THE EFFECTS OF POTASSIUM APPLICATIONS ON DROUGHT STRESS IN SUGAR BEET: PART II. PLANT NUTRITION CONTENT

Yıl 2020, Cilt: 4 Sayı: 3, 203 - 216, 19.08.2020

Gizem Aksu , Hamit Altay

https://doi.org/10.26900/jsp.4.015

Öz

This is the second in a series of papers describing the effects of potassium applications on drought stress in sugar beet. Drought is a natural phenomenon that can affect water resources and agriculture. In this research, the effect of potassium applications under drought stress on some plant nutrition of sugarbeet, which is a strategic plant, was investigated. In the experiment, irrigation levels were kept at 33%, 66% and 100% of field capacity. Different doses (10-20-40-80 mg kg-1) of potassium were applied to the plants. The plants were grown in the growth chamber under controlled conditions (day/night 16/8 hours, 25/15 0C, 60-70% humidity). According to the results, the effect of irrigation x potassium interaction on the shoot and root sodium (Na) potassium (K) calcium (Ca) and phosphorus (P) content Na/K and Na/K ratio was found to be statistically significant. Shoot and root sodium content decreased with potassium applications under drought conditions (33%). Shoot and root potassium, phosphorus content increased with potassium applications in both drought and sufficient water conditions. Shoot calcium content change irregular with potassium application while root calcium decreased with potassium application under drought conditions (33%). Shoot and root sodium/potassium ratio decreased with potassium applications in both drought and sufficient water conditions. Shoot and root sodium/calcium ratio change irregular with potassium applications. Therefore, it can be said that potassium may play a critical role in reducing the negative effect of drought stress anduptake plant nutrition in sugar beet.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Drought, Irrigation, Potassium, Sugar Beet

