Dayanışma Mimarlığı: Mimarlık Mesleki Uygulamasında Gelişen Toplum Odaklı Yaklaşımlar

Yıl 2022, Cilt: 15 Sayı: 4, 1996 - 2009, 15.12.2022

Mehmet Gökhan Berk , Tolga Akbulut

https://doi.org/10.35674/kent.1167138

Öz

Bu makale, mimarlık mesleki uygulaması ile birlikte tasarım, planlama ve genel olarak mekân yapımına ilişkin mesleki faaliyetlerin ifasında dayanışma kavramını bir yaklaşım, yöntem ve iletişim biçimi olarak açık veya örtülü bir şekilde içermek üzere çeşitli şekillerde ortaya çıkan yaklaşımları irdelemektedir. Mesleki tutumların özellikle modernleşmenin tarihsel süreci içindeki gelişimi ve değişimi, değişen toplumsal dinamikler ve toplumsal olaylar dikkate alınarak genel olarak değerlendirilmiş bulunmaktadır. Mesleki anlamda dayanışma yaklaşımını içeren bir tutum alınmasına ilişkin incelenen genel özellikler profesyoneller ve toplum arasındaki ikilik ve ayrışmanın giderek ortadan kalkması, mesleki faaliyetlerin hedeflerinin birey ölçeğinden veya ihtiyaç sahibi olan kesimlerden daha geniş katmanlara, özellikle toplumun çoğunlukla baskı altında bulunan, daha az ayrıcalıklı, yoksun ve dezavantajlı gruplarını içine alır şekilde genişlediği tespit edilmektedir. Bu tanımdan hareketle, Dayanışma Mimarlığı, yapılı fiziksel çevrenin oluşmasında etkin olan mesleki faaliyetlerin toplum odaklı bir şekilde, etkileşimde bulundukları toplumsal gruplarla beraber yürütülmesini önemseyen bir mimarlık yaklaşımı olarak ele alınabilir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Dayanışma Mimarlığı, Özgecilik, Katılımcı Mimarlık, İnsani Mimarlık, Pro Bono, Müşterekleştirme

Solidarity Architecture: Socially-Minded Approaches Emerging in the Professional Practice in Architecture

Öz

This article evaluates the various forms of emerging approaches in the professional conduct of the architectural practice and other forms of professional activities related to the design, planning, and space making in general, making explicit or inherent use of the notion of solidarity as an approach, method, and means of communication. A broad review of the evolution of the status of the professional attitude has been made with consideration of the changing social dynamics and social movements, throughout the recent history of modernization. The common characteristics observed with the adoption of the professional solidarity approach, are the dissolving of the duality and distinction between the professional and the community, the shift or enlargement of the target of the professional activity from the individual or people in need to a wider community, most of the time being the oppressed, less privileged, deprived and disadvantaged sections of the society. In line with this description, the concept of Solidarity Architecture can be evaluated to be an understanding in architecture attaching importance to the performance of the professional activities which are determinant in the formation of the built physical environment in a socially minded manner and together with the interacted social groups.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Solidarity Architecture, Altruism, Participatory Architecture, Humanitarian Architecture, Pro Bono, Commoning

