Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

EVALUATION OF THE PATIENTS OPERATED WITH VSDs OF DIFFERENT AGES

Yıl 2023, Cilt: 24 Sayı: 1, 96 - 104, 03.01.2023
https://doi.org/10.18229/kocatepetip.1053701

Öz

OBJECTIVE: Ventricular septum defect (VSD) can be defined as one or more openings located in the septum separating the left and right ventricle. Ventricular septal defects can be congenital or acquired. It is the most common congenital heart anomaly. In this article, we evaluated the VSDs that we treated surgically in our clinic in the light of the literature.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: 68 VSD patients were intervened in our clinic. 39 cases were male (57.3%) and 29 cases were female (42.7%). The mean age was 9.10 ± 9.13 (1-48), and the mean weight was 25 ± 16.5 (7-75). When the preoperative New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional capacity (FC) was compared, FC-I was determined as 31 cases (45.5%), FC-II as 30 cases (44.1%), and FC-III as 7 cases (10.2%). The most common preoperative existing anomalies were 15 cases (22.05%) with aortic insufficiency (AR) and aortic valve prolapse (AVP); 18 cases (26.4%) ASD and 8 cases (11.7%) with PDA.
RESULTS: When looking at the intervention methods according to VSD types, the most common cases of perimembranous type were right atriotomy in 53 cases (77.9%), right atriotomy in 1 case (1.4%) and tricuspid septal annulus radial incision; 8 cases of muscular type (11.7%) and right atriotomy and left ventriculotomy in 2 cases (2.9%) of Swiss-Chess type; Right ventriculotomy was preferred in 4 cases (5.8%) of DCJA (Doubly Committed Jukstaarterial) type. Between postoperative complications the most frequent one was residual VSD in 9 patients (15.3 %). Mortality was seen in 3 patients (5.09 %) with preoperative PAB 67±7.5 mmHg, LV- RV shunt 49±9.6 mmHg, Qp/Qs 4.7±3.87, PVR 7.5±4.6 values in follow-up. According to the comparison of the pre/postoperative NYHA and RVP statistics (p<0.05), the survival rate without reoperation was estimated as 93.2 %.
CONCLUSIONS: Ventricular septal defect is the most common congenital heart disease. The development of ECHO and cardiac angiography has a great share in the diagnosis and classification. It should be preferred to evaluate the defects very well and close them after 3 months.

