VÜCUT YÜZEY ALANI VE KULLANIM ALANLARI

Yıl 2024, , 127 - 134, 17.01.2024

Merve İnce Palamutoğlu

https://doi.org/10.18229/kocatepetip.1021995

Öz

Vücut yüzey alanı, ilaç doz ayarlamasından yanık tedavisine, sıvı ihtiyacının belirlenmesinden bazal metabolizma hızının hesaplanmasına kadar birçok alanda kullanılan antropometrik bir parametredir. Kemoterapi, transplantoloji, yanık tedavisi ve toksikoloji dahil olmak üzere birçok tıbbi alanda önemli bir rol oynamaktadır. On dokuzuncu yüzyıla kadar araştırmacılar vücut yüzey alanını hesaplamanın kolay yollarını aradılar ve çeşitli formüller geliştirdiler. Vücut yüzey alanını tahmin etmek için boy ve ağırlık ölçümlerinden türetilmiş farklı denklemler bulunmaktadır. Tarihsel olarak, DuBois & DuBois formülü en yaygın kullanılanıdır, ancak Mosteller'in formülü basitliği nedeniyle daha popülerdir. Günümüzde halen kullanılmakta olan vücut yüzey alanı formüllerinin doğruluğu, az sayıda örnek çalışma ile belirlendiği ve örnek seçiminde çocuk, yetişkin gibi farklı büyüklükler dikkate alınmadığı için halen tartışılmaktadır. Yeni ve pratik hesaplama yöntemleri belirlenmeye çalışılmaktadır. Bu derleme, vücut yüzey alanının ortaya çıkışını ve kullanım alanlarını incelemeyi amaçlamaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Vücut Yüzey Alanı, Dubois & Dubois, Mosteller

BODY SURFACE AREA AND USAGE AREAS

Öz

Body surface area is an anthropometric parameter used in many areas like drug dose adjustment, burn treatment, and determination of fluid requirement, as well as to calculate the basal metabolic rate. It is critical for many medical specialties, such as chemotherapy, transplantology, burn therapy, and toxicology. Until the 19th century, researchers looked for easy ways to calculate body surface area and developed various formulas. There were several different formulas derived from height and weight measurements to predict body surface area. Historically, the DuBois & DuBois formula is the most used, but Mosteller's formula is more popular due to its simplicity. The accuracy of the body surface area formulas, which are still in use today, is still being debated because they are determined by a few sample studies, and different sizes such as children and adults are not taken into consideration in sample selection. New and practical calculation methods are tried to be determined. This review aims to investigate the emergence of the body surface area and where it is used.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Body Surface Area, Dubois & Dubois, Nutrition

