The process and size of global income distribution: A review for the 1980-2016 period

Yıl 2019, Cilt: 2 Sayı: 2, 59 - 76, 30.12.2019

Emin Efecan Aktaş

Öz

Inequality, a concept at the heart of social justice theories, generally refers to the non-equivalence of rights and opportunities. The concept of inequality can lead to misconceptions or confusion in public debates because it tends to express different things to people. The term "income inequality" is often used to distinguish economic inequality from others. The issue of how income is distributed in an economy, in a country and in a given period is determined by income distribution and related calculation methods. At this point, it becomes more important to determine income inequality by which income groups and how much income is gained rather than how the income is distributed. Although income inequality is in a periodic and domestic or transnational decline trend, many studies have indicated that it continues to exist at the global level and income inequality has increased in some periods and economic regions. Inequality continues to increase among countries, especially among the richest and poorest countries, due to the ever-increasing growth rates of successful developed economies compared to other economies. For instance, sub-Saharan Africa and Latin America have the least growth in income distribution while China has made the best progress in global income distribution. In this context, the aim of this study is to analyze the current situation of the process of global income distribution for the period 1980-2016 and the size of income inequality worldwide with the current data compiled from several reports after an overall assessment of the causes of increased income inequality.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Income Inequality, Income Share, Income Distribution

Küresel gelir dağılımının seyri ve boyutu: 1980-2016 dönemi için bir inceleme

Öz

Sosyal adalet teorilerinin merkezinde bir kavram olan eşitsizlik genel olarak haklarda ve fırsatlarda denk olmama durumunu ifade etmektedir. Ancak eşitsizlik kavramı, insanlara farklı şeyler ifade etme eğiliminde olduğu için kamuoyu tartışmalarında yanılgılara veya karışıklığa yol açabilmektedir. Ekonomik eşitsizliği diğerlerinden ayırt etmek için çoğunlukla “gelir eşitsizliği” kavramı kullanılmaktadır. Gelirin bir ekonomide, bir ülkede ve belirli bir dönemde nasıl dağıldığı hususu da gelir dağılımı ve buna ilişkin hesaplama yöntemleri ile tespit edilmektedir. Bu noktada ise gelirin nasıl dağıldığından çok, hangi gelir grupları tarafından ve ne kadar elde edildiği, gelir eşitsizliğinin tespiti için önem kazanmaktadır. Gelir eşitsizliğinin dönemsel ve ülke içi veya bölgeler ve ülkeler arası azalma eğilimindeki seyrine karşın, küresel düzeyde varlığını sürdürdüğü ve bazı dönemlerde ve ekonomik bölgelerde ise gelir eşitsizliğinin arttığı pek çok çalışmada belirtilmektedir. Ülkeler arasında ve özellikle en zengin ve en fakir ülkeler arasında, başarılı gelişmiş ekonomilerin diğer ekonomilere kıyasla büyüme oranlarındaki sürekli artan fark sebebiyle eşitsizlik artışı devam etmektedir. Örneğin, Çin küresel gelir dağılımında en iyi gelişmeyi kaydeden ülke iken Sahra altı Afrika ve Latin Amerika ülkeleri gelir dağılımında en az oranda büyüme sağlayan ülkelerdir. Bu çerçevede, bu çalışmanın amacı, artan gelir eşitsizliğinin nedenlerine ilişkin genel bir değerlendirme yapıldıktan sonra, 1980-2016 dönemi için küresel gelir dağılımının seyrinin ve dünya genelinde gelir eşitsizliğinin boyutunun çeşitli raporlardan derlenen güncel verilerle mevcut durum analizini yapmaktır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Gelir Eşitsizliği, Gelir Dağılımı, Gelir Payı

