An Evaluation in Terms of Native Woody Taxa with Threatened Status and Conservation Strategies in the Flora of Hatay Province

Yıl 2020, Cilt: 6 Sayı: 2, 51 - 61, 24.12.2020

Elif Bozdoğan Sert

Öz

Cities started to form the settlement of human beings. There is intense pressure on natural resources due to the increasing urbanization in recent years. The natural vegetation that forms in the area where it is located without any human-induced effects is in danger of extinction due to unconscious and overuse. In this context, with climate change emerging all over the world, environmental pollution threatens biodiversity at a national, regional, and urban scale. However, the genetic resources of countries are of international importance. Turkey flora of the location, topography, has a high level of biodiversity due to climatic differences, etc. natural factors. Likewise, the flora of Hatay province has a high level of floristic diversity, especially with the contribution of the Amanos Mountains; Many herbaceous and woody taxa are natural or endemic. Preservation of biodiversity is as important as its existence. In this context; Conservation strategies based on the conservation of the species or population in (in situ) and outside (ex-situ) of its location are accepted. With this study, the native woody species found in the flora of Hatay province were determined based on the "Flora of Turkey" work of Davis (1965-1986); The threatened status of these species has been determined by taking into account IUCN data. Accordingly, it was determined that 13 taxa belonging to 11 families in the flora of Hatay province have threatened status at NT (1), VU (1), LC (9), DD (2) levels. As a result, Hatay province has been accepted as a part of the urban green areas conservation strategies to protect these species. It has been demonstrated that if it is organized as areas with an important potential in the protection of biodiversity, it will contribute to the city scale.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Biodiversity, conservation strategy, natural vegetation, Hatay

Kaynakça

• Yılmaz, K.T. (1996). Akdeniz Doğal Bitki Örtüsü. Çukurova Üni. Ziraat Fak. Genel Yayın No: 141, Yardımcı Ders Kitapları Yayın No: 13, Adana.
• Demirel, Ö. (2005). Doğa Koruma ve Milli Parklar. Karadeniz Teknik Üniversitesi Rektörlüğü, Orman Fakültesi Genel Yayın No: 219, Fakülte Yayın No: 37. KTÜ Matbaası, Trabzon, 424 S.
• Cetin, M (2017). Change in Amount of Chlorophyll in Some Interior Ornamental Plants. Kastamonu University Journal of Engineering and Sciences (KUJES), 3(1):11-19, 2017. http://dergipark.gov.tr/download/issue-file/5600
• Cetin, M., Cobanoglu, O. (2019). The Possibilities of Using Blue Spruce (Picea pungens Engelm) as a Biomonitor by Measuring the Recent Accumulation of Mn in Its Leaves. Kastamonu University Journal of Engineering and Science (KUJES), 5(1): 43-50. https://dergipark.org.tr/download/article-file/745562
• Cetin, M (2019). The effect of urban planning on urban formations determining bioclimatic comfort area's effect using satellitia imagines on air quality: a case study of Bursa city. Air Quality, Atmosphere & Health, (Air Qual Atmos Health). 12(10):1237-1249. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11869-019-00742-4 https://rd.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11869-019-00742-4
• Seaton, P.T., Hu, H., Perner, H., Pritchard, H.W. (2010). Ex Situ Conservation of Orchids in a Warming World. Bot. Rev., 76:193-203.
• Mounce, R., Smith, P., Brockington, S. (2017). Ex situ conservation of plant diversity in the world’s botanic gardens. Nature Plants, 3: 795-802.
• Oldfield, S.F. (2009). Botanic gardens and the conservation of tree species. Trends in Plant Science. Special Issue: Plant science research in botanic gardens, 14(11): 581-583.
• Arnet, M., Santos, M., Brockerhoff, B., Pelser, E.G., Ecroyd, P.B., Clemens, J.C. (2015). Importance of arboreta for ex situ conservation of threatened trees. Biodiversity Conservation, 24: 3601–3620.
• TOD (2019). Türkiye Ormancılığı: 2019, Kuban Matbaacılık Yayıncılık, Ankara, 164 S.
• Yücel, M. (2010). Doğa Koruma. Çukurova Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Genel Yayın No:265, Ders Kitapları Yayın No: A-85, 2.Baskı, Adana.
• Dulloo, M. E., Hunter, D., Borelli, T. (2010). Ex Situ and In Situ Conservation of Agricultural Biodiversity: Major Advances and Research Needs. Notulae Botanicae Horti Agrobotanici Cluj, 38 (2): 123-135.
• Harris, S., Shaw, J., Crane, N., 2009. Planning the integration of ex situ plant conservation in Tasmania. Cunninghamia, 11(1): 123–130.
• BGCI (2020). Botanic Gardens Conservation International. https://www.bgci.org/
• Republic of Turkey The Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry, (2020) T.C. Tarım ve Orman Bakanlığı (2020). Korunan Alan İstatistikleri. Doğa Koruma ve Milli Parklar Genel Müdürlüğü. https://www.tarimorman.gov.tr/DKMP/Menu/18/Korunan-Alan-Istatistikleri
• IUCN (2020). IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. https://www.iucnredlist.org/
• Özçelik, H., Dutkuner, İ., Balabanlı , C., Akgün, İ., Gül, A., Karataş, A., Kılıç, S., Deligöz, A. (2006). Süleyman Demirel Botanik Bahçesinin Tanıtımı. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi, 10-3: 352-373
• Satıl, F., Tümen, G., Selvi, S. (2016). Balıkesir Üniversitesi Botanik Bahçesi ve Florası. Biyoloji Bilimleri Araştırma Dergisi, 9 (2): 26-32.
• Davis, P.H. (ed.), (1965-1980). Flora of Turkey and The East Aegean Islands, Vol 1-10, Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh.