leaders. Industrial and Commercial Training, 39(1): 35-42.
  • Kanten, P., Kanten, S., Keceli, M., & Zaimoglu, Z. (2017). The Antecedents of Organizational Agility: Organizational Structure, Dynamic Capabilities and Customer Orientation. PressAcademia Procedia, 3(1): 697-706.
  • Karaman, F. (2023). Türk Sivil Havacılık Sektöründe Farklılaştırma Uygulamalarının Toplam Kalite Yönetimine Etkisinde Çalışan Performansının Aracı Rolü. Elektronik Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 22(88), 1472-1491.
  • Kestek, S. B., Çolakoğlu, Ü., & Atay, H. (2018). Otel Çalışanlarının Algılanan Örgütsel Destek Düzeylerinin Demografik Özelliklerine Göre İncelenmesi: Kuşadası Örneği. 1. Journal of Travel and Tourism Research, (13): 53-68.
  • Kettunen, P. (2009). Adopting Key Lessons From Agile Manufacturing to Agile Software Product Development—A Comparative Study. Technovation, 29(6-7): 408-422.
  • Khalil, S., & Winkler, T. J. (2023). How software as a service simultaneously affords organizational agility and inertia. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 32(4), 101804.
  • Kirkman, B. L., & Rosen, B. (1999). Beyond Self-Management: Antecedents and Consequences of Team Empowerment. Academy of Management Journal, 42(1), 58-74.
  • Kline, S. (2002). Türk Havacılık Kronolojisi. Havaş Havaalanları Yer Hizmetleri, İstanbul.
  • Lado, M., & Alonso, P. (2017). The Five-Factor Model and Job Performance in Low Complexity Jobs: A Quantitative Synthesis. Revista de Psicología del Trabajo y de las Organizaciones, 33(3): 175-182.
  • Lebas, M., & Euske, K. (2002). A Conceptual and Operational Delineation of Performance. Business Performance Measurement: Theory and Practice, 65-79.
  • Lin, C. T., Chiu, H., & Chu, P. Y. (2006). Agility Index in The Supply Chain. International Journal of Production Economics, 100(2): 285-299.
  • Lyu, J. (2023). How Does Digital Leadership Improve Organizational Sustainability: Theory and evidence. Journal of Cleaner Production, 140148.
  • MacKinnon, D. P., Lockwood, C. M., & Williams, J. (2004). Confidence Limits for The Indirect Effect: Distribution of The Product and Resampling Methods. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 39(1), 99-128.
  • Mack, T. C. (2015). Leadership in The Future. Leadership, 2050: 9-22.
  • Mansi, G., & Levy, Y. (2013). Do Instant Messaging Interruptions Help or Hinder Knowledge Workers’ Task Performance?. International Journal of Information Management, 33(3): 591-596.
  • Marhraoui, M. A., & El Manouar, A. (2017, October). IT Innovation and Firm's Sustainable Performance: The Mediating Role of Organizational Agility. In Proceedings of The 9th International Conference on Information Management and Engineering (pp. 150-156).
  • Mathis, R. L. ve Jackson, J. H. (2000). Human Resources Management, 9th ed. South-Western College Publishing: Ohio.
  • Mensah, J. K. (2015). A “Coalesced Framework” of Talent Management and Employee Performance: For Further Research and Practice. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 64(4): 544-566.
  • Meydan, C. H., & Şeşen, H. (2011). Yapısal Eşitlik Modellemesi AMOS Uygulamaları, Ankara: Detay Yayıncılık.
  • Miller, C. L. (2018). Digital Leadership: Using The Internet and Social Media to Improve The Lives, Well-Being and Circumstances of Others. Journal of Family & Consumer Sciences, 110(1): 45-48.
  • Miller, V. D., Allen, M., Casey, M. K., & Johnson, J. R. (2000). Reconsidering The Organizational Identification Questionnaire. Management Communication Quarterly, 13(4): 626-658.
  • Molla, A., & Peszynski, K. (2012). Enterprise Systems and Organizational Agility: A Review of The Literature and Conceptual Framework. Communications of The Association for Information Systems, 31(1): 167-193.
  • Müller, S. D., Konzag, H., Nielsen, J. A., & Sandholt, H. B. (2024). Digital transformation leadership competencies: A contingency approach. International Journal of Information Management, 75, 102734.
  • Nafei, W. A. (2016). Organizational Agility: The Key to Organizational Success. International Journal of Business and Management, 11(5): 296-309.
  • Narci, M. T. (2024). Examination of Turkish-Made Products with The Theory of Planned Behavior: A Research on Regular Migrants in Turkey. Journal of Asian Scientific Research, 14(1), 58-67.
  • Nejatian, M., Zarei, M. H., Nejati, M., & Zanjirchi, S. M. (2018). A Hybrid Approach to Achieve Organizational Agility: An Empirical Study of A Food Company. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 25(1): 201-234.
  • Noe, R.A., Hollenbeck, J.R., Gerhart, B. ve Wright, P.M., (1997). Human Resource Management, “Gaining A Competitive Advantage”, Second Edition, McGraw-Hill, Irwin, Chicago, ss.238-242.
  • Olbert, S., Prodoehl, H. G., & Worley, C. G. (2017). Organizational Agility as A Competitive Factor: The “Agile Performer Index”. NEOMA Business School, Reims Cedex, France.
  • Overby, E., Bharadwaj, A., & Sambamurthy, V. (2006). Enterprise Agility and The Enabling Role of Information Technology. European Journal of Information Systems, 15: 120-131.
  • Park, Y. K. (2011). The Dynamics of Opportunity and Threat Management in Turbulent Environments: The Role of Information Technologies. ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, PO Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106.
  • Plonka, F. E. (1997). Developing A Lean and Agile Work Force. Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries, 7(1): 11-20.
