A geometric and mechanical description of the talus and cochlea tibiae in horse and ox

Yıl 2021, Cilt: 40 Sayı: 1, 54 - 60, 19.08.2021

Fatma İşbilir , Ayşe Burcu Çelik , Kadri Arslan , Betül Bulca , Bahri Yıldız

https://doi.org/10.30782/jrvm.804125

Öz

In this study, geometrical and mechanical identification of the talus and cochlea tibiae in horse and ox is presented. The shape of the expressed bones of these animals can be considered as rotational surfaces of planar curves. The model is established based on the bolt-nut mechanism while interpreting the relationship between talus and tibiae, and describing geometrical differences between ox and horse in functional anatomy. The results obtained from the geometric and mechanical data have led to the conclusion that lateral and friction forces applied on talus and cochlea tibiae of the horse are higher than that in ox. For this reason, it can be concluded that horses can stand longer than cattle, consistent with the way of life.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Talus - Cochlea tibiae in horse and ox, ruled surface, tube, mechanical fasteners

Teşekkür

We thank Dr. Bayram Süzer for helping with language and Dr. İlker Arıcan for her positive guidance.

Kaynakça

• 1. Getty R. The anatomy of the domestic animals. 5th ed. Volume I, Philadelphia- London- Toronto, WB Saunders Company; 1987: 309-761.
• 2. Bahadır A, Yıldız H. Hareket Sistemi ve İç Organlar. Ezgi Kitabevi. Bursa- Türkiye, 2017: 85- 88.
• 3. Nickel R, Schummer A, Seiferle E. The Locomotor System of the Domestic Animals. Volume I. Verlag Paul Parey. Berlin-Hamburg, 1986: 95- 99.
• 4. Dyce KM, Sack WO, Wensing CJG. Textbook of veterinary anatomy (Veteriner Anatomi Konu Anlatımı ve Atlas). 4th Ed. Güneş Tıp Kitabevleri. Ankara- Türkiye, 2017: 624- 644.
• 5. Budras DK, Habel RE. Bovıne Anatomy. 14th ed. Hannover-Germany, Schlütersche Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co.; 2011.
• 6. Gray A. Modern differential geometry of curves and surfaces. CRC Press. Tokyo, 1993: 123-161.
• 7. Coşkun İ, Yıldız H, Arslan K. A geometric modeling of dog intestine. It J Anat Embryol. 2007; 112(1): 27-36.
• 8. Ezentaş R, Arslan K, Yıldız H. A Geometric Description of the Urinary Bladder of the Turkish Shepherd Dog (Karabaş). Ann Anat. 2005; 187: 179-184.
• 9. Yıldız B, Arslan K, Yıldız H, et al. A Geometric Description of the Ascending Colon of Some Domestic Animals. Ann Anat. 2001; 183: 555-557.
• 10. Yıldız H, Yıldız B, Arslan K. A Mathematical Model of the Ascending Colon of the Horse. Ann Anat. 2001; 183: 551-554.
• 11. Yıldız H, Arslan K, Coşkun İ. A Geometric Modelling of dog Intestine. Turk J Vet Anim Sci. 2006; 30: 483-488.
• 12. Babalık FC. Makine Elemanları ve Konstrüksüyon Örnekleri. Dora Yayınları. Bursa- Türkiye, 2006: 188- 235.
• 13. Juvınall RC, Marshek KM. Fundamentals of Machine Component. 5th ed. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., USA, 2017: 411-463.
• 14. Mortensen J. Friction Analysis of Bolts. Aalborg Universitet. Esbjerg, 2013: 12-17.
• 15. Ma S, Nemcik J, Aziz N. An analytical model of fully grouted rock bolts subjected to tensile load. Construction and Building Materials. 2013; 519-526.
• 16. Shigley JE. Standard Handbook of Machine Design. 23. The University of Texas at El Paso, Texas; 2004.