Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Yıl 2024, Cilt: 19 Sayı: 73, 40 - 61, 31.01.2024

Zeynep Helin Zengin , Ebru Beyza Bayarçelik , Sinan Apak

https://doi.org/10.19168/jyasar.1245582
Cited By: 1

Öz

Kaynakça

  • Ağar F., 2010. Tedarik Zinciri Yönetiminde Scor Modeli, Tedarik Süreci Performans Değerlendirmesi ve Scorcard Uygulaması, İstanbul Teknik Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Yüksek Lisans Tezi, İstanbul.
  • Aksaraylı, M. ve Pala, O. 2017. Hibrit DEMATEL ve TOPSİS Yaklaşımı ile Bist Sektörleri Arası Performans Değerlendirmesi. International Congress of Management Economy and Policy.
  • Alomar, M. ve Zbigniew J. P. 2014. Linking supply chain strategy and processes to per-formance improvement. Procedia CIRP 17: 628-634.
  • Anand, G. ve Kodali, R., 2008. A conceptual framework for lean supply chain and its implementation. Int. J. Value Chain Manag. 2 (3), 313–357.
  • Angerhofer, B. J., ve Marios C. A. 2006. A model and a performance measurement system for collaborative supply chains. Decision support systems 42.1: 283-301.
  • Ansari, Z. N. ve Kant, R. 2017. A state-of-art literature review reflecting 15 years of focus on sustainable supply chain management. Journal of Cleaner Production, 142(4), 2524-2543.
  • Ayçın E. ve Özveri O. 2015. Bulanık Modelleme ile Tedarik Zinciri Performansının Değerlendirilmesi ve İmalat Sektöründe Bir Uygulama, Journal of Economics and Administrative Sciences-Volume: XVII Issue:1, 51-60.
  • Bakir, S., Khan, S., Ahsan, K. ve Rahman, S. 2018. Exploring the critical determinants of environmentally oriented public procurement using the dematel method. Journal of Environmental Management, 225, 325-335.
  • Bappy, M. M., Ali, S. M., Kabir, G. ve Paul, S. K. 2019. Supply chain sustainability assessment with Dempster-Shafer evidence theory: Implications in cleaner production. Journal of Cleaner Production, 237, 117771.
  • Beamon, Benita M. 1999. Measuring supply chain performance. International journal of operations & production management19.3: 275-292.
  • Blanchard, D., 2010. Supply chain Management Best Practices, second ed. John & Wiley Sons, UK.
  • Blos, M., Hoeflich, S., Miyagi, P., 2015. A general supply chain continuity management framework. Proced. Comput. Sci. 55, 1160–1164. 2
  • Bourlakis, M. A ve Weightman P. W. H. 2004. Food Supply Chain Managament. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
  • Bourlakis, M., Maglaras, G., Aktas, E., Gallear, D. ve Fotopoulos, C. 2014. Firm size and sustainable performance in food supply chains: Insights from Greek SMEs. International Journal of Production Economics, 152, 112-130.
  • Brewer, P. C., ve Thomas W. S. 2000. Using the balanced scorecard to measure supply chain performance. Journal of Business logistics 21.1: 75
  • Bruce, M., Daly, L., Towers, N., 2004. Lean or agile: a solution for supply chain management in the textiles and clothing industry? Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manag. 24 (2), 151–170.
  • Butar M., Sanders D., ve Frei R. 2016. Measuring Performance of Reverse Supply Chains in a Carpet Manufacturer, Journal of Advanced Management Science Vol. 4, No. 2.
  • Cagliano, R., Caniato, F., Spina, G., 2006. The linkage between supply chain integration and manufacturing improvement programmes. Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manag. 26 (3), 282–299.
  • Carvalho, H., Susana G. A. ve Virgilio C. M. 2012. Agile and resilient approaches to supply chain management: influence on performance and competitiveness. Logistics research 4.1-2: 49-62.
  • Chan, F., TS. 2003. Performance measurement in a supply chain. The international journal of advanced manufacturing technology21.7: 534-548.
  • Chardine-Baumann, E. ve Botta-Genoulaz, V. 2014. A framework for sustainable performance assessment of supply chain management practices. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 76, 138-147.
  • Chimhamhiwa, D., van der Molen, P., Mutanga, O., ve Rugege, D. 2009. Towards a framework for measuring end to end performance of land administration business processes–A case study. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 33(4), 293-301.
  • Cox, A., ve Chicksand, D. 2005. The Limits of Lean Management Thinking: Multiple Retailers and Food and Farming Supply Chains. European Management Journal, Volume 23, Issue 6, p. 648-662.
  • Dianhua, W. ve Douxuan, H. 2010. Food Supply Chain Management Under Conditions of Food Safety. 2010 International Conference on Management and Service Science.
  • Dissanayake C. K. ve Cross J. A. 2018. Systematic mechanism for identifying the relative impact of supply chain performance areas on the overall supply chain performance using SCOR model and SEM, International Journal of Production Economics 201, 102–115.
  • Dong, Y., Carter, C., Dresner, M., 2001. JIT purchasing and performance: an exploratory analysis of buyer and supplier perspectives. J. Oper. Manag. 19 (4), 471–483.
  • Fernandes, S. 2018. Systematic literature review on the ways of measuring the of reverse logistics performance." Gestão & Produção 25.1: 175- 190.
  • Fitzgerald, L., Johnston, R., Brignall, S., Silvestro, R. ve Voss, C. 1991. Performance measurement in service businesses. Management Accounting 69.10: 34-36.
  • Flynn, B.B., Huo, B., Zhao, X., 2010. The impact of supply chain integration on performance: a contingency and configuration approach. J. Oper. Manag. 28 (1), 58–71.
  • Frazzon, E.M., Albrecht, A., Hurtado, P.A., de Souza Silva, L., Pannek, J., 2015. Hybrid modelling approach for the scheduling and control of integrated production and logistic processes along export supply chains. IFAC-PapersOnLine 48 (3), 1521–1526.
  • Ganeshkumar, C., Pachayappan, M., ve Madanmohan, G. 2017. Agri-food Supply Chain Management: Literature Review. Intelligent Information Management, 9, p. 68-96.
  • Ganga, G., Carpinetti, L. C. R. ve Politano, P. 2011. A fuzzy logic approach to supply chain performance management. Gestão & Produção 18.4: 755-774.
  • Goldsby, T., Griffis, S., Roath, A., 2006. Modeling lean, agile, and leagile supply chain strategies. J. Bus. Logist. 27 (1), 57–79.