Kaynakça

• ACE Architects’ Council of Europe (2014) The role of the architectural profession in delivering responsible design.
• ACE Architects’ Council of Europe (2016) European Deontological Code for providers of architectural services.
• Bayertz, K. (1999) Solidarity. Dordrecht, Kluwer Academic Publishers.
• Bianco, A. (2011) Self-employment as a Social Figuration, The Mozart Case, Cambio 1 (II): 113-119.
• Braverman, H. (1974). Labor and monopoly capital: the degradation of work in the twentieth century. New York: Monthly Review Press.
• Brenner, N. (2009). What is Critical Urban Theory? City, 13 (2),198 – 207.
• Carr-Saunders, A.M. and Wilson, P.A. (1933). The professions. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
• Cleveland, J. W. (2003) Does the New Middle-Class Lead Today’s Social Movements? Critical Sociology, 29 (2), 163-188.
• De Carlo, G. (2013) Architecture’s Public, in Jones, P. B., Petrescu, D., Till, J. (eds) Architecture and Participation, Routledge, New York (3-22).
• Durkheim, E. (1933) The Division of Labor in Society, Macmillan, New York.
• Ehrenreich, B. and Ehrenreich, J. (1979). The professional-managerial class. In P. Walker (Ed.) Between capital and labor (pp. 5-45). Brighton: Harvester Press.
• Elias N. (1991). Mozart: portrait of a genius, Schröter M. ed., Berkeley: University of California Press, 1993.
• Foucault, M. (1979). Discipline and punish: the birth of the prison. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
• Fournier, V. (1999). The Appeal to ‘Professionalism’ as a Disciplinary Mechanism. Social Review, 47(2), 280–307.
• Hoyle, E. (1975). Professionality, Professionalism, and Control in Teaching. In V. Houghton et al. (Eds.), Management in Education: the Management of Organisations and Individuals, London, Open University Press.
• Illich, I. (1974) Limits to Medicine: Medical Nemesis: The Expropriation of Health Marion Boyar Publishers Ltd, London.
• Jones, P. B., Petrescu, D., Till, J. (2005) Architecture and Participation, Routledge, New York
• Larson, M. S. (2013). The rise of professionalism. Monopolies of competence and sheltered markets (2nd ed.). New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.
• McAdams, J. (1987) ‘Testing the theory of the New Class’, Sociological Quarterly, 28(1): 23-49.
• McKnight, J. (1981) The professional problem. The Grantsmanship Center News, 9(1),36-43.
• McKnight, J. M. (2016). The Pro Bono Payoff. Retrieved from https://www.architectmagazine.com/aia-architect/aiafeature/the-pro-bono-payoff_o
• Marshall, T.H. (1950). Citizenship and Social Class and Other Essays. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Murhpy, M. (2011, April 15) The poverty of Starchitecture. Retrieved from https://designobserver.com/feature/the-poverty-of-starchitecture/26358
• Newel, C. (2011, March 29). 75. Predicting the Pritzker Prize Part I. Retrieved from http://famousarchitect.blogspot.com/2011/03/75-predicting-pritzker.html?utm_medium=website&utm_source=archdaily.com
• Newel, C (2015, January 22) Dear Martha: An Open Letter to the Pritzker Prize Committee. Retrieved from https://www.archdaily.com/590620/dear-martha-an-open-letter-to-the-pritzker-prize-committee.
• Olofsson G (2009) The coming of the proto-professions - a third stage of professionalization? Paper presented at ESA Conference, Lisbon, RN19.
• Omacan, S. (2017) Preface, Solidarity Architecture, Turkish Chamber of Architects Istanbul Branch, Istanbul (p. 7-14).
• Parsons, T. (1939). The Professions and Social Structure, Social Forces, 17(4), 457–467.
• Schmale, W. (2017). European Solidarity: A Semantic History European Review of History: Revue européenne d'histoire, 24(6) 854-873.
• Stavrides, S. (2016). Occupied squares, societies in movement." Common Space: The City as Commons. London.
• Tawney, R.H. (1921). The Acquisitive Society. New York: Harcourt Bruce
• Troman, G. (1996). The Rise of the New Professionals? The Restructuring of Primary Teachers’ Work and Professionalism. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 17(4), 473–487.
• UIA (2011) Guidelines for the UIA Accord on recommended international standards of professionalism in architectural practice policy on ethics and conduct.
• Vinnitskaya, I (2013, January 22) Public Architecture's 1% Program Provides Projects for Habitat for Humanity. Retrieved from: https://www.archdaily.com/tag/public-architecture#:~:text=Public%20Architecture%20is%20an%20organization,interaction%20within%20the%20built%20environment.
• Zardini, M. (2008) A New Urban Takeover in G. Borasi and M. Zardini (eds.) Actions: What you can do with the City, CCA (Canadian Centre for Architecture), Montreal.