Öz
In Muslim thought, human being is a very special creature because of the intellect and the willpower given to him/her. Likewise, s/he has obligations owing to his/her superior qualities. As a result of this responsibility, the man who is interlocutor before the divine orders thanks to his/her mind will be judged in the hereafter on account of his/her words and behaviors. As a result of the divine judgement, s/he will be rewarded or punished. From the aspect of Muslim tought, the position of the individuals having religious obligations is clear both here and in the Hereafter. However, it is not easy to say that clarity is available from the aspect of children. According to divine justice, the first condition of obligation is the reason. The persons that correctly uses their willpower will be saved, and incorrectly uses will be punished. So, what is the religious status of children in the world and the Hereafter? There are different answers for this question between Muslim thinkers and groups. This answers are usually about their religious obligation what is the position on it
Anahtar Kelimeler
Kaynakça
- - Abdulbâkî, Muhammed Fuad, el-Mu’cemu’l Müfehres li’l Elfâzı’l Kur’âni’l Kerîm, Dâru'l- Kutubi'l-Mısrıyye, Mısır 1945. - el-Âmidî, Seyfeddîn Alî b. Muhammed, el-İhkâm fî Usûli’l-Ahkâm, Daru’s-Samî’î, Riyad 1424/2003. - el-Bağdâdî, Ebû Mansûr Abdulkâhir b. Tâhir b. Muhammed, el-Fark beyne’l Fırak, (thk.
- Muhammed Muhyiddîn Abdulhamîd), el-Mektebetü’l-Asriyye, Beyrut 1416/1995. - el-Buhârî, Ebû Abdullah Muhammed b. İsmail, el-Câmiu’s Sahîh, (thk. Muhibbuddîn el
- Hatîb-Muhammed Fuâd Abdulbâkî), el-Matbaatü’s-Selefiyye, Kâhire 1400. - Ebû Dâvud, Süleyman b. el-Eş’as es-Sicistânî, Sünenü Ebû Dâvud, (nşr. Muhammed
- Muhammed Nâsıruddîn el-Elbânî), Mektebetu’l-Me‘ârif, Riyad ts. - Ebû Zehrâ, Prof. Dr. Muhammed, Usûlu’l-Fıkh, (Prof. Dr. Abdulkadir Şener), Fecr Yayınları, Ankara 1990. - ed-Debûsî, Ebû Zeyd Abdullah b. Muhammed b. Ömer b. Îsâ, Takvîmü’l-Edille fi’l Usûli’l
- Fıkh, (nşr. Halil Muhyiddin el-Meys), Dâru’l-Kutubi’l-İlmiyye, Beyrut 1421/2001. - el-Eş’arî, Ebu’l Hasan Alî b. İsmâil, Makâlâtu’l İslamiyyîn ve Ihtılâfû’l-Musallîn, (thk.
- (thk. Dr. Muhammed İbrâhîm Nasr, Dr. Abdurrahmân Umeyra), Dâru’l-Ceyl, Beyrut 1416/1996. - İbn Kayyım el-Cevziyye, Şemseddîn Muhammed b. Ebû Bekr b. Eyyub ez-Zür’î ed
- Dımeşkî, Tuhfetü’l-Mevdûd bi Ahkâmi’l-Mevlûd, Dârü’l-Kütübi’l-İlmiyye, Beyrut 1983. - İbn Kesîr, Ebu’l-Fidâ İsmâil ed-Dimeşkî, Tefsîru’l Kurâni’l Azîm, (thk. Mustafa Seyyîd
- Muhammed vd), Müessesetü Kurtuba, Kahire 1421/2000. - İbn Mâce, Ebu Abdullah Muhammed b. Yezîd el-Kazvînî, Sünenü İbn Mâce, (thk.