  • Golrizgashti, S. 2014. Supply chain value creation methodology under BSC approach. Journal of Industrial Engineering International 10.3: 67.
  • Gökoğlan, K. ve Atalan, İ. 2022. Tarımsal Gıda Ürünlerinin Tedarik Zinciri Yönetimine Blok Zincir Teknolojisinin Etkisi. Kırşehir Ahi Evran Üniversitesi, İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt 6, Sayı 1.
  • Green, K., Inman, R., Birou, L., Whitten, D., 2014. Total JIT (T-JIT) and its impact on supply chain competency and organizational performance. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 147, 125–135.
  • Guimarães da S., José L. ve Valério S. 2015. ANP applied to the evaluation of performance indicators of reverse logistics in footwear industry. Procedia Computer Science 55: 139-148.
  • Hemalatha, S., Rao, K. N., Rambabu, G., ve Venkatasubbaiah, K. 2017. Supply chain performance evaluation through AHM and Membership degree transformation. Materials Today: Proceedings, 4(8), 7848-7858.
  • Hines, P., Holweg, M., Rich, N., 2004. Learning to evolve: a literature review of contemporary lean thinking. Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manag. 24 (10), 994–1011.
  • Jasti, N.V., Kodali, R., 2015 Oct 3. A critical review of lean supply chain management frameworks: proposed framework. Prod. Plan. Control. 26 (13), 1051–1068.
  • Kafa, N., Hani, Y. ve El Mhamedı, A. 2013. Sustainability performance measurement for green supply chain management. IFAC Proceedings Volumes, 46.24: 71-78.
  • Kamble, S. S., Gunasekaran, A. ve Gawankar, S. A. 2020. Achieving sustainable performance in a data-driven agriculture supply chain: A review for research and applications. International Journal of Production Economics, 219, 179-194.
  • Kaplan, R.S., Norton, D.P. 1997. Balanced scorecard: translating strategy into action. 4 th Edition. Harvard Business School Press, Boston.
  • Katiyar, R., Meena, P. L., Barua, M. K., Tibrewala, R. ve Kumar, G. 2018. Impact of sustainability and manufacturing practices on supply chain performance: Findings from an emerging economy. International Journal of Production Economics, 197, 303-316.
  • Keleş, B. ve Ova, G. 2020. Gıda Tedarik Zinciri Yönetiminde Bilgi Teknolojileri Kullanımı. Adnan Menderes Üniversitesi, Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, 17(1):137-143.
  • Kocaoğlu B., 2009. Tedarik Zinciri Performansı Ölçümü İçin Stratejik ve Operasyonel Hedefleri Bütün-leştiren SCOR Modeli Temelli Bir Yapı, Doktora Tezi, Yıldız Teknik Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, İstanbul.
  • Levy, D.L., 1997. Lean production in an international supply chain. Sloan Manag. Rev. 38, 94–102.
  • Lewis, M., 2006. Lean production and sustainable competitive advantage. In: Rhodes, E., Warren, J., Carter, R. (Eds.), Supply Chain and Total Product Systems: a Reader. The Open University, Milton Keynes, pp. 306–326. Li, D., Wang, X., Chan, H. ve Manzini, R. 2014. Sustainable Food Supply Chain Management. Int. J. Production Economics, 152, 1-8.
  • Li, Z., Xiaoxia X. ve Arun K. 2007. Supply chain performance evaluation from struc-tural and operational levels. Emerging Technologies and Factory Automation, 2007. ETFA. IEEE Conference on. IEEE.
  • Lima-Junior, F. R., ve Carpinetti, L. C. R. 2019. Predicting supply chain performance based on SCOR® metrics and multilayer perceptron neural networks. International Journal of Production Economics, 212, 19-38.
  • Mahalik, N. ve Kim, K. 2016. The Role of Information Technology Developments in Food Supply Chain Integration and Monitoring. Innovation and Future Trends in Food Manufacturing and Supply Chain Technologies: 21-37.
  • Makinde, O., 2020. Mowandi, T., Munyai, T., & Ayomoh, M. Performance evaluation of the supply chain system of a food product manufacturing system using a questionnaire-based approach. Procedia Manufacturing, 43, 751-757.
  • Manzini, R., ve Accorsi, R. 2012. The New Conceptual Framework for Food Supply Chain Assessment. Journal of Food Engineering, 115, p. 251-263.
  • Manzouri, M., Rahman, M., Saibani, N. ve Zain, C. 2013. Lean Supply Chain Practices in the Halal Food. International Journal of Lean Six Sigma, Vol. 4, No. 4, pp. 389-408.
  • McCullen, P., Towill, D., 2001. Achieving lean supply through agile manufacturing. Integr. Manuf. Syst. 12 (7), 524–533.
  • Moshtaghfard R., Arbabshirani B. ve Alinaghian M. 2016. Reverse Logistics Performance Measurement by Integrated Balanced Scorecard and Data Envelopment Analysis (Case Study in Pak Dairy Co.), International Journal of Advances in Management Science (IJ-AMS), Volume 5.
  • Moyano-Fuentes, J., Sacristan-Díaz, M., 2012. Learning on lean: a review of thinking and research. Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manag. 32 (5), 551–582.
  • Özalp Ö. 2016. Tedarik Zinciri Performansının Ölçümü: Ekonomik Katma Değer Yönteminin Analizi, Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, İzmir.
  • Öztürk, D. ve Tekin, M. 2020. Tedarik Zinciri Yönetiminin İşletme Performansı Üzerindeki Etkisi: Gıda Sektöründe Bir Uygulama. Reseacrh Journal of Business and Management- RJBM, Vol. 7, Issue. 2, p.56-66.
  • Parker, C., 2000. Performance measurement. Work study 49.2: 63-66.
  • Perez, C., Castro, R., Simons, D., Gimenez, G., 2010. Development of lean supply chains: a case study of the Catalan pork sector. Supply Chain Manag. Int. J. 15 (1), 55–68.
  • Petra, N., Marek, V., 2015. Lean supply chains in engineering, metallurgy and key principles of their management. In: Metal 2015, Brno, Czech Republic.
  • Pila, J., Monroy, C., Antelo, R., Torrubiano, J. ve Roldan, L. 2007. Designing Food Supply Chains: An Application of Lean Manufacturing and Lean Supply Chain Paradigms to the Spanish Egg Industry. European Association of Agricultural Economists (EAAE).
  • Pires, S. R. ve Carlos H. M. A. 2001. Measuring supply chain performance. Anais da XII annual conference of POMS.
  • Power, D., 2005. Supply chain management integration and implementation: a literature review. Supply Chain Manag. Int. J. 10 (4), 252–263.