Kaynakça

  • 1. Reller MD, Strickland MJ, Riehle-Colarusso T, et al. Prevalence of congenital heart defects in metropolitan Atlanta, 1998-2005. J Pediatr. 2008;153(6):807-13.
  • 2. Charlotte Ferencz, Adolfo Correa–Villasenor, Christopher A. et al., Genetic and environmental risk factors of major cardiovascular malformations: Baltimore-Washington Infant Study:1981–9. Armonk, NY: Futura, 1997.
  • 3. Ooshima A, J Fukushige, and K Ueda, Incidence of structural cardiac disorders in neonates: an evaluation by color Doppler echocardiography and the results of a 1-year follow-up. Cardiology. 1995;86(5):402-6.
  • 4. Sanders SP, S Yeager, and R.G. Williams, Measurement of systemic and pulmonary blood flow and QP/QS ratio using Doppler and two-dimensional echocardiography. Am J Cardiol, 1983;51(6):952-6.
  • 5. McDaniel NL. and Gutgesell HP., Ventricular Septal Defect. Allen HD, Driscoll DJ, Shaddy RE, Feltes TF, eds. Moss and Adams’ Heart Disease in Infants, Children, and Adolescents 7th Edition. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins. 2008; 668- 82.
  • 6. Zhang J, Ko JM, Guileyardo JM, Roberts WC et al. A review of spontaneous closure of ventricular septal defect. Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent). 2015;28(4):516-20.
  • 7. Cresti A, Giordano R, Koestenberger M, et al. Incidence and natural history of neonatal isolated ventricular septal defects: do we know everything? A 6‐year single‐center Italian experience follow‐up. Congenit Heart Dis. 2018;13(1):105‐12.
  • 8. Warnes CA, Williams RG, Bashore TM, et al. ACC/AHA 2008 guidelines for the Management of Adults with Congenital Heart Disease. Circulation. 2008;118(23):714‐833.
  • 9. Ricci Z, Sun J, Sun K, Chen S, et al. A new scoring system for spontaneous closure prediction of Perimembranous ventricular septal defects in children.PLoS One. 2014;9(12):113822.
  • 10. Li X, Song GX, Wu LJ, et al. Prediction of spontaneous closure of isolated ventricular septal defects in utero and postnatal life.BMC Pediatr. 2016;16(1):207.
  • 11. Mishra A, Shah R, Desai M, et al. A simple surgical technique for closure of apical muscular ventricular septal defect. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014;(148):2576–79.
  • 12. Scully BB, Morales DL, Zafar F, et al. Current expectations for surgical repair of isolated ventricular septal defects. Ann Thorac Surg. 2010;89(2):544-9; 550-1.
  • 13. JT Hardin, et al., Primary surgical closure of large ventricular septal defects in small infants. Ann Thorac Surg, 1992;53(3):397-401.
  • 14. McGrath LB, Methods for repair of simple isolated ventricular septal defect. J Card Surg. 1991;6(1):13-23.
  • 15. Shamsuddin AM, Chen YC, Wong AR, et al. Surgery for doubly committed ventricular septal defects. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2016;(23):231–234.
  • 16. Salih HG, Ismail SR, Kabbani MS, et al. Predictors for the outcome of aortic regurgitation after cardiac surgery in patients with ventricular septal defect and aortic cusp prolapse in saudi patients. Heart Views. 2016;17:83–87.
  • 17. Buratto E, Khoo B, Ye XT, et al. Long-Term Outcome After Pulmonary Artery Banding 540 in Children With Atrioventricular Septal Defects. Ann Thorac Surg. 2018;106:138.
  • 18.Backer CL, Winters RC, Zales VR, et al. Restrictive ventricular septal defect: how small is too small to close? Ann Thorac Surg.1993. 56(5):1014-8; discussion 1018-9.
  • 19. Nygren A, Sunnegardh J, and Berggren H, Preoperative evaluation and surgery in isolated ventricular septal defects: a 21 year perspective. Heart. 2000;83(2): 198-204.
  • 20. Miyake T A review of isolated muscular ventricular septal defect. World J Pediatr. 2020;16(2):120-128.

FARKLI YAŞLARDAKİ OPERE EDİLEN VSD'Lİ HASTALARIN DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ

Yıl 2023, Cilt: 24 Sayı: 1, 96 - 104, 03.01.2023
https://doi.org/10.18229/kocatepetip.1053701

Öz

AMAÇ: Ventriküler septum defekt (VSD), sol ve sağ ventrikülü ayıran septuma yerleşen, bir ya da daha fazla sayıda olabilen açıklık olarak tanımlanabilir. Ventriküler septal defektler konjenital veya akkiz olabilir. En sık görülen doğuştan kalp anomalisidir. Bu yazımızda Kliniğimizde cerrahi olarak tedavi ettiğimiz VSD leri literatürler eşliğinde değerlendirdik.
GEREÇ VE YÖNTEM: Kliniğimizde 68 VSD hastasına girişim yapıldı. 39 olgu erkek (%57.3), 29 olgu kadın (%42.7) idi ve yaş ortalaması 9,10±9,13(1-48) yaş/yıl, kilo ortalaması 25±16,5(7-75)kg olarak bulundu. Preoperatif NYHA fonksiyonel kapasite(FK) karşılaştırıldığında FK-I 31 olgu(%45,5), FK-II 30 olgu(%44,1), FK-III 7 olgu(%10,2) olarak belirlendi. Preoperatif anomali olarak en sık 15 olgu(%22,05) aort yetmezliği(AY) ve aort valf prolapsusu (AVP); 18 olgu(%26,4) ASD; 8 olgu(%11,7) PDA mevcuttu.
BULGULAR: VSD tiplerine göre girişim yöntemlerine bakıldığında perimembranöz tipte en sık 53 olgu (%77,9) ile sağ atriotomi, 1 olgu(%1,4) sağ atriotomi ve triküspit septal annulus radial kesisi; müsküler tipte 8 olgu (%11,7) ile sağ atriotomi ve Swiss-Chess tip olan 2 olguda (%2,9) sol ventrikülotomi; DCJA( Doubly Committed Jukstaarteryel ) tipte 4 olgu (%5,8) ile sağ ventrikülotomi tercih edilmiştir. Postoperatif komplikasyonlar arasında en sık görülen 9 olgu(%15,3) ile rezidü VSD dir. Fatal seyreden 3 hastanın(%5,09) PAB 67±7,5mmHg; LV-RV şant 49±9,6mmHg; Qp/Qs 4,7±3,87; PVR 7,5±4,6 değerlerinin yüksek oldukları görülmüştür. Pre/postoperatif NYHA ve RVP karşılaştırıldığında istatistiki olarak anlamlı(p<0,05) olduğu görülmüş olup reoperasyonsuz yaşam olasılığı %93,2 olarak hesaplanmıştır.
SONUÇ: Ventriküler septal defekt en sık görülen konjenital kalp hastalığıdır. Tanı ve sınıflandırılmasında EKO ve kardiak anjiografinin gelişiminin payı büyüktür. Defektleri çok iyi değerlendirip 3 aydan sonra kapatılması tercih edilmelidir.