Kaynakça

• ABDALLA, M.M., EL-KHOSHIBAN, N.H., 2007. The Influence of Water Stress on Growth, Relative Water Content, Photosynthetic Pigments, Some Metabolic and Hormonal Contents of Two Triticium aestivum Cultivars. Journal of Applied Sciences Research, 3(12): 2062-2074.
• ABD-EL-MOTAGALLY, F. M. F., 2004, Evaluation of two sugar beet cultivars (Beta vulgaris L.) for growth and yield under drought and heat conditions, A thesis for PhD. Institute of Plant Nutrition ,University Giessen, Germany, 143 pp.
• ADILOGLU, A. and GULER, M., 2002, Tekirdag-hayrabolu yöresinde yetiştirilen seker pancarının (Beta Vulgaris L.) beslenme durumunun belirlenmesi. S. Ü. Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, 16 (29):26–30.
• AL-JBAWI, E. and ABBAS, F., 2013, The Effect of Length during Drought Stress on Sugar Beet (Beta vulgaris L.) Yield and Quality, Persian Gulf Crop Protection ISSN: 2251-9343, Volume 2 Issue 1, Pages 35-43.
• ASHRAF, M., 1998, Yield and yield components response of wheat (Tritcium aestivum L.) genotypes grown under different soil water deficit conditions, Acta Agron. Hung., 46: 45-51.
• ASHRAF, M., ARFAN, M., AHMAD, A., 2003, Salt Tolerance in Okra: Ion Relations and Gas Exchanges Characteristics, Journal of Plant Nutrition, 26 (1): 63-79.
• BEE, P.M., JARVIS, P.J., ARMSTRONG, M.J. 1997, The Effect of potassium and sodium fertiliser on sugar beet yield and quality, Procedings of the 60 th International Institute for Beet Research Congress, July, Cambridge (UK).
• CHOLUJ, D., KARWOWSKA, R, CISZEWSKA, A, JASINSKA, M., 2008, Influence of long-term drought stress on osmolyte accumulation in sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) plants. Acta Physiol. Plant, 30, 679–687.
• DASGAN, H.Y., KOÇ, S., EKICI, B., AKTAŞ, H., ABAK, K., 2006. Bazı Fasulye ve Börülce Genotiplerinin Tuz Stresine Tepkileri. Alatarım, 5(1): 23-31.
• GHOULAM C., FOURSY, A., FARES, K., 2002, Effects of salt stress on growth, inorganic ions and proline accumulation in relation to osmotic adjustment in five sugar beet cultivars, Environ Exp Bot 47:39–50.
• HU, Y.C., SCHMIDHALTER, U., 2005. Drought and salinity: A comparison of their effects on mineral nutrition of plants, J Plant Nutr Soil Sci 168: 541-549.
• HUIJBREGTS, A.W.M., GLATTKOWSKI, H., HOUGHTON, B.J. and HADJIANTONIOU, D., 1996, Effect of agronomic factors on parametersused in formulas to estimate extractable sugar in sugar beets, Institut Internationalde Recherches Betteravieres Proceedings, 353-368.
• JACKSON, M.L., 1962, Soil chemical analysis. Prentice Hall, Inc. Eng. Cliffs. N.J. USA,
• KABAY, T., SENSOY, S., 2017, Enzyme, chlorophyll and ion changes in some common bean genotypes by high temperature stress. Ege Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, 54(4): 429-437.
• KADIOGLU, M., Türkiye’de İklim Değişikliği Risk Yönetimi. Türkiye’nin Birleşmiş Milletler İklim Değişikliği Çerçeve Sözleşmesi’ne İlişkin İkinci Ulusal Bildirimi Hazırlık Faaliyetlerinin Desteklenmesi Projesi. T.C. Çevre ve Şehircilik Bakanlığı, Birleşmiş Milletler Kalkınma Programı (UNDP), 2012.
• KAYA, C., TUNA, A. L., 2010. Potasyumun tuz stresinde yetişen bitkilerde rolü ve önemi. http://www.ipipotash.org
• KHONDAKAR, Z.H., ASLAM, A., REHMAN, S., KHAN, T.H., 1983, Influence of soil moisture stress on yield, grain quality, availability and uptake of N, P and K by wheat, Int. J. Tropical Agric. 1, 211-220.
• KIZIL, U., AKSU, S. and CAMOGLU G., 2018, Kontrollü ortamda bitkisel yetiştiricilik için arduino uyumlu bir toprak nemi izleme sistemi tasarımı, Comü Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, vol.6:131-139.
• KOC, S., 2005. Fasulyelerde Tuzluluğa Tolerans Bakımından Genotipsel Farklılıkların Erken Bitki Gelişimi Aşamasında Belirlenmesi, Çukurova Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enst., Yüksek Lisans Tezi.
• KUSVURAN, S., 2010, Kavunlarda Kuraklık ve Tuzluluğa Toleranslı Fizyolojik Mekanizmaları Arasındaki Bağlantılar, Çukurova Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Doktora tezi, Adana.
• LI, Y., 2009. Physiological Responses of Tomato Seedlings (Lycopersicon esculentum) to Salt Stres. Modern Applied Science, 3 (3): 171-176.
• MUBARAK, M.U., ZAHIR, M., AHMAD, S., WAKEEL, A., 2016, Sugar beet yield and industrial sugar contents improved by potassium fertilization under scarce and adequate moisture conditions, Journal of Integrative Agriculture 2016, 15(11): 2620–2626.
• NEJAD, T. S., BAKHSHANDE, A. and JAZAYERI, A. 2010, Calculated linear regression equations of motion K+ and Na+ ions and compare moving process these elements in corn roots, Report and Opinion, 2(3): 15-22.
• RAZA SAMAR, M. A., FARRUKH SALEEM, M., MUSTAFA SHAH, G., JAMIL M. and HAIDER KHAN, I., 2013, Potassium applied under drought improves physiological and nutrient uptake performances of wheat (Triticum Aestivun L.), Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, 2013, 13(1), 175-185.
• TURHAN, M. and PIŞKIN, A, 2005, Farklı dozlarda uygulanan potasyumun şeker pancarının verim ve kalitesine etkisi, Potassium and its Importance in Agriculture Symposium. Eskisehir. Turkey.
• WILHITE, D.A., 2000, Drought: A Global Assessment. Natural Hazards and Disasters Series. London: Routledge Publishers.
• WU, G., LIANG, N., FENG, R., and ZHANG, J., 2013, Evaluation of salinity tolerance in seedlings of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) cultivars using proline, soluble sugars and cation accumulation criteria, Acta Physiologiae Plantarum 35:2665–2674.