  • Ramezankhani M.J., Torabi S. A. ve Vahidi F. 2018. Supply chain performance measurement and evalua-tion: A mixed sustainability and resilience approach, Computers & Industrial Engineering 126, 531–548.
  • Riet, C., Clerck, D., Demeulemeester, E., 2015. Lean beyond Company Borders: Costs or Benefits? Faculty of Economics and Business of KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
  • Sezen, G. 2011. Gıda Zincirlerinde Dağıtım Ağı Tasarımı: Hollanda’ da Bir Uygulama. Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Adnan Menderes Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Aydın.
  • Shah, R., Ward, P., 2003. Lean manufacturing: context, practice bundles, and performance. J. Oper. Manag. 21, 129–149.
  • Shah, R., Ward, P., 2007. Defining and developing measures of lean production. J. Oper. Manag. 25 (4), 785–805.
  • Sharma, R., Kamble, S. S., Gunasekaran, A., Kumar, V. ve Kumar, A. A. 2020. Systematic literature review on machine learning applications for sustainable agriculture supply chain performance. Computers & Operations Research, 104926.
  • Si, S. L., You, X. Y., Liu, H. C. ve Zhang, P. 2018. DEMATEL technique: A systematic review of the state-of-the-art literature on methodologies and applications. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2018, 1-33.
  • Soni, G., Kodali, R., 2012. Evaluating reliability and validity of lean, agile and leagile supply chain constructs in Indian manufacturing industry. Prod. Plan. Control 23 (10–11), 864–884.
  • Subramanian, L., Alexiou, C., Steele, P. ve Tolani, F. 2020. Developing a sustainability index for public health supply chains. Sustainable Futures, 100019.
  • Sufiyan, M., 2019. Haleem, A., Khan, S., & Khan, M. I. Evaluating food supply chain performance using hybrid fuzzy MCDM technique. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 20, 40-57.
  • Şen, E. 2006. Kobilerin Uluslararası Rekabet Güçlerini Artırmada Tedarik Zinciri Yönetiminin Önemi, İGEME Yayınları, Ankara, 1-56.
  • Tao, X. 2009. Performance evaluation of supply chain based on fuzzy matter-element theory. Information Management, Innovation Management and Industrial Engineering, 2009 Inter-national Conference on. Vol. 1. IEEE.
  • Taylor, D. 2006. Strategic Considerations in the Development of Lean Agri-Food Supply Chains: A Case Study of the UK pork Sector. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, Volume 11, Number 3, 271-280.
  • Taylor, D., 2006. Strategic considerations in the development of lean agri-food supply chains: a case study of the UK pork sector. Supply Chain Manag. Int. J. 11 (3), 271–280.
  • Theagarajan, S., Manohar, H., 2015. Lean management practices to improve supply chain performance of leather footwear industry. In: 2015 International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management, Dubai, United Arab Emirates.
  • Tortorella, G., Marodin, G., Fettermann, D., Fogliatto, F., 2016. Relationships between lean product development enablers and problems. Int. J. Prod. Res. 54 (10), 2837–2855.
  • Tsai, W. H. ve Chou, W.C. 2009. Selecting management systems for sustainable development in SMEs: A novel hybrid model based on DEMATEL, ANP and ZOGP. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(2), 1444-1458.
  • Tyagi, M., Pradeep K. ve Dinesh K. 2015. Parametric selection of alternatives to improve performance of green supply chain management system. Procedia- Social and Behavioral Sciences 189: 449-457.
  • Tzeng, G. H., Chiang, C. H.,ve Li, C. W. 2007. Evaluating intertwined effects in e-learning programs: A novel hybrid MCDM model based on factor analysis and DEMATEL. Expert systems with Applications, 32(4), 1028-1044.
  • Uçal Sarı, İ., Çayır Ervural, B. ve Bozat, S. 2017. Sürdürülebilir tedarik zinciri yönetiminde DEMATEL yöntemiyle tedarikçi değerlendirme kriterlerinin incelenmesi ve sağlık sektöründe bir uygulama. Pamukkale Univ Muh Bilim Derg, 23(4), 477-485.
  • Wee, H., Wu, S., 2009. Lean supply chain and its effect on product cost and quality: a case study on Ford Motor company. Supply Chain Manag. Int. J. 14 (5), 335–341.
  • Womack, J., Jones, D., 2003. Lean Thinking: Banish Waste and Create Wealth in Your Corporation. Simon & Schuster Inc, London.
  • Womack, J., Jones, D., 2005. Lean consumption. Harv. Bus. Rev. 83 (3), 58–68.
  • Wong, W., Ignatius, J., Soh, K., 2014. What is the leanness level of your organisation in lean transformation implementation? An integrated lean index using ANP approach. Prod. Plan. Control 25 (4), 273–287.
  • Yavuz, O. ve Ersoy, A. 2013. Tedarik Zinciri Performansının Değerlendirilmesinde Kullanılan Değişkenle-rin Yapay Sinir Ağı Yöntemiyle Değerlendirilmesi, Gazi Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi 15 /2, 209-256.
  • Yellepeddi, S. S., S. Rajagopalan ve D. H. Liles. 2005. "A balanced scorecard approach for an effective reverse supply chain in electronics industry." Proceedings of the Annual Conference of International Journal of Industrial Engineering, Clearwater, Florida, USA, December.
  • Yeong-Dong, H., Yi-Ching, L., ve Jung, L., Jr. 2008. The performance evaluation of SCOR sourcing process-The case study of Taiwan's TFT-LCD industry. International Journal of Pro-duction Economics 115.2: 411-423.
  • Yontar, E., 2020. Sürdürülebilir Tedarik Zinciri Yönetiminde Performans Endeksi Modeli: Gıda Sektörü Örneği. Kırıkkale Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü.
  • Yusuf, Y., Gunasekaran, A., Adeleye, E. ve Sivayoganathan, K., 2004. Agile supply chain capabilities: determinants of competitive objectives. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 159, 379–392.
  • Zhong, R., Xu, X., ve Wang, L. 2016. Food Supply Chain Management: Systems, Implementations and Future Research. Industrial Management & Data Systems, Vol. 117, No. 9, pp. 2085-2114.
  • Zimmer, K., Frohling, M. ve Schultmann, F. 2016. Sustainable supplier management – a review of models supporting sustainable supplier selection, monitoring and development. International journal of production research, 54(5): 1412–42.