Kaynakça

  • 1. Reller MD, Strickland MJ, Riehle-Colarusso T, et al. Prevalence of congenital heart defects in metropolitan Atlanta, 1998-2005. J Pediatr. 2008;153(6):807-13.
  • 2. Charlotte Ferencz, Adolfo Correa–Villasenor, Christopher A. et al., Genetic and environmental risk factors of major cardiovascular malformations: Baltimore-Washington Infant Study:1981–9. Armonk, NY: Futura, 1997.
  • 3. Ooshima A, J Fukushige, and K Ueda, Incidence of structural cardiac disorders in neonates: an evaluation by color Doppler echocardiography and the results of a 1-year follow-up. Cardiology. 1995;86(5):402-6.
  • 4. Sanders SP, S Yeager, and R.G. Williams, Measurement of systemic and pulmonary blood flow and QP/QS ratio using Doppler and two-dimensional echocardiography. Am J Cardiol, 1983;51(6):952-6.
  • 5. McDaniel NL. and Gutgesell HP., Ventricular Septal Defect. Allen HD, Driscoll DJ, Shaddy RE, Feltes TF, eds. Moss and Adams’ Heart Disease in Infants, Children, and Adolescents 7th Edition. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins. 2008; 668- 82.
  • 6. Zhang J, Ko JM, Guileyardo JM, Roberts WC et al. A review of spontaneous closure of ventricular septal defect. Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent). 2015;28(4):516-20.
  • 7. Cresti A, Giordano R, Koestenberger M, et al. Incidence and natural history of neonatal isolated ventricular septal defects: do we know everything? A 6‐year single‐center Italian experience follow‐up. Congenit Heart Dis. 2018;13(1):105‐12.
  • 8. Warnes CA, Williams RG, Bashore TM, et al. ACC/AHA 2008 guidelines for the Management of Adults with Congenital Heart Disease. Circulation. 2008;118(23):714‐833.
  • 9. Ricci Z, Sun J, Sun K, Chen S, et al. A new scoring system for spontaneous closure prediction of Perimembranous ventricular septal defects in children.PLoS One. 2014;9(12):113822.
  • 10. Li X, Song GX, Wu LJ, et al. Prediction of spontaneous closure of isolated ventricular septal defects in utero and postnatal life.BMC Pediatr. 2016;16(1):207.
  • 11. Mishra A, Shah R, Desai M, et al. A simple surgical technique for closure of apical muscular ventricular septal defect. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014;(148):2576–79.
  • 12. Scully BB, Morales DL, Zafar F, et al. Current expectations for surgical repair of isolated ventricular septal defects. Ann Thorac Surg. 2010;89(2):544-9; 550-1.
  • 13. JT Hardin, et al., Primary surgical closure of large ventricular septal defects in small infants. Ann Thorac Surg, 1992;53(3):397-401.
  • 14. McGrath LB, Methods for repair of simple isolated ventricular septal defect. J Card Surg. 1991;6(1):13-23.
  • 15. Shamsuddin AM, Chen YC, Wong AR, et al. Surgery for doubly committed ventricular septal defects. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2016;(23):231–234.
  • 16. Salih HG, Ismail SR, Kabbani MS, et al. Predictors for the outcome of aortic regurgitation after cardiac surgery in patients with ventricular septal defect and aortic cusp prolapse in saudi patients. Heart Views. 2016;17:83–87.
  • 17. Buratto E, Khoo B, Ye XT, et al. Long-Term Outcome After Pulmonary Artery Banding 540 in Children With Atrioventricular Septal Defects. Ann Thorac Surg. 2018;106:138.
  • 18.Backer CL, Winters RC, Zales VR, et al. Restrictive ventricular septal defect: how small is too small to close? Ann Thorac Surg.1993. 56(5):1014-8; discussion 1018-9.
  • 19. Nygren A, Sunnegardh J, and Berggren H, Preoperative evaluation and surgery in isolated ventricular septal defects: a 21 year perspective. Heart. 2000;83(2): 198-204.
  • 20. Miyake T A review of isolated muscular ventricular septal defect. World J Pediatr. 2020;16(2):120-128.
Toplam 20 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Konular Klinik Tıp Bilimleri
Bölüm Makaleler-Araştırma Yazıları
Yazarlar

