Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Performance Measurement in Cargo Distribution Center A Case Study

Yıl 2022, Cilt: 6 Sayı: 1, 1056 - 1064, 30.06.2022

Öz

Cargo transportation is a key element for an effective and properly functioning logistics chain. Due to the role it plays in overall logistics chain performance, it is important for cargo firms to be at their peak level in terms of provided service quality and implementation. Continuous performance evaluation is critical for diagnosing and preventing any problems that might disrupt the firms’ ability to keep providing their services and further prevent customer dissatisfaction. Therefore, the aim of this paper is identifying the problems that cause the performance of Company X’s distribution center located in City A to stay below desired levels, which consequently lead to customer dissatisfaction, and to offer a feasible solution for the identified problems. In order to identify underlying problems, performances of two distribution centers located in different cities are compared and improvements for worker performance, workload distribution, and processes are suggested.

Kaynakça

  • Akyuz, G. A., & Erkan, T. E. (2010). Supply chain performance measurement: a literature review. International journal of production research, 48(17), 5137-5155.
  • Bititci, U. S., Carrie, A. S., & McDevitt, L. (1997). Integrated performance measurement systems: a development guide. International journal of operations & production management, 17(5), 522-534.
  • Boussofiane, A., Dyson, R.G. and Thanassoulis, E. (1991), “Applied data envelopment analysis”,European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 52 No. 1, pp. 1-15.
  • Chan, F. T. (2003). Performance measurement in a supply chain. The international journal of advanced manufacturing technology, 21(7), 534-548.
  • Folan, P., & Browne, J. (2005). A review of performance measurement: Towards performance management. Computers in industry, 56(7), 663-680.
  • Jordan, K. (2009). Performans Değerlendirme Harvard Business School Press Pocket Mentor. Çev: Melis İnan, City Y: Optimist Yayınları.
  • Kumar, A., Sah, B., Singh, A. R., Deng, Y., He, X., Kumar, P., & Bansal, R. C. (2017). A review of multi criteria decision making (MCDM) towards sustainable renewable energy development. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 69, 596-609.
  • Min, H. and Joo, S.J. (2006), “Benchmarking the operational efficiency of major third-party logistics providers using data envelopment analysis”, Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, Vol. 11 No. 3, pp. 259-65
  • Murphy, D.J., Pearson, J.N. and Siferd, S.P. (1996), “Evaluating performance of the purchasing department using data envelopment analysis”, Journal of Business Logistics, Vol. 17 No. 2, pp. 77-91.
  • Nozick, L. K., Borderas, H., & Meyburg, A. H. (1998). Evaluation of travel demand measures and programs: a data envelopment analysis approach. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 32(5), 331-343.
  • Parker, C. (2000). Performance measurement. Work study, 49(2), 63-66.
  • Poli, P.M. and Scheraga, C.A. (2000), “The relationship between the functional orientation of senior managers and service quality in LTL motor carriers”, Journal of Transportation Management, Vol. 12 No. 2, pp. 17-31
  • Shafer, S.M. and Byrd, T.A. (2000), “A framework for measuring the efficiency of organizational investments in information technology using data envelopment analysis”, Omega, Vol. 28, pp. 125-41
  • Talluri, S., Hug, F. and Pinney, W.E. (1997), “Application of data envelopment analysis for cell performance evaluation and process improvement in cellular manufacturing”, International Journal of Production Research, Vol. 35 No. 8, pp. 2157-70.
  • Valdmanis, V. (1992), “Sensitivity analysis for DEA models: an empirical example using public vs NFP hospitals”, Journal of Public Economics, Vol. 48 No. 2, pp. 185-205.
  • White, G. P. (1996). “A survey and taxonomy of strategy‐related performance measures for manufacturing”, International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 16(3), 42-61
  • Zacharia, Z. G., Sanders, N. R., & Nix, N. W. (2011). The emerging role of the third‐party logistics provider (3PL) as an orchestrator. Journal of Business Logistics, 32(1), 40-54.
Yıl 2022, Cilt: 6 Sayı: 1, 1056 - 1064, 30.06.2022