Kaynakça

• Acemoğlu, D. (2002). Technical change, inequality, and the labor market. Journal of Economic Literature, 40(1), 7-72.
• Alvaredo, F., Chance, L., Piketty, T., Saez, E., ve Zucman, G. (2018). World inequality report. World Inequality Lab, Erişim Tarihi: 23.07.2019, https://wir2018.wid.world/files/download/wir2018-full-report-english.pdf
• Autor, D. H., Katz, L. F., ve Kearney, M. S. (2006). The polarization of the US labour market. American Economic Review, 96(2), 189-194.
• Baldacci, E., Callegari, G., Coady, D., Ding, D., Kumar, M. S., Tommasino, P., ve Woo, J. (2010). Public expenditures on social programs and household consumption in China (No: 10/69). International Monetary Fund Working Paper.
• Barro, R. J. (1989). Economic growth in a cross section of countries (No: w3120). National Bureau of Economic Research Working Papers.
• Barro, R. J. (1991). Economic growth in a cross-section of countries. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106(2), 407-444.
• Barro, R. J. (1992). Human capital and economic growth. Poicies for Long-Run Economic Growth bildiriler kitabı (s. 199-216) içinde. Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City.
• Barro, R. J., ve Sala-i-Martin, X. (1995). Economic growth. New York: McGraw-Hill.
• Becker, G. S. (2007). Health as human capital: Synthesis and extensions. Oxford Economic Papers, 59(3), 379-410.
• Birdsall, N. (2006). The world is not flat: Inequality and injustice in our global economy (No: 9). Helsinki: United Nations University World Institute for Development Economics Research Annual Lecture. Erişim Tarihi: 23.06.2019, http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.178.8962&rep=rep1&type=pdf
• Bosworth, B. P., Burtless, G., ve Zhang. K. (2016). What growing life expectancy gaps mean for the promise of social security. Washington: Brookings Institution. Erişim Tarihi: 25.06.2019, https://www.brookings.edu/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/bosworthburtlesszhang_retirementinequalitylongevityfullpaper.pdf
• Bourguignon, F. (2018). World changes in inequality: An overview of facts, causes, consequences, and policies. CESifo Economic Studies, 64(3), 345-370.
• Case, A., ve Deaton. A. (2017). Mortality and morbidity in the 21st century. Brookings Panel on Economic Activity konferans kitabı (s. 397-476) içinde. Washington: The Brookings Papers on Economic Activity (BPEA).
• Charles-Coll, J. A. (2011). Understanding income inequality: Concepts, causes and measurement. International Journal of Management and Economics, 1(3), 17-28.
• Chetty, R., Stepner, M., Abraham, S., Lin, S., Scuderi, B., Turner, N., Bergeron, A., ve Cutler, D. (2016). The association between income and life expectancy in the United States 2001-2014. Journal of the American Medical Association, 315(16), 1750-1766.
• Dinopoulos, E., ve Segerstrom, P. (1999). A schumpeterian model of protection and relative wages. American Economic Review, 89(3), 450-472.
• Egger, H., ve Kreickemeier, U. (2009). Firm heterogeneity and the labor market effects of trade liberalization. International Economic Review, 50(1), 187-216.
• Ehrlich, I., ve Becker, G. S. (1972). Market insurance, self-insurance and self-protection. The Journal of Political Economy, 80(4), 623-648.
• Ehrlich, I. (2000). Uncertain lifetime, life protection and the value of life saving. Journal of Health Economics, 19(3), 341-367.
• Feenstra, R. C., ve Hanson, G. H. (1996). Foreign investment, outsourcing and relative wages (No: 5121). National Bureau of Economic Research Working Papers.
• Goos, M., Manning, A., ve Salomons, A. (2009). The polarization of the european labor market. American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings, 99(2), 58-63.
• Gómez, P. G., ve Nicolás, A. L. (2006). Health shocks, employment and income in the spanish labour market. Health Economics, 15(9), 997-1009.
• Grossman, M. (1972). On the concept of health capital and the demand for health. Journal of Political Economy, 80(2), 223-255.