Gıda Sektöründe Yalın Tedarik Zinciri Yönetimi ile Tedarik Zinciri Yönetimi Arasında Performans Değerlendirmesi

Yıl 2024, Cilt: 19 Sayı: 73, 40 - 61, 31.01.2024

Zeynep Helin Zengin , Ebru Beyza Bayarçelik , Sinan Apak

https://doi.org/10.19168/jyasar.1245582
Cited By: 1

Öz

Gıda üretimi, topraktan toplanan ham maddelerin işlenmesi ile başlar. Kaynakların verimli kullanılması, üretilen gıdaların paketlenmesinde ve dağıtımında en önemli husus, verimliliği artırmak ve hataları en aza indirmektir. Bu, yalnızca tedarik zinciri yönetimi sürecine yalın ilkelerin uygulanmasıyla elde edilebilir. Bu çalışmanın temel amacı, öncelikle Yalın Tedarik Zinciri Yönetimi söz konusu olduğunda dikkate alınması gereken kesin uygulamaları ve ilkeleri tanımlamaktır. İkincisi, yalın tedarik zinciri yönetimi ilkeleri ile gıda sektörüne dayalı tedarik zinciri yönetimi performansı farklarını ve ilişkilerini ortaya koymaktır. Yalın Tedarik Zinciri Yönetiminin sistematik olarak uygulanmasının arka planı ve sonuçları ile tedarik zinciri yönetimi performans değerlendirmesi hakkında çok fazla çalışma yoktur. Bu nedenle yalın tedarik zinciri yönetimi ve tedarik zinciri yönetimi ilkelerinin performansı nasıl etkilediğini göstermek çok önemlidir ve makalenin temel amacı da budur.

Gıda sektörü düşünülerek yürütülen çalışma, yalın tedarik zinciri yönetimi ile tedarik zinciri yönetimi arasındaki temel performans göstergelerini ölçmek üzerine planlanmıştır. Çalışmada ilk olarak gıda tedarik zinciri yönetimi ve gıda yalın tedarik zinciri yönetimindeki temel performans ölçütleri belirlenmiştir ve literatür araştırması ile birleştirilmiştir. Daha sonra nihai puanı elde etmek ve her boyut için performans indeksini hesaplamak üzere DEMATEL yöntemi uygulanmıştır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Gıda Sektörü Tedarik Zinciri Yönetimi Yalın Tedarik Zinciri Yönetimi Performans Değerlendirme

