In this study, the relationship between intermediate goods import (MI),
capital goods imports (MC), industrial production (IP) and economic
growth (GDP) in Turkey was explored by using the quarterly data consist of 32
observations between 2010Q1 – 2017Q4. VAR
Granger causality analysis was employed to explore the short-run causality and
the direction between variables. It is concluded: a) a bidirectional causality between GDP and MI b) a bidirectional causality
between (IP) and (MI), c) a unidirectional causality from IP to GDP,
d) a unidirectional causality from MC to MI and there is
not a causality between IP and MC. “Johansen Co-integration” test
results indicated a long-run relationship between, MC, MI,
IP and GDP. Variance decomposition test was employed to assess the variability of
the dependent variable over time. As a result,
while in the first period (quarter) GDP
is explained by itself at 100%. However In the tenth period GDP is explained by
18% GDP, 18% MC, 32% MI and 32% IP.. As a result, in the
short-term, industrial production and intermediate goods importation are the
determinants of economic growth. However, in the long-term, capital and
intermediate goods importation, industrial production are the determinants of economic growth in Turkey.
Economic Growth Intermediate Goods Imports Capital Goods Imports Industrial Production
Birincil Dil | İngilizce |
---|---|
Bölüm | Makaleler |
Yazarlar | |
Yayımlanma Tarihi | 31 Temmuz 2019 |
Yayımlandığı Sayı | Yıl 2019 Cilt: 14 Sayı: 55 |