  • Prasongko, A., & Adianto, T. (2019). The Role of The Agile Leadership Model as a Competitive Advantage for The Future Leader in The Era of Globalization and Industrial Revolution 4.0. Jurnal Pertahanan: Media Informasi Tentang Kajian & Strategi Pertahanan Yang Mengedepankan Identity, Nasionalism & Integrity, 5(3): 126-133.
  • Prentice, A. E. (2013). Leadership for The 21st Century. ABC-CLIO.
  • Promsri, C. (2019). The developing Model of Digital Leadership for A Successful Digital Transformation. GPH-International Journal of Business Management, 2(08): 01-08.
  • Ravichandran, T. (2018). Exploring The Relationships Between IT Competence, Innovation Capacity and Organizational Agility. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 27(1): 22-42.
  • Saha, N., Gregar, A., & Sáha, P. (2017). Organizational Agility and HRM Strategy: Do They Really Enhance Firms’ Competitiveness?. International Journal of Organizational Leadership, 6: 323-334.
  • Samsudin, A., Saputra, N., & Abdinegoro, S. B. (2020, December). Authentic Leadership, Work Engagement and Performance. In The International Conference on Business and Management Research, 160: 276-283.
  • Schermerhorn, J.R., Hunt, J.G. ve Osborn, R.N. (1994). Managing Organizational Behavior, 5. Baskı, John Wiley & Sons., New York, USA, 332s.
  • Schuster, J. R., & Zingheim, P. K. (1992). The New Pay: Linking Employee and Organizational Performance. (No Title).
  • Setiawati, L. (2021). The Effect of Agile Leadership and Work Environment to Employees’ Performance in A VUCA World (Study on Millennial Generation Employees in Jabodetabek). International Journal of Social Science and Human Research, 4(11), 3123-3131.
  • Shahaei, B. (2008). Paradigm of Agility, Definitions, Features and Concepts. Tadbir Publication, 194th Issue, 14-18.
  • Sharifi, H., Colquhoun, G., Barclay, I., & Dann, Z. (2001). Agile Manufacturing: A Management and Operational Framework. Proceedings of The Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture, 215(6): 857-869.
  • Sharifi, H., & Zhang, Z. (1999). A Methodology for Achieving Agility in Manufacturing Organisations: An Introduction. International Journal of Production Economics, 62(1-2): 7-22.
  • Sharifi, H., & Zhang, Z. (2001). Agile Manufacturing in Practice‐Application of A Methodology. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 21(5/6), 772-794.
  • Sharp, J. M., Irani, Z., & Desai, S. (1999). Working Towards Agile Manufacturing in The UK Industry. International Journal of Production Economics, 62(1-2): 155-169.
  • Sheninger, E. (2019). Digital Leadership: Changing Paradigms for Changing Times. Corwin Press.
  • Shippmann, J. S., Ash, R. A., Batjtsta, M., Carr, L., Eyde, L. D., Hesketh, B., ... & Sanchez, J. I. (2000). The Practice of Competency Modeling. Personnel Psychology, 53(3): 703-740.
  • Silva-Martinez, J. (2024). Practical implications to becoming agile organizations: NASA case study. Acta Astronautica, 215, 102-106.
  • Sivil Havacılık Genel Müdürlüğü. (2018). 2019-2023 Stratejik Planı. Ankara.
  • Sivil Havacılık Genel Müdürlüğü. (2019). Faaliyet Raporu. Ankara.
  • Sivil Havacılık Genel Müdürlüğü. (2022). Faaliyet Raporu. Ankara.
  • Sürücü, L., Yıkılmaz, İ., & Maşlakçı, A. (2022). Dijital Liderlik: Bir Ölçek Uyarlama Çalışması. Abant Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 22(3), 1038-1050.
  • Tanniru, M. R. (2018). Digital Leadership. In Management of Information Systems. IntechOpen.
  • Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic Capabilities and Strategic Management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7): 509-533.
  • Teece, D., Peteraf, M., & Leih, S. (2016). Dynamic Capabilities and Organizational Agility: Risk, Uncertainty, and Strategy in The Innovation Economy. California Management Review, 58(4): 13-35.
  • Todd, R. J. (1999). Transformational Leadership and Transformational Learning: Information Literacy and The World Wide Web. National Association of Secondary School Principals. NASSP Bulletin, 83(605), 4-12.
  • Tunçer, P. (2011). Örgütsel Değişim ve Liderlik. Sayıştay Dergisi, (80), 57-84.
  • Ulaştırma, Denizcilik ve Haberleşme Bakanlığı. (2020). Havacılık ve Uzay Teknolojileri - Ulaşan ve Erişen Türkiye. Ankara.
  • Wamba, S. F. (2022). Impact of Artificial Intelligence Assimilation on Firm Performance: The Mediating Effects of Organizational Agility and Customer Agility. International Journal of Information Management, 67, 102544.
  • Wirtz, B. W., & Wirtz. (2021). Digital Business and Electronic Commerce. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
  • Xia, Y., Liu, X., Wang, X., Deng, H., Han, C., Liu, Z., & Tsai, S. B. (2023). The power of role models in a team: The impact of lead entrepreneur's digital leadership on digital entrepreneurial success. Information Processing & Management, 60(6), 103498.
  • Zaheer, A., & Zaheer, S. (1997). Catching The Wave: Alertness, Responsiveness, and Market Influence in Global Electronic Networks. Management Science, 43(11): 1493-1509.
  • Zhang, Z., & Sharifi, H. (2000). A Methodology for Achieving Agility in Manufacturing Organisations. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 20(4): 496-513.
  • Zeike, S., Bradbury, K., Lindert, L., & Pfaff, H. (2019). Digital Leadership Skills and Associations with Psychological Well-Being. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(14), 2628: 1-12.
  • Žitkienė, R., & Deksnys, M. (2018). Organizational Agility Conceptual Model. Montenegrin Journal of Economics. Podgorica: Economic Laboratory Transition Research Podgorica-Elit, 2018, vol. 14, iss. 2.
Toplam 114 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil Türkçe
Konular Hava Taşımacılığı ve Nakliye Hizmetleri
Bölüm Araştırma Makalesi
Yazarlar