Kaynakça

  • Ağar F., 2010. Tedarik Zinciri Yönetiminde Scor Modeli, Tedarik Süreci Performans Değerlendirmesi ve Scorcard Uygulaması, İstanbul Teknik Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Yüksek Lisans Tezi, İstanbul.
  • Aksaraylı, M. ve Pala, O. 2017. Hibrit DEMATEL ve TOPSİS Yaklaşımı ile Bist Sektörleri Arası Performans Değerlendirmesi. International Congress of Management Economy and Policy.
  • Alomar, M. ve Zbigniew J. P. 2014. Linking supply chain strategy and processes to per-formance improvement. Procedia CIRP 17: 628-634.
  • Anand, G. ve Kodali, R., 2008. A conceptual framework for lean supply chain and its implementation. Int. J. Value Chain Manag. 2 (3), 313–357.
  • Angerhofer, B. J., ve Marios C. A. 2006. A model and a performance measurement system for collaborative supply chains. Decision support systems 42.1: 283-301.
  • Ansari, Z. N. ve Kant, R. 2017. A state-of-art literature review reflecting 15 years of focus on sustainable supply chain management. Journal of Cleaner Production, 142(4), 2524-2543.
  • Ayçın E. ve Özveri O. 2015. Bulanık Modelleme ile Tedarik Zinciri Performansının Değerlendirilmesi ve İmalat Sektöründe Bir Uygulama, Journal of Economics and Administrative Sciences-Volume: XVII Issue:1, 51-60.
  • Bakir, S., Khan, S., Ahsan, K. ve Rahman, S. 2018. Exploring the critical determinants of environmentally oriented public procurement using the dematel method. Journal of Environmental Management, 225, 325-335.
  • Bappy, M. M., Ali, S. M., Kabir, G. ve Paul, S. K. 2019. Supply chain sustainability assessment with Dempster-Shafer evidence theory: Implications in cleaner production. Journal of Cleaner Production, 237, 117771.
  • Beamon, Benita M. 1999. Measuring supply chain performance. International journal of operations & production management19.3: 275-292.
  • Blanchard, D., 2010. Supply chain Management Best Practices, second ed. John & Wiley Sons, UK.
  • Blos, M., Hoeflich, S., Miyagi, P., 2015. A general supply chain continuity management framework. Proced. Comput. Sci. 55, 1160–1164. 2
  • Bourlakis, M. A ve Weightman P. W. H. 2004. Food Supply Chain Managament. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
  • Bourlakis, M., Maglaras, G., Aktas, E., Gallear, D. ve Fotopoulos, C. 2014. Firm size and sustainable performance in food supply chains: Insights from Greek SMEs. International Journal of Production Economics, 152, 112-130.
  • Brewer, P. C., ve Thomas W. S. 2000. Using the balanced scorecard to measure supply chain performance. Journal of Business logistics 21.1: 75
  • Bruce, M., Daly, L., Towers, N., 2004. Lean or agile: a solution for supply chain management in the textiles and clothing industry? Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manag. 24 (2), 151–170.
  • Butar M., Sanders D., ve Frei R. 2016. Measuring Performance of Reverse Supply Chains in a Carpet Manufacturer, Journal of Advanced Management Science Vol. 4, No. 2.
  • Cagliano, R., Caniato, F., Spina, G., 2006. The linkage between supply chain integration and manufacturing improvement programmes. Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manag. 26 (3), 282–299.
  • Carvalho, H., Susana G. A. ve Virgilio C. M. 2012. Agile and resilient approaches to supply chain management: influence on performance and competitiveness. Logistics research 4.1-2: 49-62.
  • Chan, F., TS. 2003. Performance measurement in a supply chain. The international journal of advanced manufacturing technology21.7: 534-548.
  • Chardine-Baumann, E. ve Botta-Genoulaz, V. 2014. A framework for sustainable performance assessment of supply chain management practices. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 76, 138-147.
  • Chimhamhiwa, D., van der Molen, P., Mutanga, O., ve Rugege, D. 2009. Towards a framework for measuring end to end performance of land administration business processes–A case study. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 33(4), 293-301.
  • Cox, A., ve Chicksand, D. 2005. The Limits of Lean Management Thinking: Multiple Retailers and Food and Farming Supply Chains. European Management Journal, Volume 23, Issue 6, p. 648-662.
  • Dianhua, W. ve Douxuan, H. 2010. Food Supply Chain Management Under Conditions of Food Safety. 2010 International Conference on Management and Service Science.
  • Dissanayake C. K. ve Cross J. A. 2018. Systematic mechanism for identifying the relative impact of supply chain performance areas on the overall supply chain performance using SCOR model and SEM, International Journal of Production Economics 201, 102–115.
  • Dong, Y., Carter, C., Dresner, M., 2001. JIT purchasing and performance: an exploratory analysis of buyer and supplier perspectives. J. Oper. Manag. 19 (4), 471–483.
  • Fernandes, S. 2018. Systematic literature review on the ways of measuring the of reverse logistics performance." Gestão & Produção 25.1: 175- 190.
  • Fitzgerald, L., Johnston, R., Brignall, S., Silvestro, R. ve Voss, C. 1991. Performance measurement in service businesses. Management Accounting 69.10: 34-36.
  • Flynn, B.B., Huo, B., Zhao, X., 2010. The impact of supply chain integration on performance: a contingency and configuration approach. J. Oper. Manag. 28 (1), 58–71.
  • Frazzon, E.M., Albrecht, A., Hurtado, P.A., de Souza Silva, L., Pannek, J., 2015. Hybrid modelling approach for the scheduling and control of integrated production and logistic processes along export supply chains. IFAC-PapersOnLine 48 (3), 1521–1526.
  • Ganeshkumar, C., Pachayappan, M., ve Madanmohan, G. 2017. Agri-food Supply Chain Management: Literature Review. Intelligent Information Management, 9, p. 68-96.
  • Ganga, G., Carpinetti, L. C. R. ve Politano, P. 2011. A fuzzy logic approach to supply chain performance management. Gestão & Produção 18.4: 755-774.
  • Goldsby, T., Griffis, S., Roath, A., 2006. Modeling lean, agile, and leagile supply chain strategies. J. Bus. Logist. 27 (1), 57–79.
  • Golrizgashti, S. 2014. Supply chain value creation methodology under BSC approach. Journal of Industrial Engineering International 10.3: 67.