• Gupta, S., Davoodi, H., ve Alonso, R. T. (1998). Does corruption affect income inequality and poverty?. (No: 98/76). International Monetary Fund Working Paper.
• Gupta, S., De Mello, L., ve Sharon, R. (2000). Corruption and military spending (No: WP/00/23). International Monetary Fund Working Paper.
• Güvenen, F., Özkan, S., ve Song, J. (2014). The nature of countercyclical income risk. Journal of Political Economy, 122(3), 621-660.
• Helpman, E., Itskhoki, O., ve Redding, S. J. (2010). Inequality and unemployment in a global economy. Econometrica, 78(4), 1239-1283.
• Houweling, T. A. J., Ronsmans, C., Campbell, O. M. R., ve Kunst, A. E. (2007). Huge poor-rich inequalities in maternity care: An international comparative study of maternity and child care in developing countries. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 85(10), 733-820.
• IMF (2017). Tackling inequality. International Monetary Fund World Economic and Financial Surveys Fiscal Monitor, Erişim Tarihi: 20.07.2019, https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/FM/Issues/2017/10/05/fiscal-monitor-october-2017
• Keskin, A. (2017). Income distribution and economic growth: A complementary cross country study to the Kuznets Curve. Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 19(2), 235-250.
• Knowles, S. (2005). Inequality and economic growth: The empirical relationship reconsidered in the light of comparable data. The Journal of Development Studies, 41(1), 135-159.
• Koske, I., Fournier, J. M., ve Wanner, I. (2012). Less income inequality and more growth - are they compatible? Part 2. The Distribution of Labour Income (No: 925). OECD Economics Department Working Papers.
• Lee, D. J., ve Son, J. C. (2016). Economic growth and income inequality: Evidence from dynamic panel investigation. Global Economic Review, 45(4), 331-358.
• Leigh, A., Jencks, C., ve Smeeding, T. M. (2009). Health and economic inequality. B. Nolan, W. Salverda ve T. M. Smeeding (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Economic Inequality (s. 385-405) içinde. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Lipset, S. M. (1960). Political man: The social bases of politics. New York: Doubleday and Company Incorporation Publishing.
• Neary, J. P. (2003). Presidential address: Globalization and market structure. Journal of the European Economic Association, 1(2-3), 245-271.
• OECD (2012). Reducing income inequality while boosting economic growth: Can it be done?. OECD Economic Policy Reforms, Erişim Tarihi: 20.07.2019, http://www.oecd.org/eco/labour/49421421.pdf.
• OECD (2016). Income inequality remains high in the face of weak recovery. OECD Centre for Opportunity and Equality, Erişim Tarihi: 20.07.2019, https://www.oecd.org/social/OECD2016-Income-Inequality-Update.pdf.
• Perkins, D. H., Radalet, S., Lindauer, D. L., ve Block, S. A. (2013). Economics of development (7th Ed). New York: W. W. Norton & Company.
• Persson, T., ve Tabellini, G. (1994). Is inequality harmful for growth? Theory and evidence. The American Economic Review, 84(3), 600-621.
• Smith, J. P. (1999). Healthy bodies and thick wallets: The dual relation between health and economic status. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 13(2), 144-149.
• Tanzi, V., ve Davoodi, H. (1997). Corruption, public investment and growth (No: WP/97/139). International Monetary Fund Working Paper.
• Wagstaff, A., Yip, W., Lindelow, M., ve Hsiao, W.C. (2009). China’s health system and its reform: A review of recent studies. Health Economics, 18(2), 7-23.
• Wagstaff, A., Bilger, M., Buisman, L. R., ve Bredenkamp, C. (2014). Who benefits from government health spending and why? A global assessment (No: 7044). World Bank Policy Research Working Paper.
• Wagstaff, A., Cotlear, D. P., Eozenou, H. V., ve Buisman, L. R. (2016). Measuring progress towards universal health coverage: With an application to 24 developing countries. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 32(1), 147-189.
• Weber, J. (2008). The impact of corruption on economic growth: Does government matter?. Academy of Management Perspectives, 22(4), 80-82.