Fatih Karaman 0000-0001-5915-8054

Erken Görünüm Tarihi 29 Ekim 2024
Yayımlanma Tarihi
Gönderilme Tarihi 2 Nisan 2024
Kabul Tarihi 29 Temmuz 2024
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2024 Cilt: 9 Sayı: 2

Kaynak Göster

APA Karaman, F. (2024). Sivil Havacılık Sektöründe Çevik ve Dijital Liderlik Tarzlarının Örgütsel Çeviklik ve Çalışan Performansları İle İlişkisi. JOEEP: Journal of Emerging Economies and Policy, 9(2), 129-147.

The sole purpose of JOEEP is to be a prestigious journal which contributes to scientific knowledge. In order to keep this purpose, JOEEP, adopts and follows the publication policies of world’s prestigious scientific journals. All original and qualified works which may contribute to the scientific knowledge, are evaluated through a rigorous editorial and peer review process. Hereby, JOEEP is a peer reviewed and scientific journal. It strictly depends on the scientific principles, rules and ethical framework that are required to this qualification.

JOEEP is published as two issues per year June and December and all publication policies and processes are conducted according to the international standards. JOEEP accepts and publishes the research articles in the fields of economics, political economy, fiscal economics, applied economics, business economics, labour economics and econometrics. JOEEP, without depending on any institution or organization, is a non-profit journal that has an International Editorial Board specialist on their fields. All “Publication Process” and “Writing Guidelines” are explained in the related title and it is expected from authors to Show a complete match to the rules. JOEEP is an open Access journal.