  • Gökoğlan, K. ve Atalan, İ. 2022. Tarımsal Gıda Ürünlerinin Tedarik Zinciri Yönetimine Blok Zincir Teknolojisinin Etkisi. Kırşehir Ahi Evran Üniversitesi, İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt 6, Sayı 1.
  • Green, K., Inman, R., Birou, L., Whitten, D., 2014. Total JIT (T-JIT) and its impact on supply chain competency and organizational performance. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 147, 125–135.
  • Guimarães da S., José L. ve Valério S. 2015. ANP applied to the evaluation of performance indicators of reverse logistics in footwear industry. Procedia Computer Science 55: 139-148.
  • Hemalatha, S., Rao, K. N., Rambabu, G., ve Venkatasubbaiah, K. 2017. Supply chain performance evaluation through AHM and Membership degree transformation. Materials Today: Proceedings, 4(8), 7848-7858.
  • Hines, P., Holweg, M., Rich, N., 2004. Learning to evolve: a literature review of contemporary lean thinking. Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manag. 24 (10), 994–1011.
  • Jasti, N.V., Kodali, R., 2015 Oct 3. A critical review of lean supply chain management frameworks: proposed framework. Prod. Plan. Control. 26 (13), 1051–1068.
  • Kafa, N., Hani, Y. ve El Mhamedı, A. 2013. Sustainability performance measurement for green supply chain management. IFAC Proceedings Volumes, 46.24: 71-78.
  • Kamble, S. S., Gunasekaran, A. ve Gawankar, S. A. 2020. Achieving sustainable performance in a data-driven agriculture supply chain: A review for research and applications. International Journal of Production Economics, 219, 179-194.
  • Kaplan, R.S., Norton, D.P. 1997. Balanced scorecard: translating strategy into action. 4 th Edition. Harvard Business School Press, Boston.
  • Katiyar, R., Meena, P. L., Barua, M. K., Tibrewala, R. ve Kumar, G. 2018. Impact of sustainability and manufacturing practices on supply chain performance: Findings from an emerging economy. International Journal of Production Economics, 197, 303-316.
  • Keleş, B. ve Ova, G. 2020. Gıda Tedarik Zinciri Yönetiminde Bilgi Teknolojileri Kullanımı. Adnan Menderes Üniversitesi, Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, 17(1):137-143.
  • Kocaoğlu B., 2009. Tedarik Zinciri Performansı Ölçümü İçin Stratejik ve Operasyonel Hedefleri Bütün-leştiren SCOR Modeli Temelli Bir Yapı, Doktora Tezi, Yıldız Teknik Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, İstanbul.
  • Levy, D.L., 1997. Lean production in an international supply chain. Sloan Manag. Rev. 38, 94–102.
  • Lewis, M., 2006. Lean production and sustainable competitive advantage. In: Rhodes, E., Warren, J., Carter, R. (Eds.), Supply Chain and Total Product Systems: a Reader. The Open University, Milton Keynes, pp. 306–326. Li, D., Wang, X., Chan, H. ve Manzini, R. 2014. Sustainable Food Supply Chain Management. Int. J. Production Economics, 152, 1-8.
  • Li, Z., Xiaoxia X. ve Arun K. 2007. Supply chain performance evaluation from struc-tural and operational levels. Emerging Technologies and Factory Automation, 2007. ETFA. IEEE Conference on. IEEE.
  • Lima-Junior, F. R., ve Carpinetti, L. C. R. 2019. Predicting supply chain performance based on SCOR® metrics and multilayer perceptron neural networks. International Journal of Production Economics, 212, 19-38.
  • Mahalik, N. ve Kim, K. 2016. The Role of Information Technology Developments in Food Supply Chain Integration and Monitoring. Innovation and Future Trends in Food Manufacturing and Supply Chain Technologies: 21-37.
  • Makinde, O., 2020. Mowandi, T., Munyai, T., & Ayomoh, M. Performance evaluation of the supply chain system of a food product manufacturing system using a questionnaire-based approach. Procedia Manufacturing, 43, 751-757.
  • Manzini, R., ve Accorsi, R. 2012. The New Conceptual Framework for Food Supply Chain Assessment. Journal of Food Engineering, 115, p. 251-263.
  • Manzouri, M., Rahman, M., Saibani, N. ve Zain, C. 2013. Lean Supply Chain Practices in the Halal Food. International Journal of Lean Six Sigma, Vol. 4, No. 4, pp. 389-408.
  • McCullen, P., Towill, D., 2001. Achieving lean supply through agile manufacturing. Integr. Manuf. Syst. 12 (7), 524–533.
  • Moshtaghfard R., Arbabshirani B. ve Alinaghian M. 2016. Reverse Logistics Performance Measurement by Integrated Balanced Scorecard and Data Envelopment Analysis (Case Study in Pak Dairy Co.), International Journal of Advances in Management Science (IJ-AMS), Volume 5.
  • Moyano-Fuentes, J., Sacristan-Díaz, M., 2012. Learning on lean: a review of thinking and research. Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manag. 32 (5), 551–582.
  • Özalp Ö. 2016. Tedarik Zinciri Performansının Ölçümü: Ekonomik Katma Değer Yönteminin Analizi, Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, İzmir.
  • Öztürk, D. ve Tekin, M. 2020. Tedarik Zinciri Yönetiminin İşletme Performansı Üzerindeki Etkisi: Gıda Sektöründe Bir Uygulama. Reseacrh Journal of Business and Management- RJBM, Vol. 7, Issue. 2, p.56-66.
  • Parker, C., 2000. Performance measurement. Work study 49.2: 63-66.
  • Perez, C., Castro, R., Simons, D., Gimenez, G., 2010. Development of lean supply chains: a case study of the Catalan pork sector. Supply Chain Manag. Int. J. 15 (1), 55–68.
  • Petra, N., Marek, V., 2015. Lean supply chains in engineering, metallurgy and key principles of their management. In: Metal 2015, Brno, Czech Republic.
  • Pila, J., Monroy, C., Antelo, R., Torrubiano, J. ve Roldan, L. 2007. Designing Food Supply Chains: An Application of Lean Manufacturing and Lean Supply Chain Paradigms to the Spanish Egg Industry. European Association of Agricultural Economists (EAAE).
  • Pires, S. R. ve Carlos H. M. A. 2001. Measuring supply chain performance. Anais da XII annual conference of POMS.
  • Power, D., 2005. Supply chain management integration and implementation: a literature review. Supply Chain Manag. Int. J. 10 (4), 252–263.
  • Ramezankhani M.J., Torabi S. A. ve Vahidi F. 2018. Supply chain performance measurement and evalua-tion: A mixed sustainability and resilience approach, Computers & Industrial Engineering 126, 531–548.