Kaynakça

• 1. Chhapola V, Sandeep KK, Shafı OM, Kumar P. Accurate estimation of body surface area in under-5 children with non-edematous severe acute malnutrition summary. J Trop Pediatr Vol. 2013;59(6):515-17.
• 2. Yu CY, Lin CH, Yang YH. Human body surface area database and estimation formula. Burns. 2010;36(5):616-629.
• 3. Furqan M, Haque A. Surface area in children: a simple formula. Indian Pediatr. 2009; 46(12):1085-87.
• 4. Fancher KM, Sacco AJ, Gwin RC, Gormley LK, Mitchell, CB. Comparison of two different formulas for body surface area in adults at extremes of height and weight. J Oncol Pharm Pract. 2016;22(5):690-95.
• 5. Gibson S, Numa A. The importance of metabolic rate and folly of body surface area calculations. Anaesthesia. 2003;58:50-83.
• 6. Lack JA, Stuart-Taylor ME. Calculation of drug dosage and body surface area of children. Br J Anaesth. 1997;78(5):601-605.
• 7. Redlarski G, Palkowski A, Krawczuk M. Body surface area formulae: an alarming ambiguity. Sci Rep. 2016;6:1-8.
• 8. Meeh K. Oberflachenmessungen des menschlichen Korpers. Z Biol. 1879;15:425–85.
• 9. Sahay M. (Edited by). Basic nephrology and acute kidney injury. In: Hoste L, Pottel H. Is body surface area the appropriate index for glomerular is body surface area the appropriate index for glomerular filtration rate?. InTech, 2012:4-20.
• 10. DuBois D, DuBois EF. Clinical calorimetry: tenth paper a formula to estimate the approximate surface area if height and weight be known. Arch Intern Med. 1916;17:863–71.
• 11. Boyd E. Growth of surface area in human body. In: Issue 10 of Monograph Series, University of Minnesota Institute of Child Development and Welfare. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, MN. 1935.
• 12. Gehan EA, George SL. Estimation of human body surface area from height and weight. Cancer Chemother Rep. 1970;54:225–35.
• 13. Haycock G, Schwartz G, Wisotsky D. Geometric method for measuring body surface area: a height-weight formula validated in infants, children, and adults. J Pediatr. 1978;93(1):62-66.
• 14. Faber HK, Melcher MS. A modification of the DuBois height-weight formula for surface areas of newborn infants. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med. 1921;19(1):53.
• 15. Mosteller RD. Simplified calculation of body-surface area. N Engl J Med. 1987;317:1098.
• 16. Slone TH. Body surface area misconceptions. Risk Analsis. 1993;13(4):375-77.
• 17. Aksoy M. (Editör) Ansiklopedik beslenme, diyet ve gıda sözlüğü. 1nci Baskı, Ankara: Hatipoğlu Yayınevi, 1978;733.
• 18. Eston R, Reilly T. (Edited by) Kinantropometry and exercise physiology laboratory manual: Volume 2. In: Cooke C. Metabolic rate and energy balance. 2nd Edition, London: Routledge, 2008:147-74.
• 19. Curtis BY. Basal Metabolism Nomogram. J Biol Chem. 1929;135(2):607-609.
• 20. Tabel Y. Association of voiding dysfunction and urinary tract infection in children; a nephrological perspective. Turkish Assoc Pediatr Surg. 2016;30(2): 106-109.
• 21. Hart DW, Wolf SE, Mlcak R, Chinkes DL, Ramzy PI, Obeng MK, et al. Persistence of muscle catabolism after severe burn. Surgery. 2000;128(2):312-19.
• 22. Sabuncular G, Acar-Tek N. Energy metabolism in burn injury and current approaches to determine the energy requirements. Turkiye Klin J Heal Sci. 2017;2(3): 184-91.
• 23. Aydoğan C, Ekici Y. Yanık Hastalarında Beslenme. Türk Yoğun Bakım Derneği Derg. 2012;10(2):74-83.
• 24. Zawacki BE, Spitzer KW, Mason AD Jr, et al. Does increased evaporative water loss cause hypermetabolism in burned patients? Ann Surg. 1970;171:236–40.
• 25. Xie WG, Li A, Wang SL. Estimation of the calorie requirements of burned Chinese adults. Burns. 1993;19:146–49.
• 26. Milner EA, Cioffi WG, Mason AD, et al. A longitudinal study of resting energy expenditure in thermally injured patients. J Trauma. 1994;37:167–70.
• 27. Dickerson RN, Gervasio JM, Riley ML, Murrell JE, Hickerson WL, Kudsk KA, et al. Accuracy of predictive methods to estimate resting energy expenditure of thermally-injured patients. J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2002;26(1):17-29.
• 28. Curreri PW, Richmond D, Marvin J, et al. Dietary requirements of patients with major burns. J Am Diet Assoc. 1974;65:415–17.
• 29. Carlson DE, Cioffi WG Jr, Mason AD Jr, et al. Resting energy expenditure in patients with thermal injuries. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1992;174:270-76.
• 30. Xi P, Kaifa W, Yong Z, Hong Y, Chao W, Lijuan S, et al. Establishment and assessment of new formulas for energy consumption estimation in adult burn patients, PLoS One. 2014;9(10):1-11.
• 31. Stevens LA, Levey AS. (Edited by). Frequently asked questions about GFR estimates. 1st Edition, National Kidney Foundation, Inc. 2011;1-20.
• 32. Levey AS, Stevens LA, Schmid CH, Zhang Y, Castro AF, Feldman HI, et al. A New Equation to Estimate Glomerular Filtration Rate, Ann Intern Med. 2009;150(9): 604-12.
• 33. Ustaalioğlu YE, Bal AS, Oral AY. Glomerüler Filtrasyon Belirteçleri ve Hesaplama Formülleri, Uludağ Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi. 2015;41(2);95-102.
• 34. Abefe SA Abiola AF, Olubunmi AA, Adewale A. Utility of predicted creatinine clearance using MDRD formula compared with other predictive formulas in Nigerian patients. Saudi J Kidney Dis Transpl. 2009;20(1):86-90.
• 35. Açıkgöz EH, Tüysüz Ö, Sarandöl E, Dirican M. Glomerüler filtrasyon hızı tahmininde MDRD formülünün kreatinin klirensi ile karşılaştırılması. Türk Klin Biyokim Derg. 2013;11(1):21-29.
• 36. McIntosh JF, Möller R, Van Slycke DD. Studies on urea excretions: III. The influence of body size on urea output. J Clin Invest. 1928;6:467–83.
• 37. Geddes CC, Woo YM, Brady S. Glomerular filtration rate - What is the rationale and justification of normalizing GFR for body surface area? Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2008;23(1):4-6.
• 38. Baker SD, Verweij J, Rowinsky EK, Donehower RC, Schellens JHM, Grochow LB, et al. Role of body surface area in dosing of investigational anticancer agents in adults, 1991-2001. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2002;94(24):1883-88.
• 39. Sacco JJ, Botten J, Macbeth F, Bagust A, Clark P. The average body surface area of adult cancer patients in the UK: a multicentre retrospective study. PLoS One. 2010;5(1):1-6.
• 40. Lamb E. Assessment of kidney function in adults. Medicine (United Kingdom). 2015;43(7): 368-73.
• 41. Jin R, Grunkemeier GL, Brown JR, Furnary,AP. Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate and Renal Function. Ann Thorac Surg., 2008;86(1): 1-3.
• 42. Bostom AG, Kronenberg F, Ritz E. Predictive performance of renal function equations for patients with chronic kidney disease and normal serum creatinine levels. J Am Soc Nephrol., 2002;13(8):2140-44.
• 43. Cockcoft DW, Gault MH. Prediction of creatinine clearance from serum creatinine. Nephron. 1976;16(1):31-41.
• 44. Woolloongabba DJ. Evaluation of renal function - Use of serum creatinine concentration to assess level of kidney function, Nephrology. 2005;10:133-76.
• 45. Botev R, Mallie JP, Wetzels JFM, Couchoud C, Schück O. The clinician and estimation of glomerular filtration rate by creatinine-based formulas: Current limitations and Quo vadis. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2011;6(4):937-50.
• 46. Orimadegun A, Omisanjo A. Evaluation of five formulae for estimating body surface area of nigerian children. Ann Med Health Sci Res. 2014;4(6):889-98.
• 47. Villa C, Primeau C, Hesse U, Hougen HP, Lynnerup N, Hesse B. Body surface area determined by whole-body CT scanning: need for new formulae?, John Wiley & Sons. 2017:37(2):183-93.