KATI ATIĞIN METABOLİK DÖNGÜSÜ: TÜRKİYE ANALİZİ

Yıl 2022, Cilt: 13 Sayı: 26, 1188 - 1213, 27.12.2022

İsmet Akbaş

https://doi.org/10.36543/kauiibfd.2022.048

Öz

Materyal akış analizi kentsel sistem içinde kaynakların akış süreçleriyle ilgili bilgi edinmek için etkili bir analiz sürecidir. Bu sayede materyal akış analizi, üretim ve tüketim süreçlerinde çevresel kaynakların kullanılmasıyla birlikte ortaya çıkan, atıkların yönetilmesini sağlamaktadır. Kentsel alanlarda metabolik döngüdeki atık akışlarının izlenmesi, sürdürülebilir bir çevre için önemlidir. Bu çalışma, Türkiye’de üretim ve tüketim süreçlerinde ortaya çıkan katı atığın akış süreçlerinin takip edilmesi ve metabolik döngü açısından başarı düzeyini belirleme amacını taşımaktadır. Bu amaçla Türkiye'de üretim ve tüketim süreçlerinde ortaya çıkan katı atığın materyal akış analizi yöntemiyle metabolik akış süreçleri değerlendirilmiştir. Yapılan analiz sonucunda, Türkiye'de tüketim ve üretim aşamalarında ortaya çıkan katı atığın metabolik döngüsünün zayıf olduğu görülmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Atık Yönetimi, Katı Atık, Metabolik Döngü, Geri Dönüşüm

METABOLIC CYCLE OF SOLID WASTE: ANALYSIS OF TURKEY

Öz

Material flow analysis is an effective analysis process to obtain information about the flow processes of resources within the urban system. In this way, material flow analysis ensures the management of wastes that arise with the use of environmental resources in production and consumption processes. Monitoring waste flows in the metabolic cycle in urban areas is important for a sustainable environment. This study aims to monitor the flow processes of solid waste that occurs in production and consumption processes in Turkey and to determine the level of success in terms of metabolic cycle. For this purpose, the metabolic flow processes of the solid waste generated in the production and consumption processes in Turkey were evaluated by the material flow analysis method. As a result of the analysis, it is seen that the metabolic cycle of the solid waste generated during the consumption and production stages is weak in Turkey.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Waste Management, Solid Waste, Metabolic Cycle, Recycling

Kaynakça

• Akbaş, İ. (2020). Kentsel Alanlarda Suyun Metabolik Döngüsü: Türkiye Analizi. Kent Akademisi, 13(3), 539-555.
• Alberti, M. (1999). Modeling the urban ecosystem: A conceptual framework. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 26(4), 605-630.
• Ayres, R. U. & Kneese, A.V. (1969), Production, Consumption, and Externalities. The American Economic Review, 59(3), 282-297.
• Barles, S. (2009). Urban metabolism of Paris and its region. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 13, 898-913.
• Barrera, P., Carreón, R. & Hugo J. de Boer (2018). A multi-level framework for metabolism in urban energy systems from an ecological perspective, resources. Conservation and Recycling, 132, 230–238.
• Bringezu, S. (1997). Material Flow Indicators. In: Moldan, B.; Billharz, S.; Matravers, R. (Eds.): Sustainability Indicators. Report of the Project on Indicators of Sustainability. Series: SCOPE, No. 58: 170-180.
• Carréon, J. R., and Worrell, E. (2018). Urban energy systems within the transition to sustainable development: a research agenda for urban metabolism, resources. Conservation and Recycling, 132, 258–266.
• Castán Broto, V., Allen, A. & Rapoport, E. (2012). Interdisciplinary perspectives on urban metabolism. Journal of Industrial Ecology,16(6), 851–861.
• Codoban, N. & Kennedy, C.A. (2008). The metabolism of neighbourhoods, ASCE. Journal of Urban Planning and Development, 134(1), 21-31.
• Collins, A. & Flynn, A. (2007). Engaging with the ecological footprint as a decision-making tool: process and responses. Local Environment, 12(3), 295–312.
• Fischer-Kowalski, M. & Huttler, W. (1997). Society's metabolism: the intellectual history of materials flow analysis part II, 1970–1998. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 2(4), 107–136.
• Hoornweg, D. & Kennedy, C. (2012). Mainstreaming urban metabolism. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 16, 780-782.
• Huan, L. & Kwan, M.(2018). Advancing analytical methods for urban metabolism studies. Resources, Conservation & Recycling, 132, 239–245.
• Huang, S. L. & Chen, C.W. (2009). Urbanization and socioeconomic metabolism in Taipei. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 13, 75-93.
• Kennedy, C., Cuddıhy, J. & Engel-Yan, J. (2007). The Changing Metabolism Of Cities, Journal Of Industrial Ecology, 11, 43-59.
• Moffatt, I. (2000). Ecological footprints and sustainable development. Ecological Economics, 32, 359-362.
• Newman, P. (1999). Sustainability and cities: extending the metabolism model. in Landscape and Urban Planning, 44, 219–226.
• Wolman, A.(1965). The metabolism of cities. Scientific America, 213(3), 179-190