  • Riet, C., Clerck, D., Demeulemeester, E., 2015. Lean beyond Company Borders: Costs or Benefits? Faculty of Economics and Business of KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
  • Sezen, G. 2011. Gıda Zincirlerinde Dağıtım Ağı Tasarımı: Hollanda’ da Bir Uygulama. Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Adnan Menderes Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Aydın.
  • Shah, R., Ward, P., 2003. Lean manufacturing: context, practice bundles, and performance. J. Oper. Manag. 21, 129–149.
  • Shah, R., Ward, P., 2007. Defining and developing measures of lean production. J. Oper. Manag. 25 (4), 785–805.
  • Sharma, R., Kamble, S. S., Gunasekaran, A., Kumar, V. ve Kumar, A. A. 2020. Systematic literature review on machine learning applications for sustainable agriculture supply chain performance. Computers & Operations Research, 104926.
  • Si, S. L., You, X. Y., Liu, H. C. ve Zhang, P. 2018. DEMATEL technique: A systematic review of the state-of-the-art literature on methodologies and applications. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2018, 1-33.
  • Soni, G., Kodali, R., 2012. Evaluating reliability and validity of lean, agile and leagile supply chain constructs in Indian manufacturing industry. Prod. Plan. Control 23 (10–11), 864–884.
  • Subramanian, L., Alexiou, C., Steele, P. ve Tolani, F. 2020. Developing a sustainability index for public health supply chains. Sustainable Futures, 100019.
  • Sufiyan, M., 2019. Haleem, A., Khan, S., & Khan, M. I. Evaluating food supply chain performance using hybrid fuzzy MCDM technique. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 20, 40-57.
  • Şen, E. 2006. Kobilerin Uluslararası Rekabet Güçlerini Artırmada Tedarik Zinciri Yönetiminin Önemi, İGEME Yayınları, Ankara, 1-56.
  • Tao, X. 2009. Performance evaluation of supply chain based on fuzzy matter-element theory. Information Management, Innovation Management and Industrial Engineering, 2009 Inter-national Conference on. Vol. 1. IEEE.
  • Taylor, D. 2006. Strategic Considerations in the Development of Lean Agri-Food Supply Chains: A Case Study of the UK pork Sector. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, Volume 11, Number 3, 271-280.
  • Taylor, D., 2006. Strategic considerations in the development of lean agri-food supply chains: a case study of the UK pork sector. Supply Chain Manag. Int. J. 11 (3), 271–280.
  • Theagarajan, S., Manohar, H., 2015. Lean management practices to improve supply chain performance of leather footwear industry. In: 2015 International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management, Dubai, United Arab Emirates.
  • Tortorella, G., Marodin, G., Fettermann, D., Fogliatto, F., 2016. Relationships between lean product development enablers and problems. Int. J. Prod. Res. 54 (10), 2837–2855.
  • Tsai, W. H. ve Chou, W.C. 2009. Selecting management systems for sustainable development in SMEs: A novel hybrid model based on DEMATEL, ANP and ZOGP. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(2), 1444-1458.
  • Tyagi, M., Pradeep K. ve Dinesh K. 2015. Parametric selection of alternatives to improve performance of green supply chain management system. Procedia- Social and Behavioral Sciences 189: 449-457.
  • Tzeng, G. H., Chiang, C. H.,ve Li, C. W. 2007. Evaluating intertwined effects in e-learning programs: A novel hybrid MCDM model based on factor analysis and DEMATEL. Expert systems with Applications, 32(4), 1028-1044.
  • Uçal Sarı, İ., Çayır Ervural, B. ve Bozat, S. 2017. Sürdürülebilir tedarik zinciri yönetiminde DEMATEL yöntemiyle tedarikçi değerlendirme kriterlerinin incelenmesi ve sağlık sektöründe bir uygulama. Pamukkale Univ Muh Bilim Derg, 23(4), 477-485.
  • Wee, H., Wu, S., 2009. Lean supply chain and its effect on product cost and quality: a case study on Ford Motor company. Supply Chain Manag. Int. J. 14 (5), 335–341.
  • Womack, J., Jones, D., 2003. Lean Thinking: Banish Waste and Create Wealth in Your Corporation. Simon & Schuster Inc, London.
  • Womack, J., Jones, D., 2005. Lean consumption. Harv. Bus. Rev. 83 (3), 58–68.
  • Wong, W., Ignatius, J., Soh, K., 2014. What is the leanness level of your organisation in lean transformation implementation? An integrated lean index using ANP approach. Prod. Plan. Control 25 (4), 273–287.
  • Yavuz, O. ve Ersoy, A. 2013. Tedarik Zinciri Performansının Değerlendirilmesinde Kullanılan Değişkenle-rin Yapay Sinir Ağı Yöntemiyle Değerlendirilmesi, Gazi Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi 15 /2, 209-256.
  • Yellepeddi, S. S., S. Rajagopalan ve D. H. Liles. 2005. "A balanced scorecard approach for an effective reverse supply chain in electronics industry." Proceedings of the Annual Conference of International Journal of Industrial Engineering, Clearwater, Florida, USA, December.
  • Yeong-Dong, H., Yi-Ching, L., ve Jung, L., Jr. 2008. The performance evaluation of SCOR sourcing process-The case study of Taiwan's TFT-LCD industry. International Journal of Pro-duction Economics 115.2: 411-423.
  • Yontar, E., 2020. Sürdürülebilir Tedarik Zinciri Yönetiminde Performans Endeksi Modeli: Gıda Sektörü Örneği. Kırıkkale Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü.
  • Yusuf, Y., Gunasekaran, A., Adeleye, E. ve Sivayoganathan, K., 2004. Agile supply chain capabilities: determinants of competitive objectives. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 159, 379–392.
  • Zhong, R., Xu, X., ve Wang, L. 2016. Food Supply Chain Management: Systems, Implementations and Future Research. Industrial Management & Data Systems, Vol. 117, No. 9, pp. 2085-2114.
  • Zimmer, K., Frohling, M. ve Schultmann, F. 2016. Sustainable supplier management – a review of models supporting sustainable supplier selection, monitoring and development. International journal of production research, 54(5): 1412–42.
Toplam 96 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil Türkçe
Bölüm Makaleler
Yazarlar