Abdurrahim Çolak 0000-0002-1380-9779

Necip Becit 0000-0002-9086-515X

Uğur Kaya 0000-0003-2000-6090

Munacettin Ceviz 0000-0003-0166-2893

Yayımlanma Tarihi 3 Ocak 2023
Kabul Tarihi 28 Mayıs 2022
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2023 Cilt: 24 Sayı: 1

Kaynak Göster

APA Çolak, A., Becit, N., Kaya, U., Ceviz, M. (2023). EVALUATION OF THE PATIENTS OPERATED WITH VSDs OF DIFFERENT AGES. Kocatepe Tıp Dergisi, 24(1), 96-104. https://doi.org/10.18229/kocatepetip.1053701
AMA Çolak A, Becit N, Kaya U, Ceviz M. EVALUATION OF THE PATIENTS OPERATED WITH VSDs OF DIFFERENT AGES. KTD. Ocak 2023;24(1):96-104. doi:10.18229/kocatepetip.1053701
Chicago Çolak, Abdurrahim, Necip Becit, Uğur Kaya, ve Munacettin Ceviz. “EVALUATION OF THE PATIENTS OPERATED WITH VSDs OF DIFFERENT AGES”. Kocatepe Tıp Dergisi 24, sy. 1 (Ocak 2023): 96-104. https://doi.org/10.18229/kocatepetip.1053701.
EndNote Çolak A, Becit N, Kaya U, Ceviz M (01 Ocak 2023) EVALUATION OF THE PATIENTS OPERATED WITH VSDs OF DIFFERENT AGES. Kocatepe Tıp Dergisi 24 1 96–104.
IEEE A. Çolak, N. Becit, U. Kaya, ve M. Ceviz, “EVALUATION OF THE PATIENTS OPERATED WITH VSDs OF DIFFERENT AGES”, KTD, c. 24, sy. 1, ss. 96–104, 2023, doi: 10.18229/kocatepetip.1053701.
ISNAD Çolak, Abdurrahim vd. “EVALUATION OF THE PATIENTS OPERATED WITH VSDs OF DIFFERENT AGES”. Kocatepe Tıp Dergisi 24/1 (Ocak 2023), 96-104. https://doi.org/10.18229/kocatepetip.1053701.
JAMA Çolak A, Becit N, Kaya U, Ceviz M. EVALUATION OF THE PATIENTS OPERATED WITH VSDs OF DIFFERENT AGES. KTD. 2023;24:96–104.
MLA Çolak, Abdurrahim vd. “EVALUATION OF THE PATIENTS OPERATED WITH VSDs OF DIFFERENT AGES”. Kocatepe Tıp Dergisi, c. 24, sy. 1, 2023, ss. 96-104, doi:10.18229/kocatepetip.1053701.
Vancouver Çolak A, Becit N, Kaya U, Ceviz M. EVALUATION OF THE PATIENTS OPERATED WITH VSDs OF DIFFERENT AGES. KTD. 2023;24(1):96-104.

88x31.png
Bu Dergi Creative Commons Atıf-GayriTicari-AynıLisanslaPaylaş 4.0 Uluslararası Lisansı ile lisanslanmıştır.