Öz

Kaynakça

  • Akyuz, G. A., & Erkan, T. E. (2010). Supply chain performance measurement: a literature review. International journal of production research, 48(17), 5137-5155.
  • Bititci, U. S., Carrie, A. S., & McDevitt, L. (1997). Integrated performance measurement systems: a development guide. International journal of operations & production management, 17(5), 522-534.
  • Boussofiane, A., Dyson, R.G. and Thanassoulis, E. (1991), “Applied data envelopment analysis”,European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 52 No. 1, pp. 1-15.
  • Chan, F. T. (2003). Performance measurement in a supply chain. The international journal of advanced manufacturing technology, 21(7), 534-548.
  • Folan, P., & Browne, J. (2005). A review of performance measurement: Towards performance management. Computers in industry, 56(7), 663-680.
  • Jordan, K. (2009). Performans Değerlendirme Harvard Business School Press Pocket Mentor. Çev: Melis İnan, City Y: Optimist Yayınları.
  • Kumar, A., Sah, B., Singh, A. R., Deng, Y., He, X., Kumar, P., & Bansal, R. C. (2017). A review of multi criteria decision making (MCDM) towards sustainable renewable energy development. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 69, 596-609.
  • Min, H. and Joo, S.J. (2006), “Benchmarking the operational efficiency of major third-party logistics providers using data envelopment analysis”, Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, Vol. 11 No. 3, pp. 259-65
  • Murphy, D.J., Pearson, J.N. and Siferd, S.P. (1996), “Evaluating performance of the purchasing department using data envelopment analysis”, Journal of Business Logistics, Vol. 17 No. 2, pp. 77-91.
  • Nozick, L. K., Borderas, H., & Meyburg, A. H. (1998). Evaluation of travel demand measures and programs: a data envelopment analysis approach. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 32(5), 331-343.
  • Parker, C. (2000). Performance measurement. Work study, 49(2), 63-66.
  • Poli, P.M. and Scheraga, C.A. (2000), “The relationship between the functional orientation of senior managers and service quality in LTL motor carriers”, Journal of Transportation Management, Vol. 12 No. 2, pp. 17-31
  • Shafer, S.M. and Byrd, T.A. (2000), “A framework for measuring the efficiency of organizational investments in information technology using data envelopment analysis”, Omega, Vol. 28, pp. 125-41
  • Talluri, S., Hug, F. and Pinney, W.E. (1997), “Application of data envelopment analysis for cell performance evaluation and process improvement in cellular manufacturing”, International Journal of Production Research, Vol. 35 No. 8, pp. 2157-70.
  • Valdmanis, V. (1992), “Sensitivity analysis for DEA models: an empirical example using public vs NFP hospitals”, Journal of Public Economics, Vol. 48 No. 2, pp. 185-205.
  • White, G. P. (1996). “A survey and taxonomy of strategy‐related performance measures for manufacturing”, International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 16(3), 42-61
  • Zacharia, Z. G., Sanders, N. R., & Nix, N. W. (2011). The emerging role of the third‐party logistics provider (3PL) as an orchestrator. Journal of Business Logistics, 32(1), 40-54.
Toplam 17 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Konular Endüstri Mühendisliği
Bölüm Araştırma Makalesi
Yazarlar

Pervin Ersoy 0000-0001-8196-0158

Burak Çetiner 0000-0003-3035-7783

Yayımlanma Tarihi 30 Haziran 2022
Gönderilme Tarihi 19 Ekim 2021
Kabul Tarihi 31 Aralık 2021
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2022 Cilt: 6 Sayı: 1

Kaynak Göster

APA Ersoy, P., & Çetiner, B. (2022). Performance Measurement in Cargo Distribution Center A Case Study. Journal of Turkish Operations Management, 6(1), 1056-1064.
AMA Ersoy P, Çetiner B. Performance Measurement in Cargo Distribution Center A Case Study. JTOM. Haziran 2022;6(1):1056-1064.
Chicago Ersoy, Pervin, ve Burak Çetiner. “Performance Measurement in Cargo Distribution Center A Case Study”. Journal of Turkish Operations Management 6, sy. 1 (Haziran 2022): 1056-64.
EndNote Ersoy P, Çetiner B (01 Haziran 2022) Performance Measurement in Cargo Distribution Center A Case Study. Journal of Turkish Operations Management 6 1 1056–1064.
IEEE P. Ersoy ve B. Çetiner, “Performance Measurement in Cargo Distribution Center A Case Study”, JTOM, c. 6, sy. 1, ss. 1056–1064, 2022.
ISNAD Ersoy, Pervin - Çetiner, Burak. “Performance Measurement in Cargo Distribution Center A Case Study”. Journal of Turkish Operations Management 6/1 (Haziran 2022), 1056-1064.
JAMA Ersoy P, Çetiner B. Performance Measurement in Cargo Distribution Center A Case Study. JTOM. 2022;6:1056–1064.
MLA Ersoy, Pervin ve Burak Çetiner. “Performance Measurement in Cargo Distribution Center A Case Study”. Journal of Turkish Operations Management, c. 6, sy. 1, 2022, ss. 1056-64.
Vancouver Ersoy P, Çetiner B. Performance Measurement in Cargo Distribution Center A Case Study. JTOM. 2022;6(1):1056-64.

2229319697  logo   logo-minik.png 200311739617396