- Mektebetü’l-Matbûâti’l-İslamiyye, Haleb 1406/1986. - el-Pezdevî, Ebu’l-Yusr Muhammed b. el-Huseyn b. Abdilkerîm, Usûlu’d-Dîn, (nşr. Hans
- Peter Linss), el-Mektebetü’l-Ezheriyye li’t-Türâs, Kahire 1424-2003. - es-Sâbûnî, Nûreddîn Ahmed b. Mahmûd, el-Bidâye fî Usûli’d-Dîn, (thk. Dr. Fethullâh
- Huleyf), Dâru'l-Maârif biMısr, İskenderiye 1969. - Şa’ban, Prof. Dr. Zekiyyüddîn, İslâm Hukuk İlminin Esasları, (çev. Prof. Dr. İbrahim Kâfi
- Dönmez), Türkiye Diyanet Vakfı Yayınları, Ankara 2012. - eş-Şehristânî, Muhammed b. Abdulkerîm b. Ahmed, el-Milel ve’n Nihâl, (thk. Emîr Alî
- Mühennâ, Alî Hasen Fâûr), Dâru’l Ma’rife, Beyrut 1414/1993. - es-Serahsî, Şemsüleimme Ebû Bekr Muhammed b. Ahmed b. Ebî Sehl, Usûlu’l-Fıkh
- (Usûlu’s-Serahsî), thk. (Ebu’l-Vefâ el-Efğânî), Dâru’l-Kutubi’l-İlmiyye, Beyrut 1414/1993. - et-Taberânî, Ebu’l Kâsım Suleymân b. Ahmed, el-Mu’cemu’l-Kebîr, (thk. Hamdi
- Abdulmecîd es-Selefî, Mektebetu İbn Teymiyye, Kahire ts. ------, el-Mu’cemu’l-Evsad, (thk. Târık b. Ardullah b. Muhammed, Abdulmuhsin b. İbrâhîm el-Huseynî), Dâru’l-Harameyn, Kahire 1415/1995. - et-Taftazânî, Mesud b. Ömer Sa’duddîn, Şerhu’l Akâidi’n-Nesefî, (thk. Ahmed Hicâzî es
- Sekkâ), Mektebetü’l-Külliyetü’l-Ezheriyye, Kâhire 1408/1988. ---- Şerhu’l Makâsid, (thk. Dr. Abdurrahman Umeyra), Âlemu'l-Kutub, Beyrut 1419/1998. - TDV, Türkiye Diyanet Vakfı, Komisyon, İslâm Ansiklopedisi, İstanbul 1988. - et-Tirmîzî, Muhammed b. Îsâ b. Serve, Sünenü’t-Tirmîzî, (thk. Muhammed Nâsıruddîn el
- Elbânî), Mektebetu’l-Me‘ârif, Riyad ts. - ez-Zuhaylî, Prof. Dr. Vehbe, el-Fıkhu'l-İslâmî ve Edilletuhû, Dâru’l-Fikr, Dımeşk 1405/1985. --- , Usûlu'l-Fıkhi'l-İslâmî, Dâru’l-Fikr, Dımeşk 1406/1986.
Öz
In Muslim thought, human being is a very special creature because of the intellect and the willpower given to him/her. Likewise, s/he has obligations owing to his/her superior qualities. As a result of this responsibility, the man who is interlocutor before the divine orders thanks to his/her mind will be judged in the hereafter on account of his/her words and behaviors. As a result of the divine judgement, s/he will be rewarded or punished. From the aspect of Muslim tought, the position of the individuals having religious obligations is clear both here and in the Hereafter. However, it is not easy to say that clarity is available from the aspect of children. According to divine justice, the first condition of obligation is the reason. The persons that correctly uses their willpower will be saved, and incorrectly uses will be punished. So, what is the religious status of children in the world and the Hereafter? There are different answers for this question between Muslim thinkers and groups. This answers are usually about their religious obligation what is the position on it.
ISSN: 1309-2030 KADER Kelam Araştırmaları Dergisi