Zeynep Helin Zengin 0000-0002-5792-0137

Ebru Beyza Bayarçelik 0000-0003-4886-5719

Sinan Apak 0000-0002-3263-7167

Erken Görünüm Tarihi 29 Şubat 2024
Yayımlanma Tarihi 31 Ocak 2024
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2024 Cilt: 19 Sayı: 73

Kaynak Göster

APA Zengin, Z. H., Bayarçelik, E. B., & Apak, S. (2024). Gıda Sektöründe Yalın Tedarik Zinciri Yönetimi ile Tedarik Zinciri Yönetimi Arasında Performans Değerlendirmesi. Yaşar Üniversitesi E-Dergisi, 19(73), 40-61. https://doi.org/10.19168/jyasar.1245582
AMA Zengin ZH, Bayarçelik EB, Apak S. Gıda Sektöründe Yalın Tedarik Zinciri Yönetimi ile Tedarik Zinciri Yönetimi Arasında Performans Değerlendirmesi. Yaşar Üniversitesi E-Dergisi. Ocak 2024;19(73):40-61. doi:10.19168/jyasar.1245582
Chicago Zengin, Zeynep Helin, Ebru Beyza Bayarçelik, ve Sinan Apak. “Gıda Sektöründe Yalın Tedarik Zinciri Yönetimi Ile Tedarik Zinciri Yönetimi Arasında Performans Değerlendirmesi”. Yaşar Üniversitesi E-Dergisi 19, sy. 73 (Ocak 2024): 40-61. https://doi.org/10.19168/jyasar.1245582.
EndNote Zengin ZH, Bayarçelik EB, Apak S (01 Ocak 2024) Gıda Sektöründe Yalın Tedarik Zinciri Yönetimi ile Tedarik Zinciri Yönetimi Arasında Performans Değerlendirmesi. Yaşar Üniversitesi E-Dergisi 19 73 40–61.
IEEE Z. H. Zengin, E. B. Bayarçelik, ve S. Apak, “Gıda Sektöründe Yalın Tedarik Zinciri Yönetimi ile Tedarik Zinciri Yönetimi Arasında Performans Değerlendirmesi”, Yaşar Üniversitesi E-Dergisi, c. 19, sy. 73, ss. 40–61, 2024, doi: 10.19168/jyasar.1245582.
ISNAD Zengin, Zeynep Helin vd. “Gıda Sektöründe Yalın Tedarik Zinciri Yönetimi Ile Tedarik Zinciri Yönetimi Arasında Performans Değerlendirmesi”. Yaşar Üniversitesi E-Dergisi 19/73 (Ocak 2024), 40-61. https://doi.org/10.19168/jyasar.1245582.
JAMA Zengin ZH, Bayarçelik EB, Apak S. Gıda Sektöründe Yalın Tedarik Zinciri Yönetimi ile Tedarik Zinciri Yönetimi Arasında Performans Değerlendirmesi. Yaşar Üniversitesi E-Dergisi. 2024;19:40–61.
MLA Zengin, Zeynep Helin vd. “Gıda Sektöründe Yalın Tedarik Zinciri Yönetimi Ile Tedarik Zinciri Yönetimi Arasında Performans Değerlendirmesi”. Yaşar Üniversitesi E-Dergisi, c. 19, sy. 73, 2024, ss. 40-61, doi:10.19168/jyasar.1245582.
Vancouver Zengin ZH, Bayarçelik EB, Apak S. Gıda Sektöründe Yalın Tedarik Zinciri Yönetimi ile Tedarik Zinciri Yönetimi Arasında Performans Değerlendirmesi. Yaşar Üniversitesi E-Dergisi. 2024;19(73):40-61.

Cited By

Yalın Tedarik Zinciri Üzerine Bibliyometrik Bir Analiz
Çukurova Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi
https://doi.org/10.35379/cusosbil.1400423
 Kapak Resmi İndir